By Stanley Collymore
Notwithstanding all the trolls
and manipulated fawners
that the rest of us who
do think for ourselves are happily
avoiding as we carry on living in
the 21st Century. So, what's my
beef I hear you ask, with this
medieval mindset man who
quite sickeningly just can't
wait for his mother to die
most critically so, simply
that he could then duly
become an hereditary
monarch, of Britain?
Some love that I say
rather sarcastically
for a woman, who
for the customary
standard term of
quite simply her
first pregnancy
naturally, bore
you safely out
her womb! A
significantly
first for her.
But that is distinctly nothing
is it Charlie boy, compared
to the plum job, you have
always rather selfishly desired and
which is very crucially connected
with being, in you case, the king
astride a hereditary monarchy.
Even that though you messed
up most spectacularly! Since
you Charles very deliberate
with Camilla, are certainly
personally so, responsible
for Diana's tragedy every
bit as the rabid vultures
around you. For clearly
you have intentionally
Charles demonstrably
idiotically enveloped
yourself with risibly
unctuous toadies all
proffering so-called
advice and wilfully
surely making you
unfit, for any kind
of truly intelligent
evaluation which
can be tabulated,
decision making.
An arrant fool and a thick
Clown Prince in sensible
words, Charles! Clearly
persuaded not to marry Camilla
when you were both free to do
so, you accepted your stooges
intimation to actually marry
a young, innocent and aptly
a most virginal broodmare
to rather obviously supply
your own children; while
equally you and Camilla:
even on that night prior
to your hailed wedding
to Diana, scheduled for
the following day, you
happily and cynically
then, so subsequently
and wilfully actually
adulterously solidly
sustained what was
formerly going on!
Fully repugnant in every
way! Yes, people have
dishonest affairs for
all sorts of pathetic reasons and
sometimes none. But to clearly
con a young, and so evidently
naive woman into marrying
you, on the assumption that
you loved her - that clearly
wasn't the truth - basically
so, you could egotistically
have your legal kids by a
virgin while dishonestly
and ongoingly shagging
somebody else that has
been around the block
several times but was
fully apprised of and
aptly approving also
of what you were so
collaboratively, and
purposefully, evilly
doing Charles does
make you and also
Camilla absolutely
abhorrent, amoral
and insidiously as
well toxic caitiffs.
You've caused egreious, and
irreparable harm to Diana
and her children and for
which you evidently haven't so
much as proffered far less so
given a sincere apology for
what you clearly did. And
yet despite all of this the
idiot toadies passionate
in their zeal to deliver
what they usually do
through convincing
you all their many
ideas were safely
solely your own.
Like proselytizing the proud
fact, that on you becoming
King you are judiciously
intent on trimming down the
monarchy - but in actuality
it's an insincere stratagem
to guarantee that both of
your inimitably, and as
well clearly perceived
by you pivotal Nigger
ethnicity grand kids:
Archie and younger
sibling Lilibet will
never definitively
be then prince or
princess of your
so non diversity
racist realm; as
those identical
stooges strong
because your
folly, is their
lighting rod
are out and
about ludicrously
but distinctly so
vaingloriously
and asininely
painting you
basically as
a distinctly
blameless
demigod.
Yet very
clearly
not so.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
4 July 2021.
Author's Remarks:
Planning, you say Charles, on paring down the British monarchy? That's like a male Anglican or Roman Catholic paedophile priest declaring that they'll give up such sexual proclivities for the period of Lent - and there are many of those whom you well know of Charles; and anyone with a functioning brain in their head, and who knows how to use it, knows full well what your racist dog whistle means in this paring down regard!
You have been obsessed with becoming King all of your pathetic life Charles; so it makes no difference one way or the other to me, as I'm an entrenched meritocrat living in the 21st Century and not in the Dark Ages as you psychologically do Charles, and consequently my own mindset accords perfectly well with the best elements of the 21st Century accordingly.
How long the UK will carry on in its current situ is anybody's guess; but the Commonwealth, which the likes of you like to delude yourselves is a British empire Mark 2 is evolving and well away from the deference that it previously paid to Britain.
Terra nuliius, genocidal and as well criminally inured mindset Australia, New Zealand and Canada will in all likelihood stay quite faithfully and fawningly so, to their kith and kin brethren in Britain, and accordingly might very well carry on having the Mountbatten Windsors as their monarchs; but most of the Commonwealth countries are already republics, and those that aren't are opting to become so. All but the Useful Idiot few who have probably never heard Bob Marley's Reggae inspirational song: Liberate your minds from mental slavery.
But whichever way you look at it Charles it's a safe bet that your mother, and the incumbent Queen, will be the last voluntarily recognized titular Head of State of the ongoing Commonwealth. Don't forget that Idi Amin of Uganda became President of that country in a coup organised by Britain's M16 because the evidently democratically elected President Milton Obote had secured enough Commonwealth members votes to actually kick Britain out of the Commonwealth at the then upcoming Commonwealth heads of state meeting, something that would have been quite unprecedented and embarrassing for the UK, which saw itself as head of the Commonwealth; and Britain couldn't allow that to occur, so Milton Obote had to be removed.
Most ironically, it didn't take long for Idi Amin to turn on Britain by kicking out all the Useful Idiots Asians from his country, and them with their British passports dashing to Britain that didn't want them either. Britain with enhanced alacrity passing legislation in under a week - still a UK parliamentary record - to keep these Asians, happy to exploit Africans but loathed to become fellow citizens in these African countries, out of the UK. Ring any bells with you coconut Priti Patel, relative to your parents? What a bloody fawning hypocrite you are!
The Commonwealth to reiterate my earlier remark is not the British Empire Mark 2 however much you want to delude yourself that it is Charles, but a group of countries - some of them ex UK colonies others not so - that voluntarily chose to have the monarch of the UK - but not everlastingly so, and they're fully at liberty to alter this concept if they choose to - as their titular, not statutory, head. So get that right!
However, most of the Commonwealth is located in the Global South and the overwhelming majority of its population is non-white. And they've seen how Meghan and Harry have been racially treated, how you Charles obsessed about the possible skin colour of their offspring reacted - did you do so with William's sprogs? Or any of the other Windsor children? Thought not!
And these Commonwealth citizens and their leaders look at the non diversity ethos at Buckingham Palace and the other palatial residences your lot occupy Charles, and sickeningly too that you are the only lot in the UK that lobbied for and strong armed successive UK governments to permanently exempt your lot from the Race Relations Acts and other allied legislation; and now we have your concerted racist dog whistles, re Archie and Lilibet, to other likeminded racists and haters so you can get some cheap relevance for yourself and Camila?
Why in the face of all that would any decent non-white Commonwealth country want a privileged, old racist white man or his similar mindset and racist inclined older son - both of you obsessed with being king of a UK, politically in a perilous state, to be their titular head of state? Go figure that out Charlie boy!
