By
Stanley Collymore
How could you, as a white British woman, dare to quit
England and in the process of doing so callously and most despicably dessert
not only your own children but also and most significantly too, which was a
decidedly contemptible thing to do, your white English husband; and all this
without the slightest care in the world for the harm to them that you were
doing and, what’s more, likewise in a state of utter remiss totally embark on a
pre-planned, it would seem, situation as regards what you were undertaking in
respect of another man, and who moreover is quite unmistakably a foreigner and
crucially a Black, Gambian African!
Oh dear me! What on earth ever possessed you to do
such an exceptionally contemptible thing? Leaving without a solitary care in
the world, it does appear, demonstrably civilized England to go over there to
Gambia Africa and willingly choose to live in an open adulterous liaison with a
much younger and less cultured, African Black man fourteen years your junior on
that Dark African continent. And even now that you’ve gone and done this dreadful
thing you still don’t see any reason, it seems, why you should relent, sensibly
reverse what you’ve imprudently done, return home to Britain and reasonably your
white British family. And, of course, in strictly rational terms the conspicuously
obvious, discernibly distinguishable and unquestionably civilized Caucasian
society and highly developed First World country that is Britain.
Even the very best of intentional, personal
relationships and marriages do sometimes for a diversity of understandable and
even at times wholly inexplicable reasons come a cropper. And unless you are
personally either directly involved in the problems that are themselves
besetting any of these relationships or are specifically either in a personal
or professional capacity asked for your input into attempting to resolve the
aforementioned problematical situation(s) by those who‘re directly involved in
them and who these problems affect the most, then quite frankly what has
already transpired or otherwise is ongoingly so, is none of your business. Let
alone for you to arrogantly assume or egotistically assert some specious right
to interfere and furthermore on a judgemental basis in what has nothing to do
with you and as is more often than not the case in a state of affairs where
you’re wholly unfamiliar with all the relevant facts.
And therefore it’s particularly odious, hypocritical
and distinctly smacks absolutely of rank double standards when you or others
like you impertinently apply characteristically obvious and subjective
criterion or criteria to some situations that you’re evidently biased in favour
of yet waste neither the opportunity you feel you’re presented with nor the
time to be caustically and vitriolic in other situations even when they are
similar to the ones you favour or are even less troublesome, as is often the
case, than they are. And such prejudiced conduct is not only quite unwarranted
it also stinks to high Heaven.
John Major the former British Prime Minister had a
consensual affair with Edwina Currie a similar Tory MP and equally a UK regime
Cabinet Minister. Both parties were married at the time of this affair and John
Major is still with his wife of the time. Paddy Ashdown, a former leader of the
British Liberal Democratic Party (The Lib-Dems) was also a married man at the
time of his longstanding affair. So too was Tony Blair – and the entire world
well knows who this mass murderer is – saw nothing wrong in shagging the
Chinese wife of his Aussie-cum- Rogue State USA citizen and political mentor
Rupert Murdoch. Then, of course, there is the current French President Emmanuel
Macron who as a school boy in his teens formed a very sexually unhealthy and
entirely immoral relationship with Brigitte his teacher at the time and the
woman who is now his wife.
Brigitte: born on the 13 April 1953 was considerably
older than Emanuel who was himself born on the 21 December 1977, so simply work
the not too difficult arithmetical conundrum out for yourself. But what
personally appals me and as someone who has spent the vast majority of my time
in education, teaching English at every conceivable level, is that any teacher
or lecturer having an emotional or sexual relationship with his or her pupil or
student is in my book not worthy to be a teacher and at worst is a sick paedophile,
and especially so when the teacher or lecturer is almost 40 years’ old and the
pupil or student is just approaching 16 years old. And they’re just the tip of
this odiously hypocritical iceberg.
But contrast the double standards and the venomous
cannonade levelled at Heidi Hepworth a white British woman, aged 44 years’ old who
freely left her husband and children in the UK to go and live in the Gambia,
Africa with the Black man Mamadou Jallow that she’s fallen in love with and
rather understandably clearly wants to be with. Both members of this obviously
romantic couple are adults and significantly so consensual ones to what they’re
both lovingly and romantically doing. But you could be easily forgiven for not
thinking so as she’s branded by the white British media as more or less a slut who
has unforgivably given up her husband and children to move to Africa to be with
her “toy boy”.
Was the term “slut” ever applied by these media morons
to Edwina Currie or Camilla who repeatedly horned Princess Diana with her
husband Prince Charles?And has the terminology of toy boy ever been applied to
Brigitte Macron, the now First Lady of France? The simple answer is
categorically “NO” and you shouldn’t, if you’ve got any sense, hold your breath
on any of these white privileged and other examples I assure you, as you won’t
see it in print or ever hear it coming out of the white controlled British and western media.
In the meantime, Heidi Hepworth’s estranged husband
casually and condemnatory labels her actions in the media as a “mid-life
crisis”. Was Camilla‘s a mid-life crisis when from the outset she undertook her
longstanding affair with Charles prompting Diana to say there were always three
persons in her marriage? Was Edwina Currie a similar mid-life crisis? And don’t
men have mid-life crises; for the way I see it if it’s an okay terminology for
women why not men also? A logical deduction I would have thought! People have
affairs for all sorts of reasons and sometimes none at all. And rather than
castigate those involved why if you’re so keen on finding out why, ask them
directly instead of speculating.
Everyone from the British Royal Family right down to
the lowliest man and woman on your average run-down council estate have affairs
of one sort or another and if someone leaves you, instead of blabbing to the
media British or other purported mainstream media where the so-called
journalists there, more realistically sonographers, who work for them have sex
and private lives that would make your average British sewerage system smell
like an exotic and flagrant bed of roses, try realistically and sensibly
sorting your problems out privately. And
if I were in Heidi Hepworth’s shoes or she did ever ask my advice on this
matter my response would be simple. Your husband should grow up and realize
that some of the responsibility for the collapse of your marriage can’t be laid
solely at your feet.
And as someone who once worked as a volunteer for the
British Marriage Guidance Council, now Relate, I’ve heard it all before. Arrogant
spouses, mostly men but also women, who just can’t see the woods for the trees
and just take their marriage for granted until it disastrously for them
collapses in front of their eyes. And I happily take this opportunity to wish
Heidi and Mamadou all the very best for their future in Africa. With the
satisfaction of doing so that these ignorant, white, racist bastards and
bitches who sanctimoniously like to condemn mixed race relationships can’t
accuse Heidi of bringing a BLACK MAN and “potential scrounger” into Britain.
How that must fucking well irk you!
This is the Article; the poem will follow in due
course.
No comments:
Post a Comment