By Stanley Collymore
With all the excess baggage that
trollops like you well into your
so problematical, menopausal
stage, of your distinctively pathetic,
thoroughly useless and irrefutably
avariciously, self-serving lives do
carry Jan Moir, it's categorically
hardly any unsurprising thing.
And furthermore, maliciously
on your twisted part Ms Moir
the sick irony of what you're
doing is actually staggering.
Meghan Markle spuriously
denounced distinctly, by a
facile nobody like you, as
not influential, Jan Moir?
Really? Thus the reason, that
the Daily Mail rag, together
with clearly considerably
intellectually challenged cretins
like you Jan Moir who work for
it daily publish several stories
about the same Meghan, so as
to actually acquire, by doing
so, distinctively desperately
necessary, urgently needed
relevance and, discernibly
so, in cases like your very
own Jan Moir to sordidly
and luxuriantly feed the
racist, far-right, agenda;
essentially additionally
to that of your alt right
and so unsurprisingly,
toxic troll supporters.
And equally so, feed your
allegedly hardened and
likewise, longstanding
addicted cocaine habit quite in
conjunction with paying your
every day bills Jan Moir. For
if, as you so contradictorily
rant, Meghan Markle isn't
the least bit influential to
anyone; why the bloody
hell then are, both you
and your distinctively
affected, and fittingly
braindead cretins, so
evidently infatuated
and surely obsessed
with Meghan, then?
Wouldn't basic commonsense
alone logically dictate that
realistically, you ideally
and purposely rather studiously
ignore, Meghan completely Jan
Moir? Rather than, repeatedly
as you do, keep on writing all
these stories of yours clearly
ad nauseam, about someone
you characterize constantly
as a nobody, and noxiously
publicly state, that nobody
is at all, interested in her?
Why then the compulsive
interest and the plethora
of sick stories, Jan Moir?
Makes no sense at all, to
me to be very viciously
berating someone who
distinctly by your own
rationale is irrelevant.
Enlighten me and my readers
Jan Moir on the essence of
relevancy. Do you go to
the lavatory basically to have a
piss; shit; or a necessary wank
of your menopausal pussy, or
incidentally because that loo
is there and can accordingly
be used randomly? Just like
your malicious and clearly
unwarranted, sick, attacks
on Meghan, if unexpected
as is especially cognizant
with ingrained prats like
you, you realistically get
where I'm coming from!
Instead, there you constantly
are Jan Moir: a thoroughly
and inimical but ineptly
meddling, menopausal
cow masquerading as a newspaper
columnist for a fervently Nazi rag
like the Daily Mail; and basically
someone very afraid to honestly
and evidently, quite objectively
look yourself wholly, and your
own well used and frequently
displayed, physically utilized
body in the mirror, basically
from shame of the routinely
now visible, and rampantly
mentally induced scars the
persistent sexual and drug
abuse, you quite regularly
and wantonly subjected it
to over multiple years. So
what do you do Jan Moir?
You adopt and embrace a
sick preference: to batter
down others with whom
you can't, even minutely
in any comparison truly
vie with, solely and also
bona fide commendable
motivators like Meghan.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
17 September 2021.
Author's Remarks:
Respect, and something I was taught and rather happily learnt from my earliest childhood in Barbados, is a commodity that has to be positively earned; but, even so, the recipient of it must readily and continuously be in a qualitative state to even access such recognition, far less so acquire it.
And the significance of all this, is that assumed birthright, accorded and invariably unwarranted privilege and/or social status; the amassing of enormous financial resources and the attendant social influence there of, and even acquired firm political and societal power do not of themselves equate to a true situation of assured respect if the basic components of respect itself - evidently having not been genuinely earned - aren't met in the first place and rather rigorously retained.
Since all else literally amounts to nothing more than self-serving, brainwashed and even braindead sycophancy; where nepotism, cronyism, fervent social climbing and a personally assumed privileged entitlement become the entrenched bedrock of a decadent, amoral, totally immoral, incompetent, avariciously self-serving and also significantly the thoroughly and so characteristically ingrained properties of a delusional society whose normal conduct then becomes that of a most markedly dysfunctional state, of the kind that the United Kingdom pathetically is.
There are numerous cases of this but here are two clear cut examples I'll use to characterize and adequately exemplify what I'm advocating. Jan Moir: most publicly and vitriolically abusing Meghan Markle - easy to do so when you're actually an ingrained racist who's essentially preaching to similarly endemic racist trolls - as Jan Moir customarily does without a shred of objective evidence to even minutely so support her ludicrously stated and ingrained obsession.
Asininely, as usual, she quite stupidly asserts that Meghan Markle who was recently featured in Times Magazine as an influential global figure is in effect really nothing whatsoever of the kind. Jan Moir is, of course, totally entitled to her own subjective opinion. However, when without a shred of evidence or any substantive proof to corroborate what she's quite fallaciously spouting, Jan Moir then blithely goes on to state that Meghan is not, never was, or will she ever be an influential figure, of any kind, to anybody anywhere, and furthermore that no one ever takes any notice of her; and thus maliciously asserts Jan Moir, Meghan is effectively and most resoundingly a nobody!
Really? And all this coming from the same Jan Moir who as a columnist at the Daily Mail rag, which she works for, quite literally continuously keeps on writing story after story about this publicly declared by her, supposedly nobody person Meghan Markle. And prompts the obvious and intelligent question; why? For how can you Jan Moir remotely logically, much less so intelligently, yet prostituting the craft of journalism, still revered by proper journalists like me, claim someone as in your obviously malevolently cited case of Meghan Markle to be actually irrelevant; yet, and as Meghan clearly doesn't give interviews or even relate what she is planning on doing to the media and distinctively not rags like the Daily Mail that she has previously taken to court and won against, quite literally and so profusely, as you Jan Moir on its behalf so often and keenly do, rather pathetically go rummaging through the distinctly positive stories on Meghan Markle which are carried in international publications, to then with your embedded racist and quite twisted agenda, essay to malevolently debunk what has been positively said about Meghan Markle.
But just like Charles Windsor and his lot that you basically sycophantically obsess with Jan Moir - and, truthfully, I really don't know of a single person of genuine intellectual acumen who thinks that they're bright, the same has to be said personally about you Jan Moir! So my simple advice to you Jan Moir is just this; go seriously see about your quite evidently acute post menopausal traumas. And logically leave Meghan and her reciprocally loving husband Harry and their own family to conduct their lives as they suitably, morally and legally care to.
My second lowlife British specimen is Piers Morgan. Having acquired a new job in broadcasting he claims, what does he instinctively do? This prized narcissist and bullying jerk intentionally goes to the same pub where those several years ago now he first met Meghan Markle to from there specifically announce his new job to the media.
But crucially and significantly it's not about this new job that he elaborates on. Oh no! It's all about Meghan and how he's actually going to cause her in his own distinct words numerous "sleepless nights". Obviously the kind which he wanted to occasion Meghan those many years ago but she clearly wanted none of it. And the egoist that he patently is Piers Morgan evidently can't stand rejection. Consequently, Meghan Markle and revenge for her having the sheer audacity to actually reject him and his overtures towards her have been categorically so, living absolutely rent free in Piers Morgan's head ever since and still do!
Meghan Markle is a happily married woman and with a family she adores. For his part Piers Morgan is similarly married to the discernibly effete; not in the very least invigorating; but all the same an aptly, obsessively social climbing and accommodating of her husband's blatant philandering Celia Walden.
Very strong smilarities here between Piers Morgan a staunch sycophant of the Windsor Klan and Charles - both men marrying women they evidently weren't or aren't in love with while at the same time obsessed with another woman. Specifically in Charles' case it was Camilla and in Piers Morgan that person is irrefutably Meghan Markle. The fundamental difference however being, that Princess Diana undeniably had the courage and determination to do something effective and distinctly positive about her invidious state of affairs. Celia Walden unlike Princess Diana quite categorically has no such redeeming qualities about her, and it accounts for why she willingly stays with a narcissistic, bullying and also a discernibly demented womanizing yet misogynistic pillock like her man Piers Morgan.
So the only sleepless nights that I can realistically envisage, and which are actually occasioned by Piers Morgan, with or without his new job, are the ones he callously inflicts on his wife Celia Walden, as like most allegedly macho white, British men he rolls off her after the standard FIVE minutes shag; turns his back on her, quickly thereafter falls asleep; while clearly assured that he is she quietly climbs out of bed, repairs impatiently to the loo; whilst there swiftly but patently assiduously embarks on cleaning her vagina then on the completion of this very essential task, washes her face, thoroughly dries herself and returns to bed, her back decidedly turned to her husband's inert body as she very silently cries herself asleep. For that Piers Morgan is realistically the only sleepless nights that you're going to actually engender. Those inside your own marital bedroom!
No comments:
Post a Comment