A convicted criminal is precisely
that Natalie Elphicke even if he
happens to be your cherished
and totally enabled husband;
unless subsequently they're legally
and specifically so quite evidently
and demonstrably exonerated, of
that distinct crime; and crucially
too, irrespective of their gender
and race, their legally engaged
in coital orientation; preferred
religion or none; solidly clung
to social standing and vitally
crucial connections or living
on the edge and with no life
of any notable significance.
It's clinically how the actual
precept of democracy truly
is supposed to firmly work
Natalie not as a sham one
with its fawning, risibly so
social-climbing; distinctly
wannabe elites obviously
and unfailingly, averse to
all aspirations of general
meritocracy, hard earned
achievements, and firmly
installed natural equality.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
19 July 2021.
Author's Remarks:
Anyone with a modicum of commonsense or any inclination towards decency, honesty, integrity or any conscionable notion of what's right or wrong is fully cognizant in their realization of the undeniably conscionable and altruistic human being that Marcus Rashford is, that this persona of him is irrefutably in marked contrast to the utterly dishonest, scheming, avariciously self-serving, rapaciously attention grabbing and the utterly disingenuous enabling of a convicted, sexually abusive, criminal and a currently incarcerated in jail husband, wife Natalie Elphicke!
Let me compare and contrast this odious specimen of homo sapiens, Natalie Elphicke, to some individuals that the more enlightened of you have assuredly heard about. I'll start with the American Cindy McCain: the excellent and highly moral, discernibly intelligent and caring wife, now unfortunately the widow, of the late and outstanding politician John McCain, who regrettably passed away in 2018 but all the same is still highly and universally regarded. After John McCain's death, conscionable Republicans and Democrats alike jointly asked Cindy to take the Senate seat vacated by her late husband's death from cancer. But on principle this brave, wonderful and truly worthy lady, in the fullest and most complimentary meaning of that word, declined these persuasive offers, preferring not to, or be seen generally as self-servingly exploiting her late great husband's memory politically.
Contrast that altruistic and admirable stance with that of Natalie Elphicke. An enabler of her criminal and sexually abusing husband Charlie, who Natalie still defends, blaming the courts rather than her sexually sick, demented, twisted, self-entitled, white privileged and odious husband for Charlie's incarceration. Natalie only divorced Charlie once he was in jail; a move highly reminiscent to that of Derek Chauvin - George Floyd's murderer - and his wife whose convenient divorce was solely to ensure that in any subsequent civil litigation by George Floyd's family the Chauvin's private assets: property and money, would be protected, as they would no longer be in Derek Chauvin's name, or even jointly with his wife, as they were conveniently divorced, but solely in her name; and as she was in no way proven to be responsible for George Floyd's death, those assets would therefore be untouchable. The same ploy that a scheming Natalie Elphicke and criminal husband Charlie - both lawyers - have pulled off. And sensibly ask yourself this: what husband, unless he and his wife were in collusion over such a matter, would hand over his assets to a wife, who on getting her hands on them, for all he knew, could or would find herself a new lover, if she didn't already unbeknown to him have one? No! You only make such personal contracts with someone whom you explicitly trust and who is and has been your enabler in your criminal wrongdoing!
Natalie Elphicke for all her rank hypocrisy and sickening disingenuousness was an enabler of her husband Charlie and every bit so as Ghislaine Maxwell was to Jeffrey Epstein; Rose West was to her husband Fred West; and wife Primrose was to mass murderer Harold Shipman. And no amount of white washing - a cynical pun intended - is going to change that; however much the manipulated brainwashed trolls, endemic dimwits; the intellectually challenged master race supremacists, inured racists and the rabid and delusional, lowlife Brexiteers fall for it!
That, too, includes the Tory selection committee for Natalie Elphicke's constituency of Dover, selecting a woman of this ilk as your parliamentary candidate and MP. Natalie's husband hadn't died as John McCain did; or was he murdered as Joe Cox was - but I guess scum readily recognize and closely empathize with its own! Twenty five years married to criminal, now incarcerated sexual abuser Charlie Elphicke, was Natalie; until her and Charlie's cynically orchestrated bogus and conveniently self-serving divorce, they're expecting intelligent persons - very few in Britain I know but there still are some - to honestly believe that it's kosher and furthermore that Natalie was wholly oblivious to what Charlie was up to? Pull the other one; it's got bells on it, if you believe that crap. Any normal woman who says that of a husband after 5 years married to him is either a pathological liar or an absolutely inane lunatic and not the full shilling. And believe me, Natalie Elphicke, as vile a perceived human being as she actually is, unquestionably doesn't fall into the latter category! But who really cares? Dover as a parliamentary constituency is a toxic cesspit; and the Tory Party there clearly constitutes its verminous enablers; and quite frankly these dregs of society, as far as I'm personally concerned, are quite welcomed to each other! And quite literally makes the Delta Variant of Covid-19 a far more pleasurable experience to encounter!
No comments:
Post a Comment