By Stanley Collymore
The preselected,
blatantly rigged Democratic party US presidential election primaries and
caucuses candidature; the Zionist Banksters; Military Industrial Complex and the
avidly supported neo-con fellowship together conjoined with the economically,
socially and politically privileged one percent and their jointly obsessively
controlled-freak, arrogant and hubristically assumed as of right, according to
their absolutely skewed and utterly sick interpretative notion of that
expression that was itself totally at variance with what that frequently
over-used declaration actually means, didn’t manage to pull off what they all
intuitively longed for, expectantly concluded would happen, and most impudently
and rather patronizingly from the perspective of their deeply ingrained,
personally compelling and graspingly avaricious vested interests declared was
an unmistakably clear-cut issue for all of them, as they then vaingloriously took
to haughtily telling not only the rest of their fellow Americans but also the
entire and somewhat bemused world would be an outcome that unquestionably was
an already foregone conclusion.
Namely, that the
utterly corrupt and US presidential candidate of their collective choice who
was buried deeply in their massive financial pockets and also like them was
decisively and unconscionably without a solitary care in question for those
whose side she too routinely, lyingly and self-servingly professed to be firmly
on, would automatically, and without the least bother or any realistically
possible concern, amble on her journey all the way to easily and decisively
winning the US presidential election. An outcome that would enable this bevy of
narcissistically, privileged and endemically, criminally corrupt elites along
with their likeminded billionaire co-sponsors in this inimical enterprise to be
quids on in terms of garnering a bumper harvest from the money and likewise the
media propaganda they were quite keen to invest in their protégé’s success.
While at the same time
absolutely convinced that their entirely selfish actions constituted both
personally and financially a clear-cut as well as a uniquely win-win situation
all round for each and everyone of them to advantageously and fully exploit to
their hearts’ content; but miserably failing in this hubristic euphoria,
rampant egotism and superior presumption on their part to perceptively detect
the storm clouds that were menacingly gathering within the US electorate; and
where significant numbers of ordinary Americans either astutely or cussedly
with the hump had already decided to ditch the prematurely acclaimed,
confidently waiting to be anointed Madam President and the all along
Establishment preferred candidate in this vitriolic contest, and go instead for
the political establishment’s sworn and openly stated nemesis Donald Trump!
A load of bullshit is
being written about Donald Trump in the aftermath of him winning the US Presidential election in a transparently
open, free, fair and democratic political exercise by the US electorate.
A state of affairs that’s being vitriolically used by some as their verbal
diarrhoea to spew out at him and specifically so by the Zionist so-called
mainstream media on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, their rent-a-mouth and
brainless pundits, the narcissistic and completely full of themselves risibly
referred to as celebrities; the plethora of dysfunctional hardcore, quite
inured male-hating, discernibly acerbic, observably bullying, controlled-freak
Dykes and their effete Queer friends, associates and sympathizers
enthusiastically conjoined with the damnable fellowship of deluded and inane
feminist scum, seems set to carry on for sometime and with an increased
intensity.
A collective of
delusional morons, who asininely and sinisterly think and even firmly believe
that being a woman, and that category alone, is in itself sufficient
justification and even more ludicrous on their part in their exposition of this
fraudulent concept is the sole exposition and qualification required for ruling
the world. No place in this totally idiotic supposition of theirs and where
women are concerned for salient characteristics like character, principles,
suitability and qualification for the job or any sort of professionalism for
the position they envisage should be theirs exclusively; nor for that matter
any utilization of realistic and workable ideas which can either constructively
change let alone enhance in anyway the much yearned for role or status quo that
they’re railing against.
The honest pledge of a
full commitment and not just propagandistic or populist grandstanding lip
service to the concepts of democracy and being mature enough to graciously
accept the free and voluntarily expressed will of the country’s legitimate
voters when their collective decision is publicly and legally made known and
not resort to using a discredited power base, or any other for that matter, to
surreptitiously, loathsomely, sinisterly, illegally and undemocratically either
attempt to conceitedly and criminally undermine or covertly and superciliously
embark on overthrowing the lawfully expressed will of the electorate simply
because its decision is one that both you, as a perceived or actual woman, and
your transparently well-heeled, inveterately corrupt, conspicuously
mind-bogglingly self-centred, graspingly avaricious, endemically and
pathetically narcissistic, hubristic, utterly self-serving and markedly
criminal vested interests sponsors and supporters, just as you do, don’t favour
what the voters have done.
Nobody, in my view of
things, whether a man or a woman, has or should ever do an automatic and
exclusive right to anything other than their own life, and even then there can
be restrictions on that depending on how constructively or inimically from a
consensual societal perspective the individual concerned actually chooses to
live theirs; and that’s why there are prisons and in some countries as well the
death penalty to ensure that lawful and moral aspects of that society are
basically protected and not subjected to the capricious whims of barbarians or
their barbaric and totally unacceptable practices. And I most categorically
believe and will always affirm that when it comes to public office positions
such an egotistical point of view is a no-brainer and should at all times be
firmly and unremittingly stamped out.
And particularly so
when that public office role is the highest, most influential and also as well
the most powerful in one’s own country and its attainment is legally prescribed
through the very explicitly stated method of free, open and democratically held
elections that accord to a registered electorate the inalienable right to
legally and unrestrictedly express its lawful constitutional entitlement to
unreservedly make that decision. And while it’s perfectly in order for anyone
with whatever conventional or contrary opinions they may have to either declare
or have themselves nominated for such an influential job it’s none the less
stupidity of the highest order for them to not only assume but also expect that
they’ll automatically triumph in their quest and that if they don’t then they,
their backers, sponsors and supporters are entitled to get all upset or even
shirty about their loss and what’s more to then embark on a spate of devious
and highly illegal ways to thwart what is unquestionably a legitimate outcome.
Something you can be absolutely sure that neither they, their bevy of sponsors,
backers or crowd supporters would in the least countenance far less so tolerate
nor accept if the situation was the other way round and very much to their
disadvantage.
Therefore the sane,
undeniably sensible and straightforwardly intelligent manner to approaching and
effectively dealing with any situation that entails anyone aspiring for a
public office job and especially when that position is an elected one, is for
that individual and their backers to have a clear-cut plan as regards what they
actually have to offer the public generally and the electorate in particular
that they themselves truthfully and practicably consider to be infinitely
better than that of their political opponents who’re vying for the same job and
even more significantly that they likewise feel that they can and will be
persuasively able to completely convince a majority of voters that that is most
categorically the case from their perspective.
Not, and as is
happening in the Donald Trump’s detractors case, to arrogantly assume in your
completely subjective and biased point of view because you either see or
perceive yourselves to be a part of the Establishment structure, or a component
however big or small of a powerful, influential and privileged elite and as
such are consciously aware that you have the unstinting endorsement: money,
media and propaganda-wise, of the wealthiest and most influential in the land,
both in terms of billionaire private individuals, major banks, other premier
financial institutions like hedge funds and, of course, the massive and
monstrously greedy multinational corporations, that you MUST necessarily win!
And if you don’t then in spite of how untainted and unambiguously free,
scrupulously fair and thoroughly and quite spotlessly democratic that election
was, nevertheless in your warped and bitter mind as well as those of your
unprincipled supporters that election sickeningly has to be declared null and
void. For if it isn’t then you and your supporters will do all you can, other
than to act maturely and accept the voters’ verdict, to illegally make the electorate’s
principled and lawfully enacted decision unworkable. Hardly in the stated
circumstances what can logically be called either democratic or grown-up
behaviour is it?
And the stark irony
that’s totally lost on all these egotistical but thoroughly brain-dead, lowlife
nerds and their throng of evidently brainwashed or gullible supporters is that
these are the very people who have enthusiastically and consistently cheer-led
for regime change in many Global South countries and others well beyond and notably
including sovereign and independent states like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya,
Cuba, Syria, Venezuela, Brazil, Sudan, Egypt, the Ukraine and even Russia among
them on the basis that they either were or still are in those cases where they
haven’t been successfully regime changed as their antagonists hoped for, very
totalitarian regimes in nature and the wilful deaths, chaos, trauma to their
hard done by populations and barbarously instigated refugee situations that
NATO, western countries and their terrorist allies are either directly or
indirectly causing - just like the over ONE MILLION Iraqi children that
needlessly died because of unwarranted sanctions placed on Iraq by the west at
the specific behest of the USA that prevented indispensible medications being
sent to that country for them and who in the words of a loathsomely sick US
immigrant Madeleine Albright, at the time the US Secretary of Sate, were
according to her worth it - are also very much worth it now in order to usher
in dishonestly and fraudulently perceived obligatory and much need democracy in
these targeted countries. Never mind that the entities that the United States
and its western allies are quite happily in bed with in pursuit of these
barbaric and illegitimate self-interests of theirs: Bantu Saudi, Qatar,
Pakistan, Egypt and Yidland among others, haven’t a solitary clue what
democracy is and sure s hell don’t practise it at home or anywhere else come to
that.
And as the old saying
goes you couldn’t make stuff like this up and get any rational person to
seriously believe you if you tried; but like it or not it’s still an everyday
factor in the equation of an inveterate imperialist, colonialist and hegemonic
mindset and so-called western civilized way of life.
For how else can you
sensibly explain that while these utterly repellent bastards and bitches are
most keen to enforcedly take their quite sickeningly warped version of
democracy to countries that didn’t ask for it, need it and most categorically
do not want it, and furthermore with all the attendant problems for them and
their citizens if their legitimate leaders refuse such demanding and coercive
overtures; yet in the United States of America, and a principal perpetrator of
such aforementioned activities, we have the quite laughable, if it wasn’t so
bloody serious a matter, spectacle of these self-same privileged elites who are
always in the vanguard of such behaviour globally, resolutely refusing, and
most disdainfully and publicly so, to accept the transparently open, free and
fair result of a democratically held presidential election there and all
because the rigged Democratic presidential nominee and preferred likeminded
neo-con and warmongering puppet candidate of theirs, Hilary Rodham Clinton – in
their shared sick minds the indisputably divinely chosen 45 President of the
United States of America barring her official acclamation, general anointing
and the endorsed shouting associated with this and all paid for by them – did
not win?
There is never a
guarantee that any politician, and regardless of who he or she might be, even
in the most efficiently conducted and assiduously functioning democracy, and
much less so in the absolutely flawed ones to be found in countries like the
United States, Britain and several other exclusively white Caucasian run and
controlled entities will actually deliver on the many promises that they
invariably quite liberally and not infrequently rather fraudulently, quite
dishonestly and even lyingly made during their election campaign. Since at the
time and even as well premeditatedly their main priority is to get themselves
elected to whatever office that they’re running for; and if the voters are
either too ill-informed, gullible, easily persuaded or just simply too
dim-witted when it comes to working that out for themselves, whose fault or
more crucially whose problem is that? Put bluntly, no one
else’s but their own!
Simply put democracy
as I see it is like a budding relationship that the two persons involved want
to take onto a more serious level and while it’s their right and privilege to
do so it’s also their firm responsibility to maturely work out where they want
to go with that relationship, and should they screw up at any stage sensibly
they should take cognizance of what has happened and try to rectify matters.
But if they don’t and for whatever reason don’t go down that path of sensibly
and rather intelligently tackling what, not only to them presumably by other
observers also is a major problem for them, as adults the complete consequences
of their cock-up must be theirs entirely and not laid at the door of anyone
else. Some politicians sensibly recognize this and act accordingly, but there
are others who don’t because in their utterly feral and narcissistic manner
they think they’ve above everyone and why should they condescend to listening
to the views, opinions or suggestions of those they not only consider to be
decisively beneath them in every conceivable way possible but in productive
terms serve only the one purpose from their self-centred and egotistical
perspective, and that’s simply to be election fodder whenever such elections
come around. Well bluntly significant numbers of voters have had enough of
this, and who either logically or intelligently can blame the?
Donald Trump did
precisely what politicians of every political hue have repeatedly done in the
past and for the most part still continue to at present when on the stump and
told the electorate what they wanted to hear.But in the same way that if
someone sets out to woo you romantically it does make sense to properly check
out where they’re coming from and what their real motives are and not accept
everything, if anything at all, at face value. And if you don’t and get burnt,
then honestly blame yourself and hopefully learn from your mistakes. Because if
you don’t you will continue to relive them! The principal difference with
genuine democracy is that come the next elections you can vote differently and
assist if you’ve a mind to in the laudable process of turfing the deceiver(s)
out, not always so easy in personal relationships. As for me, I don’t, have
never done, or will I ever judge anyone by their words alone, if ever! Since
for me the proof of the pudding is always in that person’s actions; and as such
that’s how I’ll treat Donald Trump, his US Presidential election victory
and what follows it! And so I wish him well!
No comments:
Post a Comment