By Stanley Collymore
A personal fetish, Joanna Bourke
so why at 59 and evidently pre
menopausal, you're so tight
lipped about your personal status,
as well as the obviously, distinctly
and very discernibly marked lack
of any perceptibly so, significant
relationships essentially past as
well as rather evidently current
ones with basically distinctively
and literally, a human content?
You justifying sex with animals
and labelling it, the last taboo?
Really? Well, I've actually news
for pathetically noxious sickos
evilly like you - Joanna Bourke.
It's no taboo just a straight up
disgustingly wrong thing! And
for several sound, discernibly
sensible, and evidently moral
reasons. Firstly, it's sickening
and horrible abuse; secondly
it's cruel and thirdly patently
immoral with all the animals
involved evidently incapable
ever, even in any specifically
implausible evaluation, very
realistically giving informed
consent, any more logically
so than a human baby can!
So seriously then why on earth
any obviously normal person
would categorically want to
listen to a distinctively fatuous and
patently evidently sickeningly plus
as well, a very insulting to anyone
with a basically, functioning brain
in their head and fully capable of
using it, purported lecture about
actually having sex with animals,
is discernibly beyond me Joanna
Bourke; unless, frankly, they are
themselves, personally involved
in such distinctly gross and very
ostensibly repugnantly evil acts
of bestiality. Very self-evidently
there are vile weirdos, who are
to be readily found, in the elite
ranks of malignant paedophile
and likewise evil sex trafficking
abusers fittingly embedded in
the vanguard, of a nauseating
and crucially regressing white
western society. All the same,
that does not actually equate
into everyone, who evidently
resides in the West, either is;
or wishes to be one of them!
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
22 August 2022.
Author's Remarks:
This is not a taboo; it's just plain sick! A classic case of going down
a very slippery slope; and just because you can discuss it doesn't mean that
you should. This is totally sick stuff and no amount of so-called academic
dressing up is going to change that.
There was a time, not that long ago, when so-called academics like Joanna
Bourke categorically stated and published articles as well that unequivocally
stated that Black women and girls - whatever their respective age - couldn't be
raped; because the bogus science from the advocates of this egregious mantra,
stipulated that the vaginas of all Black females were completely different in
both their composition and requirements to those of white women; causing, as a
result, Black females to be constantly in oestrus!
Therefore to be, or whenever Black females and even non-pubescent ones were
sexually abused and raped by white males, these non-consensual activities on
the part of the victims was not only a supposed huge relief but likewise too, a
blessing for these Black victims, since these enforced acts of rape and other
forms of egregious sexual barbarities literally saved them from going off their
heads and becoming insane. So essentially these white rapists and sexual
abusers weren't evil men and youths but irrefutably commendable and
compassionate philanthropists.
The real purpose of this utter and egregious nonsense directed at Blacks was to
simply justify white barbaric, discernibly lascivious and physical domination
over enforcedly enslaved Black females who self-evidently had no legal recourse
to justice in any court of law organized and run by delusion master race white
supremacists, who, like their present day counterparts, were in effect nothing
more than toxic vermin.
But to justify and appease their endemically sick behaviour what better way
than having university trained, but with the same sick mentality, proponents
corroborate and justify their sick perversions. And frankly, this is what
Joanna Bourke is doing with animals that like Black slaves, perceptibly in
these odiously vile and sick "academics" minds, have no rights
whatsoever and are simply objects for their perverse and thoroughly
reprehensible sexual pleasure!
And from my personal perspective the last taboo is being unable or purposely
unwilling, either through truculence, outright stupidity or dim-witted and
manipulated gullibility, in recognizing and fully accepting what is morally
right and abysmally wrong; and the difference between the two of them!
And when are you sociopathic and psychopathically as well morons going
to cease offloading your own sick proclivities and beliefs onto those who are
light years removed from the likes of yourselves, and especially when you look
into the mirror and don’t like the reflection there that is being beamed back
at you – not that I’m holding, or ever will, my breath on that one where you
lowlifes are concerned. If you must use the word “woke” whose origin and actual
meaning you haven’t the foggiest notion of, then at least expend some time on
getting to truly know what this very important, to folk like me, terminology
means before you start to rather asininely, pathetically and malevolently hurl
it about at everyone who has a different opinion or concept of the world and
what it both beneficially and equitably should be like than what your
discernibly right-wing, Nazi and undoubtedly twisted one is.
And believe me! Joana Bourke, who is essentially one of you kind is no
more a “Woke” person than the white Antipodeans of New Zealand and Australia
were, or still quite ludicrously are, the best friends of the Maoris and
Aborigines whom they barbarically and genocidally culled in their own
indigenous homelands where they had been living exclusively for in excess of
60,000 years before any white man or woman knew where these two countries were,
then furthermore had the audacity as became quite commonplace in Australia and
in the sick minds of Europeans that these genocidally acquired and arbitrarily
renamed countries were effectively Terra nullius lands; solely on the basis
that their indigenous inhabitants weren’t white Caucasian. So don’t kid
yourselves that Joanna Bourke is some liberal or even a woke person; as
categorically she most certainly is not!
No comments:
Post a Comment