By Stanley Collymore
Sexually devious and Wikipedia
shy about this sordid aspect of
his rather queer life, Stephen
Glover again has one of his usually
boring repetitive goes, at a clearly
undeniably evidently definitively
heterosexual Meghan Markle; in
a situation that he, himself can't
with any sensible, conscionably
minded conviction, discernibly
particularly state, he's actually
definitively in; even so clearly
foolishly believes that his vile
rather tawdry privacy is, and
ought really to be sacrosanct
and unlike that, of Meghan's.
Stephen Glover: a pernicious,
vilely egregious, racist prat,
deceitfully and virulently
castigating Meghan for not being in
court during the Daily Mail's, clear
Appeal Court's hearing, distinctly
too when there was evidently no
lawful requirement for Meghan
to be actually there as the three
judges had really unanimously
agreed. Yet, this same odiously
and demented Stephen Glover
is very, diametrically opposed
to Andy Windsor cooperating
with the FBI, far less so really
ethically literally showing up
in a lawfully stipulated court
on essentially rather serious
wholly criminal accusations
of illicitly carnal knowledge
with distinctively, underage
trafficked females, linked to
fittingly acts of paedophilia
with exploitatory sufferers.
Far minor - no pun at all
intended - issues, these
distinctively Andrew
Windsor suppositions very clearly
so in Stephen Glover's discernibly
sick and absolutely twisted mind
than the distinctly nonsensically
egregious act of Meghan legally
and courageously undoubtedly
redoubtably, championing her
inalienable right to the actual
copyright, of a rather private
letter that, realistically, with
hindsight, she'd regrettably,
sent to her foul, graspingly
avaricious father and that
the Daily Mail rag's evilly
twisted Stephen Glover's
boss, in its characteristic
bullying and essentially
egregious, misogynistic
tendencies, specifically
towards Meghan grisly
and racially infringed.
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
3 December 2021.
Author's Remarks:
I earnestly suggest to you Stephen Glover and your similarly likeminded morons at the Daily Mail to sensibly and judiciously get a real life; but fully cognizant of your shamefully repugnant but none the less so shamelessly indulged in and likewise also arrogantly glorified in noxious behaviour, espousing yourselves to be journalists and far more ridiculously the ethical ones that you proselytize yourselves to be, when nothing could be more at variance with reality; that the lot of you calibrate your utterly useless, pathetic, conceitedly and concertedly malevolent lives into some sort of normal, recognizable and personally responsible human behaviour - a perfectly valid suggestion although one I shan't be holding my breath on in your regards - or else in your specific case Stephen Glover, since this poem is principally although not exclusively targeted at you, that you far more beneficially in your specific case do what the title of this poem overtly recommends.
The Daily Mail has now lost twice to Meghan so the laws must be changed, obviously runs the sick and twisted argument of the losers and their keen racist supporters. How could that happen to us the white master race at the hands of an African American and in of all places England? And also perceived by these inured racists as an irrefutably and insulting blow to all of them. Never mind the niceties of the law and its just application; all that mattered was the outcome, and to them all Meghan winning was the wrong outcome! Never mind one bit the actual facts.
Instead, spin Meghan's second win in the Appeal Court, taken there by the Daily Mail when it lost the initial case as a bogus free speech issue, when it is obviously nothing of the kind. The case was never about free speech but privacy and copyright. It similarly is and always was the actual difference between what the public may be very interested in and what's basically in the public's interest. And quite clearly the latter is what must be protected. So it's absolutely incomprehensible to anyone in possession of a functioning brain why a private letter to one's father would be in the latter category. And if you think otherwise then quite obviously you're racially bigoted and seriously deluded.
And here's specifically why! William who has distinctively opposed Harry's marriage to Meghan exclusively so on the basis of her skin colour and racial ethnicity has evilly continuously since Harry's marriage really endeavoured to break up his brother's marriage. As such he and his waity, social climbing Stepford wife, broodmare Kate have essentially been principally, although not exclusively, getting their several employed palace stooges who were themselves rather racially appalled at having to "serve" a Black woman in the so-called royal household, that as always by royal and parliamentary diktat has been exclusively white, to covertly and routinely get these vile sycophants to liaison with the UK's rightwing media, notoriously the Daily Mail and Daily Express, and plant dishonest, lying and fabricated stories about Meghan, specifically done at the behest of William, Kate and as well - irony lost on dimwitted William here relative to Camilla, one of whose offspring is an employee of the Daily Mail.
But the principal agents of these very hostile, fabricated and so egregiously evil stories, spitefully, liberally laced with vile envy and entrenched racism are fundamentally without any doubt the pathetically demented actions of bone idle, work shy, white privileged and deeply inured racists william and his scheming bitch of a wife Kate. On the day of Meghan's second win in the Court of Appeal against the Daily Mail Kate and William who together had surreptitiously provided the Daily Mail with huge assistance against Meghan during the Daily Mail's appeal hoping she would lose, were utterly and publicly dumbstruck when the opposite verdict came out.
Ask yourself this, if your brother and sister-in-law were so unwarrantedly vilified as Harry and also specifically Meghan were and still are and your sister in law had again triumphed in court against her bullies wouldn't you at least publicly have hailed her victory? And if you didn't, why not? And the answer in Kate and William's case is discernibly clear, as these two envious and distinctly inured racist clowns were and still undeniably are the principal and instigatory palace moles odiously supplying rightwing rags, like the Daily Mail specifically, with these plethora of fabricated stories about Meghan.
And with that particular channel of abuse shown up for what it actually is, on the very day of the Appeal Court's verdict, these two dimwits William and Kate decided to go and actually went online and to talk about faberge eggs, something which they know bugger all about, but it was a distraction; quite stupid as both these pillocks are, but a distraction all the same in their sick and quite twisted minds.
Now the new disingenuous and very dishonest rallying call is all about the media's supposed right to free speech and freedom of information. Really? Like knowing the real wealth of the Windsors; the freedom to see their wills which in every other person's case is freely open to public scrutiny but not so those of the Windsors. Similarly, the right to publicly know the wealth of the tax evading owners of the Daily Mail and others so very much against Meghan, including the same Windsors and the antagonistic political opponents of Meghan hiding their ill-gotten gains in overseas tax haven?
Boris Kamal Johnson and his Tory chums incensed by the Appeal Court's decision in favour of Meghan are being canvassed by their rightwing media paymasters, principally the Daily Mail, and similarly William and Kate totally irate that Meghan has again won, to change the media's free speech laws. Not only ironic this one but also laughable. The same Boris Kemal/Johnson who threatened the same media with injunctions because they wanted to know how many kids - legitimate as well as bastard ones - that he has sired.
And if the Daily Mail really thinks that their version of intrusive press free speech is so important, why didn't they and the rest of the UK's media report on William's post marital and adulterous affairs and the alleged bastard daughter he has sired, and all reliable reports reaching me clearly indicate that she's the spitting image of her father William, and the principal reason why the child's mother, quite happy to place current pictures of her earlier sons on social media, resolutely refuses to do the same with her daughter.
Surely this categorical state of affairs with William, the added fact that this child's mother is no longer the quite inseparably close and intimate friend of Kate that she previously was, and additionally that William threatened legal action to stave off media reports about his affairs had no effect on the global media other than the British one, that of their own volition freely decided not to publish and literally be damned - after all we live in a DNA era - rather definitively does show the bloody hypocrisy, double standards and brownnosing sycophancy rather apparent here.
For in both Boris Kemal/Johnson and William Windsor's individual as well as their joint cases these are evidently two figures of prominent interest in the affairs of the UK state and as such their actions are rather correctly and equally so in the public interest. Not a bloody personal letter that Meghan sends to her essentially estranged and trailer trash father and that you quite evil and vile racists solely empathize with because he's white and Meghan has justifiably dumped him. But if he was Black you hypocrites wouldn't have given a toss either about him or Meghan!
And what priceless gall exuded by the Windsor spinners and racists - chiefly William and Kate - and their Pavlov dogs type, brownnosing media and sycophants, in painting Meghan as the spawn of the devil, then happily whistling in the wind whenever the name of Andrew Windsor, the grand old Duke of York, comes up!
No comments:
Post a Comment