Why is this white British slapper still with her husband if she actually doesn't want to be with him?

By Stanley Collymore 

Really, why would anyone marry 

someone they're not sexually 

attracted to, other perhaps 

than basically doing so for money, 

social climbing prestige or hiding  

their distinctly sexual propensity 

like being a distinctively literally 

dishonestly lying, clearly nastily 

and evilly closet Queer, or aptly 

a repugnant, likeminded, Dyke.  

Generally in the huge majority 

of actually intensive, personal 

relationships distinctly sexual 

attraction undeniably arrives

before any lasting friendship. 

And if you really detest your 

husband, or your partner's 

sexual attention now and 

as such actually force yourself to 

detestably have sexual relations 

with them then it's much better 

and far more sensible, that the 

pair of you really go your own 

separate ways; as one, or both 

of you will literally eventually 

find somebody else, to satisfy 

your dominant sexual needs. 

So, self-evidently, if this wife 

is not at all interested in her 

husband, the obviously and 

predictable outcome is that 

he'll inevitably start to look 

elsewhere and humanly so 

most unquestionably stray. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

1 August 2022.  

Author's Remarks:

Makes me wonder though what sort of relationship this couple had before they got married. Did they marry, for instance, purely down to her pregnancy, either by her then future but now present husband or perhaps some other man that she genuinely wanted in her life but who didn't feel the same way about her, and who she's still asininely and pathetically as a lot of British women of her ilk do, carrying highly exaggerated and obviously to everyone but her sick and utterly twisted self, distinctively quite laughable delusional notions about? So conveniently she sought and did marry the man who she is now with but very obviously she evidently detests knowing full well that the child she did conceive is in all probability not her husband's; a reality that in all likelihood that he is ignorantly but blissfully totally unaware of! A quite commonplace occurrence in Britain from the monarichal family, other hereditary, the political and administrative and even the liturgical elites right down to the feudal serfs that hero worship and brownosingly, sycophantically fawn to their medievally mindset, perceived to be and actively encouraged to think divinely in their elevated and also self entitled positions, social betters! 

And quite seriously why would any married woman be asking a public forum what she should be doing as a consequence of the situation she's in, doing so before or clearly not even speaking to her husband or at the very least her closest and most trusted friends; rather than going to an aforesaid public forum with her evidently contrived problem? 

Seems to me that what this utterly self-serving and a most egregious tart of a despicable British woman - the sort that most ironically and routinely like the Daily Mail Pavlov dog trolls that they undoubtedly are, spitefully, vitriolically enviously and most caustically, lyingly and racially castigate Meghan Markle for precisely the exact things they're themselves doing - wanted with her quite convenient husband was a house sharer plus a financial provider; and certainly with him not a proper living and tactile husband! Since she's rather transparently not matched with the husband that she has, or is being sexually satisfied elsewhere!