Some people are just born quite unbelievably thick - like Natalie McGonigle!

By Stanley Collymore  

How could what you Natalie 

McGonigle did, arbitrarily 

yanking, and not simply 

the once but actually distinctly so 

on two quite separate occasions, 

the hijab off the face of a fellow 

female employee at Morrisons, 

the well known and evidently 

obvious distinctively popular 

corporate food store that the 

both of you duly worked for

and, furthermore, crucially 

in your specific capacity as 

one of the Morrisons' then 

actually trusted employee 

team leaders who equally 

fully aware, of Morrisons 

clarifying company rules

assuring mutual respect,

among all its employees; 

haughtily assert, in your  

rather asinine and lame 

excuse, when insultedly

you were then reported 

by this harassed victim, 

of your vile assault that 

you were fairly having,

a quite harmless laugh.  

But when Morrisons justly 

sacked you for your very 

racist effrontery to your 

fellow employee you then Natalie 

McGonigle, boldfacedly had the 

sheer and fucking audacity to 

white privileged preference 

arrogantly, take Morrisons 

to this industrial tribunal 

for risibly, a supposedly 

unfair dismissal. Justly 

you lost your petition;

yet it didn't deter you 

though from lyingly 

and vilely claiming 

fake, mental stress 

as a crucial factor 

duly responsible, 

for an abnormal 

lapse sadly, into 

unusual racism. 

The problem with male, white 

morons, and their female 

equivalent Karens, is 

that they're actually, brought up to 

believe that they're superior over 

everyone else. However, clearly 

these braindead pillocks really 

can't take it when it's crucially 

and rather unquestionably so, 

wholly proven, that distinctly 

they're not. Thus predictably 

that then naturally becomes 

essentially the primary and 

clearly also the discernibly 

fittingly firmly established 

source of their evil racism.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

29 December 2021.  

Author's Remarks:  

Morrisons acted quite properly and correctly in my opinion where this bullying, racist and quite dimwitted nerd Natalie McGonigle was clearly concerned. What a stupid and rather arrogant thing on her part to do. 

You should never touch or interfere with someone else's clothing, and as well regardless of what that item is, without their express permission to do so. Abrogating that rule not only shows very poor judgement, it's also obviously done to either humiliate or bully the person at whom this rather perverse behaviour is directed at. It also doesn't excuse such vile conduct  to say, when as the bully you clearly are, when you're called out or rarely reported that the offender was "just having a laugh", or simply "messing about"; or even most egregiously that the picked on victim "has a chip on their shoulder" or "doesn't have any sense of humour". Since anyone with even half a brain undeniably knows that this sort of behaviour is actually  unacceptable.  

How would you personally and also distinctively Natalie McGonigle feel or like it if someone, and specifically so a workplace acquaintance or even a stranger assaulted you by actually pulling down your blouse in clearly open company and then telling you that you looked much better without a bra on? 

Or yanked down the trousers which you were wearing and declared that you'd be far more attractive wearing a skirt? And when having been quite insulted in this blatantly disgusting manner you correctly so reported the matter to the fitting authorities; your terribly sick and similarly distinctly twisted abuser readily employed the same deceitfully and so disingenuous tactics which Natalie McGonigle used to try and save her pathetic, racist and evilly manipulative ass. Then sickeningly adding insult to her gross injury, did Natalie McGonigle, despicably and so distinctively as well, arrogantly take Morrisons to an industrial tribunal; for what she ludicrously, somehow, regarded as her unfair dismissal.

White privilege didn't work this time Kim Potter, as surprisingly justice was served!

By Stanley Collymore  

People, usually white, British and 

Daily Mail trolls, defending Kim 

Potter; vitriolically saying that 

she should be freed, basically 

because what she did was naturally 

an accident and effectively the real 

fault of Daunte Wright that he got 

himself killed, are racist nuts and 

distinctively also, unsurprisingly 

literally categorically Daily Mail 

manipulated, click bait, morons. 

What, if I, a Black man - were to 

drive through a red light solely 

'by accident' and killed a loved 

one of yours and regardless of 

what the white relative's own 

personal character was, truly 

like: good or unquestionably 

criminally, bad - Would, you 

take the same philosophical 

stance and say to the lawful 

authorities and also myself 

just don't worry about it as 

these things do happen! Of 

course, you rather fucking 

well won't! So what then is 

the actual difference here? 

Stupid me, for asking such

a bloody obvious question. 

Kim Potter wasn't some rookie 

cop who could be forgiven 

for making a mistake in 

the edgy heat of the moment amid 

unfamiliar consequences. As she 

was a very experienced police 

officer who would know the 

difference between a taser 

and a gun - doing so with 

her eyes shut. Similarly 

she would clearly also 

have actually known 

from the real feel of 

that weapon in her 

hand; crucially its 

weight, fitting on 

the belt position 

if it was truly a 

taser, or a gun.  

So there's no excuse whatsoever 

for Kim Potter killing Daunte 

Wright; except in the sick 

and twisted minds of sociopathic 

white master race supremacists 

who idiotically need to rely on 

their skin colour - which they 

had nothing to doing with its 

composition - to vainly seek 

to prove, as the discernibly, 

dimwitted morons that the 

intelligent world sees and 

fully knows them as; that 

risibly, somehow, they're 

eligible to be labelled as 

bona fide homo sapiens. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

25 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

In the same courtroom in Minneapolis that white police officer Kim Potter was recently found guilty of killing Black Daunte Wright a Black police officer Mohammed Noor was in 2017 similarly found guilty of killing a white female, one Justine Ruszczyk, aka Diamond, an Australian immigrant to the USA, and sentenced, was Mohammed Noor, to 12.5 years in prison. Equally, Justine Diamond's white Aussie family members were also very charitably given a massive $20 million dollars in compensation for the loss of their relative by the grovellingly contrite, Minneapolis authorities. Overall, the difference in circumstances leading up to two dead victims: white Justine Diamond and Black Daunte Wright and as well their distinctly respective treatment couldn't be more stark. 

In 2017 Black police officer Mohammed Noor and his police partner officially responded to a 911 emergency call to their HQ from a woman saying she was raped. Arriving at the location of the alleged rape, an exceedingly dark alley, a female picked out in car's headlights as a scantily dressed white woman suddenly appeared from the intense darkness and suspiciously made her way towards the police car. Thinking that it was a set up Mohammed Noor instinctively over the shoulder of his colleague fired a warning shot from the window of the police car.  

The discharged warning bullet from officer Mohammed Noor's gun sadly ricocheted from where it landed and hit Justine Diamond, for whom it was never intended, unfortunately killing her in the process. From the outset of all of this Mohammed Noor, a police officer with a superbly impeccable record both as a human being and a serving police officer was open and very contrite about what actually did happen, an account verified by his accompanying officer. 

However, the authorities had their own particular axe to grind. A white woman had been killed by a Black man, never mind the circumstances or that he was a highly competent and impeccable police officer who told the truth of what did occur. Had Justine Diamond been a Black woman or otherwise a non white female it would in these sick and twisted white morons minds unquestionably have been all in a normal day's work. Not so the very unfortunate and even the unplanned death of a white woman. 

Furthermore with the vile rightwing media effusively fanning the flames of racial hatred and whites with their own endemic notions of superiority over everyone else, and Blacks in particular, Mohammed Noor had to be conveniently and unquestionably sacrificed on the divine altar of white supremacy and fake exceptionalism. 

And so accordingly Mohammed Noor was charged, found guilty and rather unsurprisingly readily sentenced to a lengthy jail term. But even far more egregiously the judge, court and also the prosecution collectively banned Mohamed Noor from outlining and in his own defence what did truthfully happen on that fateful night; and just as absurdly never produced or ever allowed the quite natural prospect of evidence, and more likely none, that Justine Diamond was unequivocally raped or attacked by anyone clearly pursuant to the 911 rape call which she'd made. But then why bother at all with such vile anomalies? Justine Diamond was quite unquestionably a white woman and that indefatigably was what seriously did matter. Other than, of course, she was killed by a Black man who quite unfortunately happened to be a police officer. The identical thinking on the part of the Minneapolis authorities who forked out $20 million dollars, without a murmur of white protest, to Justine's Aussie kith and kin. 

A wholly different attitude however by all these hypocritical whites; the same rightwing MSM and their sick manipulated social media trolls who frankly, literally convince themselves that Kim Potter should be rewarded for what she did. Her evidence that it was all an unfortunate accident, her  killing a totally unarmed Black man in broad daylight unlike Mohammed Noor who did genuinely accidentally kill Justine Diamond in a discernibly darkened alley, rather more feasible because Kim Potter is white. A state of affairs not withstanding the fact that Kim Potter wasn't only a rather seasoned police officer but also in the bargain an experienced training one as well. 

I've included prior to this poem and my remarks a number of significant, tweeted articles which you are fully at liberty to read. Most conscionable people would do so but if your lack of integrity along with an insatiable and likewise a demented thirst for a distinctively crude white entitlement, superiority and the attendantly bogus exceptionalism that goes with all that crap, well quite honestly that is your problem! Not mine! 

And for those whites with even the merest modicum of a conscience, I earnestly suggest that you research on, and for once other than on your white preposterous and delusional fantasies, think and also preferably ruminate on the fate of the following  Black victims - just a few of multiple  others - and also their dear families.

 

George Junius Stinney Jnr; Emmett Louis Till; Tamir Rice; Trayvon Martin; Breonna Taylor and Jemel Roberson. And on this Christmas Day 2021, may God the Almighty Father grant that the souls of these and the several other Black departed males and females who racially, unjustly, demonstrably and quite sickeningly have egregiously lost their lives rest in God's eternal peace. As assuredly we shall overcome!

 

An uncharitable Christmas to the Windsors, their enablers and unctuous, brownnosers!

By Stanley Collymore  

The only thing that the Windsors, 

aka the British royal family, are 

genuinely interested in saving 

are their rather sorry and evidently 

pathetic asses. They know, that the 

tide of intelligent feeling running 

throughout Britain has distinctly 

and rather emphatically turned 

against them; so as a decidedly 

compensatory move they pick 

and choose any causes which 

publicly, but disingenuously 

will demonstrably crucially 

boost their own popularity.  

And reasonably putting aside, 

albeit temporarily, the Daily 

Mail and, additionally also, 

its sister rag and identical

mouthpiece the vile Sunday Mail's 

gut wrenching, sanitized garbage 

and puerile, saintly praise being 

lavishly and so unquestionably 

clearly unwarrantedly heaped 

quite distinctly and fulsomely 

on Kate Middleton, slotted in 

tandem with her half-witted

husband William; plausibly 

if the said William, actually 

likemindedly and crucially 

naturally immorally takes 

after his own dad Charles

and likewise his now late 

grandfather Philip - with  

all indications rationally 

substantiating the basic  

perceived belief that he 

already distinctly does;

there's every reasonable 

expectation that Wills 

will similarly carry  

on banging his quite evidently  

privileged white tarts exactly 

as his father callously did in  

evident relation, to his very 

own mother Diana; and, as 

his late grandfather Philip 

routinely did for decades, 

as regards his actual wife 

and Will's, grandmother: 

the deified, Liz Windsor.

Generally also aware of 

what Philip was, lustily 

doing; so this allegedly  

divine entity could too 

do her very own thing 

which simply, she did.

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

23 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:   

The likelihood of Kate Middleton ever voluntarily leaving William Windsor is as likely as Vladimir Putin applying for British citizenship, successfully acquiring it and immediately joining the Tory Party - Why not? Loads of Russian oligarchs have successfully done so and are living the life of Riley in the UK.  

However, I'm just pulling your leg Vladimir Putin, as I simply couldn't resist that dig at Brexiteer Britain and its empire loyalists, pot-bellied, largely alcoholically soaked, Class A drug addicted males and post menopausal female, pathetic lives, tart bloomers, forced to give up an empire they believe that should never have happened, and clearly not having the intelligence or commonsense to come to terms with reality in the 21st Century; are still asininely looking for an automatically given to them all, a commanding role in the global community. 

A role based not on any acquired or actually innate ability, let alone any discernible competence that they might have, as they evidently have none, but simply and outrightly their delusional master race assumptions coupled with their deeply ingrained white supremacy notions. Neither of which are elements rudimentarily to be found across the entire length and breadth of the United Kingdom; and most specifically so among those who would idiotically have everyone else believe that they have these traits in abundance. 

I mentioned earlier that under no circumstances would Stepford wife and broodmare Kate Middleton ever voluntarily leave William Windsor irrespective of how precisely in its character William's own behaviour is akin not just to that of his father and grandfather but equally so none other than the current British Prime Ministe in terms of predatory carnal conduct. 

For starters waity Katie, assiduously enabled by her mother, quite clearly invested great energy and enormous determination in rather successfully stalking and also ensnaring William for their pre-planned purposes; and having achieved these distinct goals would be quite stupid, which neither of this duo is in any way essentially, in terms of their own respective and avid social climbing attainments. Add to that the endemic hatred generated towards Meghan based categorically on her race and Britain's discernibly innate racism, the miraculous and as well MSM transformation of the quite despised waity Katie from essentially what she was derogatorily conceived as, instantaneously became the actual epitome of sainthood; with evidently Meghan, distinctly African American, readily and castigatorily portrayed as the Devil's spawn. 

But lies, like everything else, do have their own shelf life and inevitably so the unbridled and genuine truth does emerge unrestricted and, undeniably too, triumphantly. And so it will with the Windsors! 

 

Sajid Javid - brownnoser supreme; and a Useful Idiot in the bargain!

By Stanley Collymore 

Are our general politicians 

regardless of the political 

party the incumbent MP 

symbolically represents nothing 

more than all ignorantly so out 

of touch, pathologically lying;  

in it crucially for themselves 

and distinctly devoid of any 

moral standards at all kind 

of people? Well, obviously 

if that's the case, basically 

all UK citizens - carefully 

immediately dismiss the 

pathetic idiotic subjects 

who so brownnosingly,  

rather masochistically 

and quite pathetically 

put odious, imbeciles 

discernibly like Sajid 

Javid in the House of 

Commons, by voting  

for them - evidently    

deserve a lot better. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

20 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

Sensible and intelligent people don't waste precious time and energy engaging in pointless conversations with vile, malevolently egregious and self-servingly fatuous fools like Sajid Javid who hasn't a solitary  moral bone in his psychologically  Coconut ensconced body.  

And for someone so enthusiastically and absolutely abhorrently inclined like his fellow rightwing Asian and Tory cabinet colleague Priti Patel to categorically diss their true ethnic identity to conveniently assume one they both feel is superior to their real one, speak volumes relative to any integrity where these two nerds are concerned. Since the word integrity in conjunction with its genuine context are discernibly nowhere to be found in the lives or actions of either Priti Patel or Sajid Javid.

Two woeful facsimile specimens of allegedly human beings - along with the multiplicity of others within all the respective parliamentary parties - who'll do anything to secure an apt position to get and sustain a job, often for which they have no knowledge of or the skills and competence to execute, so long as it assists their perceived right to have their noses buried in the troughs of clearly what is effectively in office public malfeasance. 

Incidentally as the current and also the immediately preceding Home Secretaries: Priti Patel and Sajid Javid, what are you personally doing to ensure that the survivors within the Windrush Generation get the compensation that they've been lawfully awarded and are legally entitled to? Or is stuffing your own snouts in the troughs of routine corruption too much of a full time occupation for either or both of you to bother with something so legitimate for a change?

 

Now that would be a first! But honestly, highly unlikely it will ever happen.

By Stanley Collymore  

Let's just put one thing in total 

perspective. Innocent people 

have rather disconcertingly 

died throughout all the wars which 

have occurred. Similarly, families 

have accordingly been evidently 

rather diastrously torn apart by 

having clearly lost, loved ones. 

Yet indisputably so braindead 

and distinctively, discernibly 

unquestionably and actually 

categorically such distinctly 

ironic, and enthusiastically 

warmongering cretins like 

you, have eagerly decided 

to aptly keep on listening 

to all the intentional lies, 

these politicians tell you.  

Which should prompt the 

evident question: why 

then don't all these 

politicians who quite obviously 

from their very own distinctly 

selfish perspective are totally 

nothing more than endemic, 

or conditionally discernibly 

inured privileged and very 

self-entitled leaders of the 

so-called, free world; and 

the ones wholly selfishly, 

self-servingly and really 

very egregiously rather 

comprehensively aptly  

driven on by personal  

financial inducement, 

obligatorily naturally 

go out, and evidently   

dutifully fight on the 

front line manifestly 

of these wars which 

they like instigating 

if they truly believe 

in what they loudly 

proselytize is right,

and must be done?  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

19 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks: 

The Daily Mail and its categorically likeminded sister paper the Sunday Mail are mostly read by women aged 58 years plus. Trollops who're either outright menopausally spent, or else in the dire throes of undergoing this crucially disturbingly traumatic and for them an undeniably distinctively, physically conceptual transformation in their otherwise distinctly pathetic and essentially unrewarding lives. 

And readily conjoined with them are the actually, evidently likemindedly, specifically dimwitted and basically intellectually challenged Karens; in essence trollops themselves and the undeniably prolific conceivers of the overwhelming majority of Britain's distinctly fatherless as well as fathers unknown, physical bastards; coupled most egregiously with likewise being the unrelenting, major beneficiaries of Britain's dole and social security system. 

That's specifically why the Daily and Sunday Mail relentlessly do aim their articles at these pillocks knowing full well that these so easily manipulated prats - the sort who consistently have Meghan quite specifically, but Harry as well, living rent free in their thick and obsessive heads - decidedly can't get enough of this distinctly specious Mail stuff.  

Dumber than dumb easily springs to mind, to be so blindly intoxicated as to realistically want to see this guff let alone actually believe it. But that's the white British master race for you and why evil and vile war criminals like Maggie Thatcher and Tony Blair could profitably wage their phoney and illegal wars and distinctly rather sickeningly so murderously get away with it.

 

Master race Britain at its most exceptional? Consummate and noxious idiocy more like!

By Stanley Collymore  

Such a marvellous notion! This

Brexit regime, incompetently

kills off British agriculture; 

idiotically, and fittingly introducing 

undeniably much lower standards 

and, in exchange, you pillocks get 

three years, stated authorization 

to rather possibly, questionably 

work in a distinctly, assuredly 

inured convict, barbaric, evil 

and comprehensively, vilely, 

crucially entrenched, racist 

entity. Such so, and readily 

too, alarmingly incredibly 

considering that the quite 

deliberately barbarically

displaced; irrefutably so 

distinctly unmistakably 

indigenous, Aborigines 

have been living there 

continuously, for over 

66 thousand years, so 

becoming as a result, 

an enforcedly white,  

readily barbarously,

actually delusional, 

discernibly myopic  

Terra nullius racist 

genocidally stolen;

non-white country.  

One quite significantly so on 

the other side of the planet, 

if these interloping Aussie 

scum want to give you a job that is, 

assuming, of course, you crucially 

fit the eligibility qualifications of 

essentially being white, and also 

under 35 years of age. A state of 

affairs that's clearly preferably 

better, it distinctively seems to  

you Brexiteer cretins wanting 

an all-white Britain distinctly 

devoid of people, that visibly 

don't look like you, basically 

the irony lost on you that by 

heading off to Australia you 

also become the immigrant 

you odiously, see others as.  

A no limit in years, relative to 

one's own residency or their 

work, in 27 countries quite 

literally nextdoor in Europe where 

you undoubtedly are; yet insanely 

that's incredibly not good enough 

for any of you lot. But a basically 

speculative, actually three years 

only, in the Antipodes and that's 

the basic boost of Brexit Britain 

Seriously? Then, let's all rather 

rapturously hear your vibrant 

applause - you fucking idiotic, 

dimwitted, vile, intellectually 

challenged, solely financially 

dole sustained and distinctly 

numerically astronomically, 

bastardized and irrefutably 

solely white British cretins. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

18 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

Innately stupid, instinctively suicidal and consequently easily manipulated lemmings characteristic of who and what they actually are; and similarly  verminously odious sewer rats whose sole purpose in life is to inimically egregiously and intentionally malevolently cause harm to others are in every deleterious sense indistinguishable from intellectually challenged, dimwitted, biologically bastardized and predominantly white Brexiteers; ingrates that self-serving politicians, politically rightwing rags and social media troll jerks supplemented by these very same Brexiteer idiots in their rancorous stupidity readily, willingly and boisterously indulge in, requisite to everything they either can't sensibly grasp, or in their specific case unintelligently understand. 

So linking them up with their inured convict and likeminded Australian kith and kin is a logical natural expectation and predictable occurrence. What a pity, though, it has to happen in forever tainted, barbarously and  genocidally butchering Australia, and once more at the expense and human dignity of the indigenous Aborigines who have no say in the running of their own country where they've lived continuously for in excess of 66 thousand years! 

How much more beneficially it would have been then if these inured racists, xenophobic and immorally lowlife Brexiteer scum and their similarly noxious white Aussie counterparts were jointly and readily enforcedly, permanently dispatched to some far flung and isolated destination like the Falklands and resolutely never heard of again. And in their specific cases, all power handed to the fatally injurious Covid-19 variants; currently Delta and Omicron! 

Congratulations to the FIA on their title victory this year!

By Stanley Collymore 

That was no genuine win 

for Max Verstappen just 

a distinctively corrupt 

FIA gift. In essence a manipulated 

and intentionally, manufactured 

result; as essentially, Formula 1 

was actually, clearly desperate 

that it wasn't, Lewis Hamilton 

winning yet again; the solely 

contemptuously concertedly 

actions of racist individuals 

delusionally spurred on by 

twisted white supremacist 

and similarly master race 

philosophies and actually 

totally petrified at seeing  

these, both emphatically 

and similarly too, rather 

decisively debunked, by  

the incredible ability of 

this singular Blackman 

in the entire history, of  

Formula 1; a distinctly 

super Lewis Hamilton. 

Lewis Hamilton whose race and 

complexion have always been 

a problem for many within 

Formula 1 and quite particularly so 

its racist bosses, rather specifically 

pillocks like inured racists Bernie 

Ecclestone and stupidly Michael 

Masi, with their so distinctively 

entrenched Nazi and similarly 

Fascist persuasions. Naturally 

Lewis Hamilton, as these sick 

racists view it, by his ingress 

to Formula 1 he'd obviously 

clearly unwarrantedly gate 

crashed an all white party; 

then quite disconcertingly

refused to leave although 

it was expected of him to 

most categorically do so.  

And moreover has in these 

racists eyes, subsequently 

and dazzlingly outshone 

by his formidable presence there 

all of those allegedly, and solely 

entitled, white party goers.  So 

consequently and definitively 

most sickeningly this relic of 

feral, Britannic imperialism 

liberally laced with savage, 

British empire colonialism 

Bernie Ecclestone, slimely 

and readily malevolently 

linked with evilly Italian 

fascism on the egregious  

very twisted part of sick 

Michael Masi is literally  

indicative of Formula 1 

so 'criminally corrupt'.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

15 December 2021.   

Author's Remarks: 

We know wrongdoing when we see it FIA; and decent and intelligent people throughout the world clearly saw first hand not only your blatantly vile and similarly odiously deeply entrenched racism but also a criminal propensity that intelligent people globally know has always existed in F1 but with the entrance of Lewis Hamilton into F1: a so-called sport when most definitively its nothing of the kind but is instead a criminal racketeering enterprise. 

How many millions passed hands and are now safely settled in the offshore and tax free havens globally basically to ensure that a truly extraordinarily gifted, exceptionally outstanding and a discernibly phenomenal Black man and skilful Formula One driver Lewis Hamilton, the only Black in the entire  history of this charade, previously all-white and still is criminal enterprise, didn't win, as he was about to do very legitimately until as was so evidently previously agreed the FIA headed by an Aussie racist corruptly handed the title to Max Verstappen. 

The FIA and its legions of distinctively and endemically inured racists might well happily congratulate themselves on the Verstappen outcome, claiming that it effectively prevented a 'Nigger' as everyone of them clearly perceive Lewis Hamilton to be, from basically becoming the globally acknowledged through merit, industry and thorough commitment, and not favouritism, the best Formula 1 driver there's been. 

Add into that sick and rather twisted mixture the FIA's and its discernibly racist afficionados contention of them all being not only white supremacists but also entitled members of a white master race; it does beg the question then: why cheat if you're so superior as you asininely and so delusionally claim? The simple answer to that is: because quite frankly you bloody well aren't; and it's actually nothing more than your dimwitted fantasy. 

The senile racist and wholly endemic Nazi, Bernie Ecclestone categorically summed up the criminal actions of Michael Masi and the rest of the FIA's racist jerks when he proudly said he didn't want for Michael Schumacher's title to be broken and particularly by Formula 1's solitary Black driver. The overall world championship title isn't the property of Michael Schumacher  or anyone else come to that. And as it happens, it's jointly shared by Lewis Hamilton and Michael Schumacher who have seven world championship wins, each. 

But having a disdainfullly perceived Nigger officially in Formula 1's own records as the best driver of all time was a bridge too far for these master race and white supremacist FIA jerks  and their likeminded aficionados. 

And all the crap by the white media with its own in-built racism that this Black man Lewis Hamilton took his "defeat" with grace and dignity, what utter crap! Are grace and dignity even when specifically and wilfully robbed and done so most egregiously, simply and exclusively the white man's own characteristics that Lewis Hamilton a Black man is "beneficially" emulating now? 

Like passing a supposed compliment to someone you ostensibly look down on because it makes you feel basically good and superior to do so; but even in giving that forced compliment the givers of it - the British media - really can't help themselves; and naturally must lace it with an insult. But as we all sensibly know, if Lewis Hamilton were white, what occurred wouldn't have happened in the first place, and in the unlikely event that it did, plus the fact that he's British all hell would have broken loose! 

And while clearly Mercedes might go through all the discernibly contrived motions of being "upset" at what has happened to Lewis Hamilton the sick charade was really debunked by Toto Wolff's very own asinine remark pertaining to Michael Schumacher his countryman, that Michael "IS" the best driver of all time; doing so at the end of a controversial and criminal win for another white man, evidently depriving the solitary Black man in Formula 1, and who Toto Wolff does control at Mercedes, from genuinely and legitimately winning the 2021 F1 world championship and similarly too the overall world championship accolade, speaks volumes.

Any difference between Toto Wolff and Bernie Ecclestone? I don't really think so. To both men and the other FIA principals and participants in an all-white, quite essentially criminally corrupt and financial enterprise like FI; race and skin colour - not natural ability and assiduous endeavour - do along with entrenched and criminal, financial corruption matter most! 

And classifying Formula 1 as a legitimate and honest sport is as realistic as designating child paedophilia and its endemic practitioners as indispensably therapeutic to children's health and wellbeing!

It's a question of IQ; and how low it must be to trust this Windsor so-called 'royal' family!

By Stanley Collymore  

I thought Charles said he never 

knew anything about the cash 

for honours crap; now all of 

a sudden he's admitting to actually 

sending out clocks and, similarly 

too, special gift cards as his own 

distinctively, very personalized 

thank you; particularly, as it so 

happens, to rather crucially at 

least one actually, specifically 

now known Saudi billionaire 

contributor, to these fittingly 

dodgy charities! Charlie boy, 

you can't have it both ways;  

as sound logic states you're 

basically up to your rather 

inherently spoilt, instilled 

and absolutely graspingly 

avaricious; quite haughty 

and discernibĺy, crucially 

aptly contemptuous neck 

in all this vile hereditary 

deceit, is clearly obvious.  

Another good reason actually 

to have a referendum vote 

in finally replacing this 

delusionally superior, 

tremendously scandal hit, Middle 

Ages mindset and, also so-called 

divine right, to unquestionably 

absolutely rule over, everyone 

else rather haplessly residing 

inside Britain - 'royal family'.  

Basically since from Charles' 

95 years old nonengenarian 

mother: Elizabeth Windsor, 

decisively downwards this 

undeniably, truly endemic 

and mercenary, deception 

is unmistakably the same.  

While expecting and likewise 

automatically receiving the 

necessary dutiful doffing 

of your caps happily accompanied 

by the evidently, liberally tugging 

of your forelocks by everyone of 

you remorselessly, distinctively, 

pathetically and so rapaciously 

evilly ingrained, brownnosing 

sycophantic plebeians. Yet too 

in rather typically dimwitted 

and actual, characteristically 

unmistakably so definitively 

self-indulgent, intellectually 

challenged and vile Britain; 

you sick imbecillic morons 

wilfully turn a blind eye to 

all this while malevolently 

and totally unwarrantedly 

racially, toxically focusing 

your odious hatred and as 

well vitriolic opprobrium 

on Meghan distinctly, and 

indisputably because he's 

obviously reciprocally in 

love with her, married to 

Meghan and jointly have 

their own superb family 

similarly, as well, Harry.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

12 December 2021.  

Author's Remarks:   

Who essentially are these people that arrogantly call themselves "royalty" not just in Britain but globally wherever they're to be found? Do they for instance use toilet paper like the rest of us? Or don't they do such a thing, quite ordinary to every normal human being, as defecate?

Frankly, these hereditary families, and as well the so-called aristocracy, should all be criminalized and proscribed and their members hunted down like common, criminal mafiosa; because, in reality, that is precisely what they are! 

Whatever anyone has done in life it's far better to face the truth rather than ruthlessly, purposely and dishonestly hide behind a lie; a philosophy, and likewise also a mindset, that's wholly alien to the entire Windsor Mafiosa Klan. Since Charles is obviously not alone in this, which is a toxic and insidious cancer that has calamitously spread throughout the enterity of the Windsor Klan, and all the way down from the head of this hereditary mafiosa Klan -  the widow Mrs Elizabeth Mountbatten Windsor - Charles' 95 years old nonengenarian mum.

Talking to myself is among some of the best conversations that I've ever had!

By Stanley Collymore  

Regrettably we live in a really 

selfish and largely uncaring 

white controlled, western 

world totally run by self-indulgent 

narcissists even among those that 

boldly, and rather unsurprisingly 

declare they are unquestionably 

naturally interested in the basic 

concerns, not only individually 

of their distinctly immediately 

respective, local communities 

but crucially the wider world 

basically. Speculation though 

and realism rarely distinctly 

conjoin with one another so 

the truth, relating to exactly 

what an alleged, overriding 

majority of these persons is 

saying, is naturally nothing 

more relevant, than clearly 

just bullshit to put it mildly. 

While using such claims as their 

platforms to cynically contrive 

and likewise garner as much 

craved after, populist approbation 

in the keen and expected hope of 

elevating their normally useless 

and distinctively, pathetic lives 

through such mechanisms; in 

the decidedly aspirant belief 

of acquiring their distinctly 

very sought after personal 

relevancy, irrespective of 

however transitory, that 

in itself might really be.  

And because society at large 

is clearly inundated with 

such bogus celebrities 

it's sad but predictable and wholly 

understandable too why so many 

people literally and also sensibly 

permanently switch off from all 

these fully contrived; annoying 

and toxically, egregious insults 

to; decidedly, and distinctively 

co-ordinated, general assaults 

on their requisite intelligence 

and vitally personal integrity, 

and even sometimes, as their 

genuine and clearly effective 

naturally determined, rather 

intentionally retaliatory step 

committedly top themselves. 

And honestly what empathetic 

human being would actually 

realistically want to blame 

them? So quite truthfully don't act 

so actually surprised considering 

the general overall state that the 

world universally and basically 

the western controlled portion 

of it, in particular, specifically 

are, that there are essentially 

countless numbers of people 

who'd actually, much prefer 

self-evidently and naturally 

not being in situations that 

they're literally enforcedly 

made to routinely exist in. 

And if unfortunately, you 

do fall into the category 

of those, who through 

no fault of their own distinctly 

find yourself in such an eerie 

and worrisome situation, try  

mulling things over relative 

to the very disastrous mess 

which unquestionably our 

distinctive species of truly 

egotistical, human beings 

have critically lumbered 

Planet Earth with - aptly 

why not occasionally, or 

even generally, just talk 

to yourself and actually 

others fittingly, relative 

a constructive remedy?  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

8 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

Talking to one's self can and often is randomly and even egregiously care free quite eagerly construed by the ill informed, rather maliciously minded and even professionals in the mental welfare and psychiatric professions as an acute sign of madness. 

And while there is some element of truth in this general assumption by some and even outright assertions by others it's not by any stretch of an overactive imagination an absolute confirmation. I know this because I've previously trained and did work as a qualified psychiatric nurse and, consequently, am rather aware that such bland assumptions could not essentially be any further from the truth than what they're fallaciously believed to be by those emphatically promoting them. 

Talking to one's self clearly has many salutary effects on the individual in question. It releases pent up tensions and also unleashes a non censorious environment where, unencumbered by the opinions of others: false, quite castigatorily insulting or simply patronizingly indulgent, one can literally, candidly and explicitly, say what they actually feel, enabling them to fittingly come to terms with their real self. 

And, accordingly, genuinely doing so without any inkling or real measures of undue persuasion or coercion ever likely in that regard. While genuinely and honestly ascertain in the process a true appraisal of precisely who and what one truly is; and unquestionably more than likely, optimistically set the relevant parameters for being a much better human being generally, and to one's self particularly so.

Boris Kemal/Johnson and Co don't plan on travelling ever again then?

By Stanley Collymore  

Middle class druggies could be 

stripped of their passports 

and similarly too their 

driving licences under a new clamp 

down on Class A drug use? Do that 

Boris and, naturally, the House of 

Commons; plainly too the House 

of Lords; undoubtedly, the First 

Division mandarins: societally 

firmly embedded, narcissistic 

and conventionally mindset, 

snobs who are allocated the 

duty, of running the British  

Civil Service. Crucially too 

the cardinal participatory 

agents of every one of the

UK' s multiple, electronic 

media and baronial rags.  

Ex Prime Ministers and also 

their quite unquestionably 

and patently distinctively, 

likeminded cabinet ministers; a 

host of public school attendees 

and principally the automatic 

incumbents of any decisively 

chosen Oxbridge university; 

every beneficiary nepotistic 

and crony old boy, and also 

clearly as well girl quango 

appointees, that'll be truly 

ominously up the distinct 

proverbial creek without 

that necessary paddle for 

certain; but actually and 

rather characteristically 

of course, your own self 

St. Boris Kemal Johnson.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

6 December 2021.  

Author's Remarks:  

Quite disingenuous soundbites from a deeply in trouble politically Prime Minister of the same Britain that did enslave and enforcedly, intentionally caused the Chinese people to become an unwilling nation of drug addicts; which waged war against them when the Chinese resisted this immoral and egregious imperialism from Britain, which then callously rubbed salt into the Chinese wounds by seizing and taking Hong Kong from them, that Britain afterwards unilaterally and with no semblance of democracy at all in its selfish actions, unilaterally controlled Hong Kong as a distinctly British governed colony. One where the British imposed governor had absolute authority from London and the Chinese people had none. A state of affairs which existed for over 200 years, until Britain finding itself no match for a rejuvenated and nuclear China with a population of 1.5 billion citizens against Britain's 67 millions, naturally and equally face savingly handed Hong Kong fully back to its rightful owners the Chinese nation. 

Wilful drug addiction and enormous  monetary control from it that readily enabled several UK companies many 

of them now household names; also long members of the stock exchange, that have skilfully covered up their sordid past and are operating as very successful billionaire multinational corporations; but even so have never once apologised for what they did or see any reason to make any financial reparations for their evil actions.  

Meanwhile within the UK the laws on unlawful drug usage are distinctively intentionally skewed. Cocaine users, who usually are well off financially, in the professions, at public schools or else have attended such; Oxbridge types, in reality white and privileged either get slaps on their wrists if they are caught or else get off Scot free.  

The users of marijuana or otherwise crack aren't treated so leniently and quite often do end up automatically serving lengthy prison sentences. A matter of rather ingrained prejudices as they're usually Black or non white and the laws are specifically framed to represent the two aforementioned circumstances. 

Personally, I have no empathy with, or any sympathy for illicit drug users as it's a mug's game. But cut the quite disingenuous and distinctly dishonest bullshit; as penalizing your own sort  in such a draconian manner simply isn't going to happen; ever! And very certainly not by you, or any of your racist Tory or similarly likeminded  Labtories sort, Boris Kemal/Johnson. Since most of them would basically be legitimately on the receiving end!

 

More beneficially you wanking off or queerly being sucked off Stephen Glover than writing racist BS for the Daily Mail!

By Stanley Collymore 

Sexually devious and Wikipedia 

shy about this sordid aspect of 

his rather queer life, Stephen 

Glover again has one of his usually 

boring repetitive goes, at a clearly 

undeniably evidently definitively 

heterosexual Meghan Markle; in 

a situation that he, himself can't 

with any sensible, conscionably 

minded conviction, discernibly 

particularly state, he's actually 

definitively in; even so clearly 

foolishly believes that his vile 

rather tawdry privacy is, and 

ought really to be sacrosanct 

and unlike that, of Meghan's.  

Stephen Glover: a pernicious, 

vilely egregious, racist prat, 

deceitfully and virulently 

castigating Meghan for not being in 

court during the Daily Mail's, clear 

Appeal Court's hearing, distinctly 

too when there was evidently no 

lawful requirement for Meghan 

to be actually there as the three 

judges had really unanimously 

agreed. Yet, this same odiously 

and demented Stephen Glover 

is very, diametrically opposed 

to Andy Windsor cooperating 

with the FBI, far less so really 

ethically literally showing up 

in a lawfully stipulated court 

on essentially rather serious 

wholly criminal accusations 

of illicitly carnal knowledge 

with distinctively, underage 

trafficked females, linked to 

fittingly acts of paedophilia 

with exploitatory sufferers. 

Far minor - no pun at all 

intended - issues, these 

distinctively Andrew 

Windsor suppositions very clearly 

so in Stephen Glover's discernibly 

sick and absolutely twisted mind 

than the distinctly nonsensically 

egregious act of Meghan legally 

and courageously undoubtedly 

redoubtably, championing her 

inalienable right to the actual 

copyright, of a rather private 

letter that, realistically, with 

hindsight, she'd regrettably, 

sent to her foul, graspingly 

avaricious father and that 

the Daily Mail rag's evilly 

twisted Stephen Glover's 

boss, in its characteristic 

bullying and essentially 

egregious, misogynistic 

tendencies, specifically 

towards Meghan grisly 

and racially infringed.  

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

3 December 2021.  

Author's Remarks: 

I earnestly suggest to you Stephen Glover and your similarly likeminded morons at the Daily Mail to sensibly and judiciously get a real life; but fully cognizant of your shamefully repugnant but none the less so shamelessly indulged in and likewise also arrogantly glorified in noxious behaviour, espousing yourselves to be journalists and far more ridiculously the ethical ones that you proselytize yourselves to be, when nothing could be more at variance with reality; that the lot of you calibrate your utterly useless, pathetic, conceitedly and concertedly malevolent lives into some sort of normal, recognizable and personally responsible human behaviour - a perfectly valid suggestion although one I shan't be holding my breath on in your regards - or else in your specific case Stephen Glover, since this poem is principally although not exclusively targeted at you, that you far more beneficially in your specific case do what the title of this poem overtly recommends. 

The Daily Mail has now lost twice to Meghan so the laws must be changed, obviously runs the sick and twisted argument of the losers and their keen racist supporters. How could that happen to us the white master race at the hands of an African American and in of all places England? And also perceived by these inured racists as an irrefutably and insulting blow to all of them. Never mind the niceties of the law and its just application; all that mattered was the outcome, and to them all Meghan winning was the wrong outcome! Never mind one bit the actual facts. 

Instead, spin Meghan's second win in the Appeal Court, taken there by the Daily Mail when it lost the initial case as a bogus free speech issue, when it is obviously nothing of the kind. The case was never about free speech but privacy and copyright. It similarly is and always was the actual difference between what the public may be very interested in and what's basically in the public's interest. And quite clearly the latter is what must be protected. So it's absolutely incomprehensible to anyone in possession of a functioning brain why a private letter to one's father would be in the latter category. And if you think otherwise then quite obviously you're racially bigoted and seriously deluded. 

And here's specifically why! William who has distinctively opposed Harry's marriage to Meghan exclusively so on the basis of her skin colour and racial ethnicity has evilly continuously since Harry's marriage really endeavoured to break up his brother's marriage. As such he and his waity, social climbing Stepford wife, broodmare Kate have essentially been principally, although not exclusively, getting their several  employed palace stooges who were themselves rather racially appalled at having to "serve" a Black woman in the so-called royal household, that as always by royal and parliamentary diktat has been exclusively white, to covertly and routinely get these vile sycophants to liaison with the UK's rightwing media, notoriously the Daily Mail and Daily Express, and plant dishonest, lying and fabricated stories about Meghan, specifically done at the behest of William, Kate  and as well - irony lost on dimwitted William here relative to Camilla, one of whose offspring is an employee of the Daily Mail.  

But the principal agents of these very hostile, fabricated and so egregiously evil stories, spitefully, liberally laced with vile envy and entrenched racism are fundamentally without any doubt the pathetically demented actions of bone idle, work shy, white privileged and deeply inured racists william and his scheming bitch of a wife Kate. On the day of Meghan's second win in the Court of Appeal against the Daily Mail Kate and William who together had surreptitiously provided the Daily Mail with huge assistance against Meghan during the Daily Mail's appeal hoping she would lose, were utterly and publicly dumbstruck when the opposite verdict came out. 

Ask yourself this, if your brother and sister-in-law were so unwarrantedly vilified as Harry and also specifically Meghan were and still are and your sister in law had again triumphed in court against her bullies wouldn't you at least publicly have hailed her victory? And if you didn't, why not? And the answer in Kate and William's case is discernibly clear, as these two envious and distinctly inured racist clowns were and still undeniably are the principal and instigatory palace moles odiously supplying rightwing rags, like the Daily Mail specifically, with these plethora of fabricated stories about Meghan.   

And with that particular channel of abuse shown up for what it actually is, on the very day of the Appeal Court's verdict, these two dimwits William and Kate decided to go and actually went online and to talk about faberge eggs, something which they know bugger all about, but it was a distraction; quite stupid as both these pillocks are, but a distraction all the same in their sick and quite twisted minds. 

Now the new disingenuous and very dishonest rallying call is all about the media's supposed right to free speech and freedom of information. Really? Like knowing the real wealth of the Windsors; the freedom to see their wills which in every other person's case is freely open to public scrutiny but not so those of the Windsors. Similarly, the right to publicly know the wealth of the tax evading owners of the Daily Mail and others so very much against Meghan, including the same Windsors and the antagonistic political opponents of Meghan hiding their ill-gotten gains in overseas tax haven? 

Boris Kamal Johnson and his Tory chums incensed by the Appeal Court's decision in favour of Meghan are being canvassed by their rightwing media paymasters, principally the Daily Mail, and similarly William and Kate totally irate that Meghan has again won, to change the media's free speech laws. Not only ironic this one but also laughable. The same Boris Kemal/Johnson who threatened the same media with injunctions because they wanted to know how many kids - legitimate as well as bastard ones - that he has sired.  

And if the Daily Mail really thinks that their version of intrusive press free speech is so important, why didn't they and the rest of the UK's media report on William's post marital and adulterous affairs and the alleged bastard daughter he has sired, and all reliable reports reaching me clearly indicate that she's the spitting image of her father William, and the principal reason why the child's mother, quite happy to place current pictures of her earlier sons on social media, resolutely refuses to do the same with her daughter.  

Surely this categorical state of affairs with William, the added fact that this child's mother is no longer the quite inseparably close and intimate friend of Kate that she previously was, and additionally that William threatened legal action to stave off media reports about his affairs had no effect on the global media other than the British one, that of their own volition freely decided not to publish and literally  be damned - after all we live in a DNA era - rather definitively does show the bloody hypocrisy, double standards and brownnosing sycophancy rather apparent here. 

For in both Boris Kemal/Johnson and William Windsor's individual as well as their joint cases these are evidently two figures of prominent interest in the affairs of the UK state and as such their actions are rather correctly and equally so in the public interest. Not a bloody personal letter that Meghan sends to her essentially estranged and trailer trash father and that you quite evil and vile racists solely empathize with because he's white and Meghan has justifiably dumped him. But if he was Black you hypocrites wouldn't have given a toss either about him or Meghan! 

And what priceless gall exuded by the Windsor spinners and racists - chiefly William and Kate - and their Pavlov dogs type, brownnosing media and sycophants, in painting Meghan as the spawn of the devil, then happily whistling in the wind whenever the name of Andrew Windsor, the grand old Duke of York, comes up!

Ignorance that's clearly beyond the realms of even the most egregiously induced stupidity!

By Stanley Collymore  

I've be told, that a mere touch 

of Elizabeth Windsor's regal 

garments will immediately 

cure brownnosing royalists and 

their discernibly allied; inured, 

and undeniably, unmistakably 

plainly proud social climbing 

aspirants of whatever illness 

or clearly associated malady 

they generally have; except, 

of course, and simply quite 

specifically their brainless 

and obvious subservience 

to this distinctively holier

than thou, nonagenarian; 

hypocrite and her family.  

For which I'm also apprised, 

and quite fully understand, 

that there's been no actual 

breakthrough either medically or 

psychologically requisite to such 

disturbingly sickening, endemic

and undeniably manipulatively 

brainwashed and, of course, an 

euphorically robust and rather 

unsurprising also in respect of 

themselves in the 21st Century 

so undisputedly, loyal subjects 

and subservient sycophants of 

a Middle Ages mindset and, as 

well, a blatant outdated realm 

rather than as any reinforced, 

genuine personal responsible 

accountability justly for their 

personally, and collective too 

destiny, modern day and also 

crucially democratic citizens. 

(C) Stanley V. Collymore 

2 December 2021. 

Author's Remarks:  

It certainly is a characteristic that is universally engaged in but by no means, even so, or any stretch of an intelligent and objective imagination is stupidity an inalienable feature or right of humanity or can it ever realistically be regarded as such. 

And those who asininely, dishonestly and gullibly think it is and also believe it confers on them the right to indulge in their own brand of stupidity and that actually doing so with absolute and egregious impunity in a supposed civilised country is a distinct plus for them, not only degrade the quite intrinsic and conscionable qualities characteristic of decent humanity, but also likewise do so additionally at their own peril, ultimately.