By Stanley Collymore
Elizabeth Windsor was always the
biggest, and most encouraging
enabler of her second son
and love child! And commonsense,
which all of you brownnosers are
wholly devoid of, dictates that if
you bring up a child, to believe
that they're superior solely by
birthright, that persons other
than their own biological ilk
are aptly of less importance
than themselves and rather
crucially that literally they
are absolutely and equally
indeterminately evidently
entitled clearly to a life of
unlimited privilege that's
equally intertwined with
such unhindered luxury.
It inevitably turns out that such
children grow up to be selfish,
entitled, arrogant and clearly
opinionated snobs. Quite evidently
so, Andrew Windsor distinctly fits
all the relevant criteria therefore
that unquestionably are actually
crucially of relevance, when it's
clearly a matter quite pertinent
to these essentially incalcuably
envisaged, distinctly necessary
rather privileged feudal based
hereditary situation he's aptly
ensconced in! And, regardless
of whether you ingratiatingly
brownnosing sycophants like
it or not; the self-evident and
distinctly, unvarnished truth
is; your literally, medievally
mindset and very outmoded
monarch Elizabeth Windsor
is truthfully every bit as her
son Andrew - both culpably
and shamelessly - to blame!
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
31 March 2022.
Author's Remarks:
The renamed (1917) Windsors have profitted massively, and still ongoingly so, from the Transatlantic Slave Trade: an inhuman barbarity in which, among other egregious things done to them, Black women could and were systemically and systematically routinely raped and sexually abused with impunity by both white men and white women, and additionally quite insultingly had no legal recourse afforded to them to rectify these repulsive and utterly dehumanizing atrocities perpetrated against them, principally because they weren't even deemed to be human beings but were actually classified as "chattel" the common terminology for property at the time.
All in the name of avariciously greedy and ongoingly sustained financial profits, with the full blessing of the laughably, were it not so serious a matter, Church of England. And crucially nothing has changed with this essentially unchristian entity even in the 21st Century, as it still caters to a huge diversity of mindbogglingly sexual perversities; notorious among these, paedophilia and other demented sexual abuses.
While these present day guardians of the Church of England, as has always been the case throughout its noxious existence, and still is today, hold lofty positions in this distinctly debauched institution, and most discernibly and ironically politically so, the House of Lords, where every sitting Church of England peer there in 1833 fervently voted AGAINST the law being debated and subsequently enacted, to actually abolish slavery; now in their basically unchristian fashion these thoroughly bogus Christians odiously spend their time literally buttressing paedophilia and other forms of sexual perversion, as the case of Peter Ball the ingrained paedophile bishop distinctly showed, on the part of those like George Carey the ex Archbishop of Canterbury!
It's well documented and crucially the meticulously and contemporaneously very assiduously maintained archival records pertinent to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and thus accordingly kept in Barbados which irrefutably clearly has the world's most extensive and as well an informative collection of such information, demonstrably shows the British monarchy to have undeniably been the precise owners of what was then the Royal African Company that had the monopoly of the slave trade that had its origins in my homeland of Barbados.
So, for today's several descendants of that same monarchy which they love to boast about when it profitably suits their vainglorious purposes, to rather
asininely in their wilful state of crass, distinctly insulting and unconvincing denial pretend that the Transatlantic Slave Trade has nothing to do with all or any of them, when the wealth from it is all around them, is pure bullshit!
But old habits die hard! And basically while there are a plethora of married trollops, like the Alice Keppel, Sheila Loughborough and the Lillie Langtry types, and many unmarried ones also quite eager in class infested Britain to very ecstatically have their perceived hereditary betters randomly, or even routinely jerk off in their discernibly rather accommodating pussies, and if British might even be rewarded with a damehood; not all women however or young girls are enthralled by any of this!
Virginia Giuffre: a young female trafficked by two very evil paedophiles, Jeffrey Epstein and his slut Ghislaine Maxwell, didn't ask to or either want to be a part of this, but was none the less enforcedly as those Black slave women and girls were, made to be.
And I don't see how anyone with an iota of morality can even remotely so, conscionably have any empathy with or sympathy in the aforesaid circumstances for either Elizabeth Windsor or her, knowingly enabled by her, favourite son. And let's not forget this is the same Klan that willingly gave carte blanche to the likes of Jimmy Savile, Peter Ball, Rolf Harris that painted the special portrait of Liz within Buckingham Palace - just where is it now after Rolf 's conviction? - Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell that among others undoubtedly had quite unlimited and similarly uncensored access not only to Buckingham Palace but equally too the array of similar Windsor palatial residences; and the world generally knows the then brief of these "royal" guests.
Sharply bringing into focus the usual adage that you brownnosers actually love using when rather essentially it suits your very own purposes. Surely you know the one: judging people by the company they keep! So why the exception then when it comes to the Windsors?
So wouldn't you mindless and sycophantic brown-nosers coupled with your obediently subservient roles as hypocritical serfs be far more beneficially and morally engaged if you were to really start listening to and subsequently genuinely dismantle all the many lame and dishonest excuses that you've either already concocted or are in the process of doing so along with their asininely glowing proselytizing of yours relative to this knowingly and egregiously engaged in enabler's actions pertaining to her son's disgustingly unacceptable sexual behaviour?
Who, were she some Black or even a white working class, council estate and likewise invariably on the dole with her bastard progeny, perceptibly scum of a mother - you know the sort! - the lot of you, like a pack of frenzied hyenas after a successful kill, would most indisputably and rabidly voraciously be all over her!
But societally she isn't! Since to the lot of you she's ludicrously and quite endearingly, despite having even worse human failings than the two previous versions of women and mothers given here, perceived as a birthright and justly entitled, massively and even impressively wealthy: although self-evidently not from any actual work on her part, nor individual merit or intellectual acumen resulting from her, as she quite glaring has none - woman, that in your sick and rather twisted minds makes her the complete embodiment of the impeccable mother - when indubitably she's nothing of the kind!
Because in 21st Century still largely feudalistic and deeply ingrained class infested Britain with an automatic deference by you submissive serfs to your delusionally acknowledged social betters, everything that you pathetically cherish and earnestly wish to obsessively prolong, although to all intelligent minds is so obnoxiously wrong, is stalwartly codified in this purposeless woman and an absolutely lousy mother - Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsor!
No comments:
Post a Comment