A tediously predictable mirage, Daily Mail!

By Stanley Collymore 

As per usual Daily Mail you've 

definitely resorted, but this 

time in obvious, pathetic 

desperation to clickbait exhibition as 

you've nothing better, importantly or 

rather in the least as is customarily  

your way, relevant to say. Seriously 

you generally could have so easily  

as obviously desperate as clearly 

you were for a royal stance, have 

utilized a picture of Liz Windsor;  

as honestly, what relevance has 

this irksome and clearly boring 

story of yours genuinely got to 

either intelligently, realistically 

or even in the minutest sense 

really have to do with Harry or 

Meghan other than whipping 

up rather expectantly by you 

the predictable response as 

you know, will clearly follow.  

The storming and very searing 

vitriolic plethora of endemic 

race hatred outbursts and 

themselves so rapturously conjoined 

with the evilly sick, and similarly too 

the discernibly twisted entrenched 

jealousy of such lowlife IQ and as 

well distinctively and specifically 

hugely, intellectually challenged 

morons; but all the same, really 

the crucially financial saviours  

pertinent to all those similarly

minded cretinous advertisers 

in the Daily Mail, who inanely 

pay due attention, to odious  

Meghan and Harry clickbait 

absolutely the full courtesy 

of the Daily Mail reassured 

trolls' own sick villification.  

Pathetic! But then your crap stories 

ludicrously being passed off as 

professional and even astute 

journalism - when they're absolutely 

nothing of the kind are specifically 

aimed at white lowlifes and, their 

non-white, usually Asian, Useful 

Idiots, endemic, racist morons!  

That right-wing and Nazi rags:  

like the Daily Mail, are so very 

exceptionally adept at rather  

cynically manipulating, plus  

so self-servingly exploiting.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

30 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:    

How incompetent, thoroughly and quite discernibly facile that this idiot and supposed journalist Maria Chiorando writing for the Daily Mail - where else? - with her unfounded aspersions about Meghan and Harry living supposedly next to a cannabis farm, and with all of Maria Chiorando's implied racist and criminal connotations to buttress those of the Daily Mail's likeminded racist trolls; didn't have the basic commonsense to enquire and subsequently tell her Daily Mail readers, and most ironically in a newspaper that always knows the monetary price of everything but crucially the value of nothing, who actually owns this legal cannabis farm Maria Chiorando reported on - despite her expressly stating that she visited it - or specifically how far it actually is from Harry and Meghan's home. Or even how long this particular cannabis farm has been in existence. 

But, of course, that was never, nor would it ever have been, the remit of this clearly dimwitted, intellectually challenged and IQ deficient moron, Maria Chiorando. An absolute nonentity desperately essaying to derive some necessary relevance for herself off the egregiously malicious and vitriolically malevolent notoriety that rabid clowns like Maria Chiorando purposely contrive in order to financially prosper from; as frankly they clearly have nothing of substance to actually offer! 

And while I'm at it Daily Mail when are you going to release the specifics of the personal marriage details regarding the breakdown of scum like Sara Vine, who while Harry and Meghan were first dating was specifically on Meghan's case, was Sara Vine, with the same kind of racist and criminal aspersions that Maria Chiorando and others like her are still profusely peddling. Yet none of you have met Meghan or realistically know anything about her private life, and certainly not her marriage with Harry; but that doesn't stop you though! 

So will you, Daily Mail, give us a full expose of Sara Vine's failed marriage; the reasons for its breakdown, and subsequently to her, all the post menopausal Karens who do the same as Sara Vine regarding Meghan? You Daily Mail and they know themselves  quite well so there won't be any need for fiction, just a case of honestly (jokingly he says) tell it as it is and let the likes of me judge it for ourselves. 

As I'm absolutely convinced, and no one will sway me from that, that you Sara Vine didn't just go to bed one night, wake up the next morning and decided your marriage was over. What happened in between? Whose bed were you actually in and with whom when this Saul on his way to Damascus type revelation hit you? Who were you and Michael otherwise shagging with? Do tell! Only fair since you have so much derogatorily to say about Harry and specifically Meghan whose marriage is excellently working. And you Sara are now a menopausal divorcee!   

So all the racist ill-will that you've fervently, liberally and toxically spewed out, SARA VINE, at Meghan and Harry has markedly rebounded on you; and in your case and that of your offspring  there's still the Covid-19 Delta Variant to consider. God does move in mysterious ways!

But I'm not holding my breath on you ever coming clean about your marital failings Sara Vine - although as a bonafide journalist and not a hack like you I've meticulously done my research, and your life even pre-teens till now has never been a savoury one. Nor, for that matter, stories about your drug using friends - your self included! And as we both know it's usually cocaine and not cannabis with your lot; and why the legal and criminal penalties in the UK for cannabis: the drug of the working class, are much harsher than cocaine, the drug your sort take, Sara Vine.  

My honest synopsis! What a sick, twisted, highly amoral, pathetic and racist bunch of lowlife scumbags the lot of you actually are, Sara Vine; while ostentatiously pretending to be the epitome of morality and human decency; concepts that evidently you haven't the faintest notion about!

Abigail Kikke - whom Covid's lockdown made into a totally luckless Scottish paedophile; she ludicrously claims in court!

By Stanley Collymore 

So in your sick, twisted 

and most thoroughly 

dishonest mind Ms. 

Abigail Kikke the, precautionary 

and rational, restrictions of this 

Covid-19 pandemic enforcedly 

and unflinchingly, placed you 

quite cruelly in a discernibly 

dark place; where evidently 

and distinctly; unavoidably 

and forlornly, significantly 

and completely helplessly  

you were inevitably, then 

cruelly transformed into 

unjustly being a hapless  

female, sexual predator 

and completely against 

your congenial nature:

a paedophile, enabler! 

Try pulling the other one, 

it likely has got bells on: 

you evilly, perceptibly 

seeing yourself as superiorly white, 

special, and actually a self-entitled 

person but in reality is effectively 

an odious and repugnant moron! 

Many people basically struggled 

economically and mentally also 

during the Covid-19, lockdown!

However, not everyone beastly 

resorted to criminally abusing 

children: just two years old in 

your awful case Abigail Kikke 

simply for financial gain plus 

the vilely, totally grotesquely 

warped, clearly indefensibly  

sexual gratification, fervidly 

sought, by the likemindedly 

rather criminally deranged. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

27 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

The Covid-19 lockdown, claims 27 years old, white Abigail Kikke, put her in a dark place. Really! Alas, in view of her perverted, paedophile activities, and brazenly for money, egregiously committed against a two years old - repeat, TWO YEARS OLD - innocent girl child, is alas not dark enough for me. 

From my perspective, and far more fittingly than Abigail Kikke's claimed dark place, mine would be a dungeon in which this unquestionably odious paedophile would be incarcerated in solitary confinement; suitably devoid of tampons to contain her menstrual periods, and appropriately allowed a shower once every fortnight. 

But Abigail Kikke is a white woman in odiously Brexiteer Britain; and unlike a man, other than those hereditary and also elite paedophiles we hear about but against whom nothing is ever legally done, Abigail Kikke will naturally and quite simply be just given by the British judiciary, a gentle slap on the hand! And God forbid, no custodial sentence; far less so any likely incarceration.

A Toxic Anachronism!

By Stanley Collymore 

Taking a man's name after 

marriage and then quite 

automatically, directly 

losing your own as a woman harks 

back undeniably, to the Dark Ages 

when women were automatically 

a man's property; and actually in 

what's unquestionably, crucially 

the 21st Century, should readily 

be scrapped unless the woman 

of her own free will, evidently 

chooses to individually retain 

this societal relic, voluntarily. 

And for those that persist we 

all of us rather compulsorily 

and slavishly, unchangingly 

similarly forever obediently 

and, also reverentially, refer 

to Kate Middleton routinely 

by some risible, antiquated  

title nepotistically given by 

his distinctively privileged 

hereditary and essentially 

monarchical grandma Liz 

to Kate's personal spouse, 

William should carefully 

initially look, objectively  

and quite realistically, at

the Windsor klan family.  

Which putting it mildly is 

crucially one of the most 

distinctly dysfunctional 

entities in the United Kingdom and 

possibly, globally. And, personally 

speaking, rationally the children 

of Kate and William discernibly 

automatically and logically too 

sensibly come into the general 

equation in respect of an only 

joint familial name for them. 

And anyway, I'll bet that you 

mindless complainers don't 

mind one bit calling Henry 

VIII many wives, basically 

Anne Boleyn, regularly so 

Jane Seymour; flippantly 

normally Catherine Parr 

or habitually, Katherine 

Howard plus etceteras!   

So what's really your problem? 

All you thoroughly dimwitted 

and distinctly also, evidently 

historically ignorant, or else  

viley pernicious revisionist 

morons obsessively and as 

well arbitrarily telling the 

remainder of us just how 

without exception - of or 

any kind, we must at all 

times whether publicly  

or privately so refer to 

Saint Kate Middleton?  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

24 August 2021. 

Author's Comments: 

How can anybody - other than the endemically and most discernibly stupid or else rabidly deranged - profess their unremitting love for a distinctly privileged couple and their three children who are undeniably complete strangers to them; basically and unquestionably so, because quite significantly they don't actually know them, have never met them and, in every likelihood, will never do so? 

Clasic British fawning to perceived hereditary, social and decidedly, but evidently so, unthinkingly acknowledged superior societal betters; staunchly epitomised at its most rampant, vilely egregious, and pathetically, odiously sickeningly ludicrous!

Toy soldier fantasy stuff!

By Stanley Collymore 

One rule for her grandson 

who adoringly married 

a Black woman of his  

choice and also crucially carries on 

being faithful to her; with another 

distinctly contrary rule basically 

created for her second son, who 

is alleged, to have committed a 

possibly significant crime and 

justifiably, could go to prison. 

Little wonder then that those  

within the Windsor Klan, as 

well as their stooges, media 

sycophants and outrageous 

rather tiresomely plebeian

toadying trolls feasibly do 

want their unpardonably

unwarranted interest, its 

manifestly vile and such  

orchestrated vilification 

plus their industriously 

formulated distractions 

to unflaggingly be then 

purposely shifted from 

a scarcely beleaguered 

but saliently, evidently 

a distinctly privileged, 

crucially monarchical 

mommy and safely so 

fully protected Andy! 

A callous diversion and 

egregious distraction 

all preponderantly 

and conveniently focused on and 

intentionally quite malevolently 

also, exclusively firmly landing 

on their maliciously contrived 

scapegoats: specifically Harry 

and Meghan, who've actually 

not, even remotely, crucially  

done anything, associatedly 

criminally, or even socially 

wrong. And whose crucial  

and clearly solitary crime  

lurking in the totally sick  

and twisted minds of the 

racist protagonists, who 

are obviously obsessed  

with Harry criminally 

so in every true sense 

purely because of his 

love of and marriage  

to an independently 

confidently, African 

American, Meghan.  

And whose so brilliantly 

envisaged, consciously 

and carefully thought 

out, decisively made 

and resolutely implemented

mutual decision to sensibly 

and intelligently, logically 

and decidedly; long-term 

and sanely, to decisively 

and promptly extricate  

themselves, decisively  

and also substantially 

from an amoral, very 

hypocritical; clearly 

and unquestionably  

a seemingly, totally 

content to carry on 

being the specious 

billionaire ridden, 

secretive, mafiosa 

syndicate, type of  

privileged family 

Klan abhorred by

Meghan and also 

Harry. However,  

clearly slavishly  

fawned upon as  

they personally 

sycophantically 

truly love to be. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

23 August  2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

If Elizabeth Windsor wants to festoon her alleged favourite son and love child with meaningless, and to the average thinking mind, thoroughly useless titles in order to intentionally camouflage his supposed serious criminality - that he's consistently and most obdurately refused to discuss with the American FBI in their ongoing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell: two intimate friends of Andrew Windsor, paedophilia and sexual trafficking investigation - that's Elizabeth, Andrew, their likeminded Windsor family Klan; nepotistic stooges, sycophantic UK media, and their hugely manipulated clickbait, and braindead hereditary fawners problen; and certainly not mine! 

What does concern me however, is the way these same collective of inured British imbeciles, hereditary and plebeian alike, have deliberately and are still ongoingly so, cynically using Harry and specifically Meghan - who have done absolutely nothing, even allegedly so, criminally or socially wrong - other than to quite  sensibly and discernibly intelligently distance themselves substantially by objectively exiting from this highly dysfunctional, clearly criminally disposed, and seemingly also above the law, hypocritical and blatantly so double standards Windsor family; as their own perniciously concerted, vilely concocted, malevolently and wilfully maliciously implemented publicly orchestrated distractions, at Harry and Meghan's expense, and ostensibly to save Andrew's ass have evidently and irrefutably shown. 

Aided and abetted by Scotland Yard and the Metropolitan Police hierarchy. Just risibly imagine, rather exaggeratedly of course, for a couple of minutes or so, that actually instead of it being Jeffrey Epstein and clearly  his assistant and enabler Ghislaine Maxwell, it was Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott: two decent people you racists and Nazis love to hate; when Jeremy was the official leader of the UK House of Commons  Opposition and Diane Abbott a Shadow Minister in his team. And I'm clearly in stitches of laughter, for very obvious reasons, as I write this bit, and it was Len Mccluskey: another of your quite unwarranted hate figures, who was in Andrew Windsor's shoes and also behaving as Andy is. The bloody lot of you would be up in arms at how insulting Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott's 'behaviour' was to your peerless monarch Elizabeth; why they should be expelled as MPs, and together with Len McCluskey instantandously extradited to the USA. But when it's Andrew Windsor and in tandem with his mother Liz's connivance, the same vitriolic aspersions and odious condemnation of the alleged perpetrators don't or won't ever come into that identical equation. Anything to do, perhaps, with blatant hypocrisy and brazen double standards, juxtaposed with absolutely endemically, commonplace British and their kith and kin's rampant stupidity?  

Similarly,  in the fictional Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and Len McCluskey scenario, Scotland Yard and the Metropolitan Police hierarchy would be having a field day, but instead we have nothing but studied silence and quite disingenuous shenanigans from these supposedly law and order, but far more interested in being the recipients of their cherished monarchical and other cronyism gongs, cowards; as was the case with the Stephen Lawrence murder. 

Sycophancy, nepotism, cronyism, and medieval mindset, hereditary worshipping then; evidently more important and crucial to Britain's entrenched class system than justice being properly and fairly dispensed universally; regardless of supposed class affiliation, privileged status or, even more sickeningly so, hereditary connections.

Afghanistan: A graveyard of empire!

By Stanley Collymore 

An example of selfishness, 

greed and arrogance and 

the epoch of the United 

States of America its toady Britain 

and other white allegedly master 

race Europeans, tiresomely long 

and completely too self-serving 

experiment, with creating and 

fostering puppet regimes that 

not only don't remotely have 

the expected confidence, far 

less so the ordinary respect  

and basically, significantly 

too, not even crucially the 

most rudimentary, of any  

authenticated legitimacy 

attained from their own 

population, whom they 

ruthlessly use; but also 

never ever practically 

sensibly tried to walk  

after having literally 

been fittingly taught 

how to avariciously 

crawl in the craven 

interests clearly of 

their white master 

controllers; as did 

the supine regime  

that was properly 

ousted, in puppet 

Afghanistan fully 

through the very 

gallant stance of 

a strong Taliban. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

21 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks: 

The white purported western nations have no right, legal obligation, far less so any moral rectitude to consistently and invariably unwarrantedly interfere in the domestic affairs specifically of Global South countries. 

For in excess of 500 years now you've either individually or collectively abused the rights and lawful entitlements of other people most unscrupulously and without a hint of regret; and additionally done so too most egregiously for your own self-serving ends, while dishonestly claiming to do this for the benefit of world security and human cohesion, when nothing could be further from the truth. 

Whatever you've achieved for yourselves beneficially is almost without question or exception at the dangerous and callously destructive expense of others; and that includes even your rarely acknowledged mistakes. So why don't you step aside or, more preferably so, allow other people and nations to carve out the existences they genuinely want; mistakes and all. You in the West have done so; so what's the difference in allowing other people who don't look like you, or want to be like you, to do the same? What's the difference? Other than your vile and evilly delusional white master race obsession? And if there is one, please explain!  

And most ironically the United States Constitution and its inherent laws do specifically state that no foreign troops, even from countries friendly with the US, should ever be based on US soil, and that includes USA colonies; so why then does the USA feel it has an outright obligation - obsession more likely - to coerce or euphemistically persuade other global nations to have its armed forces on their soil indefinitely and often continuously for several decades? Even when doing so entails ethnically cleansing indigenous peoples from their longstanding indigenous homelands! What brazen and blatant hypocrisy on the US's part! 

The Black Chagossians case is a prime example of this. In the early 1960s the US wanted a military base in the Indian Ocean and settled on Diego Garcia the largest of the Chagos peninsula islands, never mind they were all inhabited with indigenous Chagossians. But, unlike the Falklands that Britain went to war with Argentina over, the Chagossians are Black, not white. Britain cowed quite willingly to the US demands and the Chagossians were totally and comprehensively ethnically and most brutally cleansed from their indigenous homeland; and, over 60 years later, are still stateless. Even though the International Court has ruled that what Britain  did was a crime against humanity and the Chagossians  must be allowed to have their country back. However, every consecutive UK regime has ignored the court's ruling and so far got away with it.

Meanwhile, the USA has its state of the art  and all-purpose nuclear base on Diego Garcia; Britain avariciously pockets the rent from it; and the Chagossians are banned from returning to their own homeland but unlike the white Falklanders don't have an automatic right to residence in the UK, even though they are British Citizens; unlike the Falkland Islanders, who categorically from the last census, two thirds of them do not regard themselves as British. Yet they can happily go to, live, work and stay indefinitely in Britain without any restrictions but the Black British Chagossians can't.  

Why? The Falkland Islanders are white, but the Chagossians are Black. And the United States supports this travesty of justice! What sickening bullies these supposed defenders of democracy and human rights are! A bloody joke, if it wasn't such an awful tragedy. Yet intelligent people are supposedly meant to jump on the west's bandwagon and vitriolically condemn the Taliban because these western hypocrites say so! 

One doesn't have to like the Taliban to understand their point of view, but at the end of the day it's their country not yours. And just as you wouldn't like anyone coming into your house or country and telling you what you can or can't do, why should the Taliban in Afghanistan? 

And to arrogantly claim that the Taliban is barbaric, let me pose a few questions to you and your white master race, or gullible sort. Who initiated and systematically carried out the Transatlantic Slave Trade; the two Holocausts at the start of the 20th Century in what was clearly then the German colony of Southwest Africa  now independent Namibia, where over 82% of that country's indigenous population was ruthlessly wiped out; two Holocausts that simply preceded just by a few years the one in Europe, that you whites only concern yourself about, but was initiated by the same nation of white people? Significantly who nuclear bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And the global list of white atrocities is hugely immense and also quite widespread; and sickeningly at this moment in time still recurrently goes on.  

Activities all carried out specifically and exclusively by whites who then ludicrously claim to be the guardians of morality, democracy and the rest of it. And it hasn't escaped me, if it has you, that the only apologies and huge compensation given continuously and up to now, and continuously 76 years after your own World War 2  ended, were and are to fellow Europeans and no one else; this notwithstanding that these white and ongoing recipients of this rather unceasing largesse, which is not available to anyone else, who were themselves similarly crucially horrendously treated victims of the same European holocaust: Gypsies and Black mixed race French citizens perceived as Rhineland Niggers, got then and still get absolutely nothing in terms of compensation; or long and quite overdue reparations. Nor have the Namibians; or the descendants of enforced Black Caribbean, and as well African American slaves! 

Yet whites of the likes of former UK Prime Minister David Cameron - who is absolutely quite resolutely against the Black descendants of the enforced slaves of the evilly Transatlantic Slave Trade era being compensated - is also very hypocritically ongoingly with his wife, both of them in their own right, receiving huge compensation for the loss, awfully occasioned to their slave owning ancestors when, with the passing of the Slave Emancipation Bill into law in the House of Commons their white ancestors had to give up their chattel - property in other words - as my and several other Black slave ancestors were designated, even though these same white slave owners were quite massively compensated at the time; and financially in today's terms that would amount to trillions of Pounds Sterling. Naturally, the freed slaves didn't get a single cent between them. 

So don't come the old flannel about it all being a long time ago. But then it always is when you whites are in the wrong! So simply, why don't you just take a step back, or several preferably and then distinctly and very seriously reflect on your own rather egregious barbarity - all you evilly, likeminded white men and women - and bloody well begin the process of growing up! Assuming  you can manage the latter.

Fidelity has never been a crucial factor in the lexicon of the Windsor family, as exemplified by their past serial and ongoing adultery!

By Stanley Collymore 

Isn't it about time that the 

country, rather seriously 

and realistically, openly 

embarked on a necessarily serious 

and objective conversation about 

the role of the hereditary British 

monarchy, if indeed it manages 

to basically, outlive its growing 

unpopularity in what's clearly 

should really unquestionably 

be actually characteristically  

in these very circumstances 

the entrenched basis of our 

modern society? Seriously, 

as it's absolutely pointless 

informing children about 

fair play and crucially as 

well the quite important 

factors of unmistakably 

just opportunity; when  

in marked contrast, the very 

highest office in the land is 

essentially represented by 

someone, whose only qualification

for the job is her or his birth after

a most carefully, and discernibly 

also quite skilfully orchestrated 

and fully approved conception. 

Royalty: the distinctly wilfully, 

undeniably throwback, to the 

medieval era, and applicably 

the Dark Ages; quite frankly  

hasn't any logical or ethical 

justification at all in rather 

purportedly so designated

democratic countries that 

additionally, approvingly 

embrace the concept too

of practical Meritocracy.   

Except for those who clearly 

intentionally, avariciously 

and self-servingly, rather 

purposely and distortedly, view 

that most distinctly antiquated 

institution crucially and very 

decidedly through evidently 

rose-tinted lenses. Since the 

having, and also fulsomely 

additionally quite happily  

nurturing too any kind of 

declining and hereditary 

monarchy still basically  

dragging on in this 21st 

Century, undeniably so 

vilely makes no sense! 

(C) Stanley V.  Collymore  

20 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

Expectantly the customary hysterical fawning when anybody objectively suggests the hereditary British royal family individually and collectively are anything other than the epitome of faithful spouses, concomitant with being duly loving and fundamentally supportive relatives. 

Additionally, equally hardworking,  thoroughly decent and absolutely too praiseworthily people; and, of course, a fine example to us all!  

Evidently, there are loads of people in Britain and among their overseas emigres, and expatriate kith and kin whose lives are so bereft of anything  even remotely original or sparsely stimulating, and having taken to then living their vilely, pathetic existences through their sick and thoroughly so twisted perception of the successes of others, do believe anything that their considered societal betters cynically tell them, or otherwise calculatedly have their own sycophantic media throw at these clearly inured gullible cretins! 

Ossified gullibility, brazen double standards, vile hypocrisy, and mindboggling stupidity! Britons in the 21st Century.

By Stanley Collymore 

Logically why is it the same 

people, who insatiably lap 

up each bit of absolutely 

uncorroborated or alledged royal

source, or rather blatantly bogus 

royal expert pieces of tittle tattle 

distinctly, and malevolently too

about Harry and Meghan, then 

purposely, rather determinedly 

crucially refuse to realistically 

recognize far less so seriously 

acknowledge, the abundantly 

firsthand sources completely 

complemented substantially 

with distinctly, well-proven 

facts essentially supportive  

of a very longstanding and 

fully fledged notion solely  

that quite unquestionably 

Philip Mountbatten, truly 

undeniably, was literally 

actually mutually living  

approvingly apart from 

his spouse Elizabeth for 

many years and clearly 

with his other woman? 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

19 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

You people believe all sorts of idle, rather barefaced and, obviously too, lying speculations about Harry and  Meghan; yet purposely ignore facts about other members of the British Mountbatten Windsor family. What obviously fundamentally obsessively, thoroughly evil, and vile hypocrites you actually are! 

And wouldn't it essentially be rather curiously interesting to realistically know what your individual opinion really is on Charles and Camilla; and what, in marked contrast, you would say or write if Harry -  since you have already ludicrously and distinctively, blatantly lyingly speculated about his wife Meghan - the sole unmistakably, unquestionably unilaterally and quite happily marital faithful person within this adulterous Mountbatten Windsor tribe - other than his cousins Beatrice and her sister Eugenie - whom Harry is biologically related to; distinctively wholly unlikely, but speculatively all the same in Harry's case, did have an affair! 

Not a Mensa IQ requirement on your part - assuming, of course, you intellectually challenged morons do actually know what Mensa is about -  in those circumstances, to ascertain what your vitriolic, voluminous, decidedly toxic and recurrently rampant malevolent response would be!

Afghans cynically used by the British and who are now collateral damage!

By Stanley Collymore 

So cavalier, stinkingly odious 

and so vermnously evil you 

Home Office pen pushers 

and likeminded rightwing lap top 

xenophobic and vile racist trolls 

cowards; bogus patriots the lot 

of you, and forever willing to 

defend Britain but always so

to the last drop of everyone 

else's blood but never your 

own. These same Afghans 

whom your're now quite 

callously purposely and  

toxically so egregiously 

and wilfully betraying 

crucially actually and   

genuinely essentially 

took what they were 

promised, by the US, 

its principal lapdog 

Britain, plus all the  

other imperialistic  

white-run; clearly  

very delusionally 

believing in their 

rather ludicrous, 

and Master Race 

sick, philosophy.  

Countries, whose clearly 

shameful and basically 

toxically, repugnantly 

contemptible actions

over the last 20 plus years wasn't 

about democracy, or the rest of 

their oily flannel, but actually 

to really exploit Afghanistan 

of its natural resources, for 

the primary benefit of the 

West's fervid, financially  

rapaciously thoroughly 

dominating, obsessive 

billionaires, plus also 

secret paymasters to 

these abundance of 

vilely corrupt most 

rabidly avaricious

evil self-servingly

clearly nepotistic 

and malfeasance 

clearly in public

office - vile civil  

servants linked

indisputably to 

basically venal 

sick politicians.  

Afghans who having believed 

what they were quite lyingly 

told by these mendaciously 

western interlopers essentially did 

understandably so, optimistically 

hope that their beloved country 

would attain, and similarly too 

maintain the many freedoms, 

which they were rather duly 

promised but so regrettably 

hasn't happened; therefore 

perhaps you vile, ignorant 

and xenophobic, crucially 

also racist knowalls, who 

feel that Britons have no 

obligations, whatsoever, 

to the multiple Afghans  

that very courageously 

and quite significantly 

too irrefutably placed  

their lives on the line 

undeniably for them  

should put your cowardly 

and crucially repulsively 

arrogant selves actually 

in their shoes for a few minutes. 

Then honestly quite simply ask 

yourselves objectively if these 

Afghans would've, recklessly 

put themselves and equally 

their own families, in such 

mortal danger if seriously 

they'd even momentarily 

thought anything, rather 

vaguely like this, would 

really happen to them? 

Truly, what a splendid 

nation sarcastically is 

this United-Kingdom; 

odiously treacherous 

to the core and quite 

predictably likewise 

evilly infested, with 

its delusional white 

master race helped  

wholly assiduously 

by those Priti Patel 

type looney, useful 

and coconut idiots.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore  

18 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

Like I intimated in this poem it's very easy and thoroughly cowardly too, to be most cavalier about other people's lives and future when you're, rather asininely and ignorantly so, not even remotely in their own or any similar situation; and are both disdainfullly and discernibĺy hypocritically, sitting comfortably behind the keyboard of your personal laptop or computer, or even a mobile phone you're using; and, in marked contrast, literally doing so from some place safe. 

Convenient amnesia Priti Patel, or the total disdain on your part for those that you as Home Secretary evidently don't regard as honorary whites like yourself? And how very fortunately, against such animosity at the time from likeminded British whites, the then Home Office, numerous civil servants, multiple politicians, the UK parliament, and the then British PM your refugee parents Priti Patel were  begrudgingly allowed to settle in the UK, where you were subsequently so, born! Only to end up being Britain's Home Secretary! No Hollywood director would ever have considered that as a viable film scenario. Too farfetched they would say.

Now you Priti Patel are far more racist and also xenophobic than even that lot back then; among them Maggie Thatcher, that you so publicly and fawningly claim to admire and style your own sick and twisted politics after. Never mind in the least, on your clearly weird and Stockholm Syndrome part Priti Patel, that that racist piece of British government legislation to stop your refugee Asian kind, all with genuine UK passports, from entering Britain was the fastest to be enacted ever within the British House of Commons; and still proudly unenviably holds that record!  

Useful Idiots and honorary whites in 21st Century Britain? Who would have thought it! And almost makes apartheid South Africa, in retrospect,  look rather enlightening.

 

Simply and unapologetically, get lost!

By Stanley Collymore 

If a group of men want to 

meet and thus socialize 

together, why should 

they be forced to include women 

into what are essentially meant 

and specifically also, distinctly 

designated only to be entirely 

male gatherings? Crucially is

that not the absolutely exact 

reasoning then for the clear  

wilful, debarment of them? 

And consequently, bearing 

this determinedly in mind 

why would any genuinely 

self respecting woman, to  

be honest, actually desire 

to be in their midst at all! 

Rather literally so totally 

being in some place that 

neither obligatorily, nor 

lawfully she was clearly 

meant to be and simply  

discernibly not wanted.  

Any such obsessive and 

absolutely demanding 

wish orchestrated by 

any woman would, 

in essence, sound distinctly and 

thoroughly crazy to me; just as 

many sensible, logical and too 

the average rational thinking 

woman would probably also 

equally, aptly agree with me. 

Unless, that is, she has truly 

so fittingly and determined 

in her rapt, social climb up  

the enticing, so personally  

rewarding and beckoning  

ladder firmly determined  

by her staunch, nurtured  

nepotism, and embraced   

elitism; significantly, too, 

you answer to the name 

Cherie Blair and are the 

wife of a former UK PM.  

But then, there are people 

in Britain that distinctly,  

delusionally, and quite 

egregiously so, rather 

insultingly do seriously regard 

themselves to be significantly 

superior to all others and, as 

such, are normally desirous  

to very arrogantly get their 

hands rather controllingly 

on what others do have if 

only to prove that it truly  

can be done, yet harshly 

at the same time, rather 

tenaciously clinging on 

to what, in their social 

climbing and toxically 

embedded, privileged 

mindset awareness state 

of mind; they never the 

less, and demonstrably 

so, rather implausibly 

but firmly assertively 

in their calculatingly 

rampant, deceitfully 

determinable mode  

must, inevitably so, 

exclusively belong 

primarily to them. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

16 August 2021.  

Author's Remarks:  

It's the epitome of civilisation when the two halves of Homo sapiens - colloquially human beings - can live, work and socially engage with each other in the utmost civility and conviviality. However, when you have a society like Britain where the laws and practices of them are asininely, wilfully and most hypocritically skewed in favour of women, who among intelligent men that have assiduously and quite necessarily set up their own men's clubs in order to purposely, properly  and naturally behave as normal men do, would want women, characteristic of today's types, egotistically thinking and even believing that they have a categorical right to enforcedly thrust themselves, even when clearly unwanted, upon these sentient specimens of male Homo sapiens?  

Women already have their own female exclusive clubs and even specific organisations from which men are distinctly and properly so excluded by them; so what's the difference when men do the same? Equality should work both ways; but sensibly isn't always relevant or credible. That's why there are male and female toilets. And how many women would seriously and sensibly object to that? 

So get a life, all you verminous, vitriolic and egregiously hypocritical men haters! As no one has an innate right to forcibly make other people personally associate, socially with them!

Brainwashingly Ridiculous!

By Stanley Collymore 

Rabid rightwingers and their 

intellectually challenged ilk 

like to hypocritically claim 

that people duly need to properly 

work, basically in order to quite 

suitably realistically, genuinely 

deserve, what they eventually 

receive - then contradictorily 

and unquestionably distinctly 

unmistakably evidently, very 

ridiculously crucial to every  

one of them unwarrantedly 

too, distinctively laughably  

happily bow and scrape to 

all of these allegedly royal 

persons, purposely rather 

customarily so born with 

their silver spoon clearly 

already accorded for the   

lot of them and crucially  

ensuring that they don't  

essentially, have to ever 

work, even a single day, 

re their personal living.  

Courtesy of thoroughly 

brainwashed fools and 

first-rate, manipulated 

plus toadying morons. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

14 August 2021. 

Author's Comments:  

Britain is a supposed nation of endemically entrenched sycophants not capable of actually determining right from wrong and consequently from their own pathetic existences continuously looking up to their perceived social betters, aping their antics, or else being fiercely protective towards them as these fawning morons ludicrously, asininely and vitriolically castigate and fervently toxically hate anyone who dares to criticize these disingenuous, dishonest and supposed paragons of virtue that clearly to anyone with a functioning brain knows, distinctly do not exist. 

And it's all so pathetic! Not long ago Camilla was to these same dimwitted morons an adulterous slapper, whose lascivious activities and egregious behaviour with Charles towards Diana resulted in the latter's untimely death. No apologies in the interim or even now belatedly after all these years from either Charles or Camilla for what they intentionally and callously did. 

But now that selfish and self-serving duo, knowing the mindset of these British sycophantic morons and their kith and kin ilk as far away as inured convict, genocider and delusional Terra nullius Australia; and having concertedly decided to capitalise on this, have both deliberately and quite cynically used Harry and Meghan, and particularly their sensibly intelligent decision to extricate themselves from this toxic and dysfunctional Windsor family, as a convenient means of deflecting attention away from themselves while happily, and much relieved, garnering these sycophantic idiots support for doing so. 

Charles, more desperate than anything else, wants his mother dead and himself to become king. It's been his primary obsession all his clearly  pathetic life. And say what you like about Meghan she's never expressed a wish to see her dad dead. Says a lot then for Charles' and the Windsors' idea of familial love, eh Charles? And especially so on your part; but rather funnily, no criticism of yourself for this by these inane and thoroughly so vile castigators of Meghan Markle, and what relationship these morons bigotedly determine that she should and even must have with her father. The same plebeians who've always hated Meghan for pure racist reasons, whatever they delusionally like to convince themselves, and others like themselves, is the contrary; and are loving it while ridiculously lauding Charlie boy, the Clown Prince, as an honourable man and all the rest of it for turning on Harry and Meghan. And asininely using words that don't feature in any lexicon that depicts Charles Windsor, to disingenuously and unwarrantedly praise him. 

But what actually has me in stitches of laughter is that these same gullible and fawning dolts have transferred their vitriol to Diana, claiming it was her adultery that put Charles off her, then going on to say that the final insult to Charles and his family firm was Diana's bastardy of Harry. And that Charles should publicly come out and say so. Well, why doesn't he Could it be what it actually is, that Harry is unquestionably Charles' son both biologically and legitimately! Just as these troll clowns are equally stipulating that Meghan's dad should likewise tell the world she's not now 40 - having recently celebrated her latest birthday on the 4 August - but is distinctly in her 50s and similarly so,  didn't produce any babies, as she is infertile and can't have any. So why then does Thomas Markle noticeably want to have access to what are quite essentially from these morons rather sick point of view, such non existent grandchildren by Meghan? And with these braindead cretins then openly and quite adamantly urging him to go to court to have access to them? Where's the logic in any of this? And these are the same lowlife specimens that regard themselves as not only members but also the guardians of the supposedly white master race.

All this from people in Britain which officially has the highest category of bastardy, abortions, pubescent pregnancies and unmarried mothers with multiple kids by different fathers - and invariably not knowing who the real dads are - in the western world. There's a Biblical quotation which I'll paraphrase here, check out the beam in your own eye before you cast aspersions at the mote that you supposedly see in the eyes of others. Or more colloquially people in glass houses shouldn't thow stones. 

But this is Britain, a prime cesspit on Planet Earth, and the country, which as they do now hypocritically laud Charles and similarly bed hopping William, as they likewise did with the late Jimmy Savile, who had free rein of the Windsor palaces, stately homes and was on pally terms with the inhabitants therein. The country that Winston Churchill quite avidly wanted the bulk of their parents and grandparents compulsorily sterilised as he saw them as being societally, biologically and in every rational sense inimical to the interests of the British hereditary elites to which he belonged, and therefore constituted a danger to them; particularly from inter breeding with them. Churchill came close to achieving his ambition but it didn't happen. What a pity! 

And these are the same sycophantic morons that not only put Churchill on a pedestal but carry on doing the same things with Britain's hereditary lot; whose personal and contemptous views  of them are rather identical to Winston Churchill's. But then there's no accounting for stupidity; and with white Britons and their ilk, they're so undeniably top of that league!

So history only started there when white men and women came and took America!

By Stanley Collymore 

This is how Donald J. Drumpf 

has managed to vilely and 

evilly snare a significant 

minority of simpleton and clearly 

self entitled whites in the United 

States of America. For evidently 

he has rather brazenly actually 

managed to very convincingly 

and instincively evilly readily 

tap into their discernibly vile 

fear of the crucially looming 

new changes which they all 

can see coming. Disturbing

vital changes that aren't in 

their very own individual, 

and wholly selfish favour.    

Changes, which basically

sensibly seek to equalize

the hateful injustices by 

them all which wilfully

have been egregiously, 

handed out; and evilly 

gone on - far too long!   

Oh yes! They're totally shit 

scared alright; and quite 

thoroughly petrified of 

what they delusionally and fearfully 

perceive will happen to them - this 

supposedly master race, and very 

firmly, deeply entrenched, racist 

specimen - in the offing. So they 

sickeningly grab their multiple 

guns; so plentiful Confederate 

flags; and basically ironically,  

bearing in mind - the type of 

duplicitous individuals they  

dishonestly clearly pretend 

they are; and questionably 

but verbosely all the same 

nonetheless voluably vile  

and lyingly, rather evilly,  

odiously claim to deeply 

worship and intently so  

only serve; Jesus Christ:

the true and living God.  

A man who by any serious 

and discernibĺy sensible 

definition that one can 

logically espouse, was even so in 

his very voluntarily chosen and 

likewise too, personally played 

significant role, quite crucially 

and essentially also, as clearly 

and basically just an ordinary 

earthly human being fittingly 

notably was himself actually 

quite literally, and naturally 

wholly different from all of 

them and distinctively also 

would undeniably, and yet 

crucially, be diametrically 

and unbiasedly positively  

and unstintingly opposed 

to effectively every thing 

which everyone, of these

hypocritical, and as well 

pathologically lying and 

overtly, vile showcasing 

evilly Nazi and fascistic 

dodgily religious nutter 

scum, and so professed  

to be devout Christians 

are deceitfully and too  

most despicably doing, 

employ the ornaments 

of their specific handy 

bibles in the keen aim  

they'll jointly, and too 

ably assist, in the dire 

action of saving them. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

13 August 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

This is what is actually fuelling white fear, itself rather obsessively coupled with its discernibly nastily pervasive and quite sickeningly condoned even by Joe Biden and the likes of equally lying and untrustworthy Joe Manchin despite their discernibly pathetically, disingenuous and so unconvincingly publicly and lying assumptions to the contrary; and these betrayals wholly and attendant with the quite blatant, cynically political gerrymandering of constituencies, plus the assiduously egregious voter repression of Blacks and other people of colour, as well as those whites, principally the young and well educated ones whose own preference is to vote Democrat, by Republican run states and fervently assisted by avidly criminal mindset and utterly self-serving politicians that have bought into the Big Lie and the criminal delusions of a Gerry and quite staunchly Nazi insurrectionist ex president Donald J Drumpf.  

These are the types of whites who have been riled up by the far right media and aspects of the social media that in just a few years time whites will be a minority in America. A land they have barbarously stolen from that continent's indigenous people and through rapacious greed and barbarous genocide literally turned them into a dismal minority in their own indigenous homeland. But arrogance is so stark and egregious on the part of these white morons that the irony of what they and their ancestors have done, while they caustically complain about today's potential immigrants of colour is totally lost on these intellectually challenged clowns, most of whom are no more than second generation immigrants to the USA themselves, if that! But nevertheless see themselves to be white and permanently privileged!  Not only in the USA but everywhere on Planet Earth that their sort happen to be!

Buttressed by their own irrational and cowardly fears that the new majority in the USA will do to them what they have consistently and barbarically done to every Black and nonwhite minority group in America. Don't kid yourselves, as you're not that bloody important except in your very own sick, twisted and distinctly delusional minds. Since most Black and other non-white immigrants to the USA are principally interested in improving their own and also their families' lifestyles, and not through skin colour, as most whites do, but a concept called Meritocracy. And I do suggest that you white nincompoops go look it up!

Yet this Windsor fawning lot is asininely and hypocritically berating Meghan, for ditching her own dysfunctional family!

By Stanley Collymore 

While ever increasingly and 

most fervently too happily 

shoving their discernibly 

idiotic and markedly brainwashed 

plebeian heads rather voluntarily 

forecefully up the individual also 

the collective asses of their quite 

intransigent, happily perceived 

hereditary masters, undeniably 

social betters, while manifestly 

simultaneously plus purposely 

refusing, to actually recognize 

let alone sensibly accept, who 

and what, this bunch of quite 

utterly disingenuous, at best, 

and likewise also, outrightly 

basically dishonest, at their 

worst, charlatans naturally 

are; while unquestionably,  

discernibly unpardonably 

ostracizing and markedly 

so, nastily unhesitatingly 

crucially unwarrantedly 

and damnably sinisterly 

imbued with hate-filled

intensity, so insidiously   

and cruelly receptively 

in their virulently sick, 

so deliberately twisted 

and vengefully inured 

caustic condemnation 

instinctively and very 

malevolently, racially 

bashing and jealously 

so, at Meghan Markle.  

Charles Windsor it's now 

openly and calculatedly 

public relations stated, 

allegedly frets about his brother 

Andrew causing likely damage 

to their family. What stinking 

and rather blatant hypocrisy.

Since Charles, should really 

have rather fundamentally 

so, thought about that type 

of thing when undeniably 

he was quite lasciviously 

and clearly adulterously 

discernibly so cavorting

with his trollop Camilla 

who, he crucially didn't 

marry, when they were 

both single as she quite 

literally knew her own 

way around the sexual 

block even then, while 

he Charles, irrefutably 

doing exactly the very 

same thing, haughtily, 

never the less, clearly 

wholly hypocritically 

wanted a virgin who  

he could dishonestly 

marry, and conceive 

his lawful offspring.   

What an odious toe rag and 

a verminously despicable, 

supposedly also but very 

distinctly questionable specimen 

of Homo sapiens in every likely 

way that Charles Windsor very 

definitively is! Unsurprisingly 

shagging Camilla, throughout 

his sickeningly brazen, sham 

marriage to an intentionally  

from him, rather insistently 

medically verified, virginal 

spouse Diana: the crucially 

cynically, plus deliberately 

and repulsively entrapped 

Stepford wife, brood mare 

mother too of his itemized 

offspring; as this basically

narcissistic and selfish oaf 

solidified his womanizing.  

While additionally, rather 

consistently, throughout 

his clearly useless and 

unwarrantedly, privileged life;

most cringeworthily, to every 

observant prescient-minded 

and likewise also, distinctly 

intelligent person; actually 

having rather undeniably 

distinctly obviously done 

bugger all else basically, 

outside of quite eagerly 

wishing for his mother 

to die so he can rather 

arrogantly and totally 

self-servingly surface  

as the king of Britain.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

11 August 2021. 

Author's Comments:  

As it currently stands Charles in the event of his mother's death succeeds  her, as he's her oldest son, as the next monarch of the United Kingdom. What though if Charles' own death precedes that of the Queen - not an outlandish supposition as it might superficially seem - Andrew then, as de facto the Queen's oldest living son is quite legitimately entitled to be the heir apparent, since William is realistically only the Queen's grandson and not her birth child! And his father would be dead while the Queen is still alive. 

Similarly, Beatrice and Eugenie - two exceedingly lovely, non-grifting down to earth lasses - would then likewise out rank, and thankfully so, egocentric and dishwater boring William and sickeningly scheming, expert social climber and likewise narcissistically, arrogantly selfish Waity Katie! 

I wonder if the Delta Variant of Covid-19 is contemplating what I'm actually thinking? And to the Queen I advisedly and honestly say this: "Keep going Ma'am. As you don't owe Charles or William anything!" And neither do we intelligent Britons. 

Laenger lebe Koenigin Elizabeth die Zweite! Und endlich Ruhe in Frieden Charles Windsor!