Free speech and freedom of expression the bugbear of Nazi Zionists and western megalomaniac politicians.

By Stanley Collymore

I’m a firm believer of unrestricted free speech and the

absolute freedom of expression regardless of who

voices either of them or the initial source these

stated expressions or comments emanated

from. And while I’m fully aware that

such pronouncements might very

well be highly inflammatory, distressing, insulting

or even offensive to the beliefs or convictions

of many who either hear them or are the

subjects of such possibly irritating

or upsetting statements, as long as no legally proven

action of wilful defamation, fraudulent character

assassination, libel or intentionally threatening

behaviour can’t be categorically determined

against the purveyors of such purportedly

offensive conduct but even so exercised

within the strictly specified parameters

of the law - as explicitly and, what is

more, universally delineated in the

archetype of a politically secure,

judicially neutral and crucially

an unsullied socially created

and transparently advanced

democracy that comprises

the combination of all of the

aforementioned basics and

vouchsafed guarantees –

then truthfully I’ve no

problem with or any

gripes against the

exercise, albeit

contentiously

of any such

occurrences

personally.

© Stanley V. Collymore

21 April 2017.

Author’s remarks:

In a competently organized, successfully run and correspondingly a genuine democratic country the cardinal principles of free speech and freedom of expression ought to be, and I’ll further add must be, the inalienable right of every citizen and resident who lives there and what constraints there might be against this commendable situation should be openly aired, freely discussed and objectively debated at will, and furthermore what measures that are eventually taken must themselves be comprehensively endorsed by a minimum two thirds majority and binding vote in a nationally held and independently supervised referendum, with the outcome subsequently passed into legislation by that country’s duly and democratically elected parliamentarians.

But what we, the general public, routinely observe and abhor are pseudo-democratic and even clandestinely self-serving and bogus proselytizing so-called democratic states whose barbaric, graspingly avaricious, megalomaniacal and warmongering controllers that clearly have no interest whatsoever in democratic values repeatedly usurp the principles, norms and creditable goals of free speech and freedom of expression to advantageously for them and very detrimental to their selected victims rein in legitimate critics of themselves and the vile regimes they run, while equally, hypocritically and in the most naked display of their arrogant and hostile double standards promote their own twisted, one-sided and malevolent agendas to the detriment of everyone but themselves and their own kind, and most especially so those whom they virulently, albeit unwarrantedly, disdain and discredit with a passionately induced revulsion and psychopathically executed enmity.