Why do, or should George Windsor's
parents, individually or jointly and
specifically at this very young
age of his - he's not even yet eligible for
secondary school - be rather fatuously
doing what the dozy, right-wing media
are publicly stating they are engaging
in and coupled unquestionably rather
laughably, with the puerile restriction
that his mother Kate is so absolutely
evidently conscientiously subjecting
herself to? Frankly, none of it makes
any logical sense to me whatsoever
and I would actually, quite rationally
and realistically, simply intelligently
argue as well that the truly average
cogent, and literally conscientious
working mother, would be similarly
rather hilariously mystified as well!
Both William and Kate, as is their
son George, are evidently quite
crucial elements of the same
monarchical system which has already
decided, George's actual future; one in
which the poor lad, will evidently have
no true authentic input realistically of
his very own; significantly so, even in
the minutest sense basically relating
to himself which distinctively means
no really clear-cut, career choices of
his own preference or literal making.
For Kate, despite her own quite avid
and obviously relentless stalking of
William until she landed him, is still,
as far as the toxically operative but
nonetheless the very obviously still
UK's clearly influential monarchical
system, unequivocally and likewise
is irrefutably effectively concerned,
basically nothing other specifically
in Kate's situation, than her agreed
to Stepford broodmare wife stated
remit and fully tasked assignment
of genuinely producing the official
heir and contingency spare, rather
important to the British monarchy
and very much so, an undertaking
which very crucially has obviously
essentially already been evidently
effervescently, quite successfully
totally accomplished approvingly
by keen stalker and evidently too
fortunate hunter, Kate Middleton.
Therefore, all else in this rather
asinine narrative by the Daily
Mail's hack is undoubtedly
clearly obviously, nothing else than very
self-serving and obviously, pathetically
so, actually distinctively disingenuous
and a sycophantic public, targeted at,
propaganda agenda for the distinctly
respective parties involved, and very
telling so, in the context of William's
apparently crucial, but patently very
solo visit to Singapore significantly
characterized, and undoubtedly so,
by Kate's curiously revealed, rather
pronounced absence exhaustively
fastened to the facile explanation,
that her no-show, is specifically to
do with George's rather upcoming
examinations. Truly, what the Hell
examinations? That essentially at
George's age could be so vitally a
necessary requirement relative to
his mother duly excluding herself,
or much more plausibly distinctly
told by William she's not required
by him to be in Singapore! Vitally
think on my last supposition and
ask yourself quite honestly what
other realistic contingency other
than genuine illness or death on
Kate's part would actually be so
vital to keep a fixatedly publicity
aficionado as Kate Middleton is
off a world stage, and at home?
George's real decided secondary
education fulfilment will be at
Eton, and you don't have to
be a Brain of Britain - are there currently
any around, and most perceptibly so in
the established and openly fawning to
Windsor family, lol - to evidently know
that George rather crucially, does not
need to pass any examinations at all
to get into that obvious toxic cesspit
of richly, unwarranted privilege, trust
funds endowment and undoubtedly,
obligatorily so the British monarchy.
Kate Middleton's literally obsessive
and keenly manipulatively engaged
in stalking worked wonderfully well
for her; but perhaps at last William,
discernibly like Saul, on his journey
to Damascus to kill Jews - there is
a relative pun in there somewhere,
lol - and undoubtedly, Christians -
has unquestionably very distinctly
and sanely, gone through his own
personal conversion, and just like
Harry did during his emphatically,
obviously commendably ditching
of Britain's monarchical family of
which he was actually crucially a
key member; William essentially,
it likewise seems has apparently
although so damnably belatedly
equally come to his senses, and
demonstrably undeniably wants
nowt more "emotionally" simply
to do with his quite narcissistic
charlatan wife, Kate Middleton!
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
1 October 2023.
Author's Remarks:
Quite relative to her exclusion from this Singaporean trip, and for the ludicrous reason given; if Kate Middleton wants to actually and indisputably so live the life of a British suburban woman and mother, why then did she with her much unrestrained stalking capabilities marry into the Windsor family?
And is the Daily Mail which consistently to the virtual point of a toxic obsession keeps on vibrantly telling us how much on the obvious rocks of destruction the marriage of Harry and Meghan is, quite literally doing in its castigating of them without an iota of substantive evidence to effectively support the Daily Mail and its odious hacks very racist contentions in their disparaging bullshit to the crass surfeit of gullible Karens and Gammons further enthused by this in their actually self-evidently, compulsive brownnosing, monarchical fawning; now basically so, preparing them all for a Charles/Diana type breakup between William and Kate by rehashing a rather distinctly fatuous story from almost 20 years ago, clearly when Meghan evidently unquestionably wasn't around and very irrefutably didn't know Harry and significantly too hadn't even met him then!
Nevertheless this very recent Daily Mail rehash of this story clearly pertaining to how the Daily Mail, and the rest of them rather aptly then labelled Kate as Waity Katie but now very conveniently and as well totally self-servingly, overlook that fact, are reminding their readers of just how conveniently and essentially badly William routinely and casually treated Kate, even misogynistically making her cry. Forgetting obviously to essentially similarly outline in their disingenuous and deceitful narrative that no one held a gun to Kate's head enforcedly making her unseemly wait on William. She very obviously did it all of her own will, and anyone, with even a most rudimentary modicum of common sense evidently knows why. Since no lad from Asda or who similarly worked as an NHS orderly or a Royal Mail postal worker, quite assuming that he was even looked at in the first place by Kate, would have been accorded the same misogynistic latitude that was so amply awarded to William Windsor by her. In effect, Kate had her eyes, as she still obsessively does, on emulating Camilla Parker Bowles, but is fretful and deeply worried that William now, but belatedly so, seeing her for what she really is: an acquisitive, self-serving, manipulative, egregiously social climbing narcissist and a wannabe queen, won't be like his father Charles in his committed loyalty, likewise one-sidedly, to Camilla, and so she Kate Middleton will similarly so, like Diana most despicably was, but simply very distinctively not so in the slightest sense morally in unethical Waity Katie's case, be surplus to his own requirements by her present husband, William.
Quite relative to her exclusion from this Singaporean trip, and for the ludicrous reason given; if Kate Middleton wants to actually and indisputably so live the life of a British suburban woman and mother, why then did she with her much unrestrained stalking capabilities marry into the Windsor family?
And is the Daily Mail which consistently to the virtual point of a toxic obsession keeps on vibrantly telling us how much on the obvious rocks of destruction the marriage of Harry and Meghan is, quite literally doing in its castigating of them without an iota of substantive evidence to effectively support the Daily Mail and its odious hacks very racist contentions in their disparaging bullshit to the crass surfeit of gullible Karens and Gammons further enthused by this in their actually self-evidently, compulsive brownnosing, monarchical fawning; now basically so, preparing them all for a Charles/Diana type breakup between William and Kate by rehashing a rather distinctly fatuous story from almost 20 years ago, clearly when Meghan evidently unquestionably wasn't around and very irrefutably didn't know Harry and significantly too hadn't even met him then!
Nevertheless this very recent Daily Mail rehash of this story clearly pertaining to how the Daily Mail, and the rest of them rather aptly then labelled Kate as Waity Katie but now very conveniently and as well totally self-servingly, overlook that fact, are reminding their readers of just how conveniently and essentially badly William routinely and casually treated Kate, even misogynistically making her cry. Forgetting obviously to essentially similarly outline in their disingenuous and deceitful narrative that no one held a gun to Kate's head enforcedly making her unseemly wait on William. She very obviously did it all of her own will, and anyone, with even a most rudimentary modicum of common sense evidently knows why. Since no lad from Asda or who similarly worked as an NHS orderly or a Royal Mail postal worker, quite assuming that he was even looked at in the first place by Kate, would have been accorded the same misogynistic latitude that was so amply awarded to William Windsor by her. In effect, Kate had her eyes, as she still obsessively does, on emulating Camilla Parker Bowles, but is fretful and deeply worried that William now, but belatedly so, seeing her for what she really is: an acquisitive, self-serving, manipulative, egregiously social climbing narcissist and a wannabe queen, won't be like his father Charles in his committed loyalty, likewise one-sidedly, to Camilla, and so she Kate Middleton will similarly so, like Diana most despicably was, but simply very distinctively not so in the slightest sense morally in unethical Waity Katie's case, be surplus to his own requirements by her present husband, William.
No comments:
Post a Comment