A Toxic Anachronism!

By Stanley Collymore 

Taking a man's name after 

marriage and then quite 

automatically, directly 

losing your own as a woman harks 

back undeniably, to the Dark Ages 

when women were automatically 

a man's property; and actually in 

what's unquestionably, crucially 

the 21st Century, should readily 

be scrapped unless the woman 

of her own free will, evidently 

chooses to individually retain 

this societal relic, voluntarily. 

And for those that persist we 

all of us rather compulsorily 

and slavishly, unchangingly 

similarly forever obediently 

and, also reverentially, refer 

to Kate Middleton routinely 

by some risible, antiquated  

title nepotistically given by 

his distinctively privileged 

hereditary and essentially 

monarchical grandma Liz 

to Kate's personal spouse, 

William should carefully 

initially look, objectively  

and quite realistically, at

the Windsor klan family.  

Which putting it mildly is 

crucially one of the most 

distinctly dysfunctional 

entities in the United Kingdom and 

possibly, globally. And, personally 

speaking, rationally the children 

of Kate and William discernibly 

automatically and logically too 

sensibly come into the general 

equation in respect of an only 

joint familial name for them. 

And anyway, I'll bet that you 

mindless complainers don't 

mind one bit calling Henry 

VIII many wives, basically 

Anne Boleyn, regularly so 

Jane Seymour; flippantly 

normally Catherine Parr 

or habitually, Katherine 

Howard plus etceteras!   

So what's really your problem? 

All you thoroughly dimwitted 

and distinctly also, evidently 

historically ignorant, or else  

viley pernicious revisionist 

morons obsessively and as 

well arbitrarily telling the 

remainder of us just how 

without exception - of or 

any kind, we must at all 

times whether publicly  

or privately so refer to 

Saint Kate Middleton?  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

24 August 2021. 

Author's Comments: 

How can anybody - other than the endemically and most discernibly stupid or else rabidly deranged - profess their unremitting love for a distinctly privileged couple and their three children who are undeniably complete strangers to them; basically and unquestionably so, because quite significantly they don't actually know them, have never met them and, in every likelihood, will never do so? 

Clasic British fawning to perceived hereditary, social and decidedly, but evidently so, unthinkingly acknowledged superior societal betters; staunchly epitomised at its most rampant, vilely egregious, and pathetically, odiously sickeningly ludicrous!