Translate

Tuesday, 7 September 2021

Monarchy - the opium for the British morons!


By Stanley Collymore 

If Charlie boy: an odious 
specimen of allegedly 
Human Beings who 
literally and fervently can't wait 
for his own mum to die so that
he with Michael Fawcett very 
much by his side, and a close 
relationship some evidently 
well-informed sources, say 
is a far more, intimate one 
than that between Charlie 
boy, and former mistress 
Camilla, who eventually 
became his wife, but all 
the same actually, were 
Charlie boy regrettably 
obliged ever to make a 
serious, personal hard 
choice between either 
of them it undeniably 
and comprehensively 
would, unmistakably, 
be distinctly Michael 
Fawcett; who clearly 
would resoundingly 
and pleasurably too
figuratively emerge  
on top; every time!  

All this respectively, and 
distinctly hopefully, the 
operative word clearly 
being hopefully; as, so stoically 
and determinedly, Lizzie at 95 
years of age happily appears 
to be in no hurry - bless her, 
at going any where fast to 
egotistically facilitate the 
narcissistic fantasies, of  
this facile heir, Charlie 
boy that compulsively 
desires Camilla, to be 
Queen as personally 
he vainly, straddles 
what emphatically 
he aptly perceives 
is his divine right  
the UK throne, as
an entitled King!

Interestingly enough, if Charlie
boy and Michael Fawcett are 
both innocent of all dodgy 
and supposedly charitable dealings 
and shenanigans, and your avidly 
wannabe future king is, entirely 
unaware of his especially close 
friend, and confidante - a nice 
word but now corruptly and 
overriding, euphemistically 
utilized by your hereditary 
lot; Britain's alleged elites; 
blatantly, social-climbing 
wannabes and ingrained 
sycophantic, right-wing, 
Nazi rags, like the Daily 
Mail, the fascistic Daily 
Express, and others; to 
not so cleverly, denote 
gross carnal intimacy;  

actions, and a supposedly 
quite characteristically 
innocent supposition 
that pertains to these dodgy charity 
dealings of Charlie boy and rather 
close friend Michael Fawcett that 
realistically I simply personally 
don't buy, for a single moment; 
then logically, on such clearly 
silly and outrightly basically 
dubious, suppositions alone 
you should really also start 
absolving, vile paedophile 
Jimmy Savile, with whom  
Charlie boy had a 30 year  
old, personal friendship.  

And likewise Bishop Peter 
Ball: similarly too a very 
close and long standing 
confidante of Charlie boy. Both of 
these irrefutably quite favoured 
gentlemen, distinctively Jimmy 
Savile and similarly Peter Ball 
evidently distinctly hardened 
paedophiles and repetitively  
sexual abusers. And in Peter 
Ball's specific case, a legally 
tried, found guilty and also 
a convicted, sentenced and 
an imprisoned paedophile. 

Nevertheless a man that
Charlie boy along with 
the identical likes of  
George Carey a former Archbishop 
and religious Head of the Church 
of England protected during his 
ministry and moreover did his 
utmost best as did Charlie boy 
to prevent the prosecution of  
Peter Ball. And furthermore, 
even after the trial and just  
conviction of this patently 
odious person but clearly  
still their man; sought to 
brow beat the court into  
not actually jailing him.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 
7 September 2021. 


Author's Remarks:  
Think what you want, or more preferably so in the vast majority of your cases, what the Windsor PR stooges and their media sycophants want you to believe in relation to this Charlie boy/Michael Fawcett dodgy charity shenanigans; but I know what my perceptive mind, rather rational thinking and quite objective analysis direct me to believe, and those salient aspects of my life have never failed me yet. So I'l embrace them as always and both bluntly and honestly say I don't believe a word of this pumped out garbage. That ludicrously has as much credibility about it as saying my cherished Barbados lies firmly in the polar region and is subjected to heavy snowfalls. 

Still curiously waiting though to hear from Piers Morgan and Angela Levin  on this one; rather slow, predictably, on commenting if ever they do. Or is it only, as anyone with a functioning brain well knows, it's only Harry and Meghan's purported dealings, which these two charlatan hacks are so very obsessively, subjectively and clearly lyingly interested in?




















No comments:

Post a Comment