A licence to criminally re-offend!

By Stanley Collymore

It's time to scrap the existing
parole system and replace
it realistically with a truly
expedient alternative that compels all
convicted prisoners to serve their full
sentences unquestionably so and as
well actually discernibly, irrespective
of who essentially, they crucially are;
quite irrefutably and simply sensibly
in undoubted full time incarceration
considering literally undeniably that
currently most custodial sentences
aren't lengthy enough or actually fit
for purpose, simply to start with! In
obvious reality, the vast majority of
these actually, simply paltry British
custodial sentences handed down,
are in actual effect only for a short
time, essentially only a year or two
normally, and basically specifically
so in the case of females! Actually
quite prejudicially so regardless of
the severity of their heinous crime.

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
30 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
A classic example of this being killer Sarah Davey, purportedly jailed at the conclusion of her trial, and a guilty verdict, indefinitely; but  has been allowed out seven (7) times on parole already; conditions she routinely abrogated, and was actually recalled back to prison, but is to be released again!  

Attendant with the aforementioned is the factual realization that there are simply several British women, who although not yet actually killers have the undoubted capacity to discernibly be such; and who quite preposterously having distinctly categorically found themselves in court on offences which could quite easily have effectively led to the quite callously enacted death of another person or persons, nevertheless found themselves, these specific women, being treated most leniently as if they were in effect the victims, when clearly they weren’t and were undoubtedly the perpetrators.

Far too many of them to enumerate here I’ll just mention three of them who should in all fairness have been jailed but clearly for prejudicial reasons principally connected with the fact that they are females weren’t. There’s Lavinia Woodward of course who brutally stabbed her then boyfriend almost to death, was a known drug abuser, but in court was treated most leniently by the judge. Essentially it seems because this female was white, in her case, from a well-to-do family and was a medical student at Oxford University; with the judge incredibly claiming that she was too clever essentially to be sent to jail; and if she was it was bring to an end her university studies as she would in all circumstances be expelled. So Lavinia Woodward, essentially with a minor slap on the wrist, walked free!

Then quite recently there was the case of Aneesha Khan, a criminology student, who was stopped by the police for excessive speeding and subsequently found to be well over the limit, in this case, illegal drugs which she’d taken. This woman without any sense of decency or loyalty then tried to stitch her own biological sister up and make out that it was her who had actually committed that specific offence. In his decision not to imprison her, even though she had a previous ban, and her dangerous driving could have killed someone or persons, the judge in this court case concluded that as Aneesha Khan’s sister had forgiven her for trying to pin that crime on her, that he too would be lenient and forgiving and not jail this pathetic and lying woman.

And I’m absolute sure that the entire British populace know of or have heard of the rather omnipresent Katie Price, and wonder as I’m sure the sensible and clearly not intellectually challenged ones do, what this woman with her disastrously ongoing criminal record, has to actually do in order for her to be sensibly and appropriately jailed. And what police officer worth his salt would understandably think that it’s actually worth their time and effort arresting such women, or men even though the latter aren’t treated as leniently as the women, when some guy or female sitting on a bench pathetically see equality as being something that women can obviously claim when it suits their purposes, but blithely ignore when it inconveniences them!

Gravy Train Alert!

By Stanley Collymore

Defections or crossing the floor of
the House of Commons aren't
very frequent but neither
are they rare either. Conservative voters
who rather obviously very undoubtedly
effectively helped to elect Dan Poulter
have now got in effect a Labour Party
MP, and logic literally states that had
they wanted a Labour MP, they really
would've initially, undoubtedly voted
for one; so it's simply unreasonable
and very unfair, to have one foisted
on them. The identical argument is
actually applicable to MPs of other
parties that quite literally gallavant
off to another party, while crucially
still obviously holding their post of
MP under their successful general
election mandate. Unquestionably
all defections should undoubtedly
include an immediate by-election,
so that those basically respective
constuency voters, who're literally  
involved are specifically given the
honourable opportunity, to select
the political party, they truly want
to support. Happily thankfully it's
election year in 2024, simply this
year, so a choice can specifically
be rapidly made which obviously
isn't the case normally. So rather
fortunately effectively unwanted
MPs can quite unceremoniously
be readily flung out on their ears.

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
29 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
Being an MP is a gravy train excursion for many of these aspirant and similarly as well successful British political candidates who ultimately become MPs; a state of ongoing affairs with evidently only a miniscule number of successful MPs literally adhering to, let alone doing so tenaciously, to the moral principles of service and avowed commitment to the constituents who not only voted for them but also who they legally, or are supposedly so, meant to represent in Parliament as the elected MP! And who among these altruistic and undoubted paragons of virtue and the utmost commendability are thoroughly outstanding representatives like Jeremy Corbyn!

In marked contrast, of course, are those who see politics and being an MP quite expressly as an express train to their own personal financial success, and who in some regards can actually blame them? Especially so with the ingrained idiots that in a democratically political system actually have the vote. Specifically so like one that I know of but shan’t dignify this lunatic and inbred moron by naming him, but who is a regular contributor to the Daily Mail’s comments section, where else actually, under his egotistically invented – irony completely lost on this braindead cunt who want Harry to be stripped of all his titles and removed from the line of succession within the British monarchy.

According to this pathetic prat and I quote him verbatim:” Luckily Charles will not live as long as his mother and when William becomes our king, then Harry, his pimp and their borrowed children will be toast; as William will personally get rid of all of them”. This, by the way, in response to a Daily Mail article “celebrating” William and Kate’s rather purportedly “happy” 13th wedding anniversary; articles that carry no message from either William or Kate on the supposedly “happy day” for them or any recent or current photos for that matter. What we had instead was a photo of Kate discernibly scantily clad at her university and the assumption being that her charm, beauty and whatever else one could asininely imagine, which wooed William rather immensely and charmed him into marrying her. People with functioning brains know evidently differently that wasn’t the case; for if so why long before the awareness and equally the arrival of Meghan were all of these same admirers quite openly labelling Kate as Waite Katie? And unquestionably bearing in mind also that William is known to have distinctively proposed marriage to two females respectively, who sensibly turned him down; and Kate was a fill-in substitute. And the fact the neither she nor William made any kind of appearance any kind of joint statement on their behalf of what was really the 13th anniversary of their marriage; speaks volumes! That this “marriage” is simply as dead as a DODO! And Kate no more has cancer or any other debilitating illness as I or you have the bubonic plague. Lol.

Moreover, the recurrent attacks on Harry, Meghan especially, and their children by those who avowedly claim they hate them also speaks volumes. No normal person even when they thoroughly detest someone repeatedly goes around stating this or brings that person or those persons up in every conversation they have, even when in actuality the conversation has nothing to do with those whom they hate. And most interestingly I detected, that the Daily Mail stories about William and Kate requisite to their supposedly “happy 13th Anniversary” drew very few comments even from their most ardent supporters; while in marked contrast the news that Harry and Meghan have been officially invited to Nigeria garnered thousands from these intellectually challenged morons. So sensibly, go draw your own conclusions. Significantly, all but the most discernibly obtuse know how boring and bloody workshy Kate and William are, but with Meghan and Harry still very much in love and basically contrary to their clearly wishful expectations still around, as they’ll certainly continue to be, these vile, odiously toxic and verminous prats can’t admit, even to themselves, that it’s William and Kate’s marriage that is kaput! But that’s their problem; and who obviously ever accused these sorts of lowlifes as having functional brains? So in essence although being a very keen political participant myself, I don’t blame intelligent or even canny unscrupulous one’s for jumping of this political gravy train and saying a hearty “fuck you” to these pathetic British morons that have the vote; because such an action is requisite in a supposedly democratic country!

No difference basically from: They all look the same to me, remark!

By Stanley Collymore  

 
That Tory MP Chris Philip doesn't  
actually know that Rwanda and  
the Congo are essentially two  
different countries despite him being a  
rather senior minister very specifically  
in the obviously current Conservative  
administration; mirrors the distinctly  
same obvious ignorance, and rather  
simply literally, unquestionably and  
vile, contemptuous attitudes of his  
kind generally across white British  
society towards Black people as a  
rule and similarly those, who have  
the nerve, to essentially challenge  
them about their gross ignorance  
and acute racism. Invariably alas,  
a situation which rather routinely  
in the offender's, very customary  
and literally entrenched, state of  
denial is usually then reinforced  
by this jibe: What's the big deal?  
 
Then have the bold effrontery to  
accuse the complainant of  
playing the race card.  
So realistically, confronted with these  
discernibly and obviously, essentially  
rather commonplace state of affairs,  
why precisely should those, who are  
effectively quite higher up the racist  
chain of command very specifically  
know or acquaint themselves really  
with anything, that's simply, literally  
outside their basically specific, but  
discernibly significantly delusional  
all the same, undoubtedly crucially  
perceived master race world - with  
scant reference if any at all simply  
tagged, and quite patronizingly so  
to the bizarre and euphemistically  
described as, the Dark Continent?  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
29 April 2024.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:  
What we have, essentially, with the likes of Chris Philip are career politicians put in charge really of major public sectors and services that very evidently are out of touch with reality. People essentially put in positions of undeniably massive responsibility but with clearly distinctly no idea of what they're doing!  
 
Sensibly, all politicians and specifically those literally in charge of government ministries or departments realistically should be clearly obligated in having a major qualification or obviously rather provable experience in whatever major position they hold; and prior to actually doing so be interviewed for that actual role, just as is routinely done to literally nearly everyone else in the country who applies for a job or is very obviously put forward for one.

Save your biased concerns for Kate's notional "happy" 13th wedding anniversary!

By Stanley Collymore  

 
British royals clearly don't have a  
monopoly on any service tours,  
or who should unquestionably  
participate in them! Consequently, in all  
reasonableness Harry and Meghan are  
actually at liberty, to do service in their  
very own characteristic way, and don't  
effectively obviously have to basically  
ask anybody's actual permission. For,  
rather clearly as Harry has previously  
and crucially actually poignantly and  
essentially said: Service is universal.  
Rather crucially also neither himself  
nor Meghan have actually ever said  
anything really about either or even  
both of them ostensibly desirous of  
being distinctively, private citizens!  
 
Furthermore, they are, to coin the  
media's and Windsors fab term,  
actually non-working royals; a  
terminology also, unsurprisingly clearly  
popular with the serf sycophants, who  
essentially love to employ it, basically  
derogatorily, when obviously referring  
to Harry and Meghan. Characteristic,  
in their vitriolically nasty, Karens and  
Gammons attacks very conveniently  
but obviously, very simply forgetting  
that unlike those clearly well-heeled,  
in favour Windsor grifters obviously  
neither Harry, nor similarly Meghan,  
are crucially taking a solitary penny  
or rather evidently, basically asking  
for any money, either from the UK's  
or any other discernible, taxpayers!  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
28 April 2024. 

Author's Remarks:  
Ordinarily as a former volunteer adviser with what was then very discernibly the Marriage Guidance Council which since then has been renamed Relate, my very frank advice to people, rather obviously such as yourselves would  basically be to specifically get a life.  
 
Regrettably nowadays, such pertinently relevant advice would be like pissing in the wind; quite pointlessly unrewarding! So go and celebrate tomorrow's for you, great anniversary day. Lol!

It's patently obvious to me that many Brits do urgently need a lobotomy!

By Stanley Collymore

The British monarchy has successfully exploited the mass media to convince the very gullible and easily manipulated members of the public that actually its own members are somehow special as well as quite superior to everyone else, when in reality these very unremarkable Windsor family members  undoubtedly represent nothing of the sort, and quite clearly are in essence virtually nothing more than the obscene continuity really of gross inequality, unquestionably also unaccountable power, and distinctively biased influence entrenchedly linked to and intricately combined with rampant societal injustice, discernibly pervasive, immoral behaviour and as well a clearly amoral and simply grotesque penchant for greed!

Significantly, it would obviously be truly, personally and beneficially illuminating for some Windsor fans, although really and most clearly not obviously the vast majority of these distinctly puerile 21st Century serfs, to distinctively know that 30% of British children live in irrefutably stark poverty, which basically accounts in literal numbers for some four million of them: statistics clearly substantiated by undeniably, creditable organizations like the Child Action Poverty Group and also in tandem likewise with others like Save the Children while very essentially at the same time and in clearly marked contrast, the multi-billionaire monarchy have 23 enormous palaces, castles and grand estates which alone stand clearly on over 800,000 acres of exclusive land plus in unquestionable attendance well over 700 servants at these monarchical family members evidently, puerile back and call. A state of affairs coupled also with their bona vacantia entitlement, as well as the rather exclusive rights to all the riches, whatever these are - oil, gas, sunken treasures, for example - off the seabed obviously around the coasts of Britain; and  rather expectantly for them no such unquestionably nasty things as inheritance taxes to pay!

Essentially, this very discernibly Middle Ages mindset institution with its clearly faustian, highly pretentious titles risibly awarded to each other is the irrefutably absolute in all respects, epitome of very gross inequality; and quite obviously for those of you who don't have a medieval mindset or ludicrously also on this sick bargain a Disney Princess fantasy will, I am quite sure, most heartily agree that not just our British one but undoubtedly and literally so, all such monarchies are very discernibly archaic in this a simply supposedly modern and self- evidently technologically 21st Century; and also that similarly all such things as literally hereditary overlords need to be simply and crucially, instantly and essentially permanently abolished!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
28 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
The ball is distinctly in your court, but in all honesty how many of you do literally actually have the real balls to obviously play the life game, as it simply ought to be? Or do you basically love being serfs and have others you delusionally regard as you societal betters really determine the course, and obviously the nature of your pathetic lives and how they simply turn out, for you?

The love story is over! And realistically, this marriage has ended!

By Stanley Collymore  

It does seem, that the Palace PR
and the MSM sycophants do
think that by keeping Kate's
name in the headlines people generally,
and the serfs specifically, will basically
feel this workshy bitch's absence less.
Personally, I'm very gradually, coming
around to the quite sensibly, bandied
suggestion that the police should do
a welfare check, to simply ascertain,
if Kate is still around since she's not
been rather believably seen now for
really approaching five months; Lol.
Factually Kate is simply regrettably
still there, but is embarrassedly for
her distinctively out of public sight
because her obviously, discernibly
very stalkingly, contrived marriage
is clearly effectually over; dead as
a dodo! And even most relative to
all those of you that have actually
quite evidently asininely, together
with being basically, undoubtedly
ridiculous, by so keenly awarding
Kate her saintly imprimatur; truly
it must be for Kate, as it will also
unquestionably be for the surfeit
of you sycophants and distinctly
braindead aficionados that saint
though she pathetically, actually
is in your sick minds Kate rather
relative to her failed marriage is
unable to raise, a Lazarus style
significant resurrection, thereof.

And very evidently with you serf
clowns and also brainwashed,
gullible and unquestionably
intellectually challenged morons rather
persuaded as well as actually, innately
believing that this undeniably was the
marriage of all ages; this obsessively
social climbing, stalking racist Karen
rampant gold digger, and bone idled,
work shy prat is too embarrassed to
show her face publicly; as recurrent
persistent solitary engagements by
her alone, as by William discernibly
by himself; just as those joint ones
they face savingly, endeavoured to
embark on would evidently quickly
alert those, who can actually think
for themselves and specifically as
well, astutely clearly see with very
unblinkered, and literally, crucially
non-prejudicial eyes, that actually
these two were simply effectively
quite undoubtedly, going through
the motions as Charles was with
Diana and with an identical body
language. For basically in actual
honest to goodness real life you
simply can't actually, indefinitely
fake crucially, non-existent love!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
28 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
Put rather bluntly and unequivocally from me neither Kate nor Charles has cancer or anything that's even remotely to it. It's all a barefacedly contrived, manipulated and, as well, a cynically exploitative lie.

What's really wrong from their sick, no pun intended, and very self-entitled perspective is that rather obviously to those who aren't sycophantic serfs and gullible morons, the distinctly, quite simply very literally fraught marriage distinctively between William and Kate is fundamentally over. In undoubtedly Germanic terms, bearing in mind their very Germanic family roots, Kaput! A distinctly, quite defunct marriage in all regards other than there is no formal divorce that rather evidently William wants, Kate obviously is not the least bit keen on, and specifically so all the stalking enterprise she not only engineered but quite assiduously simply enthusiastically got involved in.

With his worryingly Jimmy Savile -esque interest in Kate, the alleged daughter he never had and asininely harangued Diana for not producing him with, as if he Charles didn't have anything whatsoever to do with his own wife's conception; Charles doesn't want a divorce between William and Kate. Hence the cancer, clearly bullshit narrative and basically vile, odious, wilfully, blatantly lying deceptions by himself and obviously his distinctly favourite surrogate daughter cum daughter in law.

Jointly on the discernible part of Kate and Charles along with those in this distinctly odious deception, like their buddies in the MSM and the usual surrogates who we all know of, to milk public sympathy, for all, it is worth; and ostensibly to put pressure on William not to ditch, this undoubtedly third choice of a wife: two other candidates he'd proposed to did turn him down, and clearly remain with Kate. Charles however, for his part, having waited so long to be monarch, has no intention of abdicating in favour of William as Margrethe of Denmark did, so that her aggrieved daughter in law would not leave her adulterously cheating spouse as she very happily settled for being queen herself.

Rather interestingly in all of this the clearly identical morons who were unquestionably very unflattering about Kate along with the MSM, remember the Waite Katie tag and much more who literally after the arrival of Meghan, suddenly became aficionados of this woman purely, whether they choose to deny it or not, because she's white and not an African American despoiling their rather unique monarchy with her basically inferior presence; circa Liz Jones of the Daily Mail for example among countless others.

I shan't be labour these issues as my open views are well known nor am I effectively  going to play your silly games either and gratuitously bring Meghan, Harry or their children into this for the kind of fatuously indulged in idiotic and childish games that your sort love to play; coupled  obviously with your pathetic obsession with Meghan which even shows itself transparently, in your pathetically poor English, even when the article in question has quite absolutely nothing to do with Meghan!

But what does have me in stitches of very refreshing laughter is knowing, that all of those from the Desperate Four of Charles, Camilla, William and Kate herself who've done their level best to destroy Harry and Meghan's marriage and are still effectively desperately doing their very best to simply achieve that goal, together quite obviously with their MSM chums, and actually failing quite pathetically in their sick endeavours,  are now literally confronted with the rather  undeniably, discernibly unflattering task of having to break the news that St. Kate has lost her allure and Phillip Schofield-esque William isn't interested anymore! Lol!

And how curiously interesting that all of these MSM body language experts who are always pontificating about Harry and Meghan's supposedly distinctly troubled relationship and how their marriage isn't going to last - because that's what they want obviously and have done from the very actual outset of Harry and Meghan's wedding - can't detect that William hasn't the slightest bloody physical or emotional interest any longer in Kate. Could this be down to the quite discernible fact these so-called experts are either Queers, Dykes or paedophiles who’ve quite obviously not got the foggiest concept of what a loving and natural heterosexual relationship, as per that of Harry and Meghan, is really all about?

Therefore, their rather biased assumptions are based wholly entirely on their own very perverted relationships!

Detailed researchers like myself know very well who, among those in the Windsor own family, are strictly heterosexual even if very adulterously so with it; who are effectively outright Queers and Dykes; and those that bat both ways. So don't any of you attempt to actually try and literally kid me with your rather pathetic bullshit! As this entire sick scenario is like an exact page out of Hans Christian Andersen's: The Emperor's New Clothes. In this case the bulk of the British public falling for this contrived and wholly pathetic crap! And essentially morons who actually in very close tandem with these intellectually challenged serf cretins distinctively do believe that if you say something often enough regardless of how idiotic and untruthful it is, that by doing so it simply makes it the truth! And these are the very people that effectively basically consider themselves the absolute epitome of the humid master race! Dream on!

Screw that notion for a start!

By Stanley Collymore  

 
In the wake of the increasing murder  
statistics in the UK with some very  
particularly heinous and vicious  
murders across the whole panoply of  
age ranges there are vocal calls that  
our country should, unquestionably,  
be given legislative powers, to thus  
specifically determine, who should  
therefore be basically permitted to  
have children, and very conversely  
those that shouldn't be allowed to.  
As I see it, there's a crucially large  
hole in this discernibly barmy, but  
supposedly basically sound logic  
that the British state must clearly  
determine who obviously breeds,  
either by essentially, distinctively  
awarding, refusing or undeniably  
subsequently, actually removing,  
given permits, evidently from its  
own citizens and similarly those  
non citizen residents that chose  
to make Britain their own home!  
 
Essentially, how can any sensible  
person think let alone conclude  
that any society, should have  
both the indispensable and irrefutable  
right to rather undoubtedly determine  
who it really, unquestionably permits  
to breed? Should wealth: essentially  
earned or actually inherited, as well  
as societal status be also included  
in this equation of who simply can  
or cannot generally have children?  
And simply where does education  
or basic commonsense, come in?  
Realistically as I effectively see it;  
any such arbitrary system clearly  
would undoubtedly be wide open  
obviously to unquestionably very  
recurrent abuse and exploitation  
and evidently quite expeditiously  
become this implacable societal  
pestilence - and I naturally, really  
couldn't resist this, lol - evidently  
in a very obviously Reform Party  
administered, and Brexiteer UK!  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
26 April 2024.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:  
We're all  rather entitled to our fancies I suppose but having very undoubtedly in my case quite unquestionably done my own legitimate siring, I must confess to my not having any worries at all on that score!
 

Banning marches you prejudicially don't like? Get real!

By Stanley Collymore

In a genuine democracy, you just
can't allow, nor should anyone
ever be actually able to pick
and choose which or simply what kind
of truly peaceful, democratic protests
are allowed and purely so on a whim;
clearly irrational, undue or concerted
pressure by significantly well-heeled
other actually influential persuaders
or for that matter rather strictly as a
consequence of the really ingrained
biases against those simply hoping
to obviously participate, in any kind
of march, linked naturally and quite
self-evidently too with the requisite
antipathy of those bodies, crucially
and simply, unquestionably tasked
quite obviously authoritatively with
the distinct mandate to grant such
permission for marches generally!

Since to accord such biased and
crucially detrimental treatment
to any group, or organization
really; and, prospectively, of a peaceful
disposition would distinctly, and most
ironically, very specifically discernibly
go against every significantly worthy
thing that simply actually effectively
and most crucially evidently, Britain
stands for, and most ironically also
all those quite arbitrarily calling for
those bans openly but purportedly
claim, that they rather tenaciously
do really vigorously stick to these
simply democratic notions which
however, from a simple objective
perspective, on the part of a very
neutral observer, they apparently
simply want, to naturally deny to
all those that they discrimatorily
hate! However, notwithstanding
that! Quite bluntly, honestly and
simply objectively, who'd be the
moral adjudicator effectively of
what was allowed and crucially
what wasn't? The same people
who're obviously, complaining?

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
26 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
An Israeli government agent and ardent provocateur is Mr. Falter who is clearly well known for his sick exploits to gain attention for whatever he is up to at that specific moment in time.

On the day of this specific march against ongoing Israeli genocide in Palestine and his encounter with that admirable police officer from the Metropolitan Police Force, Mr Falter was no simple religious devotee walking home after a service at the nearby synagogue. So it's no coincidence that he was there. There's also simply, irrefutable evidence that Mr Falter had reconnoitred the area and also the known route of the march long before the latter took place and was clearly seen doing so, and also crossing the same stretch of road without any hindrance to himself.

So by no stretch of any imagination other that a malignantly egregious and a clearly discernibly sick and self-entitled one can it rationally be thought, said or claimed, that this guy was a target of anyone other than his pathetic self.

The asininely perceived and mercenary exploited perennial victims Mr Falter's sort who conveniently forget that it was they who started the TransAtlantic Slave Trade in my ancestral homeland of Barbados, and that lasted considerably longer than the period they like to highlight in 1930s Europe, and where allegedly 6 million of them were said to have been killed; no mention on their part of the millions more, the Gypsies and the derogatorily referred to Rhineland Niggers, who unlike Mr Falter's Zionist Yids and evidently genocidal lot are repugnantly ongoingly receiving billions in Wiedergutmachung Compensation simply from Germany, that none of the other real European holocaust victims or simply their relatives have to this day receive a solitary Deutschmark!

Not dissimilar from the TransAtlantic Slave Trade where my ancestors and clearly also other similar victims likewise got nothing. But there are Yids to this day, who like all the ones that got billions for enforcedly giving up Slavery, get compensation still. Like David Cameron and his own wife for instance, who're by no stretch of the most vivid imagination the only ones.

Perfectly alright for these very generations down the line of slave owners to be rather handsomely compensated at the time, and while the freed slaves and essentially their offspring got nothing, for all those of these descendants to be so financially rewarded but it's undoubtedly taboo to even suggest that reparations should simply be made to genuine victims and not simply mercenary Zionist Yid ones, who obviously make the Third Reich's 1930 activities compared and contrasted with the barbaric theft, and the vile, apartheid genocide of the Palestinian people look like child's play. And yet clearly your sort Mr Falter do still asininely in your sick and perverted self-entitlement wonder why discernibly conscionable people of all walks of life and ethnicities, are obviously marching and equally protesting on behalf of the Palestinian people being effectively genocided before our very eyes!

Long live Palestine and the highly commendable people who are its rightful and very evidently indigenous citizens! And God bless all those across Britain and the wider world communities who altruistically and morally do also, commendably support you against your genocidal mass murderers! 

There must never ever be allowed to consolidate in Palestine the asinine, contemptuous and toxically egregious, malevolent and ludicrously delusional notion of Palestine either being or ever was a Terra nullius entity as still dementedly pertains quite flamboyantly in that Antipodean country, arbitrarily renamed as Australia and with similarly like-minded white racist supremacist lowlifes in Israel requisite to their attitude to the Palestinians, who perceive the indigenous Aborigines as non-existent, even though they've been living continuously for in excess of 66 thousand years before the white man and woman even knew the place existed, and shouldn't even be dignified with the courtesy of being called human beings. No way must this be allowed to happen a second time and most ironically be a people who like quite mercenarily none the less to portray themselves as the perennial victims. And if it needs World War 3 to finish off what the Germans admirably started but did finish in the 1930s; then so be it!

Have a heart! The serfs do need to be entertained!

By Stanley Collymore 

The fact that two people from this
dysfunctional Windsor family of
unaccomplished individuals
might actually like each other, and giving
one another medals is considered to be
news tells you all you basically need to
know! In actuality it is not distinctively
discernibly vitally important, let alone
compulsory, to simply have a special
relationship with an inured adulterer,
or someone, whose essentially best
mates were obviously, paedophiles:
as were crucially Jimmy Savile and
Bishop Peter Ball! However though,
when clearly the specific individual
in person, is basically the monarch
and you're an inured social climber
and mercenarily avid gold digger it
effectively does help. Furthermore,
white Britons very apparently have
obviously short memories; always
thinking about, and equally saying
and doing what's very convenient
for them beneficially, at that time!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
25 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
These Windsors live in a bubble and don't have the slightest idea actually about the real world the rest of humanity obviously lives in. Nevertheless, the serfs, peasants, plebeians and subjects - call yourselves in essence what you will - are thus expected to see them as infinitely than the rest of us who actually do reside in the real world!  

Attendant, at the same time, very evidently with all the problems we have to face and effectively contend with, to be discernibly kowtowing over two individuals with clearly, and significantly, zilch personality jointly between the two of them!

Personally, I'll never bow to them; nor will I ever very supposedly, expectedly know my place where they're personally concerned, or regard them as anything more, than an effectively outdated, requisitely obsolete entity, discernibly tarnished by recurrently innumerable scandals! That's evidently my honest opinion; you, of course, are clearly, undoubtedly as I am, entitled to your own and whether it tallies with mine or not I'll wholeheartedly respect it, even if I don't agree with it!

Kate Middleton's porno friend Emma Sayle, raking the dosh in!

By Stanley Collymore

Emma Sayle and Kate Middleton
both attended the same private
school and were close friends
there; a friendship that carried on after
they left school and intensified in their
adult relationship. Kate ultimately did
marry William, and Emma undeniably
also married and began a still clearly
ongoingly to this day, a very lucrative
pornography business, that naturally
specializes in running orgies, for the
Middle Classes, and that ilk who are
themselves, rather crucially married.
Kate is simply actually cognizant of
this, but her clearly close friendship
with Emma is as simply steadfastly
enduring as ever. Rather funny that,
in a quite peculiar sort of way! Now
just stop, think, and simply imagine
for a moment, that Meghan literally
had such a friend that undoubtedly
was basically doing precisely what
Kate's obviously really close friend
Emma Sayle is doing. Get crucially
where I'm obviously coming from?
Yes, I quite imagined, that the very
intelligent ones among you would;
as the obviously blatant hypocrisy
from Kate's sycophants is literally
staggering, but actually expected!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
24 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
The classic case obviously of birds of a feather flocking - feel free to substitute your own actually descriptive word - together! And don't they half do so!  

Lechery, promiscuity, unceasing adultery and rampant paedophilia are undoubtedly consistent, salient and quite thoroughly entrenched behavioural patterns of conduct amongst the aspirant Middle Classes, as well as the assiduously committed, social climbing elements of Britain’s self evidently fixated class embedded societies; quite coupled, of course, with the same aspirant requirements of the said UK’s hierarchal and hereditary purported elites, and most naturally also quite widespread across the British monarchical family!

Unquestionably though in all of this, the aforementioned behaviour is also evidently, quite appealing to significant elements within the British lower classes; but while the activities of their societal betters are unquestionably heralded and lauded as fun and obviously requisite inducements to be wholeheartedly and gaily engaged in, these similar acts of behavioural conduct indulged in by the sycophantic serfs, plebeians and the fawning social climbing gullible, subject elements involved are undeniably very instantaneously dismissed out of hand as common, and actually demeaning, coarse acts of behavioural conduct by these distinctly same purportedly upper crust and quite hypocritical deviants.

Basically what Emma Sayle and her husband are running and that Kate Middleton is fully cognizant of is effectively a whore shop; but as brothels are officially illegal in Britain this is a circumvention of the law and self-evidently a distinct way of avoiding this specific legislation; and it clearly works! Principally so, because both the tacit and open support accorded to such enterprises, and most specifically this one, by high profile figures as well as monarchical family members, and just as equally so the nudge nudge, wink wink mindset of hypocritical, mercenary inured rags that see nothing wrong with the rich and influential behaving both badly and immorally, and clearly getting away with it, would be the very first to most scathingly and derogatorily be have a go if some Blacks or even white working class  members of the public off a council estate were doing the same thing!

Why are so many British people, and mainly whites, in such a pathetic state of denial?

By Stanley Collymore 

If you're going to bullshit people

William at least be original in
your actions. This photo of
Louis, allegedly currently taken on his
6th birthday, was distinctly shown on
Good Morning America: distinctively
on the 24 April 2022 - obviously two
years ago - so, it's rather discernibly
literally not a current, or even a very
recent birthday photo really, simply.
But what the heck, you know those
sycophantically kissing, your really
over privileged ass based stupidly
on achievements you quite simply
didn't earn and really are basically
too thick to discernibly personally
acquire yourself are quite like you
obviously unquestionably literally
therefore, simply rather evidently,
not even quite distinctly remotely
among the sharpest implements
literally there, in the cutlery box!

And as for the Daily Mail, you
purport to be a newspaper,
so why don't you publish
what sensible people logically regard
as news; or at least, try to effectively
acquire the habit of simply doing so
rather than quite consistently being
the populist shit stirrer and actually
unquestionably mercenary maniac
I clearly half-expected that William
had seen sense, literally bearing in
mind the Windsors’ clear personal
connections with discernibly quite
wholesome moral figures actually
like clear favourites Jimmy Savile,
Bishop Peter Ball, Jeffrey Epstein,
and Rolf Harris, very undoubtedly
amongst several others and thus
had morally, sensibly chosen not
to simply use his son Louis, as a
PR prop; and, thus, consequently
refrain, from using Louis' picture
as evidently queer bait for those
with a strange fascination really
with other people's kids. Clearly
I was wrong! For either William,
you actually bowed to pressure
or just obviously couldn't resist
the opportunity - being the lazy
work shy bastard you evidently
undeniably are for more media
coverage, which you obviously
see as your indisputable right!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
24 April 2024.


Author's Remarks:
My readers will notice I've clearly made no reference to Kate Middleton which is rather deliberate; as Kate is distinctively and most unquestionably, very crucially and significantly quite essentially out of the equation! Obviously you’re rather at liberty to make of that what you will!

There's a specifically, and very evidently also a logical and distinctively poignant Barbadian saying that significantly says those whom the Devil literally envisions himself destroying, or has already quite surreptitiously done so he deceitfully as well as deceptively publicly and actually ostentatiously heaps great praise on!

I've already written my promised article on this Windsor saga but have decided not to publish it yet. Clearly, not for any legal reasons - in this scenario I simply don't give a fuck about those a clearly my research and sources are evidently impeccable.

Three copies: legally witnessed and, as well, countersigned are discernibly now in the "custody" of trusted associates in 3 distinct countries, while we obviously, very patiently wait for the Palace's most interesting explanation, of quite current events. No hurry on our part! As clearly, we'll be proven right. And besides, with my Bajan sense of humour, why spoil it for the self, and brainwashed plebeian, monarchical sycophants? Lol!