By Stanley Collymore
The utterly selfish and totally inconsiderate idea
that because someone has taken to having a compulsive obsession with something
or other and consequently either unintelligently or else ferally assumes that
because they consider it to be ideal for themselves that everyone else should
therefore be compulsorily inducted into believing likewise – regardless of
whether they may favourably want to, or more likely than not, actually don’t –
has regrettably rather disgustingly and quite coercively become a highly pernicious,
troublesome and contentious fashionable fad in the 21st Century. And
there’s no more a clear-cut exemplification of this concertedly manipulative
and accursed conduct than Queerism and Dykeism.
Consciously agreed to and personally indulged in acts
or routinely participated in activities, whether casually embarked on or are of
themselves a longstanding nature, of homosexual or lesbian behaviour between
consensual adults that don’t in any way
infringe the law of the land are frankly, as a life-long, strictly so and
committed heterosexual man, none of my business; nor do I wish or have the
slightest intention of ever making it so, whether or not these sexual
encounters or unions are fashioned from intense feelings of love between those
involved or else moulded through actions which are redolent of lascivious lust.
And while most dedicated heterosexuals will
unsurprisingly, and justifiably so, strenuously object to being questioned or
forced into giving an account of why they indulge in lawful and consensual acts
of normal heterosexual, sexual intercourse, homosexuals of both genders, from
my personal perspective, are equally perfectly entitled to the same rules that
govern us heterosexuals, and which significant numbers of us automatically take
for granted.
However, sexual deviances, whether by heterosexuals or
homosexuals, cannot and must never be allowed to go unchallenged, and
especially so when the perpetrating culprits of these are exceedingly powerful
political figures; influencing sections the corporate and financially endowed; corrupt
and supposedly law and order enforcement state officials; civil servants; tax-evasion
media barons and their underling so-called journalists; those who run the BBC,
or prominent but bent members of the clergy – all of whom invariably drawn from
the same private schools and purportedly “social elites”, unabashed,
arrogantly, thoroughly self-servingly, quite routinely and not uncommonly
through deviously enlisted litigious means exclusively assign to themselves the
omnipotent right, as they see it, to unchallenged push their detestable and
sexually deviant ways and predilections down the throats of the rest of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment