By Stanley Collymore
No man; with even a mere
modicum of true moral
integrity or the basic
awareness of what
love truly is cynically
dumps a woman, he
declares to actually
love determinedly
so he can actually
play the field - or
rather ensuingly
does ponder for
basically, some
ten clear years
the wisdom of
marrying her.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
8 July 2021.
Author's Remarks:
Not anyone: neither a brother, close biological relative nor any friend, would I ever be asking their prescriptive advice relative to the affairs of my heart; and particularly so in relation to to someone I definitely knew I was in love with and was equally cognizant of the fact that she was likewise absolutely irrefutably and unquestionably, and rather clearly too, reciprocating that identical intensity of love for me. Inform such relatives out of familial courtesy possibly; but seek their permission - Never!
And this notwithstanding the actual duration of our personal relationship itself!
And, moreover, I would tell anyone: relative or general busy body, with their own personal agendas, and equally too with such an amoral and utterly disingenuous track, and approach to life, as is specifically laid out in the above and quite deliberately written poem, to literally go to Hell and while there what they could do with their bigoted and similarly interfering suggestions; on their twisted assumptions that just because we were siblings or otherwise related: biologically or through marriage, they accordingly had the infernal right to distinctively and coercively tell me who I should or should not marry.
And furthermore the time frame that I should actually court this female in my life should equally so be arbitrarily determined by that set of the very same coercive relatives who took it unilaterally upon themselves to determine if it was suitable, according to their own subjective standards - or the discernible lack of a6such thing - to accordingly tell me if this lady in my life who I genuinely love and who likewise feels the same about me, and regardless of how long, or short for that matter, we've been together, is suitable or otherwise to enter not only the circle of my biological family but crucially and significantly too my very own personal life!
So I'm absolutely and thoroughly tremendously proud of you Harry and Meghan that quite intelligently, courageously and honourably you impeccably and implacably resisted the odiously racist dog whistles of William and Kate as well as those other sick and twisted likeminded members of the Windsor and Spencer families were also, and still are, engaging in. And that even Charles: your own dad and Meghan's father-in-law, with his own odious track record as regards his utterly deplorable, egregiously despicable and unforgivable, from many moral perspectives, treatment of your cherished mother Diana, is likewise too, with his own racist dog whistles relative to Archie and Lilibet, in order to gain much needed relevance from Brexiteer Britain, because of the indelible stain of his adulterous relationship with Camilla and the untimely circumstances of Diana's death - which significant numbers of people globally believe was premeditated murder - but still obsessed with making Camilla queen against the general public opposition she's facing regarding that notion; when Charles, as he hopes to do, ascends the British throne. Totally aware, is Charles, of the rank stupidity and systematic and deep rooted racism of Brexiteer Britain, and how even has-beens who want to desperately grab some relevance for themselves, know that all they have to do is to publicly indicate they're anti Meghan, for racist, misogynistic and jealousy reasons, and Harry too for marrying her: an African American woman and not the archetypal Stepford wife Broodmare that the likes of Kate Middleton is.
So grab some popularity with the plebeians and racist Brexiteers Charles's palace stooges would have advised him, and this is precisely what Charlie boy is doing! Having not one previously, seriously thought for himself; something that his paid stooges have invariably done for him, even though intellectually they're no better than him! And William certainly takes after you in that evident deficiency in logically thinking for one's self department, Charles.
I'm no aficionado of hereditary monarchies being myself a staunch meritocrat living in the 21st Century. But wouldn't it be the height of irony if Charles's mum, the incumbent monarch - and considering Charles's longstanding obsession with becoming king - does outlive him? Lol! As it does appeal to my sense of humour; and an old Barbadian saying - and my roots are Bajan - "The more one wants the less they usually get!" Not a farfetched likelihood as Elizabeth II has the requisite longevity genes to do it. So hang in there ma'am; and between you and me I'm secretly rooting for you!
No comments:
Post a Comment