Simply and unapologetically, get lost!

By Stanley Collymore 

If a group of men want to 

meet and thus socialize 

together, why should 

they be forced to include women 

into what are essentially meant 

and specifically also, distinctly 

designated only to be entirely 

male gatherings? Crucially is

that not the absolutely exact 

reasoning then for the clear  

wilful, debarment of them? 

And consequently, bearing 

this determinedly in mind 

why would any genuinely 

self respecting woman, to  

be honest, actually desire 

to be in their midst at all! 

Rather literally so totally 

being in some place that 

neither obligatorily, nor 

lawfully she was clearly 

meant to be and simply  

discernibly not wanted.  

Any such obsessive and 

absolutely demanding 

wish orchestrated by 

any woman would, 

in essence, sound distinctly and 

thoroughly crazy to me; just as 

many sensible, logical and too 

the average rational thinking 

woman would probably also 

equally, aptly agree with me. 

Unless, that is, she has truly 

so fittingly and determined 

in her rapt, social climb up  

the enticing, so personally  

rewarding and beckoning  

ladder firmly determined  

by her staunch, nurtured  

nepotism, and embraced   

elitism; significantly, too, 

you answer to the name 

Cherie Blair and are the 

wife of a former UK PM.  

But then, there are people 

in Britain that distinctly,  

delusionally, and quite 

egregiously so, rather 

insultingly do seriously regard 

themselves to be significantly 

superior to all others and, as 

such, are normally desirous  

to very arrogantly get their 

hands rather controllingly 

on what others do have if 

only to prove that it truly  

can be done, yet harshly 

at the same time, rather 

tenaciously clinging on 

to what, in their social 

climbing and toxically 

embedded, privileged 

mindset awareness state 

of mind; they never the 

less, and demonstrably 

so, rather implausibly 

but firmly assertively 

in their calculatingly 

rampant, deceitfully 

determinable mode  

must, inevitably so, 

exclusively belong 

primarily to them. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

16 August 2021.  

Author's Remarks:  

It's the epitome of civilisation when the two halves of Homo sapiens - colloquially human beings - can live, work and socially engage with each other in the utmost civility and conviviality. However, when you have a society like Britain where the laws and practices of them are asininely, wilfully and most hypocritically skewed in favour of women, who among intelligent men that have assiduously and quite necessarily set up their own men's clubs in order to purposely, properly  and naturally behave as normal men do, would want women, characteristic of today's types, egotistically thinking and even believing that they have a categorical right to enforcedly thrust themselves, even when clearly unwanted, upon these sentient specimens of male Homo sapiens?  

Women already have their own female exclusive clubs and even specific organisations from which men are distinctly and properly so excluded by them; so what's the difference when men do the same? Equality should work both ways; but sensibly isn't always relevant or credible. That's why there are male and female toilets. And how many women would seriously and sensibly object to that? 

So get a life, all you verminous, vitriolic and egregiously hypocritical men haters! As no one has an innate right to forcibly make other people personally associate, socially with them!