By Stanley
The preselected, blatantly rigged Democratic Party US
presidential election primaries and caucuses candidature;
the Zionist Banksters; Military Industrial Complex
and the enthusiastically supported neo-con
fellowship together conjoined with the
financially, socially and politically
privileged one percent and their jointly obsessively
controlled-
freak, arrogant and rather hubristically assumed as of
right,
according to their absolutely skewed and entirely sick
interpretative notion of that expression that is itself
totally at variance with what that frequently over
used declaration actually means, didn’t manage to pull off
what they all intuitively longed for, eagerly concluded
would happen, and most impudently and noticeably
patronizingly from the perspective of their quite
deeply ingrained, personally compelling and
graspingly materialistically vested interests
declared was an unmistakably clear-cut
concern for all of them, as they then
vaingloriously took to haughtily
telling not only the rest of their
fellow Americans but equally
the entire and somewhat
bemused world would
be an outcome that
incontrovertibly
was an already
unavoidable
conclusion.
That the utterly corrupt and US presidential candidate of
their
collective choice who was buried deeply in their massive
financial pockets and also like them was decisively
and unconscionably without a solitary care in
question for those whose side that she too
routinely, lyingly and self-servingly
professed to be steadfastly on,
would automatically, and without the least bother or any
realistically possible concern, amble on her journey
all the way to easily and decisively winning the
would enable this bevy of narcissistically,
privileged and endemically, criminally
corrupt elites along with their like-
minded billionaire co-sponsors
in this inimical enterprise to be quids on in terms
of advantageously garnering a genuine bumper
harvest from all the money and likewise the
massive and enormously gainful media
propaganda they were rather keen
to fully and uncompromisingly
invest in their particular and
winning protégé’s success.
While at the same time absolutely convinced that their
entirely selfish actions constituted both personally
and financially a clear-cut as well as a uniquely
win-win situation all round for each and
everyone of them to advantageously
and fully exploit to their hearts’
content; but miserably failing
in this hubristic euphoria,
rampant egotism and
superior presumption on their part to perceptively
detect the storm clouds that were menacingly
gathering within the US electorate; and
where significant numbers of ordinary
Americans either astutely or else
cussedly with the hump had
by now decided to ditch
the quite prematurely
acclaimed, rather confidently waiting to
be anointed Madam President, all
along the Establishment openly
preferred candidate in this
vitriolic contest and to
unambiguously go
instead for the
political establishment’s
sworn and publicly
stated nemesis;
one Donald
Trump!
© Stanley V. Collymore
21 November 2016.
Author’s Remarks:
I’ve never subscribed to nor will I ever do to the totally
asinine and unsustainable point of view that one gender alone of the distinctly
two which I still firmly and will always believe that the Almighty God or
Nature if you’re an atheist or agnostic created and always intended to be
permanently so is entitled to, should ever be allowed to and what’s more must
on that totally flawed premise of gender alone exclusively and furthermore
forever unchallengeable let alone sycophantically be permitted to run the world
and additionally in the process control the lives of everyone else who either
currently lives or in the future will do so on this planet that we call Earth.
Anymore than I believe or could ever be persuaded to that
either brutally and barbarically enslaving millions of people unjustly as well
as unjustifiably and considered by those who did so, still see such behaviour
as perfectly permissible and even as legitimate by those who over several
generations later have subsequently succeeded them are themselves staunchly of
the likeminded opinion that it’s something desirable to be embarked on, as such
people are by nature essentially and in every conceivable way inferior to them;
or else that it’s perfectly in order to hideously exploit those people or
others like them forced into a similar situation as them through a multitude of
ways for their abusers’ own barbaric and utterly self-serving interests, and
thus this is a wonderful prescription to be beneficially initiated, vigorously
implemented or propagandistically proselytised
As a life long and meritocratically minded individual while
I firmly, fundamentally and will always unfalteringly believe in the equality
of opportunity for all persons regardless of their inherently racial or ethnic,
discernibly cultural, chosen religious, social or national identity;
educational or financial background; physical wellbeing – and that includes any
disabilities they may have, age, linguistic capabilities, a sparsity or even in
the case of the overwhelming majority of white Britons none of the latter, or gender,
I nevertheless fully acknowledge as well as both sensibly and rationally accept
that although we’re all supposedly human beings and therefore individually may
well be genetically equipped from birth or through societal inculcation with a
diversity of skills, or on a sliding scale considerably less or even none of
these, we’re however in no way all equal or should we ludicrously pretend to
ourselves that we are.
That said, it doesn’t mean that because one set of
individuals have and competently exhibit skills or capabilities that are
currently fashionable then they must somehow be accorded a superiority status
and consequently expect and be given accelerated priority over everyone else
who doesn’t fit into this particular and favoured scheme of things however
popular or even important at the time it might be. For instance a doctor, known
locally in the UK as a GP and a shortened form for general practitioner or a
heart or brain surgeon may be vital as regards saving lives in a way that even
the best electrical engineer couldn’t but for their part are utterly useless
when it comes to getting a national and vital electrical grid system up and
running satisfactorily if at all. In brief, one’s usefulness shouldn’t ever be
determined solely by completely subjective, basically narrow-minded, thoroughly
bigoted or wholesale and to all intents and purposes fraudulent assumptions but
rather by its competence and suitability.
And that’s why the introduction of gender as an exclusive
and absolute prerequisite for any position going, however elevated or lowly it
might be, is not only rank arrogance and a total nonsensical approach to life
when observed objectively but also a massively contemptuous insult to human
dignity, commonsense and intelligence I believe. And to use the flawed and
obviously spurious argument as many in Britain are doing to support their
brainless assertion that because there are numerically more women there than
men – into what category do we I wonder place the plethora of Dykes and Queers
that abound there – women per se and totally irrespective of their manifest
lack of suitability, temperament or qualification for any job in question must
purely because they’re women hog as of right all prominent jobs going or that
are subsequently created, is a contention I personally find to not only be
mindboggling and an illogical supposition but also one that is the epitome of
stupidity!
For that’s tantamount to other equally but opposing
numbskulls similarly and categorically stating that only members of the male
gender and especially those who are Black because of the horrendous
emasculation of Black men over several centuries of white instituted and run
slavery and colonialism should as a matter of conscionable conduct and
accelerated priority be now given high profile status jobs and exclusively so
because of their race and gender. As a Black man that wouldn’t only be complete
madness but also outright imbecility. For neither ignorant nor unconcerned
about what has transpired in the past and still largely goes on I’m
nevertheless fully cognizant of it all and confident in myself as well that
both women and Blacks generally - and not only Black men – have for far too
long been consistently and are still habitually given an appalling deal
socially and most particularly so in the job market and consequently comprise a
state of affairs that must be conscionably, positively, vigorously and
impartially tackled, and in that unambiguous approach be permanently and
constructively put to rest.
But while there are indisputably several ways of
beneficially doing this nepotism, cronyism, favouritism, inverted sexism or
racism, or simply throwing the proverbial baby out with the bathwater in order
to please or placate populist elements within the population aren’t, in my
opinion, requisite or satisfactory solutions to what’s basically a dire problem
or should they ever be. Anymore than women should be legally or asininely
allowed to nationally pick and choose what jobs generally, and especially those
of a prestigious or influential nature in their society, that they can then
patronizingly deem should or shouldn’t be theirs as of right and also in that
sense automatically be theirs to have or else contemptuously turn their noses
up at not doing.
And you know as well as I do what I’m driving at here. Quite
okay for women to aspire to be Prime Minister or the President of their
respective country and to rather vaingloriously hold down in their view any
other number of prestigious jobs – and that’s perfectly fine with me – but no
such enthusiasm I see when it actually comes to for instance doing vital but
low status and even backbreaking jobs however well paid these might be like
sanitary workers, dustmen to you and me, or being on the frontline militarily
bravely defending in their bogus patriotism the same country they unabashedly,
warmongeringly and hubristically unlawfully urge to go to war. No, that’s not
women’s work they’ll hurriedly tell you in their most contrived pained,
horribly hurt and pretend insulted manner; it’s what men are essentially there
for but with an irony lost entirely on such feminist morons, Dykes, risibly
effete Queers and their supporters that these are activities exclusively
reserved for men in a society or country to be controlled solely by women!
Well I did some rather detailed, empirical research recently
to basically confirm a suspicion which I already had, and it was to factually
determine the numerical quantities of verminous cockroaches and other similar
creatures – not exclusively the Blairites, Labtory, Nazi-Zionist, Tory,
Lib-Dem, Westminster Bubble, other privileged scum and their dim-witted
supporters across Britain although they too were included in my survey – that
infest and infect the UK, and predictably discovered that even without the
inclusion of this purported human element the former vermin vastly outnumbered
the total mass of human beings across the United Kingdom. Which prompts the
very obvious question, should cockroaches for example, which are greater in
number alone than the entire UK population and are the only creatures known to
be able to withstand, survive and thrive in the aftermath of a nuclear
extinction of most other forms of life and particularly so the human kind,
using the fraudulent argument regarding the numerical superiority of women in
Britain or anywhere else in the world be similarly used as the basis for
ridiculously giving them full and exclusive control to run the country where
they happen to live? Now honestly work that out for yourself and then ask yourself
if they were women if you could live with the answer you came up with.
From the moment of my birth, throughout my life and
ongoingly still females of one kind or another have contributed greatly to my
life, have at times played significant roles in it and in several specific
instances have most gratefully and appreciatively on my part been absolutely
super and marvellously constructive mentors to me.
And they’ve instinctively arisen from a number of voluntary
and varied sources: close family members, members of the society I grew up in
and spent my formative years there; those females who throughout all the
several aspects of my diverse educational background as well as my professional
and working lives have been unreservedly and quite enthusiastically there for
me as well as to assist me when I needed them the most; and, of course, others
I’ve either intimately observed on a national or international level or if no
longer in this world they once lived in whose individual life, struggles and
successes against all the odds have indisputably and immensely inspired me to
follow their example in my own life’s journey.
Consequently I happily, thankfully and shall enduringly be
indebted to these marvellous and outstandingly, exceedingly principled,
thoroughly altruistic, courageous and admirably self-effacing ladies, in the
truest meaning of that word, that took life on on their terms and in their
hearts and minds knew precisely what it was that they wanted to constructively
achieve while both courageously and confidently setting about their committed
task of doing so.
The roll of honour in my case of such ladies is enormous and
although each one of them is a veritable treasure in their own right and is
firmly and permanently embedded in my mind and thoughts at all times, for an
article of this nature and with current day attention spans woefully and most
regrettably what they are I shan’t demean either their memories, my tribute to
them or the valuable contributions they all of them made in my life by listing
each and everyone of them here; but they know who they are, those who’ve
featured personally in my life.
Nevertheless, I still thought it absolutely essential that I
gave a representative cross-section of these truly outstanding ladies here who
in their own incomparable manner have tremendously assisted in shaping the
course of my own life. With distinction and very much among them are my
maternal Grandmother and Mum both named Louise, my paternal Great Aunt fondly
and lovingly referred to by me as Aunt Millie, two specially among the others
of my paternal aunts, Aunt Daphne now deceased, and Aunt Eurine
who lives in Canada with her three sons and grandchildren;
Dame Anita Barrow: former Governor-General of Barbados, first female diplomat
to the United Nations and deeply revered sister of Errol Walton Barrow the
Father of Barbados’ Independence, Royal Air Force wartime hero and a personal
friend of my Dad and later myself and who in his own right was an influential
mentor of mine, both of these remarkable personages no longer unfortunately
with us.
Significant persons in my private life: Sharon Hurley, Erika
Huebel, Lorna Dent, Stephanie Robinson, Barbara Southey, Birgit Rabofski,
Annegart Ratajczak, Jeanette Davis,
Brigitte Blaurock, Sandra Hartas, Carolyn A. Tippin, Jane Richards, Elaine
Crooks, Tracey Cavey and, of, course, my Partner. Then there are those whom
I’ve never met nor physically could have done so but who either politically,
socially as conscionable activists or as civil rights advocates have impacted
both positively and considerably on my life. And among them are: Shirley
Chisholm, Winnie Mandela, Ruth First, Josephine Baker, Harriet Tubman, Mairead
Maguire, Sarah Ann Gill, Emmeline Pankhurst and Angela Merkel. Although in
reference to Angela Merkel this hasn’t always been the case and her stature in
my perspective has only grown over the last years of her current role as German
Chancellor.
With the implementation of the barbarous Transatlantic Slave
Trade and specifically the Caribbean element of it which was just as
barbarically replaced by colonialism; and with both these evil entities being
throughout their entire existence not only a horrendous travesty of justice for
but also and intentionally so a cultural as well as a personal assault on all
the indigenous peoples of the region coupled with the senseless barbarity
calculatedly inflicted on millions of Black Africans of both genders and of all
races savagely kidnapped and then involuntarily transported from their African
continental homeland to the same region to spend the rest of their harrowing
lives as enforced slaves for the express purpose and financial benefit of white
Caucasians, their European homelands and the Arab go-betweens who willingly
facilitated this loathsome but highly profitable for its unconscionable and
combined white European Jewish, Christian and atheist perpetrators’ human
trafficking business enterprise, Black men in particular were specifically
targeted for total dehumanization.
This was effectively done by totally emasculating them at
every given opportunity and in every conceivable way possible. And the reason
from the sick perspective of whites for doing this was simple enough, and still
exists in the 21st Century – namely that if you successfully
dehumanize someone or a people you are that more likely to totally control them
while delusionally convincing yourself that that individual or persons involved
are inherently inferior to you and as such you’re not only entitled to act
against them in any contemptuous manner that you and others likeminded to
yourself feel inclined to but that you also have a solemn duty as well to
unambiguously demonstrate to those you’re humiliating your innate and
unchallengeable superiority in every respect over them. A policy which as far
as Black men was concerned wasn’t only premeditatedly worked out by whites but
also mercilessly and meticulously implemented against these Black victims by
their white abusers.
With Black women however, while the common superior mode of
whites being good and better versus Blacks being bad or even evil and utterly
useless was very much generally intact, the fear of Black men while palpable
among white men, when it came to Black women it wasn’t as obsessive as it was
in the case of Black men and besides white males could always rely on their
physical, psychological as well as their alleged racial superiority to subdue
Black women, most infamously through rape, other forms of sexual abuse, taking
what children they already had away from them and selling them further afield
into slavery anywhere across the entire so-called New World never to be seen or
heard of again by their mothers, loved ones and the community they’d been taken
from; or else doing the same to the women themselves knowing full well that
their Black men folk further hampered by not being allowed to marry of their
own free will and have a “normal family life” without the say so of their slave
master or mistress were unable to come to these women’s assistance without
placing their own lives in jeopardy.
Consequently the only effective way that most Black women
could and did survive while ensuring as best they could that what family they
had was kept intact, was to keep their heads down while clandestinely serving
as a unifying bond between their children, other family members and communal
friends. A tradition that gradually built up over the centuries of slavery and
colonialism, consolidated itself and became the norm in Black Caribbean life
where the matriarchal figure positively emerged and became the prominent and
indispensable one in Caribbean society and is still largely the case even in
the 21st Century. So women both subconsciously, consciously and in
actuality have pride of place within Caribbean society and from birth not only
girls but also Caribbean boys are taught how invaluable they are to the fabric
of our existence as a people, and not only constantly reinforced but also
indelibly stamped into the collective psyche of our culture.
The same is not the case however with white men and their
women folk; and in marked contrast misogyny is a deeply ingrained factor of
their relationship with the so-called fairer and gentler sex. And the only time
that white men rush to the “defence” of their white women, and this is most
certainly the case in white Britain and its alleged kith and kin in the US,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand specifically, is when these white misogynists
either justifiably or more likely than not delusionally think that someone of a
different race, and most particularly so Black males, is after their women.
Then their own barbarity, rape and the rest of it that for centuries they’ve
employed fulsomely against women of other races, and most especially so Black
women, forcibly and involuntarily come back and to the fore of their concerns
haunt them and as a reactionary response, and reinforced as well by their own
guilt complex they ludicrously and rather pathetically risibly transform
themselves for that specific incident into a courageous St. George on his white
charger figure about to and quite determines as well to slay the evil dragon of
inferior racial impudence towards the snow white chastity of white womanhood
and on its part the sole purpose of corrupting the latter. But other than
instances like that white men per se in Britain don’t really care that much for
their female kind and truth to tell very much prefer the company and sexual
bonding of other men like themselves. So generally their natural approach to
their white women is essentially one of the classic dog in the manger
situation.
White women know this and it accounts for the marked rise in
Dykeism in the 21st century in Britain
but which was always there and why Queen Victoria
refused to outlaw it, a problem she evidently didn’t have when it came to proscribing
Queerism! And as a result of all of this there’s a general belief among British
white women in particular that in order to succeed, and especially so
politically and economically, then they must inculcate the worst misogynistic
habits of their male kind; and frankly there’s not one single WHITE British
politician, past or present, with perhaps the exception of EMILY THORNBERRY,
that I’d unquestionably regard or remotely accept as exemplifying genuine
female characteristics, as they’re all either markedly Dyke butch in character
or else sickeningly Dyke effeminate in nature, if that’s not a contradiction in
itself.
And the same is disgustingly true of their kith and kin in
places like Australia , New Zealand and across the Atlantic in Canada and the US . While in demonstrably marked
contrast in Germany
for example female politicians of whatever political persuasion are
delightfully FEMALE and proud of that fact, and what’s more are their own women
and don’t try to ape men. And it’s the same in France . And like or hate her
politics does anyone in their right senses doubt for a single moment that Marie
le Pen is anything other than a female in every meaningful and proper male,
red-blooded sense of that word and very
sexy with it too? A no-brainer isn’t it?
Now in contrast take even a casual look at Theresa May,
Hilary Clinton, Julia Gillard, Penny Wong, Louise Pratt, Jennie Rice, Joan
Logie, Maryan Street, Louisa Wall, Angela Eagle, Liz Kendall, Jess Phillips,
Justine Greening, Margot James, Kezia Dugdale, Ruth Davidson, and the sorry
list goes on – now feel free to accuse me of being biased if you want to as I
simply don’t care, and not least so for the reason that during my life time
I’ve been around the block so to speak several times and instinctively know
through those experiences and on top of my own familial and Bajan, female
empowering upbringing what real and natural femininity is and what, to be
perfectly blunt with the lot of you out there, is bloody bogus! And this odious
bunch of creatures masquerading as feminine kind when in reality they’re more
akin to a sick and pathetic bunch of Dyke-Androids don’t impress me in the
least and never will; and their Queer counterparts aren’t much cop either!
So the idea that women should exclusively be in charge of
this planet - and we all know who those creatures given half a chance would be:
a consortium of Dykes assisted by their Queer allies – doesn’t impress me in
the least and NEVER will. And my preference is for a world run by those
regardless of their traditional and indispensable male or female gender who I
believe should be in the job because they’re capable of doing it, have the
innate capabilities, skills and professionalism to effectively and efficiently
perform it at least satisfactorily; and where or in whom they place their
turgid cocks or with whom they might choose to consensually rub their dripping
fannies has bugger all to do with what’s societally, nationally and globally
required of our respective leaders. Otherwise just fuck off and permanently do
so!
No comments:
Post a Comment