Only the braindead and the naively delusional see self-entitlement as an epithet for reality!

By Stanley Collymore

Fundamentally and quite obviously
to all those with functioning brain
cells in their heads, assuming of
course that these undoubtedly, obvious
observers rather distinctively have any,
Harry and Meghan quite transparently
no longer care! Now crucially get that
into your thick skulls! And essentially
furthermore, very clearly why should
they do so quite basically, over what
a discernibly significant, specifically
undeniably petulant Charles, and an
equally too actually unquestionably,
quite racist, and white supremacist
aficionado William, Charles' clearly
older son does or think? Harry and
Meghan, whether you like it or not;
want to accept it or prefer to quite
delusionally, obviously create your
own puerile fantasies about them,
are distinctively, a rather powerful
and crucially, a very unmistakably
influential force in their own right.

For if this weren't really the case
why would you and the racist
rags that you support and
provide substantive click bait for spend
so much of your time an energy clearly
and rather obsessively going on about
them? Do you really, attach that much
energy to your reason for being there,
when you go to the lavatory or have a
deceitful shag with a one night stand
from which you could possibly easily
obtain VD, or some other debilitating
sexual disease. Of course, you don't!
So why, waste your energy uselessly
on Harry and Meghan? Who actually
rather simply attract attention and a
buzz, distinctly wherever discernibly
they go; because undeniably they're
naturals at what they do! Therefore,
sensible, and equally too intelligent
persons, effectively fully know that
in spite of your devisely risible and
instinctively also ludicrous denials
that your vile and rather obsessive
hatred against Harry and Meghan,
is based on Jealousy and Racism

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
19 May 2024.


Author's Remarks:
Ask yourself seriously; other than a very paranoid concept, of an unquestionably very lowlife designation literally relative to yourself but which you self- evidently and discernibly quite undoubtedly don't have the intellectual acumen to unquestionably, actually understand or deal with, what's actually the point of evidently hating people you obviously don't even know, distinctively have never met or are ever likely to; that don't actually, crucially give a fuck really about what you think of them, even if in essence they knew you exist, and rather clearly, simply live their lives undeniably and specifically to suit themselves? Not you!

We hate you Meghan and Harry but it's an obsession that hugely pays off financially!

By Stanley Collymore

What's the odds that on the 7
June 2024, the actual day of
Hugh Grosvenor and very
specifically, Olivia Henson's marriage
the Daily Mail will very undoubtedly
run a plethora of continuous stories
on Harry and Meghan basically not
being there! Snubbed, and likewise
equally also ignored, will generally
undoubtedly, be the two, distinctly
choice, headline words, which will
be employed, rather so than these
media outlets really concentrating
as well as reporting on the actual
wedding. In actual effect do trust
me! As rather basically, the Daily
Mail, other likeminded rags, also
coupled, with the extreme racist
media will simply unashamedly,
while clearly using the wedding
falsely as their pretence handle,
nevertheless prioritize the clear
distinctly obvious, non-event of
Harry and Meghan's effectively
unquestionably readily actually
known absence, over the same
wedding itself; simply because
their very names alone attract
greater interest, and distinctly
undoubtedly as well as rather
self-evidently, those requisite
clickbait that all populist rags
like the Daily Mail truly need.

And even with William present
at this wedding along possibly
too with Charles and Camilla,
any absence of a literally, concerted
mention of Meghan and Harry quite
pertinent to the stories which these
rags are publishing won't similarly
initiate the same interest, publicly.
Plus, with the additional inclusion
of Harry and Meghan there is too
the very undoubted likelihood, of
these said media outlets literally
and clearly willingly, throwing in
yet again for very good measure
on their part, and to also ensure
the desired, obviously expected,
and actually instinctively known
response, from the white, racist
Karens; undoubtedly obviously
actually, likeminded Gammons
rather thoroughly, sycophantic
serfs and quite unquestionably
discernibly gullible, brain-dead
plebeians, what they're clearly
rather puerilely, good at doing;
and simply as assuredly, in all
of this most crucially the Daily
Mail's own evidently, clickbait
rating and revenue gathering!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
19 May 2024. 

Author's Remarks:
Basically eulogizing a man 
all of whose wealth was actually inherited and none of it effectively worked for! Discernibly another obscene example of privileged Britain. A man who didn't and still very clearly hasn't actually done a great deal of anything of great importance to truly bag a spot effectively as one of the UK's very richest persons, aside, that is, from actually sitting around, and undeniably waiting for daddy to die!

The real facade of a rather delusionally, enlightened Britain; but in essence very much still the distinctly unquestionably and deeply embedded feudal and really rather class entrenched society Britain has consistently, and asininely proudly so carries on being! Added to which the wilful propagation of hatred and racism is quite undoubtedly a lucrative financial blessing for the UK’s MSM!

Do climb down off your egotistical, virtue signalling and hypocritical high horses!

By Stanley Collymore

What Rebecca Joynes actually
did was quite undoubtedly
wrong but I must take
issue with the lot of you loathsome and
evidently odious, hypocrites describing
these boys who she actually slept with
as "children". I do say this, considering
the rather obvious fact, that for well in
excess of a decade now, these simply
very same types of children were and
still are unquestionably, self-evidently
considered, and significantly allowed
by your sort: quite openly and clearly
very vitriolically lambasting Rebecca
Joynes as obviously adult enough to
ask for, and irrefutably be effectively
literally prescribed puberty blockers;
discernibly change their names, and
rather significantly, similarly identify
as an entirely, different gender from
what they genuinely and undeniably  
essentially, quite clearly biologically
are, and invariably doing so without
any consensual parental or actually
guardianship permission, or simply
knowledge or actual consent; even
if these specific wishes are known,
and fittingly very sensibly opposed.

And in addition to that, there are
several conscionable teachers
who've unquestionably, been
sacked from their teaching posts, quite
cruelly been blacklisted, and also even
obviously simply harshly, permanently
too very effectively removed from the
national teaching register, essentially
banning them undoubtedly from ever
teaching again! Doing so, apparently,
for intelligently and literally, crucially
sensibly and logically refusing to go
along with these evidently, basically
obvious, pernicious and undeniably
also very distinctively childish fads.
So please, as you essentially either
patronizingly contemplate or really
quite simply actually self-servingly
and very egotistically jump on this
naturally specific Rebecca Joynes
bandwagon, or any simply, similar
ones for that matter; do distinctly,
specifically first make your minds
up as you both hypocritically, and
cogently set about doing so - just
what you're truly denouncing! For
either those, you're really lauding,
and simply ostentatiously feeling
sorry for are aptly children totally
incapable of clearly making adult
decisions or unquestionably, they
are individuals simply completely
cognizant of what they are doing.
For quite commonsensically they
actually can't be both crucially to
suit your vile invidious purposes!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
17 May 2024.


Author's Remarks:
Every competent and professional teacher unquestionably and basically instinctively knows the difference between being very good friends with their pupils and students; and being discernibly, distinctively friendly with them! A lesson that self-evidently so, Rebecca Joynes either didn’t apprise herself of or otherwise quite literally didn’t care two figs about. Only she for certain knows the real answer to that state of affairs. It’s also a known fact that individuals of both genders with quite paedophiliac tendencies do tend to quite deliberately enter jobs or professions, where their access to children is a cast-iron guarantee. The other worrying problem requisite to Rebecca Joynes is that she got pregnant with the younger boy, 15 years old, after she was undoubtedly under investigation for her relationship with an older pupil. She’s 30 years old and it can be reasonably assumed that Rebecca knows about contraception; so effectively was this pregnancy of hers a concerted attempt, knowing that in all possibility she’d be found guilty of the first offence, to actually ensure she assumed that she wouldn’t get a custodial sentence? Worth thinking about that one!

However, Rebecca Joynes aside, what I distinctively find rather appalling as well as discernibly hypocritical are the surfeit of vitriolic comments coming from the distinctly usual sources in the Daily Mail and other rightwing rags rather invidiously castigating this young woman, when from past comments of theirs, actually depending on whom the target of the day is, as prescribed to them by the likes of the Daily Mail, they all of them like the lemmings they are do as they’re commanded to. No one quite evidently in their right mind applauds Rebecca Joynes for what she did; but obviously if the lot of you can look in the mirror and honestly tell yourselves that your very own, in most cases, private life is any better, then that’s the only occasion I feel that you can very realistically, and not hypocritically, jump on this invidious Rebecca Joynes currently rolling bandwagon.

Respect must be earned - not arrogantly claimed or expected as a so-called birthright!

By Stanley Collymore

It simply shows how out of touch
with reality this actual Windsor
monarchical family is if they
seriously think, as they rather evidently
do, that their clearly undoubtedly and
obviously too obscene and naturally
pathetic show of nepotism by vilely
actually very literally handing each
other medals, and bogus superior
military titles, and their associate
uniforms, will impress intelligent
folk. Literally no! As such clearly
puerile actions, irrefutably don't,
and the only ones that are quite
that gullibly impressed are very
fatuous serfs; decidedly, social
climbing subjects, and actually
braindead plebeians! But quite
what these rather undoubtedly
obviously selfish, monarchical
actions do demonstrate rather
explicitly; is that there's simply
no cure for clearly sociopathic
narcissism, literally steeped in
generally ludicrous arrogance,
and rather blindingly stupidity!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
16 May 2024.


Author's Remarks:
One would obviously quite honestly like to think that this world is actually full of good people, who quite occasionally do bad things; but then I look at Britain and quickly realise, how unquestionably the opposite undeniably is!

Modernization? Will monarchical waving become extinct then, if George becomes King? Lol!

By Stanley Collymore

Another fawning and asininely
ridiculous story by so-called
but always nameless royal
experts and an obvious indication that
it's all concocted speculation without
basically a solitary shred of any real
pertinent relevance! But there are a
surfeit of racist Karens and largely
too azoospermiac Gammons plus
serfs; literally sycophantic and so
naturally proud of it subjects and
quite braindead plebeians willing
to unquestionably simply believe
what's very undeniably obviously
being clearly lyingly told to them,
so why shouldn't these evidently
ludicrous, and quite nonsensical
distinctly stated experts bearing
fully in mind, that they're literally
always, undeniably Yids, and we
all know how obsessed they are
with money, specifically, as they
are discernibly doing, in tandem
essentially, with the likes simply
of the Daily Mail, irrefutably and
customarily monetarily cash in?

George Windsor is a 10 year old
child; and at his age, just like
all ten year olds, hasn''t a
realistic clue, what he'll do later in an
adult life. His dad William is already
looking absolutely starchy and very
backwards, compared to his peers;
and quite definitely, certainly won't
be any sort of modernizer, far less
so, the type he's rather ludicrously
predicted to be! And quite sure as
Hell: the Windsor family evidently
very natural, and indigenous after
life home exists, basically neither
is your incumbent Charles either!

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
16 May 2024.


Author's Remarks
The British Empire, or more pertinently so Britain, barbarously invaded other people's countries at will globally; quite irrefutably, rather barbarically plundered their wealth and now, most gratefully, has actually thankfully disappeared! So however much you evidently brainwashed morons desire to ludicrously, and even desperately, want to undoubtedly carry on evidently and unquestionably worshipping your monarchical superiors; even if only exactly 10 years old, that's entirely up to you! But one thing is absolutely certain; I shan't ever be joining you!

Only criminals and the very rich get special judicial treatment in the UK!

By Stanley Collymore

Jamie Barrow a 32 year old clearly
remorseless and unrepentant
mass murderer has had
his criminal conviction quite evidently
significantly reduced by three British
Appeal Court judges actually simply
because In the evidently sick minds
patently of Jamie Barrow, obviously
his lawyer and the judges, this truly
evil murderer's actual earlier prison
term was adjudged by them clearly
to be literally manifestly excessive!
This rather odious, obviously racist
bastard effectively really murdered
a mother - Mrs Fatoumatta Hydara,
28 and her two young daughters, 3
and 1 years respectively, by wilfully
setting their home, blazingly alight.

Jamie Barrow knew precisely what
he was doing. The victims, clearly
neighbours of his, evidently had    
petrol liberally and basically gratuitously
poured through their letter box; and his
resultant evil work, then culminated by
him, setting his contrivance act, alight.
After which, he then effectively clearly
very callously, and intentionally, stood
outside, to unquestionably make sure
that the property was fully ablaze and
raging; all this time knowing a mother
and her children, were simply trapped
inside their flat, as rather evidently he
could basically hear them screaming.

But Jamie Barrow didn't care a fig!
An attitude he plainly arrogantly
displayed throughout his trial
and discernibly showed no remorse for
his actions just as he evilly, repeatedly
did at his own Appeals Court hearing!
Yet remarkably, had his original court
sentence of 44 years unquestionably
rather dramatically reduced by these
truly, hopelessly out of touch judges,
despite him undoubtedly discernibly
callously and racially killing a young
mum and her really toddler children.

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
14 May 2024.


Author's Remarks:
I'll write my remarks after having rather worryingly digested this Appeal Court verdict and have slept on it! As it's now 22.51 hours and I’ll be preparing for bed soon.

It's Wednesday now and I’ve done what I promised I would last night. One of the very first things that came to mind was that no crime, even if they look similar, are actually identical, nor are the circumstances in which they are carried out precisely the same, therefore each crime for which someone is subsequently convicted should in fact be based on the exact circumstances enveloping it and not on what happened previously in the case of someone else, or even other persons.

James Bulger, a 1 year old toddler, was killed by Jon Venables and his mate who were both 10 years old at the time. The entire UK, unless elements of it were away on Jupiter or Mars and weren’t aware of that case and the publicity surrounding it, know precisely what criminal treatment was meted out to these young lads and most people would say, justifiably so. Jon Venables is still in jail. The reasons for which you’ll just have to research and ascertain for yourself.

My point is that Jamie Barrow was 32 years old when he also premeditatedly and very callously killed Mrs Fatoumatta Hydara, 28 and her two young daughters, 3 and 1 years respectively. There’s a massive age rage between Jamie Barrow and those two killers of James Bulger; and if the full ire of the court could justifiably come down on two 10 year old boys yet in 2024 we’re now expected to accept that the tariff handed down to this calculated, racist and unrepentant murderer is too excessive, then clearly something is fucking wrong with the thinking of the judges, I would say Jamie Barrow’s lawyer as he’s paid to represent him, and any member of the British public or their genocidal allies in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the USA, who think that murdering a Black woman and her two toddlers aged 3 and 1 year old, is no big deal. Because that is precisely what message is being sent out by the British Appeals Court? And you don’t have to have a Mensa IQ to work out that if Jamie Barrow was BLACK and his victims: a young married mother and her toddler kids were WHITE, there’s no way that the Appeals Court would have entertained a request to examine the original sentence, let alone reduce it. So much for equality before the law.

Britain is essentially still a feudal and deeply class-ridden and additionally an entrenched racist society with the participants deeply bound up in the latter living in their deeply ingrained and delusional state of DENIAL. And I ask myself, but already knew the answer, if this was a family from among Britain’s so-called toffs; its monarchy: say Kate, George, Charlotte and Louis, would this bloke Jamie Barrow be still alive? Ask a daft question, eh? What we’re essentially seeing here is a play out of Animal Farm; a state of affairs where theoretically, for propaganda purposes, we are all equal, but some self-evidently are more equal than others. And, doubtlessly if Jamie Barrow had killed one of these judge’s family members in similar fashion, no Appeals Court judges would have regarded his prison sentence of 44 years for very malevolently and premeditatedly killing them as “Extremely Excessive!” And in case you too conveniently forget, because of who these victims were, THREE people were quite callously and premeditatedly murdered. Aren’t their lives worth anything and aren’t they too entitled to justice? For if the Appeals Court think not, why shouldn’t other racists and psychopathic murderers do the same, knowing full well that they’ll be treated leniently if the “right persons” are murdered?

What part of piss off you racist Karen Brits and Gammons don't you pillocks understand?

By Stanley Collymore

And for those of you that quite
obviously maintain the rather
feigned notion that Meghan
doesn’t come or go to the UK principally
because she actually knows, she’s very
disliked; and therefore will accordingly
be, by your sort, simply openly booed;
ask yourselves, this obviously, clearly
put logical question, if you’ve got the
actually needed minimal brain power
required to do so! Additionally, what
intelligent person and, undoubtedly,
of whom, Meghan is quite certainly
among that number, very decidedly
and voluntarily or basically, happily
goes to someplace, where actually
they obviously know, that rarely for
justifiable reasons, but specifically
though, for obviously unjustifiable,
and undoubtedly rather prejudicial
ones, they’re evidently not wanted;
obviously have no reason logically
to be there either; and very literally
on their part quite clearly wouldn't
be seen dead there; yet simply, for
all that, distinctly, still goes ahead
and fatuously visits such a place?

Braindead Britons and their quite
likeminded convict and actually
genocidal kin literally infesting
other peoples undoubtedly indigenous
countries crucially quite evidently with
their unquestionably literally distinctly
and discernibly, effectively thoroughly
and generally corrosive presence, like
for example in their generally, fittingly,
and naturally delusional, Terra nullius,
Australia; New Zealand; crucially also
Canada and the USA while arrogantly
baying like the jackals they inevitably
are for an all-white Europe and rather
clearly so a pristine white Caucasian
Britain; most laughably, something it
has never effectively evidently been!

Yearningly, such discernibly fatuous
clowns might with their irrefutably
thoroughly empty lives generally
do such things, as actually going where
they're crucially not wanted, but clearly
no one with even the merest modicum
of commonsense or clear self esteem
would actually contemplate, engaging
in such undoubtedly pointless actions
and most discernibly, not someone as
irrefutably so obviously self-confident,
hugely literate and essentially actually
liberated, unquestionably, as Meghan!
Now does that generally satisfactorily
answer your question and crucially as
well kill-off your countless and simply
malevolent speculations, distinctively
so, regarding Meghan and her family?

(C) Stanley V. Collymore
14 May 2024.


Author's Remarks:
Another Barbadian saying: obsessively or frequently recurrently people only actually talk about those they either phenomenally respect or are infernally jealous of; but, in essence, in their state of denial obviously can't bring themselves to acknowledge let alone accept the latter.

Which category are you in where Meghan and Harry are concerned? Lol! Simply eat your hearts out, you utterly sick and really pathetic haters with no real lives your own; because you wouldn’t know how to constitute such a thing!