By Stanley Collymore
If Charlie boy: an odious
specimen of allegedly
Human Beings who
literally and fervently can't wait
for his own mum to die so that
he with Michael Fawcett very
much by his side, and a close
relationship some evidently
well-informed sources, say
is a far more, intimate one
than that between Charlie
boy, and former mistress
Camilla, who eventually
became his wife, but all
the same actually, were
Charlie boy regrettably
obliged ever to make a
serious, personal hard
choice between either
of them it undeniably
and comprehensively
would, unmistakably,
be distinctly Michael
Fawcett; who clearly
would resoundingly
and pleasurably too
figuratively emerge
on top; every time!
All this respectively, and
distinctly hopefully, the
operative word clearly
being hopefully; as, so stoically
and determinedly, Lizzie at 95
years of age happily appears
to be in no hurry - bless her,
at going any where fast to
egotistically facilitate the
narcissistic fantasies, of
this facile heir, Charlie
boy that compulsively
desires Camilla, to be
Queen as personally
he vainly, straddles
what emphatically
he aptly perceives
is his divine right
the UK throne, as
an entitled King!
Interestingly enough, if Charlie
boy and Michael Fawcett are
both innocent of all dodgy
and supposedly charitable dealings
and shenanigans, and your avidly
wannabe future king is, entirely
unaware of his especially close
friend, and confidante - a nice
word but now corruptly and
overriding, euphemistically
utilized by your hereditary
lot; Britain's alleged elites;
blatantly, social-climbing
wannabes and ingrained
sycophantic, right-wing,
Nazi rags, like the Daily
Mail, the fascistic Daily
Express, and others; to
not so cleverly, denote
gross carnal intimacy;
actions, and a supposedly
quite characteristically
innocent supposition
that pertains to these dodgy charity
dealings of Charlie boy and rather
close friend Michael Fawcett that
realistically I simply personally
don't buy, for a single moment;
then logically, on such clearly
silly and outrightly basically
dubious, suppositions alone
you should really also start
absolving, vile paedophile
Jimmy Savile, with whom
Charlie boy had a 30 year
old, personal friendship.
And likewise Bishop Peter
Ball: similarly too a very
close and long standing
confidante of Charlie boy. Both of
these irrefutably quite favoured
gentlemen, distinctively Jimmy
Savile and similarly Peter Ball
evidently distinctly hardened
paedophiles and repetitively
sexual abusers. And in Peter
Ball's specific case, a legally
tried, found guilty and also
a convicted, sentenced and
an imprisoned paedophile.
Nevertheless a man that
Charlie boy along with
the identical likes of
George Carey a former Archbishop
and religious Head of the Church
of England protected during his
ministry and moreover did his
utmost best as did Charlie boy
to prevent the prosecution of
Peter Ball. And furthermore,
even after the trial and just
conviction of this patently
odious person but clearly
still their man; sought to
brow beat the court into
not actually jailing him.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
7 September 2021.
Author's Remarks:
Think what you want, or more preferably so in the vast majority of your cases, what the Windsor PR stooges and their media sycophants want you to believe in relation to this Charlie boy/Michael Fawcett dodgy charity shenanigans; but I know what my perceptive mind, rather rational thinking and quite objective analysis direct me to believe, and those salient aspects of my life have never failed me yet. So I'l embrace them as always and both bluntly and honestly say I don't believe a word of this pumped out garbage. That ludicrously has as much credibility about it as saying my cherished Barbados lies firmly in the polar region and is subjected to heavy snowfalls.
Still curiously waiting though to hear from Piers Morgan and Angela Levin on this one; rather slow, predictably, on commenting if ever they do. Or is it only, as anyone with a functioning brain well knows, it's only Harry and Meghan's purported dealings, which these two charlatan hacks are so very obsessively, subjectively and clearly lyingly interested in?
No comments:
Post a Comment