By Stanley Collymore
Had anyone managed to assassinate Adolf Hitler and his Nazi cabinet of like-minded ministers that individual would unquestionably have gone down in history as a hero or heroine and additionally would most definitely have earned the eternal gratitude and lasting respect of scores of millions of people around the world, and rightly so. But bête noire as it undoubtedly was Germany even then is far outdone by what we know today as the United States of America that from its inception even as colonies of Britain to the present day has wiped out, practised genocide against, ethnically cleansed, slaughtered, disappeared, interned, massacred, tortured, kidnapped, killed, renditioned and displaced on a global scale far more people than Germany or any other country, apart from Britain and France, has ever done, and while Germany only wanted to have control over Europe the ambition of the US is to control the world.
Notwithstanding its numerous past and ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity the United States however always manages to walk away scot-free from these, seemingly immune from being forced to face up to the consequences of its illegal actions and able to do this by dint of its political and military power, specifically its nuclear capabilities, which it shamelessly uses to force its will on other and thumb its nose to international laws and conventions that it nevertheless hypocritically and selectively demands must be scrupulously adhered to by weaker or its chosen vilified states. And to add gross insult to injury goes on to unilaterally reserve the right to attack any country it chooses to in order to remove by brute force, assassination or skulduggery, employing the dark arts of the CIA, any leader who it dislikes or doesn’t find favour with the USA.
Bearing all this in mind and knowing full well that no court: domestic or international or the United Nations for that matter, as things currently stand, will ever have the guts or moral decency to order the arrest, have formally charged and brought to trial and on the weight of overwhelming evidence convict and severely punish US mass murderers and perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity whether those persons are the country’s president, cabinet ministers, Pentagon officials, CIA operatives or whoever – look what happened to Raymond Davis the CIA killer who murdered two Pakistanis in their own country – and with US presidents, Congress, the Pentagon and CIA still arrogantly conceding to themselves the right to arbitrarily assassinate and extrajudicially kill those they dislike, isn’t it about time that the policy of what’s good for the goose be similarly considered as appropriate for the gander, and all United States officials from its president downwards who are reliably suspected of or are known to have personally ordered or actually carried out mass murders, war crimes and horrendous crimes against humanity be similarly targeted for assassination and extra judicial killings? Or would that be instantaneously regarded by these savage but cowardly hypocrites as acts of terrorism?
And why stop at the United States? Why not Britain where Liam Fox its Defence Minister is widely known to be enthusiastically in favour of the assassination of Colonel Gaddafi and those that support him; as well as France and the rest of the EU that are similarly in the same boat? The same countries that cheerlead grant immunity to and applaud Israel whenever that rogue state embarks on another of its customary fits of obsessive paranoia and goes on yet another killing spree. As it’s a safe bet that we’ll never see these white, racist, colonialist and imperialist Zionists brought before the ICC which really the judicial arm of the Zionist movement, is not a court set up to punish white men or women for their wrongdoings, but is there primarily and with the full backing of the United Nations Security Council and its puppet General Secretary to give a pseudo judicial gloss to 21st Century colonialism.
Adolf Hitler let’s not forget was democratically elected by the German voters as was Barack Obama by the US electorate, Cameron by the British, but only just, and Nicolas Sarkozy by the French, and in Italy, Germany’s wartime friend, it was a combination of grassroots support and public popularity that successfully propelled Benito Mussolini into power, and we all know or should do what the end game was. So the notion that because someone has been democratically elected in a set of particular circumstances that he or she then inevitably becomes an individual who can be trusted to look after or is even remotely interested in the general welfare of their country and fellow citizens; is actually competent to hold down and efficiently carry out the job that they were elected to do; isn’t a supine coward and obsequious figurehead that readily and compliantly yields to the slightest pressure that comes their way like an unstable stalk even in the gentlest of breeze; or worst still isn’t just a lying, dishonest and greedy charlatan expediently and self-servingly embedded in the pockets of powerful external as well as minority domestic economic, political, ideological and military interests indelibly linked to the fostering, preservation and fanatical protection of capitalist and unethical multinational corporations and the agents of death, the military industrial complex, isn’t only implausible but also quite ludicrous as well.
The tactic of fear, widely and successfully implanted in the minds of their people, was systematically and ruthlessly used by both Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini to hoodwink, cajole, coerce and even browbeat their local populace into either believing or at least accepting what they were told by their governing regime; it was then further utilized to get the green light to destroy, displace or co-opt for their personal use the democratic institutions they’d shamelessly employed to gain power but now wanted to neuter or dispense with and, significantly, enabled both dictators to create the kind of state where all legal checks and balances enshrined in their respective constitutions to thwart the abuse of power were summarily and arbitrarily got rid of and the regime, particularly those who ran it, now became the sole arbiter: effectively the judge and jury, of what could take place and did occur.
The courts, civil service, media, civic authorities, the police, the security services; public and private sector organizations, the armed forces, trade unions and even the church were now quite beholden to the national regime that effectively had complete control not only over their continued existence but also over what they could say, do and even how they could respond to measures imposed upon them; and looked at through objective lens the United States of America in 2011 is a mirror image of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.
The United States Constitution guarantees the separation of powers but anyone who thinks this is a reality in contemporary USA is either a fool, hopelessly naïve, a knave or completely mad. The so-called US Supreme Court is far from being impartial let alone reputable, and what little credibility that this blatantly politically packed, ideological body ever had vanished like a snowflake would in the broiling hot tropical sun when it promptly and complicitly with its fellow Republicans in Florida, and notably George W. Bush’s own brother who was governor there, fraudulently handed the 2000 presidential elections to the evident loser of those elections, one George W. Bush whose father had appointed most of those so-called impartial arbiters to their life-long judicial seats in the very same Supreme Court. Payback time in other words.
This not insignificant factor apart, the entire US judicial system is endemically corrupt and partisan, presides over a vicious, elitist and discriminatory process of judicial dispensation where the rich and powerful get off scot-free leaving in their wake the poor and non-white minorities to swell the ranks of the US prison population. Disproportionate too to their actual number as citizens or legal residents in the United States Blacks and Hispanics account for as much as 95% of those that are on death row in that country with the US judicial system fitting easily and comfortably into the ranks of the worst Third World, repressive, police states, and in that regard Saudi Arabia readily comes to mind; hardly surprising then that the bond between the United States and Saudi Arabia is such a close one.
As for the US media it no longer exists and its sorry replacement is more akin to fantasy theme park that is much more adept at fiction than Hollywood currently is or ever was, while the US Congress is unmistakably analogous to a university student with an exaggerated sense of his or her importance and a similar sense of entitlement but no discernable intellectual acumen to back this up or even the required grades to rightfully have bestowed on them a much coveted place at any kind of university but still succeeds in conning their way into one because he or she is quite proficient at being able to cold-bloodedly prostitute themselves so as to gain the appropriate advantage they’re after; brazenly carries on doing so while at university and even acquires on the face of it a degree, but one that was obtained not through hard work, academic prowess or intellectual discernment but was derived only because that student was happy to literally climb into bed with his or her tutors who just as corruptly awarded them pass grades based entirely on sexual favours rather than the proper criteria of rigorous, intellectual study and examination.
Against this backdrop therefore no one should take the United States Congress any more seriously than they would the pronouncements coming out of a public whorehouse in Amsterdam’s famed red light district for example, where those that are in the business of selling themselves to the highest or most consistent bidder financially, who gain huge economic benefits from doing so and additionally even decadently get their kicks from this immoral pastime nevertheless don’t accord to themselves unwarranted airs and graces which they feel require them to go around imagining and even deluding themselves that they’re other than what they really are.
Which brings us to the US presidency and the incumbent who holds that office. Similarities abound between Adolf Hitler’s dishonest rhetoric and Barack Obama’s campaign claims; and what Obama has done since coming to office is glaringly stark and in many instances alarmingly identical to the German Nazi era. Both men were endowed with the gift of the gab which they ruthlessly and lyingly used to kick start and promote their political careers, and just as Hitler was a pathological liar so too is Barack Obama. Truth for either man was and is a commodity to be economical with while lies and complete fabrications were seen as and used by both of them as if they were or are important virtues; and significantly both Hitler and Obama are your classic outsiders: one an Austrian, the other born in Hawaii, who the mainstream political classes in both their countries viewed and unshakably regarded as outsiders, and who Adolf Hitler in his time and now Barack Obama felt they had to do everything that they could, even indulging in extreme forms of behaviour in order to get themselves accepted by these people.
In Barack Obama’s case he’s further handicapped by the fact that he is the unwelcomed product in racist USA of a black father and a white mother and whatever his politics were it was always going to be his skin colour that would be his biggest handicap, and a life threatening one to boot once he aspired to becoming the president of his country; and therefore to stop himself from being instantly eradicated from the political scene and in all likelihood lose his life as well imperative deals had to be struck which carried with them massive IOUs.
No US presidential candidate or eventual president, all of whom previously have been white, have ever had, even collectively, the enormous number or the intensity of death threats that presidential candidate and now President Barack Obama has been subjected to, and when one contemplates the relative ease with which the Kennedy brothers were killed, the near assassination of Ronald Reagan and even that of Dr. Martin Luther King: a prominent, black public figure, one doesn’t need to be a rocket scientist to conclude why Barack Obama, in view of all I’ve said earlier, is still alive and not another gun statistic victim in the USA. The key to Barack’s inviolability from the assassin’s bullet so far is the CIA. One of the most ruthless but glaringly incompetent security services in the world the CIA nevertheless has tentacles everywhere, and because of the US’s position as the world’s only superpower de facto carries a great deal of influence with those that it deals with, many of whom are literally shit scared of what the United States vindictively can and will do to them in a multiplicity of ways: economically, politically, diplomatically, militarily; through isolating them, the imposition of sanctions on them or threatening to inflict these and then bullying its friends and allies to follow suit, and through a thousand and one other ways if it chooses to if these countries refuse to do as they’re required to, or are actually told they must by the American Empire.
A man who evidently puts self before principles Barack Obama struck as deal with the CIA which in return for keeping him alive allowed the CIA to have carte blanche, public presidential support and immunity in the eventuality of him becoming president to do whatever it liked; immunity that would similarly extend to AIPAC, other Zionist and pro-Israel lobbies, which is why Barack is too petrified to even denounce Israel’s worst excesses, and the all important and enormously influential military industrial complex, all of whom are the decadent bedfellows of the CIA. Ask yourselves what other US president has abrogated his responsibilities to the extent which Barack Obama has done to an un-elected and publicly unaccountable body, allocating unconstrained powers to what is fundamentally an information gathering quango aka the CIA, enabling to deliberately and in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, United Nations Resolutions, the UN’s own charter, international and even US laws to intentionally and premeditatedly wage undeclared war against a sovereign, independent state and member of the United Nations? Yet this is exactly what the CIA is doing with impunity against Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia among other countries, and which a deeply compromised and cowardly Barack Obama is permitting.
Like Britain’s MI6 the CIA needs to justify its existence and the enormous amounts of money which is given to it, and the more wars and ongoing conflicts that there are the greater is its scope for doing so; and since this is the matching agenda of AIPAC; the Neo-cons; Zionists and those who either run or benefit immensely from the extremely profitable and only capitalist growth industry, the industrial military complex, in an otherwise bankrupt economical system and has become the intense focus of a re-emergent incentive for the reactionary racists, colonialists and imperialists who hanker after the good old days following the 1884 Berlin Conference, and while painstakingly doing everything they can within their power to unify the white former colonialist states of Europe conversely do their best to politically, diplomatically, economically and militarily keep the purported Third World countries weak, divided and balkanized the better to subjugate them and plunder their resources for the sole benefit of the west, it’s comparatively easy to see and understand why Barack Obama does as he’s told. How else can one account for his odd behaviour and puerile comments that are not only quite contradictory by sensibly defy all logic and commonsense?
Here are some of Barack Obama’s gems: 1) Syria’s actions against its protestors are deplorable and outrageous; 2) Syria is seeking help from Iran to quell the unrest in Syria; 3) the Syrian regime has refused to respect the democratic rights of Syrians; 4) there’s no freedom of expression in Libya; journalists are being arrested; civilians targeted; and freedom of speech and assembly denied; 5) and notwithstanding his authorization to Hillary Clinton to publicly state that Bahrain is a sovereign state and has the fundamental right to invite the armed forces of any country it pleases to enter its territory even when the invading forces have the full backing of the United States and are there primarily to wreak havoc on, slaughter, massacre, and ethnically cleanse the majority indigenous population just like the white half of his own ancestry did to the Native North Americans; all these Bahraini crimes going on at the behest of an imposed, autocratic ruling, hereditary family of self-grandiose, feudal, savage, barbaric and Dark Ages rogue monarchs.
Now judge the above against the reality that Barack Obama is being wilfully blinkered to and sum it up in one word: BAHRAIN. Every single thing that Barack accuses Syria and Libya of is happening a thousand times worse in Bahrain but there are no such condemnations of the despotic Al-Khlaifa family in Bahrain from him, his western allies or their media; in short there’s a deliberate conspiracy of silence among them regarding the well documented atrocities going on in Bahrain. Saudi Arabia a major ally and cat’s-paw of the US, given the green light by Robert Gates to invade Bahrain has no democracy of any kind; is an artificially constructed country that was forged under the Sykes-Picot Agreement and where women are literally the slaves of the male population and is rule by a vile and decadent family at the head of which is a dictator with absolute powers, the kind that the archetypal Divine Rights of Kings advocate Charles 1 of England never had; but he nevertheless still managed to lose head, quite literally, for his abuse of power. But once again we see no criticism of a state that is clearly in violation of all civilized norms of conduct but gets away with it because it’s a friend and ally of the United States of America. And why, even if Iran was assisting Syria, is it perfectly alright for Bahrain to invite outsiders, as Hillary Clinton categorically asserts that it has the right to do, to help it out but so wrong and offensive to the sensitivities of United States and its friends for Syria to do the same? Notwithstanding the fact that since 2003 the US has been secretly funding and bribing pro-western elements in Syria to the tune of several million US dollars annually to foment trouble in that country courtesy of, you guessed it, the CIA that has a very long and rather disreputable history of overthrowing elected governments in the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere around the world and has been operating for the past three decades in (guess where?) LIBYA!
The raison d’être is obvious; the United States and the EU countries are all faced with dire economic problems; capitalism is a brain dead patient on life support and to keep their peasants from revolting at home and deflect attention away from their economic woes the United States and European Union are desperately resorting to the Galtieri formula: using foreign wars as a diversionary tactic, and this is precisely what Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy have embarked on as they all three of them wholly incompetent as political leaders, haven’t a clue how to run the economy of their respective country and knowing how dim-witted many of their domestic constituents are and what short memories they have, have evidently gone for the foreign wars option and the machismo attendant with that, with the implicit assumption that it would be quite unpatriotic of their fellow citizens (subjects in the UK) to criticize one’s government while the country’s troops are in harm’s way. And they get away with it because the stupid citizens and subjects don’t have the guts to ask: who put them there and why? So charging off into some developing country or other to kill the worthless natives there, taking it in turn to drop bombs on the poor hapless sods who live there, in the same way that a bunch of thugs would gang rape a defenceless pubescent girl, we observe Barack Obama, David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy and the rest of this odious bunch of human misfits doing the same to boost their poll ratings at home while they bleat disingenuously about humanitarian concerns and democratic rights for the people they happily and uncaringly kill.
The irony of all this being that while they clearly feel that they can march into whatever developing country they care to when as obviously happens there’s a resultant refugee problem caused by their actions these are the very people who hastily pull up the drawbridge of their castles to prevent them coming in as we saw with Nicolas Sarkozy hypocritically suspending the Schengen Accord with EU support to stop Libyans and Tunisians from entering France and the rest of the EU, and it’s a sure bet that the United States won’t have them either; after all they’re not that keen on their near neighbours the Mexicans entering that country.
The Zionists who run the military industrial complex would like nothing better than to have another major war as that would further boost arms production and the phenomenal sales of these, ratcheting up in the process even more outrageous profits for that 1% of the populace that owns and controls this industry, and Iran is the target they have in sight. That’s why henpecked cuckolds and Zionist mummy’s boy Dennis Ross ludicrously professing to be a Middle East expert to compensate for his natural lack of machismo and henpecked status, since it’s not he who wears the trousers at home, go around intentionally and quite dishonestly claiming that it’s Iran which is behind all the unrest in the Middle East and particularly the Gulf region. To this prized cuckold suppressing the local people as the west has been systematically and ruthlessly doing for centuries, fitting them out with tyrannical regimes that keep them permanently in check allowing the west to steal their wealth while blatantly denying them their dignity, human aspirations and even their basic human rights isn’t a problem at all and has nothing whatsoever to do with the current spate of unrest.
So now we know; the problems occurring in the Middle East are all the fault of nasty, Islamic Iran that its many Zionist detractors like cuckold Dennis Ross conveniently neglect to tell you has itself been a long suffering victim of US and before that British and French hegemony in the region. And these scoundrels know all too well that large numbers of you are credulous fools and that’s why they give all this bull to swallow and that you gulp down in large dollops. And while you’re mulling over that try digesting the following as well: 1) the US is 4 trillion dollars in debt; 2) in 2010 it spent 6.5 billion dollars conducting its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; 3) there are 24 million people currently out of work in the United States and the figure is growing; the figures of unemployment are also on the increase in Britain, France and the rest of the EU. And when you’ve taken in all of the above I’ll like to suggest that you honestly ask yourself this vital question: “Who are the genuine idiots, those whom you elected and who have heartlessly and self-servingly betrayed you or you yourselves; and crucially, what are you going to do about it?
Tuesday, 26 April 2011
Thursday, 21 April 2011
CALLOUS, CRAZED AND CULPABLE
By Stanley Collymore
Intelligence is about deception and the security services of every country that has them indulge in deceptions of one kind or another and invariably charm, inveigle, bribe or coerce their media and journalists to print, broadcast and run stories that are pure fiction in order to serve the vested interests of these spy organizations, their governments and the powerful forces in and out of the country that they are linked to. The British foreign spy organization MI6 and the domestic one MI5 both have a specialist department of their own where the sole purpose of that section is to manufacture lies; stories that aren’t even based on half truths, innuendoes or suspicions but are 100% unadulterated concoctions of the sick minds of those working in those departments. These sickos then either through profitable inducements flatter or else compromise journalists and their editors in the British media to carry these fabricated stories with promises of further scoops if they cooperate; if they don’t they are themselves targeted, isolated, shunned and even subjected to much worse. So British journalist many of whom are limp-wristed cowards readily comply and do the bidding of the security services flattered by the privileged treatment they’re given by powerful men and women with the immunity to do what they want to and no questions asked, and when one factors in the endemic class system which still pervades much of British society it’s very easy, if not wholly comprehensible if you’re intelligent and objective that is, to see why it happens.
David Rose a prominent British journalist who finally came to his senses recounted how he was approached by MI5; deeply flattered by it but too cowardly to resist its advances he played ball and produced for his paper stories he never bothered to check for their veracity but which he none the less wrote with a passion as if they were actually true. His editor needless to say was also in on this. Eventually though David Rose’s conscience started to bother him and he felt uneasy about what he was doing. Even so what took place wasn’t by any means a rebellion on his part. Off his own bat he decided to do a story on Guantanamo Bay and the detainees held there. His research was quite thorough and in the mould of what every impartial and competent journalist ought to be and should use as his or her benchmark when reporting the news but sadly 99.9% of then don’t because they’re either too bone idle to, or so incompetent that it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to them and in the final analysis the end result would still be the same as they’d still get it hopelessly wrong.
David Rose wrote and in due course published his Guantanamo Bay story but shortly after its publication discovered that calls to him from MI5 suddenly dried up and just as importantly to him his calls even to special MI5 numbers he’d been given by its chief and had regularly used in the past were now unattainable to him. Flummoxed by this he spoke to his editor an insider with MI5 who on his behalf spoke to MI5’s chief Stella Rimington: a cold-hearted bitch and every bit as much in the mould of Hillary Clinton, about the matter. Her response was that David Rose’s story on Guantanamo Bay was her words: “unhelpful to MI5.” Told by David’s editor that the story was none the less true this wholly unsavoury and immoral cow replied: “That’s not the point.” The word truth was obviously not part of her lexicon.
This woman and her ilk have been largely responsible not only for fabricating non existent tall tales and passing these off as facts but are instrumental in planting them in the media through their cat’s paws and having them paraded there as substantial stories with substance to them. More dangerous of all though is that they similarly present these lies they’ve made up to the British government, MPs, public and the world at large through the Foreign Office funded BBC World Service as irrefutable facts; and as if that wasn’t bad enough they then go on television, straight-faced and lying as Hillary Clinton regularly does vis-à-vis the United States, and make the case for war based on these lies. Wars conducted with countries whose resources they and their Zionist paymasters want to get their hands on and permanently control; boost even further their lucrative and major growth industry the military industrial complex and subjugate those rules and their countries like Iran, Venezuela and Cuba that have the guts to strand up to them.
Survey after survey has show that the sons and daughters of these warmongers never enter the armed forces of their countries and while their mums and dads in the security services happily foment war and dishonestly generate conflict around the globe needlessly killing and seriously maiming millions of innocent civilians in hapless, war ravaged countries like Afghanistan and Iraq; callously slaughtering thousands more in occupied and besieged Palestine, most notably Gaza, in Lebanon and North Africa, and displacing many millions more throughout the entire Middle East , and despite that still have an insatiable appetite and vicious bloodlust for more wars as they’re currently angling to do in Iran, they are themselves meticulously groomed for cushy, lucrative jobs.
We won’t for example ever see Chelsea Clinton for real in a United States military uniform, nor Tony Blair’s tribe either in relation to the British armed forces. Instead, Chelsea works for a very prominent hedge fund, one of those that gambled recklessly with your money, caused the credit crunch and have adversely affected millions of people around the world financially, but Chelsea won’t be short of a bob or two to use a colloquial English expression that infers she’ll always be well off; and it’s a sure bet she’s also being groomed as a future resident of the White House, an ambition her mother Hillary still has. It’s the same with Tony Blair’s brood; safe parliamentary constituent seats; ministerial and cabinet posts in a UK government; and then the top job.
Stella Rimington: MI5’s former boss and, as an individual, the physical embodiment of evil has officially stepped down as head of MI5 but her influence hasn’t waned and she’s now become a political advisor to the Conservative Party. But how many Afghans, Iraqis and other innocent civilian victims have died I wonder as a direct result of this woman’s lies - I’m talking about wholly and intentionally concocted fabrications here – which because of the crucially important and highly influential job she held down she could cynically and dishonestly use as a platform to lie to the British people, credulously soften them up, and dupe the UK’s parliament into going to war when it shouldn’t and wouldn’t have done so if the truth was told? And why in the name of everything that’s decent, particularly so when extra-rendition, torture transfers and extrajudicial executions have been her trade mark is this woman still alive? Is there no justice anymore in the world when callous mass murderers like Stella Rimington dishonestly passing themselves off as our nation’s protectors but are nothing of the kind; have no genuine allegiance to the people of the UK but only the money interests and those with power to satisfy their avarice are permitted to fabricate lying situations that result in our sons and daughters being sent off to God-forsaken countries to needlessly fight, get seriously injured or become permanently and mentally scarred and even pay the ultimate sacrifice in senseless, manufactured wars while deceitfully flaunting their fake patriotism, and are quite willing to defend the UK to the last drop of somebody else’s blood? Why I reiterate is Stella Rimington still alive and not subjected to the same fate that she arbitrarily and barbarously meted out to the numerous innocents whom she condemned to their untimely deaths and obviously got her kicks from doing so; since justice alone demands that she should die?
Vile as Stella Rimington is Hillary Clinton is even worse. The Mother of all Liars Hillary is a pathological and shameless liar who even believes her own lies, and when someone gets to that stage then having them legally sectioned, incarcerated and permanently out of harm’s way in the padded cell of a lunatic asylum is the only remedial course that I can think of except perhaps humanely putting them to sleep, out of their misery and effectively neutralizing their danger to others as one would a rabid dog on the loose and incurably infected with rabies. And there’s a legal recourse for this; it’s called the United States Constitution; the clause that categorically gives US citizens the right to bear arms.
That specific and highly crucial element of the United States Constitution wasn’t included by the Founding fathers to give lawless thugs and gangsters in Chicago, New York or elsewhere in the United States a free hand to maim or kill each other or wreak havoc on innocent civilians in their neighbourhoods but is in effect the official and legally enshrined green light for all US citizens to rise up if need be and by force of arms bump off or eradicate all tyrannical politicians and public figures who either individually or collectively abuse their offices and the power these bestow on them to the detriment of the US populace at large. But what really puzzles me, and I’m assuming that the average American knows his country’s constitution inside out, is why Americans who to put it mildly are instinctively such gun toting lovers don’t take more notice of their constitution, especially this aspect of it and bearing in mind the circumstances they’re currently in, to convert those hideously offending political power bases inside their country into full-scale firing ranges? The odds are that if they did they’d find themselves immeasurably better off than they presently are and additionally see their status and popularity throughout the world rise expeditiously as a result of what they’d done.
The crux of the matter is that the lie merchants in the United States, Britain, the rest of the EU and Israel aren’t only playing politics with the truth and de facto our lives but they’ve also gone much further and are creating lies on the ground which they then present as irrefutable facts and doing so with a single purpose in mind to dupe their respective citizens into believing that what they’re told is the unvarnished truth, enabling them to embark unchallenged in perpetrating even more heinous atrocities using these lies that they know are wilfully manufactured as justification for what they’re doing or are about to do.
And creating fear is a crucial element of this propaganda exercise. And a classic example of this is the position of Britain’s MI6. There would be no justification for many of its operations and possibly even its existence without the propaganda of fear, and many of the atrocities that MI6 reports as having been carried out by the bogeymen of so-called terrorists that they’ve invented and then go to great lengths to publicly disparage are in effect the handiwork of MI6 itself or its proxies to literally in most cases justify its existence and the expenditure spent on it. A situation akin to a crafty glazer paying sycophantic thugs to covertly go around and smash your house or shop windows then audaciously approaching you, fraudulently but oh so politely sympathizing with you over your unprovoked bad luck then conveniently offering you his services as a glazer.
Besides a lot of MI6 principal operatives are products of the class ridden, British public schools system (for those of you not familiar with the English educational system public schools are in effect tremendously expensive, fee paying, private and privileged, elite schools and colleges and shouldn’t be confused with public schools which are state owned and free), haven’t got a clue of the real world outside their constricted elitist confines, and for the most part, irrespective of their gender, are either gay or lesbian with both groups seemingly feeling the necessity to demonstrate their machismo, because in reality neither of them has any which is natural anyway, and with the women ending up the more butch and testosterone driven of the two. Not all that surprising when one takes fully into consideration the sexual ethos of these public schools and the position played by their disciplinarian matrons vis-à-vis these highly impressionable boys in their charge. And as we learnt from Burgess and MacLean two key MI6 spies that defected to the Soviet Union, many of these operatives in the upper echelons of MI6 are little more than pebble mouthed and double-barrelled named dimwits who were they ever to find themselves confronted on a one to one basis with a real honest to goodness foe would simply piss themselves with fear; dysfunctional people that quite frankly are totally incapable of determining what are security matters as they pertain to Britain and what are essentially British interests and being able therefore to differentiate between the two of them.
The latest barefaced lie being wantonly put about by these people is that the Iranian broadcaster Press TV which specializes in giving an alternative and more objective appraisal and reporting of global news from the sickeningly infernal propaganda that characterizes all western broadcasters with their vested financial interests to take care of and therefore have no time or any concern for the truth or impartial reporting of the news which is selectively embarked on anyway, and which assiduously, deliberately and refreshingly devotes its energy and programming to giving a much appreciated voice to the voiceless is, according to these tedious hypocrites, peddling propaganda and must be reined in. The reality though is that increasingly large numbers of people in the west are tuning into Press TV and shutting of completely their western broadcasting stations because the general consensus is that these can no longer be trusted and viewers see no reason why they should continue to have their intelligence insulted by these organisations, or have to stomach the wilful lies and distortions they’re being constantly fed and have grown thoroughly sick and tired of. But rather than take a long, hard look at themselves and what they’re doing and then sensibly rectify their wrongdoings these western media stations have instead opted to do what all bullies and tyrants do when their lack of oblivious credibility is questioned and highlighted; denigrate the person or persons who are drawing attention to their failings or to use another terminology kill the messenger for bringing unpleasant news and showing them up for what they really are.
It’s an open secret in the UK that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates have all had talks with David Cameron, senior members of his cabinet, the BBC’s Board of Governors, its Director General, heads of the independent television companies in the UK, notably Channel 4 and ITV, and crucially with Ofcom, the British broadcasting watchdog; poodle would be a more fitting title for it, to manufacture a plethora of mendacious reasons and methodically use these as the basis to ban Press TV from operating in the United Kingdom where it is very popular and has a large following among the local British population who look to it for unbiased, informative and accurate news reports on normally reported stories but more specifically on stories that the media in the west most cynically conspire with each other not to touch let alone cover; and the result of this puerile short-sightedness and rank stupidity by these western broadcasting companies is that while the viewing figures of these broadcasting corporations are plummeting dramatically, most conspicuously those of the public broadcaster and involuntary citizen and resident funded BBC, in marked contrast those of Press TV are literally skyrocketing.
I’ve written a number of articles in the past about the BBC’s lack of impartiality, its propaganda and deliberate lies going back despite its lofty charter to its very inception, but it really took the biscuit when on Monday 11 April 2011 in its Panorama programme hosted by a presenter who is widely known to be an incorrigible Zionist, virulent Islamophobe and hater of all things Iranian, the BBC having from the very beginning of the peoples’ peaceful protests in Bahrain resolutely refused to screen or report on any news concerning Bahrain or the Yemen for that matter in spite of the well documented accounts of ongoing atrocities in both these countries aided and abetted by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait, none the less devoted its prime time television slot to doing a hatchet job on Iran and Press TV, labelling the Iranian Republic which unlike Britain hasn’t waged war on any country for centuries but instead has had war visited on it by the west and its proxies, chiefly Iraq, as abysmally short on human rights then using footage which at the end of the Panorama programme the BBC barefacedly announced couldn’t be verified as being authentic as it had no corroborative evidence to substantiate its claims, as dubious and evidently lying assertions to denigrate and vilify Iran. Then utterly insensitive to the irony of what it was doing and Britain’s own human rights violations that are legion and have stretched over a period of almost a half a millennium up to the present time the BBC in that same Panorama programme went on to state further that Press TV isn’t a genuine news broadcasting organization but is really the mouthpiece of the undemocratic Iranian government and should have its licence to operate in the UK revoked.
Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and the BBC an impartial news broadcaster that assiduously distances itself from the dictates of No.10 and its Zionists controllers; well you couldn’t have made that up could you?
Nevertheless I was heartened by the fact that the BBC’s switchboard was jammed during and after the screening of the Panorama programme with many thousands of irate calls from furious viewers deeply angered and disgusted that in abrogation yet again of its clearly defined charter to be impartial and non-propagandistic in its programming the BBC had chosen as it has repeatedly done in the past and regularly keeps on doing with impunity to violate these tenets. At the same time the BBC’s website I understand also crashed as a consequence of the enormous number of protests which were sent it, but unsurprisingly none of this was ever made public by the BBC of its own volition, and only when relentlessly questioned did it admit to what happened.
How on earth with broadcasting media organizations like Fox News; CNN; ABC, France 24 and the same BBC either inventing stories, distorting others or quite flatly refusing to report on many others because in doing so would run contrary to the agenda of their political and or financial pay masters can these same organizations have the nerve to damn and malign honest broadcasters for doing what competent and genuinely professional broadcasters are meant to do? To watch these broadcasters at work one could be readily forgiven for thinking that everything is peace and light in Bahrain, the Yemen and Saudi Arabia for example, but where instead gruesome atrocities that are far worse than those allegedly taking place in Libya, and significantly much more widespread and intensified against unarmed and peaceful protestors, are going on apace against the backdrop of western silence and complicit military, diplomatic and financial support for the perpetrators.
Barack Obama also talks a lot about the absence of freedom of expression in Libya; journalists being arrested; civilians being targeted and killed and goes on to use these as justifiable pretexts for the United States and its NATO allies to intervene in Libya but conveniently steers clear of what he, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton and the rest of these hypocrites know full well is happening in the Gulf region at the behest of his administration which gave the green light for it. Bill Gates can lie till the cows come home, it was he who went to Bahrain and assured the despot there that the United States had okayed it for Saudi Arabia to go into Bahrain to kill and suppress the local people in that country. Even more damning was Hillary Clinton’s remarks on Thursday 20 April that the US expects to see permanent and positive reforms in Syria; nothing about Saudi Arabia a totally autocratic state run by a bunch of murdering Wahhabi savages whose only raison d’être in life is to obsessively and exclusively hold on to political and economic power and the massive oil wealth of Saudi Arabia at all costs in order to lavishly fund the decedent life style of its outsized, inbred and incestuous family members.
Try these for size Barack: Saudi Arabia’s destruction of centuries’ old mosques in Bahrain in a desperate attempt to foment a sectarian divide because the protests there aren’t anything of the sort but a general uprising over centuries of abuse on the majority indigenous population by an implanted foreign hereditary family, but this nevertheless isn’t how that Al-Khalifi family and its western allies in order to justify their mutual brutal crackdown would like to portray the people’s protests to the world; the stark irony is that Saudi Arabia then has the audacity to portray itself as the authentic protector of Islam and the guardian of two of its most holy places. The widespread use of torture; kidnapping; the refusal of medical help to the injured and dying; dragging the sick and injured from their hospital bed; arresting public workers; teachers; doctors; even school kids for peacefully protesting about the ills in their country; arbitrary executions and the dumping of the bodies of those slain in rubbish bins; banning political parties; arresting people in their homes and disappearing them; stopping the funding of Bahraini students on educational courses abroad and demanding that they return home if members of their families or even they speak out about what is going on in their country; and much more. But despite knowing this there are no words of condemnation from or any action taken by the troika of Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy, the western media or its human rights organizations which are always quick to condemn far less heinous crimes committed elsewhere outside the preserve of the west.
Saudi Arabia has no constitution, no democracy, no voting, the country is ruled by one family and by decree; Saudi Arabia also sponsors terrorism through its Wahhabi and Salafist terrorist networks which the US and the west are well aware of; so much for their much vaunted claims that they want to root out world terrorism, but we all know much of the terrorism in the world is western financed anyway and the words of Barack Obama and his counterparts are just hollow and quite meaningless. An example of these utterly infernal and irritating double standards can be judged from Catherine Ashton’s recent remarks. This woman aka the EU’s foreign minister but who is an absolute nonentity even in her native Britain recently issued a veiled warning to the Iraqi government about not respecting the rights of the MKO. For those of you who are still unfamiliar with who the MKO are, they are globally recognized as a terrorist group even in the west and were used by Saddam Hussein to massacre the Kurds and also against Iran in his war against that country, sponsored as I’m sure you know by the west.
They are now housed in Iraq and have been useful to the west for carrying out sectarian violence in Iraq to justify the presence of western foreign troops in that country. Operating like a religious sect in the west where once you become a member either voluntarily or involuntarily you can’t leave the MKO has been given a new lease of life. The Iraqis desperately want them out of their country where they don’t belong as they’re not local people but the Americans and the west see them as a convenient tool to use against their obsessive bogeyman Iran, and so the US and EU have both expediently revoked their terrorist status and with the political, financial and military help of far right morons like the former prime minister of Spain and other western leaders past and present these real live terrorists are now let loose to carry out their western and well funded terrorism against Iran from their base in neighbouring Iraq; and even when they killed several of their members to stop them leaving the MKO and falsely blame the Iraqi security forces for this Catherine Ashton, even when news of this eventually emerged thanks to MKO members who’d managed to escape, it didn’t stop Catherine Ashton from supporting these terrorist; and we’re supposed to trust and have respect for their alleged champions of democracy and human rights. But the lives of these people are so full of lies and deception in everything that they do that the truth for them is really a bridge too far.
I was told confidentially that the British media does not report on Bahrain for fear of upsetting the hereditary, petrol monarch there who is a close friend of the British Royal Family and has been invited to Prince William’s wedding; and were the British people at large to know the full extent of his murderous atrocities brutally compounded by those of members of his family and other Arab savages like the Saudis and those from similarly tyrannical Gulf states that this man has inexcusably and deplorably invited into Bahrain to systematically slaughter the indigenous people there, that there’d be massive demonstrations in London against his presence in the UK. For let’s not forget that the al-khalifa family that sees and treats Bahrain as if it were its private estate is a foreign import, taken there in 1820 by the British who have supported them through thick and thin ever since, and at no time following its enforced implantation on the majority of the Bahraini people have these crude interlopers saw or felt the need to integrate with the local people or express any empathy with them. Let me posit this supposition to you. Try imagining that the country where you were born, belong to and that your ancestors have lived in for many thousands of years suddenly finds itself ruled by outsiders who not only don’t want to have any thing at all to do with you but even prohibit you from being a member of its armed forces.
Yes, that’s the situation in Bahrain where the military is comprised of mercenaries from Jordan, Pakistan, India, anywhere you can imagine except from among the Bahraini people and therefore it’s hardly surprising that they too don’t empathize with the local people; they get paid, are told what they have to do, are given residence in the country and callously do what they are instructed to; and when you compound this approach with invitations from this depraved Bahrain butcher to the Saudis and other repulsive Gulf states to march into Bahrain to further massacre and terrorize the local Bahraini populace little wonder that stalwart friends in the west of this power-obsessed psychopath and their media organisations are tight-lipped about what is going on at the hands of one of their buddies. Contrast this with what would have been a wholly different approach from these utterly odious people if it were Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas that was doing any of this. In fact they are so worried by their own silence and the knowledge that there are growing numbers of people out there who see them for what they really are that they’re even trying to put the very obvious lie out that what is happening in Bahrain and the Yemen is being orchestrated by Iran. In other words it’s everybody else’s fault bar their own, and if they can shout loud and long enough that it’s the doing of those whom they like to vilify perhaps enough idiots, or the gullible among their own population will believe these lies as well. That’s why they hate with a passion stations like Press TV, as they show a blazing spotlight on the hypocrisies and double standards of these infantile but highly dangerous people. The Israelis have an apt saying, namely: it’s best to lie and the bigger that lie is and the louder and more frequently you repeat it the greater is the possibility people will be believed. My view on this is if you’re one of those naïve cretins then you deserve everything you get.
That this Bahrain butcher should be contemplating coming to the UK in view of what is going on in the country over which he rules (note I’ve made a clear distinction here and not used the term his country) is mindboggling; that the House of Windsor hasn’t cancelled that invitation is even more loathsome in my view. But knowing that there will be demonstrations against him and in a classic situation of using lies to buttress up their perfidy MI5 is putting it about in the media and through Scotland Yard that there must be additional security to protect William and his fiancée Kate from stalkers and or demonstrators against Prince Charles. What a load of tosh! First this is not Charles’ wedding or even his coronation. Second, the people of the United Kingdom whether they are diehard monarchists, few in number; apathetic to the monarch, most of us; or are simply republicans have nothing personally against William or Kate. Moreover, all empirical data show that William’s mother Princess Diana was greatly loved by the vast majority of the British public a figure that averages around 98% after the tragic circumstances of her death which many of us believe was cold-blooded murder by the security services.
It’s common knowledge among journalists that it was Bill Gates, the US Defence Secretary, who gave the green light to set in place the honey trap in which to lure the Wikileaks founder and in collaboration with the Swedish authorities created the lying scenario that resulted even when the original state prosecutor said there was no case to answer. This is the same Bill Gates that said he was unaware that Saudi Arabia would invade Bahrain to suppress its indigenous people seeking the same democratic rights that Bill Gates takes for granted in the United States, yet it was none other than Bill Gates that gave the green light for the Saudi invasion to take place; so would you really want to trust this man unless you were plain stupid, naïve or the same compulsive liar that he is? Much too is made of Libya using cluster bombs in Misrata and we have the UN so-called human rights body stating that Colonel Gaddafi and his government will be brought to brook at the ICC for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Where was this organization when enfant terrible Israel was dropping hundred of thousands of these same cluster bombs on Lebanon and Gaza, and where was the ICC during all this.
I’ll tell you; in New York being partisan. We know from Wikileaks disclosures that Susan Rice the US ambassador at the UN and a lightweight intellectually and in every other respect trying to make a name for herself and prove that she can outdo Condi Rice pressured both the ICC and the UN Human Rights body not to take any action against Israel and went on to issue a veiled threat to the ICC that if it did then it would lose credibility in the eyes of the US. Can you believe that? The US like Israel are not signatories to the ICC and adamantly refuse to yet that body allows both these countries to call the shots when they shouldn’t even be listened to. Would you have someone who doesn’t live in your house, who doesn’t contribute to your household expenses and the like telling you how to run your home? But this is the arrogance of the Zionists who feel they can do whatever they like and get away with it; and they do because of people like you who fall for their lies and deception every time; and the dreadful part about that is the lies and deceptions are the same. So who really are the idiots these people or yourselves?
In any democratic election held in any of the Gulf States and particularly in Saudi Arabia these autocrats would be swept from power and western rulers know this; but having these murderous despots in place guarantees the west’ and especially the US’s hegemony of the area and its crude exploitation of the region’s natural resources; for in a true democracy they wouldn’t be allowed to as any government that permitted this sort of thing would be wiped out at the polls. But as one US journalist proudly boasted to me, all we want in these countries is lots of Sharia laws to keep the Arab populations in check and unscrupulous, greedy dictators who’ll happily do this for us as we continue to reap the benefits in the west. And this was literally given credence in several US media outlets today, 21 April 2011, when in what is clearly a concerted western campaign on the behalf of long-term western cat’s paw Hosni Mubarak prominent US newspapers were positing the notion that, wait for it, Mubarak has suffered enough and ought now to be left in peace. Oh really? Over 30 brutal years of dictatorship and the suppression of Egyptians (note I haven’t said his people as he never considered them as such); the callous and barbaric killing of around 1000 peaceful protestors and the injurious of thousands more in the recent upsurge of peaceful protests against his autocratic rule of Egypt and the negation of all democratic rights there; let him be so he can waltz away scot-free with the over 75 billion US dollars that he and his family embezzled from the Egyptian people?
Is this why no western country has been keen to freeze his vast and illegally acquired financial assets or those of his family members and friends; why we don’t hear a similar clamour that he be sent to the ICC like all those who for wholly unjustifiable reasons the west want to see there and the ICC readily complies? Does one get a blank cheque to do what he or she likes so long as they support the Zionist entity in the Middle East as the butcher in Bahrain boasts that he does and as we know Mubarak did working closely not only with the government there but also with Mossad whose tactics they copied and employed even down to the desecration of holy places? Now we’ve further learnt that the butcher of Bahrain is to send new recruits of his mercenary army and police to the US to be trained; doubtlessly at the School of the Americas where all of America’s terrorist friends are trained with the full backing and support of the CIA. Then these people fake surprise when people say enough is enough and in a few instances and in the absence of Cobra helicopters, cruise missiles, nuclear weapons, depleted uranium bombs and the whole panoply of state of the art weaponry at the disposal of the west, strike back with the only things they have, their bodies; using these as incendiaries and live weapons against their obdurate and unrelenting enemies; and who if they’re being just and fair can blame them?
And to this end we ask that Press TV and the alternative media stay vigilant and true to the principle of the fourth estate and report the news as it is; you don’t have to fall into the west’s trap of chasing ratings as it’s not what your viewers want. What they most emphatically want however is to be treated with respect and as persons with working brains in their heads; give us the facts as they are and allow us in an informative way to make up our own minds and not go down the road of the western media that treat its viewers as idiots and do so primarily because they know that many of them are credulous; ill-informed; and have short memories. Education isn’t their natural remit, and as you’ll recall immediately in the wake of 9/11 President George W. Bush exhorted the US public to go out and shop; and he did this because the US is based on consumerism, nothing else. I think that about says it all and why successive US governments literally get away with mass murder.
In concluding this article I believe that Diana did a fantastic job in raising her two boys and in manner completely different from the sterile manner in which the Queen and Margaret were brought up and that the Queen herself adopted as regards her own children as she knew nothing else or anything better; a situation that has resulted despite all their money, privileged status and the rest of it has resulted in Her Majesty having one of the most dysfunctional families in the United Kingdom, and let’s be perfectly honest about that. That said I would still prefer to have her as head of state any day than see that role take on by lying, dishonest bastards of the ilk of Tony Blair, Gordon Browne, David Cameron, Neil Kinnock or the rest of them. But Princess Diana with all her foibles (and who is without theirs?) was special and particularly so as a mum. She had that instinctive touchy empathetic feeling and naturalness that the Queen, Charles and the rest of the Queen’s kids lack, and more importantly Diana conveyed this admirably to both her sons just as she equally did so with the rest of the world, and I honestly believe that William and Harry are all the better off for this wondrous gift that they inherited and had reinforced by their mother.
Furthermore, the closest that the British people en masse came to demanding a republic in my life time was when the Queen and Philip decided initially to distance themselves from Diana’s death and the spontaneous national mourning surrounding it and deliberately opted to stay away from London; the resultant public mood towards them for this discourtesy was virulently hostile and tangible and the survivor that she is the Queen quickly latched onto to what was a genuine public sentiment and changed her tune. She not only came down to London post haste from her Balmoral holiday residence but gave instructions that the Union Jack be flown at half mast over Buckingham Palace; but it was a close call for her Majesty!
Now ask yourselves with Diana even after her tragic murder those many years ago still a Lady who is overwhelmingly loved by the British public and with William the spitting image of his dead mother why would anyone in Britain with even the barest modicum of love for Diana want to spoil her son’s great day knowing as we all do what a bastard Prince Charles was to Diana? What would be their motivation; and why would they want to sully Diana’s memory? And the red herring about Prince Charles is just that; he’s already married to Camilla and I didn’t detect any rebellions in the UK because of this even though 99.9% of the British people don’t want to see her as Queen and would never stomach her, even though as Charles legal wife she’s entitled to the title, as the Princess of Wales which we will always associate with Diana. So is being put out there is nothing more than lies and propaganda; the ruler of Bahrain should not be here and I don’t care how friendly he is with Charles or the Queen or Philip, he should not be coming to the UK, but don’t then insult our intelligence by claiming it’s all to do with protecting William.
So when next you’re told by the BBC, Fox News, CNN, the BBC World, France 24, ABC and the rest of that mob that this or that is being done for whatever farfetched reason they then go on to give or that your security services or mine have discovered this or that terrorist plot my advice to you is hold your nose tightly and keep the stinking stench out. The fact that this collective of pathological liars, their government and security services are spending time, effort and vast sums of money to malign Press TV and dupe you in the process is a clear indication if you ever needed one that Press TV is getting it right and these brigands are deeply worried. As a result be on your guard at all times and importantly try thinking for yourselves.
Intelligence is about deception and the security services of every country that has them indulge in deceptions of one kind or another and invariably charm, inveigle, bribe or coerce their media and journalists to print, broadcast and run stories that are pure fiction in order to serve the vested interests of these spy organizations, their governments and the powerful forces in and out of the country that they are linked to. The British foreign spy organization MI6 and the domestic one MI5 both have a specialist department of their own where the sole purpose of that section is to manufacture lies; stories that aren’t even based on half truths, innuendoes or suspicions but are 100% unadulterated concoctions of the sick minds of those working in those departments. These sickos then either through profitable inducements flatter or else compromise journalists and their editors in the British media to carry these fabricated stories with promises of further scoops if they cooperate; if they don’t they are themselves targeted, isolated, shunned and even subjected to much worse. So British journalist many of whom are limp-wristed cowards readily comply and do the bidding of the security services flattered by the privileged treatment they’re given by powerful men and women with the immunity to do what they want to and no questions asked, and when one factors in the endemic class system which still pervades much of British society it’s very easy, if not wholly comprehensible if you’re intelligent and objective that is, to see why it happens.
David Rose a prominent British journalist who finally came to his senses recounted how he was approached by MI5; deeply flattered by it but too cowardly to resist its advances he played ball and produced for his paper stories he never bothered to check for their veracity but which he none the less wrote with a passion as if they were actually true. His editor needless to say was also in on this. Eventually though David Rose’s conscience started to bother him and he felt uneasy about what he was doing. Even so what took place wasn’t by any means a rebellion on his part. Off his own bat he decided to do a story on Guantanamo Bay and the detainees held there. His research was quite thorough and in the mould of what every impartial and competent journalist ought to be and should use as his or her benchmark when reporting the news but sadly 99.9% of then don’t because they’re either too bone idle to, or so incompetent that it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to them and in the final analysis the end result would still be the same as they’d still get it hopelessly wrong.
David Rose wrote and in due course published his Guantanamo Bay story but shortly after its publication discovered that calls to him from MI5 suddenly dried up and just as importantly to him his calls even to special MI5 numbers he’d been given by its chief and had regularly used in the past were now unattainable to him. Flummoxed by this he spoke to his editor an insider with MI5 who on his behalf spoke to MI5’s chief Stella Rimington: a cold-hearted bitch and every bit as much in the mould of Hillary Clinton, about the matter. Her response was that David Rose’s story on Guantanamo Bay was her words: “unhelpful to MI5.” Told by David’s editor that the story was none the less true this wholly unsavoury and immoral cow replied: “That’s not the point.” The word truth was obviously not part of her lexicon.
This woman and her ilk have been largely responsible not only for fabricating non existent tall tales and passing these off as facts but are instrumental in planting them in the media through their cat’s paws and having them paraded there as substantial stories with substance to them. More dangerous of all though is that they similarly present these lies they’ve made up to the British government, MPs, public and the world at large through the Foreign Office funded BBC World Service as irrefutable facts; and as if that wasn’t bad enough they then go on television, straight-faced and lying as Hillary Clinton regularly does vis-à-vis the United States, and make the case for war based on these lies. Wars conducted with countries whose resources they and their Zionist paymasters want to get their hands on and permanently control; boost even further their lucrative and major growth industry the military industrial complex and subjugate those rules and their countries like Iran, Venezuela and Cuba that have the guts to strand up to them.
Survey after survey has show that the sons and daughters of these warmongers never enter the armed forces of their countries and while their mums and dads in the security services happily foment war and dishonestly generate conflict around the globe needlessly killing and seriously maiming millions of innocent civilians in hapless, war ravaged countries like Afghanistan and Iraq; callously slaughtering thousands more in occupied and besieged Palestine, most notably Gaza, in Lebanon and North Africa, and displacing many millions more throughout the entire Middle East , and despite that still have an insatiable appetite and vicious bloodlust for more wars as they’re currently angling to do in Iran, they are themselves meticulously groomed for cushy, lucrative jobs.
We won’t for example ever see Chelsea Clinton for real in a United States military uniform, nor Tony Blair’s tribe either in relation to the British armed forces. Instead, Chelsea works for a very prominent hedge fund, one of those that gambled recklessly with your money, caused the credit crunch and have adversely affected millions of people around the world financially, but Chelsea won’t be short of a bob or two to use a colloquial English expression that infers she’ll always be well off; and it’s a sure bet she’s also being groomed as a future resident of the White House, an ambition her mother Hillary still has. It’s the same with Tony Blair’s brood; safe parliamentary constituent seats; ministerial and cabinet posts in a UK government; and then the top job.
Stella Rimington: MI5’s former boss and, as an individual, the physical embodiment of evil has officially stepped down as head of MI5 but her influence hasn’t waned and she’s now become a political advisor to the Conservative Party. But how many Afghans, Iraqis and other innocent civilian victims have died I wonder as a direct result of this woman’s lies - I’m talking about wholly and intentionally concocted fabrications here – which because of the crucially important and highly influential job she held down she could cynically and dishonestly use as a platform to lie to the British people, credulously soften them up, and dupe the UK’s parliament into going to war when it shouldn’t and wouldn’t have done so if the truth was told? And why in the name of everything that’s decent, particularly so when extra-rendition, torture transfers and extrajudicial executions have been her trade mark is this woman still alive? Is there no justice anymore in the world when callous mass murderers like Stella Rimington dishonestly passing themselves off as our nation’s protectors but are nothing of the kind; have no genuine allegiance to the people of the UK but only the money interests and those with power to satisfy their avarice are permitted to fabricate lying situations that result in our sons and daughters being sent off to God-forsaken countries to needlessly fight, get seriously injured or become permanently and mentally scarred and even pay the ultimate sacrifice in senseless, manufactured wars while deceitfully flaunting their fake patriotism, and are quite willing to defend the UK to the last drop of somebody else’s blood? Why I reiterate is Stella Rimington still alive and not subjected to the same fate that she arbitrarily and barbarously meted out to the numerous innocents whom she condemned to their untimely deaths and obviously got her kicks from doing so; since justice alone demands that she should die?
Vile as Stella Rimington is Hillary Clinton is even worse. The Mother of all Liars Hillary is a pathological and shameless liar who even believes her own lies, and when someone gets to that stage then having them legally sectioned, incarcerated and permanently out of harm’s way in the padded cell of a lunatic asylum is the only remedial course that I can think of except perhaps humanely putting them to sleep, out of their misery and effectively neutralizing their danger to others as one would a rabid dog on the loose and incurably infected with rabies. And there’s a legal recourse for this; it’s called the United States Constitution; the clause that categorically gives US citizens the right to bear arms.
That specific and highly crucial element of the United States Constitution wasn’t included by the Founding fathers to give lawless thugs and gangsters in Chicago, New York or elsewhere in the United States a free hand to maim or kill each other or wreak havoc on innocent civilians in their neighbourhoods but is in effect the official and legally enshrined green light for all US citizens to rise up if need be and by force of arms bump off or eradicate all tyrannical politicians and public figures who either individually or collectively abuse their offices and the power these bestow on them to the detriment of the US populace at large. But what really puzzles me, and I’m assuming that the average American knows his country’s constitution inside out, is why Americans who to put it mildly are instinctively such gun toting lovers don’t take more notice of their constitution, especially this aspect of it and bearing in mind the circumstances they’re currently in, to convert those hideously offending political power bases inside their country into full-scale firing ranges? The odds are that if they did they’d find themselves immeasurably better off than they presently are and additionally see their status and popularity throughout the world rise expeditiously as a result of what they’d done.
The crux of the matter is that the lie merchants in the United States, Britain, the rest of the EU and Israel aren’t only playing politics with the truth and de facto our lives but they’ve also gone much further and are creating lies on the ground which they then present as irrefutable facts and doing so with a single purpose in mind to dupe their respective citizens into believing that what they’re told is the unvarnished truth, enabling them to embark unchallenged in perpetrating even more heinous atrocities using these lies that they know are wilfully manufactured as justification for what they’re doing or are about to do.
And creating fear is a crucial element of this propaganda exercise. And a classic example of this is the position of Britain’s MI6. There would be no justification for many of its operations and possibly even its existence without the propaganda of fear, and many of the atrocities that MI6 reports as having been carried out by the bogeymen of so-called terrorists that they’ve invented and then go to great lengths to publicly disparage are in effect the handiwork of MI6 itself or its proxies to literally in most cases justify its existence and the expenditure spent on it. A situation akin to a crafty glazer paying sycophantic thugs to covertly go around and smash your house or shop windows then audaciously approaching you, fraudulently but oh so politely sympathizing with you over your unprovoked bad luck then conveniently offering you his services as a glazer.
Besides a lot of MI6 principal operatives are products of the class ridden, British public schools system (for those of you not familiar with the English educational system public schools are in effect tremendously expensive, fee paying, private and privileged, elite schools and colleges and shouldn’t be confused with public schools which are state owned and free), haven’t got a clue of the real world outside their constricted elitist confines, and for the most part, irrespective of their gender, are either gay or lesbian with both groups seemingly feeling the necessity to demonstrate their machismo, because in reality neither of them has any which is natural anyway, and with the women ending up the more butch and testosterone driven of the two. Not all that surprising when one takes fully into consideration the sexual ethos of these public schools and the position played by their disciplinarian matrons vis-à-vis these highly impressionable boys in their charge. And as we learnt from Burgess and MacLean two key MI6 spies that defected to the Soviet Union, many of these operatives in the upper echelons of MI6 are little more than pebble mouthed and double-barrelled named dimwits who were they ever to find themselves confronted on a one to one basis with a real honest to goodness foe would simply piss themselves with fear; dysfunctional people that quite frankly are totally incapable of determining what are security matters as they pertain to Britain and what are essentially British interests and being able therefore to differentiate between the two of them.
The latest barefaced lie being wantonly put about by these people is that the Iranian broadcaster Press TV which specializes in giving an alternative and more objective appraisal and reporting of global news from the sickeningly infernal propaganda that characterizes all western broadcasters with their vested financial interests to take care of and therefore have no time or any concern for the truth or impartial reporting of the news which is selectively embarked on anyway, and which assiduously, deliberately and refreshingly devotes its energy and programming to giving a much appreciated voice to the voiceless is, according to these tedious hypocrites, peddling propaganda and must be reined in. The reality though is that increasingly large numbers of people in the west are tuning into Press TV and shutting of completely their western broadcasting stations because the general consensus is that these can no longer be trusted and viewers see no reason why they should continue to have their intelligence insulted by these organisations, or have to stomach the wilful lies and distortions they’re being constantly fed and have grown thoroughly sick and tired of. But rather than take a long, hard look at themselves and what they’re doing and then sensibly rectify their wrongdoings these western media stations have instead opted to do what all bullies and tyrants do when their lack of oblivious credibility is questioned and highlighted; denigrate the person or persons who are drawing attention to their failings or to use another terminology kill the messenger for bringing unpleasant news and showing them up for what they really are.
It’s an open secret in the UK that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates have all had talks with David Cameron, senior members of his cabinet, the BBC’s Board of Governors, its Director General, heads of the independent television companies in the UK, notably Channel 4 and ITV, and crucially with Ofcom, the British broadcasting watchdog; poodle would be a more fitting title for it, to manufacture a plethora of mendacious reasons and methodically use these as the basis to ban Press TV from operating in the United Kingdom where it is very popular and has a large following among the local British population who look to it for unbiased, informative and accurate news reports on normally reported stories but more specifically on stories that the media in the west most cynically conspire with each other not to touch let alone cover; and the result of this puerile short-sightedness and rank stupidity by these western broadcasting companies is that while the viewing figures of these broadcasting corporations are plummeting dramatically, most conspicuously those of the public broadcaster and involuntary citizen and resident funded BBC, in marked contrast those of Press TV are literally skyrocketing.
I’ve written a number of articles in the past about the BBC’s lack of impartiality, its propaganda and deliberate lies going back despite its lofty charter to its very inception, but it really took the biscuit when on Monday 11 April 2011 in its Panorama programme hosted by a presenter who is widely known to be an incorrigible Zionist, virulent Islamophobe and hater of all things Iranian, the BBC having from the very beginning of the peoples’ peaceful protests in Bahrain resolutely refused to screen or report on any news concerning Bahrain or the Yemen for that matter in spite of the well documented accounts of ongoing atrocities in both these countries aided and abetted by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait, none the less devoted its prime time television slot to doing a hatchet job on Iran and Press TV, labelling the Iranian Republic which unlike Britain hasn’t waged war on any country for centuries but instead has had war visited on it by the west and its proxies, chiefly Iraq, as abysmally short on human rights then using footage which at the end of the Panorama programme the BBC barefacedly announced couldn’t be verified as being authentic as it had no corroborative evidence to substantiate its claims, as dubious and evidently lying assertions to denigrate and vilify Iran. Then utterly insensitive to the irony of what it was doing and Britain’s own human rights violations that are legion and have stretched over a period of almost a half a millennium up to the present time the BBC in that same Panorama programme went on to state further that Press TV isn’t a genuine news broadcasting organization but is really the mouthpiece of the undemocratic Iranian government and should have its licence to operate in the UK revoked.
Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and the BBC an impartial news broadcaster that assiduously distances itself from the dictates of No.10 and its Zionists controllers; well you couldn’t have made that up could you?
Nevertheless I was heartened by the fact that the BBC’s switchboard was jammed during and after the screening of the Panorama programme with many thousands of irate calls from furious viewers deeply angered and disgusted that in abrogation yet again of its clearly defined charter to be impartial and non-propagandistic in its programming the BBC had chosen as it has repeatedly done in the past and regularly keeps on doing with impunity to violate these tenets. At the same time the BBC’s website I understand also crashed as a consequence of the enormous number of protests which were sent it, but unsurprisingly none of this was ever made public by the BBC of its own volition, and only when relentlessly questioned did it admit to what happened.
How on earth with broadcasting media organizations like Fox News; CNN; ABC, France 24 and the same BBC either inventing stories, distorting others or quite flatly refusing to report on many others because in doing so would run contrary to the agenda of their political and or financial pay masters can these same organizations have the nerve to damn and malign honest broadcasters for doing what competent and genuinely professional broadcasters are meant to do? To watch these broadcasters at work one could be readily forgiven for thinking that everything is peace and light in Bahrain, the Yemen and Saudi Arabia for example, but where instead gruesome atrocities that are far worse than those allegedly taking place in Libya, and significantly much more widespread and intensified against unarmed and peaceful protestors, are going on apace against the backdrop of western silence and complicit military, diplomatic and financial support for the perpetrators.
Barack Obama also talks a lot about the absence of freedom of expression in Libya; journalists being arrested; civilians being targeted and killed and goes on to use these as justifiable pretexts for the United States and its NATO allies to intervene in Libya but conveniently steers clear of what he, Bill Gates, Hillary Clinton and the rest of these hypocrites know full well is happening in the Gulf region at the behest of his administration which gave the green light for it. Bill Gates can lie till the cows come home, it was he who went to Bahrain and assured the despot there that the United States had okayed it for Saudi Arabia to go into Bahrain to kill and suppress the local people in that country. Even more damning was Hillary Clinton’s remarks on Thursday 20 April that the US expects to see permanent and positive reforms in Syria; nothing about Saudi Arabia a totally autocratic state run by a bunch of murdering Wahhabi savages whose only raison d’être in life is to obsessively and exclusively hold on to political and economic power and the massive oil wealth of Saudi Arabia at all costs in order to lavishly fund the decedent life style of its outsized, inbred and incestuous family members.
Try these for size Barack: Saudi Arabia’s destruction of centuries’ old mosques in Bahrain in a desperate attempt to foment a sectarian divide because the protests there aren’t anything of the sort but a general uprising over centuries of abuse on the majority indigenous population by an implanted foreign hereditary family, but this nevertheless isn’t how that Al-Khalifi family and its western allies in order to justify their mutual brutal crackdown would like to portray the people’s protests to the world; the stark irony is that Saudi Arabia then has the audacity to portray itself as the authentic protector of Islam and the guardian of two of its most holy places. The widespread use of torture; kidnapping; the refusal of medical help to the injured and dying; dragging the sick and injured from their hospital bed; arresting public workers; teachers; doctors; even school kids for peacefully protesting about the ills in their country; arbitrary executions and the dumping of the bodies of those slain in rubbish bins; banning political parties; arresting people in their homes and disappearing them; stopping the funding of Bahraini students on educational courses abroad and demanding that they return home if members of their families or even they speak out about what is going on in their country; and much more. But despite knowing this there are no words of condemnation from or any action taken by the troika of Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy, the western media or its human rights organizations which are always quick to condemn far less heinous crimes committed elsewhere outside the preserve of the west.
Saudi Arabia has no constitution, no democracy, no voting, the country is ruled by one family and by decree; Saudi Arabia also sponsors terrorism through its Wahhabi and Salafist terrorist networks which the US and the west are well aware of; so much for their much vaunted claims that they want to root out world terrorism, but we all know much of the terrorism in the world is western financed anyway and the words of Barack Obama and his counterparts are just hollow and quite meaningless. An example of these utterly infernal and irritating double standards can be judged from Catherine Ashton’s recent remarks. This woman aka the EU’s foreign minister but who is an absolute nonentity even in her native Britain recently issued a veiled warning to the Iraqi government about not respecting the rights of the MKO. For those of you who are still unfamiliar with who the MKO are, they are globally recognized as a terrorist group even in the west and were used by Saddam Hussein to massacre the Kurds and also against Iran in his war against that country, sponsored as I’m sure you know by the west.
They are now housed in Iraq and have been useful to the west for carrying out sectarian violence in Iraq to justify the presence of western foreign troops in that country. Operating like a religious sect in the west where once you become a member either voluntarily or involuntarily you can’t leave the MKO has been given a new lease of life. The Iraqis desperately want them out of their country where they don’t belong as they’re not local people but the Americans and the west see them as a convenient tool to use against their obsessive bogeyman Iran, and so the US and EU have both expediently revoked their terrorist status and with the political, financial and military help of far right morons like the former prime minister of Spain and other western leaders past and present these real live terrorists are now let loose to carry out their western and well funded terrorism against Iran from their base in neighbouring Iraq; and even when they killed several of their members to stop them leaving the MKO and falsely blame the Iraqi security forces for this Catherine Ashton, even when news of this eventually emerged thanks to MKO members who’d managed to escape, it didn’t stop Catherine Ashton from supporting these terrorist; and we’re supposed to trust and have respect for their alleged champions of democracy and human rights. But the lives of these people are so full of lies and deception in everything that they do that the truth for them is really a bridge too far.
I was told confidentially that the British media does not report on Bahrain for fear of upsetting the hereditary, petrol monarch there who is a close friend of the British Royal Family and has been invited to Prince William’s wedding; and were the British people at large to know the full extent of his murderous atrocities brutally compounded by those of members of his family and other Arab savages like the Saudis and those from similarly tyrannical Gulf states that this man has inexcusably and deplorably invited into Bahrain to systematically slaughter the indigenous people there, that there’d be massive demonstrations in London against his presence in the UK. For let’s not forget that the al-khalifa family that sees and treats Bahrain as if it were its private estate is a foreign import, taken there in 1820 by the British who have supported them through thick and thin ever since, and at no time following its enforced implantation on the majority of the Bahraini people have these crude interlopers saw or felt the need to integrate with the local people or express any empathy with them. Let me posit this supposition to you. Try imagining that the country where you were born, belong to and that your ancestors have lived in for many thousands of years suddenly finds itself ruled by outsiders who not only don’t want to have any thing at all to do with you but even prohibit you from being a member of its armed forces.
Yes, that’s the situation in Bahrain where the military is comprised of mercenaries from Jordan, Pakistan, India, anywhere you can imagine except from among the Bahraini people and therefore it’s hardly surprising that they too don’t empathize with the local people; they get paid, are told what they have to do, are given residence in the country and callously do what they are instructed to; and when you compound this approach with invitations from this depraved Bahrain butcher to the Saudis and other repulsive Gulf states to march into Bahrain to further massacre and terrorize the local Bahraini populace little wonder that stalwart friends in the west of this power-obsessed psychopath and their media organisations are tight-lipped about what is going on at the hands of one of their buddies. Contrast this with what would have been a wholly different approach from these utterly odious people if it were Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas that was doing any of this. In fact they are so worried by their own silence and the knowledge that there are growing numbers of people out there who see them for what they really are that they’re even trying to put the very obvious lie out that what is happening in Bahrain and the Yemen is being orchestrated by Iran. In other words it’s everybody else’s fault bar their own, and if they can shout loud and long enough that it’s the doing of those whom they like to vilify perhaps enough idiots, or the gullible among their own population will believe these lies as well. That’s why they hate with a passion stations like Press TV, as they show a blazing spotlight on the hypocrisies and double standards of these infantile but highly dangerous people. The Israelis have an apt saying, namely: it’s best to lie and the bigger that lie is and the louder and more frequently you repeat it the greater is the possibility people will be believed. My view on this is if you’re one of those naïve cretins then you deserve everything you get.
That this Bahrain butcher should be contemplating coming to the UK in view of what is going on in the country over which he rules (note I’ve made a clear distinction here and not used the term his country) is mindboggling; that the House of Windsor hasn’t cancelled that invitation is even more loathsome in my view. But knowing that there will be demonstrations against him and in a classic situation of using lies to buttress up their perfidy MI5 is putting it about in the media and through Scotland Yard that there must be additional security to protect William and his fiancée Kate from stalkers and or demonstrators against Prince Charles. What a load of tosh! First this is not Charles’ wedding or even his coronation. Second, the people of the United Kingdom whether they are diehard monarchists, few in number; apathetic to the monarch, most of us; or are simply republicans have nothing personally against William or Kate. Moreover, all empirical data show that William’s mother Princess Diana was greatly loved by the vast majority of the British public a figure that averages around 98% after the tragic circumstances of her death which many of us believe was cold-blooded murder by the security services.
It’s common knowledge among journalists that it was Bill Gates, the US Defence Secretary, who gave the green light to set in place the honey trap in which to lure the Wikileaks founder and in collaboration with the Swedish authorities created the lying scenario that resulted even when the original state prosecutor said there was no case to answer. This is the same Bill Gates that said he was unaware that Saudi Arabia would invade Bahrain to suppress its indigenous people seeking the same democratic rights that Bill Gates takes for granted in the United States, yet it was none other than Bill Gates that gave the green light for the Saudi invasion to take place; so would you really want to trust this man unless you were plain stupid, naïve or the same compulsive liar that he is? Much too is made of Libya using cluster bombs in Misrata and we have the UN so-called human rights body stating that Colonel Gaddafi and his government will be brought to brook at the ICC for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Where was this organization when enfant terrible Israel was dropping hundred of thousands of these same cluster bombs on Lebanon and Gaza, and where was the ICC during all this.
I’ll tell you; in New York being partisan. We know from Wikileaks disclosures that Susan Rice the US ambassador at the UN and a lightweight intellectually and in every other respect trying to make a name for herself and prove that she can outdo Condi Rice pressured both the ICC and the UN Human Rights body not to take any action against Israel and went on to issue a veiled threat to the ICC that if it did then it would lose credibility in the eyes of the US. Can you believe that? The US like Israel are not signatories to the ICC and adamantly refuse to yet that body allows both these countries to call the shots when they shouldn’t even be listened to. Would you have someone who doesn’t live in your house, who doesn’t contribute to your household expenses and the like telling you how to run your home? But this is the arrogance of the Zionists who feel they can do whatever they like and get away with it; and they do because of people like you who fall for their lies and deception every time; and the dreadful part about that is the lies and deceptions are the same. So who really are the idiots these people or yourselves?
In any democratic election held in any of the Gulf States and particularly in Saudi Arabia these autocrats would be swept from power and western rulers know this; but having these murderous despots in place guarantees the west’ and especially the US’s hegemony of the area and its crude exploitation of the region’s natural resources; for in a true democracy they wouldn’t be allowed to as any government that permitted this sort of thing would be wiped out at the polls. But as one US journalist proudly boasted to me, all we want in these countries is lots of Sharia laws to keep the Arab populations in check and unscrupulous, greedy dictators who’ll happily do this for us as we continue to reap the benefits in the west. And this was literally given credence in several US media outlets today, 21 April 2011, when in what is clearly a concerted western campaign on the behalf of long-term western cat’s paw Hosni Mubarak prominent US newspapers were positing the notion that, wait for it, Mubarak has suffered enough and ought now to be left in peace. Oh really? Over 30 brutal years of dictatorship and the suppression of Egyptians (note I haven’t said his people as he never considered them as such); the callous and barbaric killing of around 1000 peaceful protestors and the injurious of thousands more in the recent upsurge of peaceful protests against his autocratic rule of Egypt and the negation of all democratic rights there; let him be so he can waltz away scot-free with the over 75 billion US dollars that he and his family embezzled from the Egyptian people?
Is this why no western country has been keen to freeze his vast and illegally acquired financial assets or those of his family members and friends; why we don’t hear a similar clamour that he be sent to the ICC like all those who for wholly unjustifiable reasons the west want to see there and the ICC readily complies? Does one get a blank cheque to do what he or she likes so long as they support the Zionist entity in the Middle East as the butcher in Bahrain boasts that he does and as we know Mubarak did working closely not only with the government there but also with Mossad whose tactics they copied and employed even down to the desecration of holy places? Now we’ve further learnt that the butcher of Bahrain is to send new recruits of his mercenary army and police to the US to be trained; doubtlessly at the School of the Americas where all of America’s terrorist friends are trained with the full backing and support of the CIA. Then these people fake surprise when people say enough is enough and in a few instances and in the absence of Cobra helicopters, cruise missiles, nuclear weapons, depleted uranium bombs and the whole panoply of state of the art weaponry at the disposal of the west, strike back with the only things they have, their bodies; using these as incendiaries and live weapons against their obdurate and unrelenting enemies; and who if they’re being just and fair can blame them?
And to this end we ask that Press TV and the alternative media stay vigilant and true to the principle of the fourth estate and report the news as it is; you don’t have to fall into the west’s trap of chasing ratings as it’s not what your viewers want. What they most emphatically want however is to be treated with respect and as persons with working brains in their heads; give us the facts as they are and allow us in an informative way to make up our own minds and not go down the road of the western media that treat its viewers as idiots and do so primarily because they know that many of them are credulous; ill-informed; and have short memories. Education isn’t their natural remit, and as you’ll recall immediately in the wake of 9/11 President George W. Bush exhorted the US public to go out and shop; and he did this because the US is based on consumerism, nothing else. I think that about says it all and why successive US governments literally get away with mass murder.
In concluding this article I believe that Diana did a fantastic job in raising her two boys and in manner completely different from the sterile manner in which the Queen and Margaret were brought up and that the Queen herself adopted as regards her own children as she knew nothing else or anything better; a situation that has resulted despite all their money, privileged status and the rest of it has resulted in Her Majesty having one of the most dysfunctional families in the United Kingdom, and let’s be perfectly honest about that. That said I would still prefer to have her as head of state any day than see that role take on by lying, dishonest bastards of the ilk of Tony Blair, Gordon Browne, David Cameron, Neil Kinnock or the rest of them. But Princess Diana with all her foibles (and who is without theirs?) was special and particularly so as a mum. She had that instinctive touchy empathetic feeling and naturalness that the Queen, Charles and the rest of the Queen’s kids lack, and more importantly Diana conveyed this admirably to both her sons just as she equally did so with the rest of the world, and I honestly believe that William and Harry are all the better off for this wondrous gift that they inherited and had reinforced by their mother.
Furthermore, the closest that the British people en masse came to demanding a republic in my life time was when the Queen and Philip decided initially to distance themselves from Diana’s death and the spontaneous national mourning surrounding it and deliberately opted to stay away from London; the resultant public mood towards them for this discourtesy was virulently hostile and tangible and the survivor that she is the Queen quickly latched onto to what was a genuine public sentiment and changed her tune. She not only came down to London post haste from her Balmoral holiday residence but gave instructions that the Union Jack be flown at half mast over Buckingham Palace; but it was a close call for her Majesty!
Now ask yourselves with Diana even after her tragic murder those many years ago still a Lady who is overwhelmingly loved by the British public and with William the spitting image of his dead mother why would anyone in Britain with even the barest modicum of love for Diana want to spoil her son’s great day knowing as we all do what a bastard Prince Charles was to Diana? What would be their motivation; and why would they want to sully Diana’s memory? And the red herring about Prince Charles is just that; he’s already married to Camilla and I didn’t detect any rebellions in the UK because of this even though 99.9% of the British people don’t want to see her as Queen and would never stomach her, even though as Charles legal wife she’s entitled to the title, as the Princess of Wales which we will always associate with Diana. So is being put out there is nothing more than lies and propaganda; the ruler of Bahrain should not be here and I don’t care how friendly he is with Charles or the Queen or Philip, he should not be coming to the UK, but don’t then insult our intelligence by claiming it’s all to do with protecting William.
So when next you’re told by the BBC, Fox News, CNN, the BBC World, France 24, ABC and the rest of that mob that this or that is being done for whatever farfetched reason they then go on to give or that your security services or mine have discovered this or that terrorist plot my advice to you is hold your nose tightly and keep the stinking stench out. The fact that this collective of pathological liars, their government and security services are spending time, effort and vast sums of money to malign Press TV and dupe you in the process is a clear indication if you ever needed one that Press TV is getting it right and these brigands are deeply worried. As a result be on your guard at all times and importantly try thinking for yourselves.
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
IS HILLARY CLINTON A SECRET DYKE?
By Stanley Collymore
Now that I’ve managed to grab your attention even though in the case of many of you it has been for totally salacious reasons, let’s proceed together.
Let me say up front that I’ve no proof of and furthermore couldn’t care less whether or not any existed as regards the above supposition that has been wilfully and dare I say it unapologetically posited in the headline of this article that the incumbent United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton either has lesbian tendencies or has ever been involved, the birth of her daughter Chelsea apart, in any lesbian activities, which absolutely signifies nothing concrete one way or another as many lesbians and gay men unable or deceitfully unwilling to deal honestly with their endemic homosexuality are known to have gone to great lengths, and Hillary Clinton might very well be one of them, to camouflage their true sexual propensities; duplicitously got married as a trick to hide these foibles of theirs, and have even allowed themselves to become biological parents to additionally deceive others and employ their parenthood as an extra mask to conceal their real sexual identity while all the time covertly indulging in their greatest passion of all, unrestrained homosexuality.
Therefore, it would be both quite immoral and utterly wrong of me to assume that either or both of these two assumptions are right; and worst still go on to categorically state, and do so publicly without a shred of evidence to support what I’d alleged, that something which wasn’t t based on fact and had no credible substance to it whatsoever and whose premise relied for the most part on innuendo, malice, vindictiveness, fabrications or plain downright lies deliberately concocted with the sole purpose of being unwarrantedly defamatory and personally injurious to Mrs Clinton was reality when patently it was not.
So why raise this fictional red herring then? Well, I’ll tell you. It’s to highlight a very important, extremely dangerous and invariably deadly game that Hillary Clinton, the US administration of which she’s a foremost and influential member, the President of the United States; that country’s security services; the US Congress and the Pentagon regularly and duplicitously and offensively play.
Intelligence is about deception and the security services of every country that has them indulge in deceptions of one kind or another and invariably charm, inveigle, bribe or coerce their media and journalists to print, broadcast and run stories that are pure fiction in order to serve the vested interests of these spy organizations, their governments and the powerful forces in and out of the country that they are linked to. The British foreign spy organization MI6 and the domestic one MI5 both have a specialist department of their own where the sole purpose of that section is to manufacture lies; stories that aren’t even based on half truths, innuendoes or suspicions but are 100% unadulterated concoctions of the sick minds of those working in those departments.
These sickos then either through profitable inducements flatter or else compromise journalists and their editors in the British media to carry these fabricated stories with promises of further scoops if they cooperate; if they don’t they are themselves targeted, isolated, shunned and even subjected to much worse. So British journalist many of whom are limp-wristed cowards readily comply and do the bidding of the security services flattered by the privileged treatment they’re given by powerful men and women with the immunity to do what they want to and no questions asked, and when one factors in the endemic class system which still pervades much of British society it’s very easy, if not wholly comprehensible if you’re intelligent and objective that is, to see why it happens.
David Rose a prominent British journalist who finally came to his senses recounted how he was approached by MI5; deeply flattered by it but too cowardly to resist its advances he played ball and produced for his paper stories he never bothered to check for their veracity but which he none the less wrote with a passion as if they were actually true. His editor needless to say was also in on this. Eventually though David Rose’s conscience started to bother him and he felt uneasy about what he was doing. Even so what took place wasn’t by any means a rebellion on his part. Off his own bat he decided to do a story on Guantanamo Bay and the detainees held there. His research was quite thorough and in the mould of what every impartial and competent journalist ought to be and should use as his or her benchmark when reporting the news but sadly 99.9% of then don’t because they’re either too bone idle to, or so incompetent that it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to them and in the final analysis the end result would still be the same as they’d still get it hopelessly wrong.
David Rose wrote and in due course published his Guantanamo Bay story but shortly after its publication discovered that calls to him from MI5 suddenly dried up and just as importantly to him his calls even to special MI5 numbers he’d been given by its chief and had regularly used in the past were now unattainable to him. Flummoxed by this he spoke to his editor an insider with MI5 who on his behalf spoke to MI5’s chief Stella Rimington: a cold-hearted bitch and very bit as much in the mould of Hillary Clinton, about the matter. Her response was that David Rose’s story on Guantanamo Bay was her words: “unhelpful to MI5.” Told by David’s editor that the story was none the less true this wholly unsavoury and immoral cow replied: “That’s not the point.” The word truth was obviously not part of her lexicon.
This woman and her ilk have been largely responsible not only for fabricating non existent tall tales and passing these off as facts but are instrumental in planting them in the media through their cat’s paws and having them paraded there as substantial stories with substance to them. More dangerous of all though is that they similarly present these lies they’ve made up to the British government, MPs, public and the world at large through the Foreign Office funded BBC World Service as irrefutable facts; and as if that wasn’t bad enough they then go on television, straight-faced and lying as Hillary Clinton frequently does vis-à-vis the United States, and make the case for war based on these lies. Wars conducted with countries whose resources they and their Zionist paymasters want to get their hands on and permanently control; boost even further their lucrative and major growth industry the military industrial complex and subjugate those rules and their countries like Iran, Venezuela and Cuba that have the guts to strand up to them.
Survey after survey has show that the sons and daughters of these warmongers never enter the armed forces of their countries and while their mums and dads in the security services happily foment war and dishonestly generate conflict around the globe needlessly killing and seriously maiming millions of innocent civilians in hapless, war ravaged countries like Afghanistan and Iraq; callously slaughtering thousands more in occupied and besieged Palestine, most notably Gaza, in Lebanon and North Africa, and displacing many millions more throughout the entire Middle East , and despite that still have an insatiable appetite and vicious bloodlust for more wars as they’re currently angling to do in Iran, they are themselves meticulously groomed for cushy, lucrative jobs. We won’t for example ever see Chelsea Clinton for real in a US military uniform, nor Tony Blair’s tribe either in relation to the British armed forces.
Instead, Chelsea works for a prominent hedge fund, one of those which gambled recklessly with your money, caused the credit crunch and have adversely affected millions of people around the world financially, but she won’t be short of a bob or two to use a colloquial English expression that infers she’ll always be well off; and it’s a sure bet she’s being groomed as a future resident of the White House an ambition that her mother Hillary still has. It’s the same with Tony Blair’s brood; safe parliamentary constituent seats; ministerial and cabinet posts; and then the top job.
Stella Rimington MI5’s boss and as an individual the physical embodiment of evil has officially stepped down as head of MI5 but her influence hasn’t waned and she’s now become a political advisor to the Conservative Party. But how many Afghans, Iraqis and other innocent civilian victims have died I wonder as a direct result of this woman’s lies - I’m talking about wholly and intentionally concocted fabrications here – which because of the crucially important and highly influential job that she held down she cynically and dishonestly used as a personal platform to lie to the British people, soften them up, and dupe the country into going to war when it shouldn’t and wouldn’t have done if the truth was told? And why in the name of everything that’s decent, particularly so when extra-rendition, torture transfers and extrajudicial executions have been her trade mark is this woman still alive?
Is there no justice in the world anymore when callous mass murderers like this woman dishonestly masquerading as our nation’s protector but are nothing of the kind; have no true allegiance to the people of the UK but only the money interests and those with power to satisfy their avarice are allowed to concoct lying situations that result in our sons and daughters being sent off to God-forsaken countries to fight, get seriously injured or permanently mentally scarred and even pay the ultimate sacrifice in pointless, fabricated wars, while they deceitfully flaunt their patriotism and are quite willing to defend the UK to the last drop of somebody else’s blood? Why I ask again is Stella Rimington not dead; subjected before that fate to the same arbitrary and barbarous treatment she meted out to others and obviously got her kicks from; since justice alone demands that she should die?
Vile as Stella Rimington is Hillary Clinton is even worse. The Mother of all Liars Hillary is a pathological and shameless liar who even believes her own lies, and when someone gets to that stage then having them legally sectioned, incarcerated and permanently out of harm’s way in the padded cell of a lunatic asylum is the only remedial course that I can think of except perhaps humanely putting them to sleep, out of their misery and effectively neutralizing their danger to others as one would a rabid dog on the loose and incurably infected with rabies. And there’s a legal recourse for this; it’s called the United States Constitution; the clause that categorically gives US citizens the right to bear arms.
That specific and highly crucial element of the United States Constitution wasn’t included by the Founding fathers to give lawless thugs and gangsters in Chicago, New York or elsewhere in the United States a free hand to maim or kill each other or wreak havoc on innocent civilians in their neighbourhoods but is in effect the official and legally enshrined green light for all US citizens to rise up if need be and by force of arms bump off or eradicate all tyrannical politicians and public figures who either individually or collectively abuse their offices and the power these bestow on them to the detriment of the US populace at large. But what really puzzles me, and I’m assuming that the average American knows his country’s constitution inside out, is why Americans who to put it mildly are instinctively such gun toting lovers don’t take more notice of their constitution, especially this aspect of it and bearing in mind the circumstances they’re currently in, to convert those hideously offending political power bases inside their country into full-scale firing ranges? The odds are that if they did they’d find themselves immeasurably better off than they presently are and additionally see their status and popularity throughout the world rise expeditiously as a result of what they’d done.
The crux of the matter is that the lie merchants in the United States, Britain, the rest of the EU and Israel aren’t only playing politics with the truth and de facto our lives but they’ve also gone much further and are creating lies on the ground which they then present as irrefutable facts and doing so with a single purpose in mind to dupe their respective citizens into believing that what they’re told is the unvarnished truth, enabling them to embark unchallenged in perpetrating even more heinous atrocities using these lies that they know are wilfully manufactured as justification for what they’re doing or are about to do.
And creating fear is a crucial element of this propaganda exercise. And a classic example of this is the position of Britain’s MI6. There would be no justification for many of its operations and possibly even its existence without the propaganda of fear, and many of the atrocities that MI6 reports as having been carried out by the bogeymen of so-called terrorists that they’ve invented and then go to great lengths to publicly disparage are in effect the handiwork of MI6 itself or its proxies to literally in most cases justify its existence and the expenditure spent on it. A situation akin to a crafty glazer paying sycophantic thugs to covertly go around and smash your house or shop windows then audaciously approaching you, fraudulently but oh so politely sympathizing with you over your unprovoked bad luck then conveniently offering you his services as a glazer.
Besides a lot of MI6 principal operatives are products of the class ridden, British public schools system (for those of you not familiar with the English educational system public schools are in effect tremendously expensive, fee paying, private and privileged, elite schools and colleges and shouldn’t be confused with public schools which are state owned and free), haven’t got a clue of the real world outside their constricted elitist confines, and for the most part, irrespective of their gender, are either gay or lesbian with both groups seemingly feeling the necessity to demonstrate their machismo, because in reality neither of them has any which is natural anyway, and with the women ending up the more butch and testosterone driven of the two.
Not all that surprising when one takes fully into consideration the sexual ethos of these public schools and the position played by their disciplinarian matrons vis-à-vis these highly impressionable boys in their charge. And as we learnt from Burgess and MacLean two key MI6 spies that defected to the Soviet Union, many of these operatives in the upper echelons of MI6 are little more than pebble mouthed and double-barrelled named dimwits who were they ever to find themselves confronted on a one to one basis with a real honest to goodness foe would simply piss themselves with fear; dysfunctional people that quite frankly are totally incapable of determining what are security matters as they pertain to Britain and what are essentially British interests and being able therefore to differentiate between the two of them.
The latest barefaced lie being wantonly put about by these people is that the Iranian broadcaster Press TV which specializes in giving an alternative and more objective appraisal and reporting of global news from the sickeningly infernal propaganda that characterizes all western broadcasters with their vested financial interests to take care of and therefore have no time or any concern for the truth or impartial reporting of the news which is selectively embarked on anyway, and which assiduously, deliberately and refreshingly devotes its energy and programming to giving a much appreciated voice to the voiceless is, according to these tedious hypocrites, peddling propaganda and must be reined in.
The reality though is that increasingly large numbers of people in the west are tuning into Press TV and shutting of completely their western broadcasting stations because the general consensus is that these can no longer be trusted and viewers see no reason why they should continue to have their intelligence insulted by these organisations, or have to stomach the wilful lies and distortions they’re being constantly fed and have grown thoroughly sick and tired of. But rather than take a long, hard look at themselves and what they’re doing and then sensibly rectify their wrongdoings these western media stations have instead opted to do what all bullies and tyrants do when their lack of oblivious credibility is questioned and highlighted; denigrate the person or persons who are drawing attention to their failings or to use another terminology kill the messenger for bringing unpleasant news and showing them up for what they really are.
It’s an open secret in the UK that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates have all had talks with David Cameron, senior members of his cabinet, the BBC’s Board of Governors, its Director General, heads of the independent television companies in the UK, notably Channel 4 and ITV, and crucially with Ofcom, the British broadcasting watchdog; poodle would be a more fitting title for it, to manufacture a plethora of mendacious reasons and methodically use these as the basis to ban Press TV from operating in the United Kingdom where it is very popular and has a large following among the local British population who look to it for unbiased, informative and accurate news reports on normally reported stories but more specifically on stories that the media in the west most cynically conspire with each other not to touch let alone cover; and the result of this puerile short-sightedness and rank stupidity by these western broadcasting companies is that while the viewing figures of these broadcasting corporations are plummeting dramatically, most conspicuously those of the public broadcaster and involuntary citizen and resident funded BBC, in marked contrast those of Press TV are literally skyrocketing.
I’ve written a number of articles in the past about the BBC’s lack of impartiality, its propaganda and deliberate lies going back despite its lofty charter to its very inception, but it really took the biscuit when on Monday 11 April 2011 in its Panorama programme hosted by a presenter who is widely known to be an incorrigible Zionist, virulent Islamophobe and hater of all things Iranian, the BBC having from the very beginning of the peoples’ peaceful protests in Bahrain resolutely refused to screen or report on any news concerning Bahrain or the Yemen for that matter in spite of the well documented accounts of ongoing atrocities in both these countries aided and abetted by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait, none the less devoted its prime time television slot to doing a hatchet job on Iran and Press TV, labelling the Iranian Republic which unlike Britain hasn’t waged war on any country for centuries but instead has had war visited on it by the west and its proxies, chiefly Iraq, as abysmally short on human rights then using footage which at the end of the Panorama programme the BBC barefacedly announced couldn’t be verified as being authentic as it had no corroborative evidence to substantiate its claims, as dubious and evidently lying assertions to denigrate and vilify Iran. Then utterly insensitive to the irony of what it was doing and Britain’s own human rights violations that are legion and have stretched over a period of almost a half a millennium up to the present time the BBC in that same Panorama programme went on to state further that Press TV isn’t a genuine news broadcasting organization but is really the mouthpiece of the undemocratic Iranian government and should have its licence to operate in the UK revoked.
Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and the BBC an impartial news broadcaster that assiduously distances itself from the dictates of No.10 and its Zionists controllers; well you couldn’t have made that up could you?
Nevertheless I was heartened by the fact that the BBC’s switchboard was jammed during and after the screening of the Panorama programme with many thousands of irate calls from furious viewers deeply angered and disgusted that in abrogation yet again of its clearly defined charter to be impartial and non-propagandistic in its programming the BBC had chosen as it has repeatedly done in the past and regularly keeps on doing with impunity to violate these tenets. At the same time the BBC’s website I understand also crashed as a consequence of the enormous number of protests which were sent it, but unsurprisingly none of this was ever made public by the BBC of its own volition, and only when relentlessly questioned did it admit to what happened.
How on earth with broadcasting media organizations like Fox News; CNN; ABC, France 24 and the same BBC either inventing stories, distorting others or quite flatly refusing to report on many others because in doing so would run contrary to the agenda of their political and or financial pay masters can these same organizations have the nerve to damn and malign honest broadcasters for doing what competent and genuinely professional broadcasters are meant to do? But the lives of these people are so full of lies and deception in everything that they do that the truth for them is really a bridge too far.
I was told confidentially that the British media does not report on Bahrain for fear of upsetting the hereditary, petrol monarch there who is a close friend of the British Royal Family and has been invited to Prince William’s wedding; and were the British people at large to know the full extent of his murderous atrocities brutally compounded by those of members of his family and other Arab savages like the Saudis and those from similarly tyrannical Gulf states that this man has inexcusably and deplorably invited into Bahrain to systematically slaughter the indigenous people there, that there’d be massive demonstrations in London against his presence in the UK.
For let’s not forget that the al-khalifa family that sees and treats Bahrain as if it were its private estate is a foreign import, taken there in 1820 by the British who have supported them through thick and thin ever since, and at no time following its enforced implantation on the majority of the Bahraini people have these crude interlopers saw or felt the need to integrate with the local people or express any empathy with them. Let me posit this supposition to you. Try imagining that the country where you were born, belong to and that your ancestors have lived in for many thousands of years suddenly finds itself ruled by outsiders who not only don’t want to have any thing at all to do with you but even prohibit you from being a member of its armed forces.
Yes, that’s the situation in Bahrain where the military is comprised of mercenaries from Jordan, Pakistan, India, anywhere you can imagine except from among the Bahraini people and therefore it’s hardly surprising that they too don’t empathize with the local people; they get paid, are told what they have to do, are given residence in the country and callously do what they are instructed to; and when you compound this approach with invitations from this depraved Bahrain butcher to the Saudis and other repulsive Gulf states to march into Bahrain to further massacre and terrorize the local Bahraini populace little wonder that stalwart friends in the west of this power-obsessed psychopath and their media organisations are tight-lipped about what is going on at the hands of one of their buddies. Contrast this with what would have been a wholly different approach from these utterly odious people if it were Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas that was doing any of this. In fact they are so worried by their own silence and the knowledge that there are growing numbers of people out there who see them for what they really are that they’re even trying to put the very obvious lie out that what is happening in Bahrain and the Yemen is being orchestrated by Iran.
In other words it’s everybody else’s fault bar their own, and if they can shout loud and long enough that it’s the doing of those whom they like to vilify perhaps enough idiots, or the gullible among their own population will believe these lies as well. That’s why they hate with a passion stations like Press TV, as they show a blazing spotlight on the hypocrisies and double standards of these infantile but highly dangerous people. The Israelis have an apt saying, namely: it’s best to lie and the bigger that lie is and the louder and more frequently you repeat it the greater is the possibility people will be believed. My view on this is if you’re one of those naïve cretins then you deserve everything you get.
That this Bahrain butcher should be contemplating coming to the UK in view of what is going on in the country over which he rules (note I’ve made a clear distinction here and not used the term his country) is mindboggling; that the House of Windsor hasn’t cancelled that invitation is even more loathsome in my view. But knowing that there will be demonstrations against him and in a classic situation of using lies to buttress up their perfidy MI5 is putting it about in the media and through Scotland Yard that there must be additional security to protect William and his fiancée Kate from stalkers and or demonstrators against Prince Charles. What a load of tosh! First this is not Charles’ wedding or even his coronation. Second, the people of the United Kingdom whether they are diehard monarchists, few in number; apathetic to the monarch, most of us; or are simply republicans have nothing personally against William or Kate. Moreover, all empirical data show that William’s mother Princess Diana was greatly loved by the vast majority of the British public a figure that averages around 98% after the tragic circumstances of her death which many of us believe was cold-blooded murder by the security services.
We also believe that Diana did a fantastic job in raising her two boys and in manner completely different from the sterile manner in which the Queen and Margaret were brought up and that the Queen herself adopted as regards her own children as she knew nothing else or anything better; a situation that has resulted despite all their money, privileged status and the rest of it has resulted in Her Majesty having one of the most dysfunctional families in the United Kingdom, and let’s be perfectly honest about that. That said I would still prefer to have her as head of state any day than see that role take on by lying, dishonest bastards of the ilk of Tony Blair, Gordon Browne, David Cameron, Neil Kinnock or the rest of them. But Princess Diana with all her foibles (and who is without theirs?) was special and particularly so as a mum. She had that instinctive touchy empathetic feeling and naturalness that the Queen, Charles and the rest of the Queen’s kids lack, and more importantly Diana conveyed this admirably to both her sons just as she equally did so with the rest of the world, and I honestly believe that William and Harry are all the better off for this wondrous gift that they inherited and had reinforced by their mother.
Furthermore, the closest that the British people en masse came to demanding a republic in my life time was when the Queen and Philip decided initially to distance themselves from Diana’s death and the spontaneous national mourning surrounding it and deliberately opted to stay away from London; the resultant public mood towards them for this discourtesy was virulently hostile and tangible and the survivor that she is the Queen quickly latched onto to what was a genuine public sentiment and changed her tune. She not only came down to London post haste from her Balmoral holiday residence but gave instructions that the Union Jack be flown at half mast over Buckingham Palace; but it was a close call for her Majesty!
Now ask yourselves with Diana even after her tragic murder those many years ago still a Lady who is overwhelmingly loved by the British public and with William almost a lookalike of his dead mother why would anyone in Britain with even the barest modicum of love for Diana want to spoil her son’s great day knowing as we all do what a bastard Prince Charles was to Diana? What would be their motivation; and why would they want to sully Diana’s memory? And the red herring about Prince Charles is just that; he’s already married to Camilla and I didn’t detect any rebellions in the UK because of this even though 99.9% of the British people don’t want to see her as Queen and would never stomach her, even though as Charles legal wife she’s entitled to the title, as the Princess of Wales which we will always associate with Diana. So is being put out there is nothing more than lies and propaganda; the ruler of Bahrain should not be here and I don’t care how friendly he is with Charles or the Queen or Philip, he should not be coming to the UK, but don’t then insult our intelligence by claiming it’s all to do with protecting William.
So when next you’re told by the BBC, Fox News, CNN, the BBC World, France 24, ABC and the rest of that mob that this or that is being done for whatever farfetched reason they then go on to give or that your security services or mine have discovered this or that terrorist plot my advice to you is hold your nose tightly and keep the stinking stench out. The fact that this collective of pathological liars, their government and security services are spending time, effort and vast sums of money to malign Press TV and dupe you in the process is a clear indication if you ever needed one that Press TV is getting it right and these brigands are deeply worried. As a result be on your guard at all times and importantly try thinking for yourselves.
Now that I’ve managed to grab your attention even though in the case of many of you it has been for totally salacious reasons, let’s proceed together.
Let me say up front that I’ve no proof of and furthermore couldn’t care less whether or not any existed as regards the above supposition that has been wilfully and dare I say it unapologetically posited in the headline of this article that the incumbent United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton either has lesbian tendencies or has ever been involved, the birth of her daughter Chelsea apart, in any lesbian activities, which absolutely signifies nothing concrete one way or another as many lesbians and gay men unable or deceitfully unwilling to deal honestly with their endemic homosexuality are known to have gone to great lengths, and Hillary Clinton might very well be one of them, to camouflage their true sexual propensities; duplicitously got married as a trick to hide these foibles of theirs, and have even allowed themselves to become biological parents to additionally deceive others and employ their parenthood as an extra mask to conceal their real sexual identity while all the time covertly indulging in their greatest passion of all, unrestrained homosexuality.
Therefore, it would be both quite immoral and utterly wrong of me to assume that either or both of these two assumptions are right; and worst still go on to categorically state, and do so publicly without a shred of evidence to support what I’d alleged, that something which wasn’t t based on fact and had no credible substance to it whatsoever and whose premise relied for the most part on innuendo, malice, vindictiveness, fabrications or plain downright lies deliberately concocted with the sole purpose of being unwarrantedly defamatory and personally injurious to Mrs Clinton was reality when patently it was not.
So why raise this fictional red herring then? Well, I’ll tell you. It’s to highlight a very important, extremely dangerous and invariably deadly game that Hillary Clinton, the US administration of which she’s a foremost and influential member, the President of the United States; that country’s security services; the US Congress and the Pentagon regularly and duplicitously and offensively play.
Intelligence is about deception and the security services of every country that has them indulge in deceptions of one kind or another and invariably charm, inveigle, bribe or coerce their media and journalists to print, broadcast and run stories that are pure fiction in order to serve the vested interests of these spy organizations, their governments and the powerful forces in and out of the country that they are linked to. The British foreign spy organization MI6 and the domestic one MI5 both have a specialist department of their own where the sole purpose of that section is to manufacture lies; stories that aren’t even based on half truths, innuendoes or suspicions but are 100% unadulterated concoctions of the sick minds of those working in those departments.
These sickos then either through profitable inducements flatter or else compromise journalists and their editors in the British media to carry these fabricated stories with promises of further scoops if they cooperate; if they don’t they are themselves targeted, isolated, shunned and even subjected to much worse. So British journalist many of whom are limp-wristed cowards readily comply and do the bidding of the security services flattered by the privileged treatment they’re given by powerful men and women with the immunity to do what they want to and no questions asked, and when one factors in the endemic class system which still pervades much of British society it’s very easy, if not wholly comprehensible if you’re intelligent and objective that is, to see why it happens.
David Rose a prominent British journalist who finally came to his senses recounted how he was approached by MI5; deeply flattered by it but too cowardly to resist its advances he played ball and produced for his paper stories he never bothered to check for their veracity but which he none the less wrote with a passion as if they were actually true. His editor needless to say was also in on this. Eventually though David Rose’s conscience started to bother him and he felt uneasy about what he was doing. Even so what took place wasn’t by any means a rebellion on his part. Off his own bat he decided to do a story on Guantanamo Bay and the detainees held there. His research was quite thorough and in the mould of what every impartial and competent journalist ought to be and should use as his or her benchmark when reporting the news but sadly 99.9% of then don’t because they’re either too bone idle to, or so incompetent that it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference to them and in the final analysis the end result would still be the same as they’d still get it hopelessly wrong.
David Rose wrote and in due course published his Guantanamo Bay story but shortly after its publication discovered that calls to him from MI5 suddenly dried up and just as importantly to him his calls even to special MI5 numbers he’d been given by its chief and had regularly used in the past were now unattainable to him. Flummoxed by this he spoke to his editor an insider with MI5 who on his behalf spoke to MI5’s chief Stella Rimington: a cold-hearted bitch and very bit as much in the mould of Hillary Clinton, about the matter. Her response was that David Rose’s story on Guantanamo Bay was her words: “unhelpful to MI5.” Told by David’s editor that the story was none the less true this wholly unsavoury and immoral cow replied: “That’s not the point.” The word truth was obviously not part of her lexicon.
This woman and her ilk have been largely responsible not only for fabricating non existent tall tales and passing these off as facts but are instrumental in planting them in the media through their cat’s paws and having them paraded there as substantial stories with substance to them. More dangerous of all though is that they similarly present these lies they’ve made up to the British government, MPs, public and the world at large through the Foreign Office funded BBC World Service as irrefutable facts; and as if that wasn’t bad enough they then go on television, straight-faced and lying as Hillary Clinton frequently does vis-à-vis the United States, and make the case for war based on these lies. Wars conducted with countries whose resources they and their Zionist paymasters want to get their hands on and permanently control; boost even further their lucrative and major growth industry the military industrial complex and subjugate those rules and their countries like Iran, Venezuela and Cuba that have the guts to strand up to them.
Survey after survey has show that the sons and daughters of these warmongers never enter the armed forces of their countries and while their mums and dads in the security services happily foment war and dishonestly generate conflict around the globe needlessly killing and seriously maiming millions of innocent civilians in hapless, war ravaged countries like Afghanistan and Iraq; callously slaughtering thousands more in occupied and besieged Palestine, most notably Gaza, in Lebanon and North Africa, and displacing many millions more throughout the entire Middle East , and despite that still have an insatiable appetite and vicious bloodlust for more wars as they’re currently angling to do in Iran, they are themselves meticulously groomed for cushy, lucrative jobs. We won’t for example ever see Chelsea Clinton for real in a US military uniform, nor Tony Blair’s tribe either in relation to the British armed forces.
Instead, Chelsea works for a prominent hedge fund, one of those which gambled recklessly with your money, caused the credit crunch and have adversely affected millions of people around the world financially, but she won’t be short of a bob or two to use a colloquial English expression that infers she’ll always be well off; and it’s a sure bet she’s being groomed as a future resident of the White House an ambition that her mother Hillary still has. It’s the same with Tony Blair’s brood; safe parliamentary constituent seats; ministerial and cabinet posts; and then the top job.
Stella Rimington MI5’s boss and as an individual the physical embodiment of evil has officially stepped down as head of MI5 but her influence hasn’t waned and she’s now become a political advisor to the Conservative Party. But how many Afghans, Iraqis and other innocent civilian victims have died I wonder as a direct result of this woman’s lies - I’m talking about wholly and intentionally concocted fabrications here – which because of the crucially important and highly influential job that she held down she cynically and dishonestly used as a personal platform to lie to the British people, soften them up, and dupe the country into going to war when it shouldn’t and wouldn’t have done if the truth was told? And why in the name of everything that’s decent, particularly so when extra-rendition, torture transfers and extrajudicial executions have been her trade mark is this woman still alive?
Is there no justice in the world anymore when callous mass murderers like this woman dishonestly masquerading as our nation’s protector but are nothing of the kind; have no true allegiance to the people of the UK but only the money interests and those with power to satisfy their avarice are allowed to concoct lying situations that result in our sons and daughters being sent off to God-forsaken countries to fight, get seriously injured or permanently mentally scarred and even pay the ultimate sacrifice in pointless, fabricated wars, while they deceitfully flaunt their patriotism and are quite willing to defend the UK to the last drop of somebody else’s blood? Why I ask again is Stella Rimington not dead; subjected before that fate to the same arbitrary and barbarous treatment she meted out to others and obviously got her kicks from; since justice alone demands that she should die?
Vile as Stella Rimington is Hillary Clinton is even worse. The Mother of all Liars Hillary is a pathological and shameless liar who even believes her own lies, and when someone gets to that stage then having them legally sectioned, incarcerated and permanently out of harm’s way in the padded cell of a lunatic asylum is the only remedial course that I can think of except perhaps humanely putting them to sleep, out of their misery and effectively neutralizing their danger to others as one would a rabid dog on the loose and incurably infected with rabies. And there’s a legal recourse for this; it’s called the United States Constitution; the clause that categorically gives US citizens the right to bear arms.
That specific and highly crucial element of the United States Constitution wasn’t included by the Founding fathers to give lawless thugs and gangsters in Chicago, New York or elsewhere in the United States a free hand to maim or kill each other or wreak havoc on innocent civilians in their neighbourhoods but is in effect the official and legally enshrined green light for all US citizens to rise up if need be and by force of arms bump off or eradicate all tyrannical politicians and public figures who either individually or collectively abuse their offices and the power these bestow on them to the detriment of the US populace at large. But what really puzzles me, and I’m assuming that the average American knows his country’s constitution inside out, is why Americans who to put it mildly are instinctively such gun toting lovers don’t take more notice of their constitution, especially this aspect of it and bearing in mind the circumstances they’re currently in, to convert those hideously offending political power bases inside their country into full-scale firing ranges? The odds are that if they did they’d find themselves immeasurably better off than they presently are and additionally see their status and popularity throughout the world rise expeditiously as a result of what they’d done.
The crux of the matter is that the lie merchants in the United States, Britain, the rest of the EU and Israel aren’t only playing politics with the truth and de facto our lives but they’ve also gone much further and are creating lies on the ground which they then present as irrefutable facts and doing so with a single purpose in mind to dupe their respective citizens into believing that what they’re told is the unvarnished truth, enabling them to embark unchallenged in perpetrating even more heinous atrocities using these lies that they know are wilfully manufactured as justification for what they’re doing or are about to do.
And creating fear is a crucial element of this propaganda exercise. And a classic example of this is the position of Britain’s MI6. There would be no justification for many of its operations and possibly even its existence without the propaganda of fear, and many of the atrocities that MI6 reports as having been carried out by the bogeymen of so-called terrorists that they’ve invented and then go to great lengths to publicly disparage are in effect the handiwork of MI6 itself or its proxies to literally in most cases justify its existence and the expenditure spent on it. A situation akin to a crafty glazer paying sycophantic thugs to covertly go around and smash your house or shop windows then audaciously approaching you, fraudulently but oh so politely sympathizing with you over your unprovoked bad luck then conveniently offering you his services as a glazer.
Besides a lot of MI6 principal operatives are products of the class ridden, British public schools system (for those of you not familiar with the English educational system public schools are in effect tremendously expensive, fee paying, private and privileged, elite schools and colleges and shouldn’t be confused with public schools which are state owned and free), haven’t got a clue of the real world outside their constricted elitist confines, and for the most part, irrespective of their gender, are either gay or lesbian with both groups seemingly feeling the necessity to demonstrate their machismo, because in reality neither of them has any which is natural anyway, and with the women ending up the more butch and testosterone driven of the two.
Not all that surprising when one takes fully into consideration the sexual ethos of these public schools and the position played by their disciplinarian matrons vis-à-vis these highly impressionable boys in their charge. And as we learnt from Burgess and MacLean two key MI6 spies that defected to the Soviet Union, many of these operatives in the upper echelons of MI6 are little more than pebble mouthed and double-barrelled named dimwits who were they ever to find themselves confronted on a one to one basis with a real honest to goodness foe would simply piss themselves with fear; dysfunctional people that quite frankly are totally incapable of determining what are security matters as they pertain to Britain and what are essentially British interests and being able therefore to differentiate between the two of them.
The latest barefaced lie being wantonly put about by these people is that the Iranian broadcaster Press TV which specializes in giving an alternative and more objective appraisal and reporting of global news from the sickeningly infernal propaganda that characterizes all western broadcasters with their vested financial interests to take care of and therefore have no time or any concern for the truth or impartial reporting of the news which is selectively embarked on anyway, and which assiduously, deliberately and refreshingly devotes its energy and programming to giving a much appreciated voice to the voiceless is, according to these tedious hypocrites, peddling propaganda and must be reined in.
The reality though is that increasingly large numbers of people in the west are tuning into Press TV and shutting of completely their western broadcasting stations because the general consensus is that these can no longer be trusted and viewers see no reason why they should continue to have their intelligence insulted by these organisations, or have to stomach the wilful lies and distortions they’re being constantly fed and have grown thoroughly sick and tired of. But rather than take a long, hard look at themselves and what they’re doing and then sensibly rectify their wrongdoings these western media stations have instead opted to do what all bullies and tyrants do when their lack of oblivious credibility is questioned and highlighted; denigrate the person or persons who are drawing attention to their failings or to use another terminology kill the messenger for bringing unpleasant news and showing them up for what they really are.
It’s an open secret in the UK that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates have all had talks with David Cameron, senior members of his cabinet, the BBC’s Board of Governors, its Director General, heads of the independent television companies in the UK, notably Channel 4 and ITV, and crucially with Ofcom, the British broadcasting watchdog; poodle would be a more fitting title for it, to manufacture a plethora of mendacious reasons and methodically use these as the basis to ban Press TV from operating in the United Kingdom where it is very popular and has a large following among the local British population who look to it for unbiased, informative and accurate news reports on normally reported stories but more specifically on stories that the media in the west most cynically conspire with each other not to touch let alone cover; and the result of this puerile short-sightedness and rank stupidity by these western broadcasting companies is that while the viewing figures of these broadcasting corporations are plummeting dramatically, most conspicuously those of the public broadcaster and involuntary citizen and resident funded BBC, in marked contrast those of Press TV are literally skyrocketing.
I’ve written a number of articles in the past about the BBC’s lack of impartiality, its propaganda and deliberate lies going back despite its lofty charter to its very inception, but it really took the biscuit when on Monday 11 April 2011 in its Panorama programme hosted by a presenter who is widely known to be an incorrigible Zionist, virulent Islamophobe and hater of all things Iranian, the BBC having from the very beginning of the peoples’ peaceful protests in Bahrain resolutely refused to screen or report on any news concerning Bahrain or the Yemen for that matter in spite of the well documented accounts of ongoing atrocities in both these countries aided and abetted by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE and Kuwait, none the less devoted its prime time television slot to doing a hatchet job on Iran and Press TV, labelling the Iranian Republic which unlike Britain hasn’t waged war on any country for centuries but instead has had war visited on it by the west and its proxies, chiefly Iraq, as abysmally short on human rights then using footage which at the end of the Panorama programme the BBC barefacedly announced couldn’t be verified as being authentic as it had no corroborative evidence to substantiate its claims, as dubious and evidently lying assertions to denigrate and vilify Iran. Then utterly insensitive to the irony of what it was doing and Britain’s own human rights violations that are legion and have stretched over a period of almost a half a millennium up to the present time the BBC in that same Panorama programme went on to state further that Press TV isn’t a genuine news broadcasting organization but is really the mouthpiece of the undemocratic Iranian government and should have its licence to operate in the UK revoked.
Press TV the mouthpiece of the Iranian government and the BBC an impartial news broadcaster that assiduously distances itself from the dictates of No.10 and its Zionists controllers; well you couldn’t have made that up could you?
Nevertheless I was heartened by the fact that the BBC’s switchboard was jammed during and after the screening of the Panorama programme with many thousands of irate calls from furious viewers deeply angered and disgusted that in abrogation yet again of its clearly defined charter to be impartial and non-propagandistic in its programming the BBC had chosen as it has repeatedly done in the past and regularly keeps on doing with impunity to violate these tenets. At the same time the BBC’s website I understand also crashed as a consequence of the enormous number of protests which were sent it, but unsurprisingly none of this was ever made public by the BBC of its own volition, and only when relentlessly questioned did it admit to what happened.
How on earth with broadcasting media organizations like Fox News; CNN; ABC, France 24 and the same BBC either inventing stories, distorting others or quite flatly refusing to report on many others because in doing so would run contrary to the agenda of their political and or financial pay masters can these same organizations have the nerve to damn and malign honest broadcasters for doing what competent and genuinely professional broadcasters are meant to do? But the lives of these people are so full of lies and deception in everything that they do that the truth for them is really a bridge too far.
I was told confidentially that the British media does not report on Bahrain for fear of upsetting the hereditary, petrol monarch there who is a close friend of the British Royal Family and has been invited to Prince William’s wedding; and were the British people at large to know the full extent of his murderous atrocities brutally compounded by those of members of his family and other Arab savages like the Saudis and those from similarly tyrannical Gulf states that this man has inexcusably and deplorably invited into Bahrain to systematically slaughter the indigenous people there, that there’d be massive demonstrations in London against his presence in the UK.
For let’s not forget that the al-khalifa family that sees and treats Bahrain as if it were its private estate is a foreign import, taken there in 1820 by the British who have supported them through thick and thin ever since, and at no time following its enforced implantation on the majority of the Bahraini people have these crude interlopers saw or felt the need to integrate with the local people or express any empathy with them. Let me posit this supposition to you. Try imagining that the country where you were born, belong to and that your ancestors have lived in for many thousands of years suddenly finds itself ruled by outsiders who not only don’t want to have any thing at all to do with you but even prohibit you from being a member of its armed forces.
Yes, that’s the situation in Bahrain where the military is comprised of mercenaries from Jordan, Pakistan, India, anywhere you can imagine except from among the Bahraini people and therefore it’s hardly surprising that they too don’t empathize with the local people; they get paid, are told what they have to do, are given residence in the country and callously do what they are instructed to; and when you compound this approach with invitations from this depraved Bahrain butcher to the Saudis and other repulsive Gulf states to march into Bahrain to further massacre and terrorize the local Bahraini populace little wonder that stalwart friends in the west of this power-obsessed psychopath and their media organisations are tight-lipped about what is going on at the hands of one of their buddies. Contrast this with what would have been a wholly different approach from these utterly odious people if it were Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas that was doing any of this. In fact they are so worried by their own silence and the knowledge that there are growing numbers of people out there who see them for what they really are that they’re even trying to put the very obvious lie out that what is happening in Bahrain and the Yemen is being orchestrated by Iran.
In other words it’s everybody else’s fault bar their own, and if they can shout loud and long enough that it’s the doing of those whom they like to vilify perhaps enough idiots, or the gullible among their own population will believe these lies as well. That’s why they hate with a passion stations like Press TV, as they show a blazing spotlight on the hypocrisies and double standards of these infantile but highly dangerous people. The Israelis have an apt saying, namely: it’s best to lie and the bigger that lie is and the louder and more frequently you repeat it the greater is the possibility people will be believed. My view on this is if you’re one of those naïve cretins then you deserve everything you get.
That this Bahrain butcher should be contemplating coming to the UK in view of what is going on in the country over which he rules (note I’ve made a clear distinction here and not used the term his country) is mindboggling; that the House of Windsor hasn’t cancelled that invitation is even more loathsome in my view. But knowing that there will be demonstrations against him and in a classic situation of using lies to buttress up their perfidy MI5 is putting it about in the media and through Scotland Yard that there must be additional security to protect William and his fiancée Kate from stalkers and or demonstrators against Prince Charles. What a load of tosh! First this is not Charles’ wedding or even his coronation. Second, the people of the United Kingdom whether they are diehard monarchists, few in number; apathetic to the monarch, most of us; or are simply republicans have nothing personally against William or Kate. Moreover, all empirical data show that William’s mother Princess Diana was greatly loved by the vast majority of the British public a figure that averages around 98% after the tragic circumstances of her death which many of us believe was cold-blooded murder by the security services.
We also believe that Diana did a fantastic job in raising her two boys and in manner completely different from the sterile manner in which the Queen and Margaret were brought up and that the Queen herself adopted as regards her own children as she knew nothing else or anything better; a situation that has resulted despite all their money, privileged status and the rest of it has resulted in Her Majesty having one of the most dysfunctional families in the United Kingdom, and let’s be perfectly honest about that. That said I would still prefer to have her as head of state any day than see that role take on by lying, dishonest bastards of the ilk of Tony Blair, Gordon Browne, David Cameron, Neil Kinnock or the rest of them. But Princess Diana with all her foibles (and who is without theirs?) was special and particularly so as a mum. She had that instinctive touchy empathetic feeling and naturalness that the Queen, Charles and the rest of the Queen’s kids lack, and more importantly Diana conveyed this admirably to both her sons just as she equally did so with the rest of the world, and I honestly believe that William and Harry are all the better off for this wondrous gift that they inherited and had reinforced by their mother.
Furthermore, the closest that the British people en masse came to demanding a republic in my life time was when the Queen and Philip decided initially to distance themselves from Diana’s death and the spontaneous national mourning surrounding it and deliberately opted to stay away from London; the resultant public mood towards them for this discourtesy was virulently hostile and tangible and the survivor that she is the Queen quickly latched onto to what was a genuine public sentiment and changed her tune. She not only came down to London post haste from her Balmoral holiday residence but gave instructions that the Union Jack be flown at half mast over Buckingham Palace; but it was a close call for her Majesty!
Now ask yourselves with Diana even after her tragic murder those many years ago still a Lady who is overwhelmingly loved by the British public and with William almost a lookalike of his dead mother why would anyone in Britain with even the barest modicum of love for Diana want to spoil her son’s great day knowing as we all do what a bastard Prince Charles was to Diana? What would be their motivation; and why would they want to sully Diana’s memory? And the red herring about Prince Charles is just that; he’s already married to Camilla and I didn’t detect any rebellions in the UK because of this even though 99.9% of the British people don’t want to see her as Queen and would never stomach her, even though as Charles legal wife she’s entitled to the title, as the Princess of Wales which we will always associate with Diana. So is being put out there is nothing more than lies and propaganda; the ruler of Bahrain should not be here and I don’t care how friendly he is with Charles or the Queen or Philip, he should not be coming to the UK, but don’t then insult our intelligence by claiming it’s all to do with protecting William.
So when next you’re told by the BBC, Fox News, CNN, the BBC World, France 24, ABC and the rest of that mob that this or that is being done for whatever farfetched reason they then go on to give or that your security services or mine have discovered this or that terrorist plot my advice to you is hold your nose tightly and keep the stinking stench out. The fact that this collective of pathological liars, their government and security services are spending time, effort and vast sums of money to malign Press TV and dupe you in the process is a clear indication if you ever needed one that Press TV is getting it right and these brigands are deeply worried. As a result be on your guard at all times and importantly try thinking for yourselves.
Saturday, 16 April 2011
A PLEA TO JACOB ZUMA - Strip Zionist Richard Goldstone of his South African citizenship and residential status.
By Stanley Collymore
Dear Mr President,
This is a personal plea to you both in your capacity as President of the Republic of South Africa and as an unrelenting fighter against apartheid.
Let me first give you some detailed background information of myself before venturing into why I am writing this letter to you. I’m British and was from the outset a member and active supporter of the Anti-apartheid Movement in the UK. A student at the time it was a very uphill battle for those of us who pinned our colours firmly to the mast of highlighting, attacking and doing everything legal in our power that we could think of to bring about democratic change and the dismantling of Apartheid in your country.
A formidable task we had no illusions about what we were undertaking knowing full well the vast range of political, civic, diplomatic, economic and military forces that were reined against us and which were quite extensive, redoubtable and at time extremely brutal in the process; but we’d psychologically prepared ourselves for this and were even prepared to risk and sacrifice our lives for the cause we’d undertaken, knew was a right and just one, and were in it for the long haul.
In Britain many of our members were constantly harassed by the civic forces organized against us including those of the police who regularly beat us up with impunity causing some of us to be hospitalized, arrested our members on spurious whims of their but never charged us of anything, preferring instead to keep us locked up in police cells overnight, humiliate us while there and release us after 24 hours detention. Meanwhile, the media routinely ridiculed us, made us out at best to be losers but more frequently branded us as fifth columnists and enemies of the state; some of them even accused us as agents who were working for foreign powers, notably Russia. None of them ever bothered to interview us, listen to anything we had to say, find out what we really stood for or objectively deal with the subject of apartheid, preferring instead to deal with abstracts and stick to their well rehearsed and intractable script that South Africa was an ally of Britain and the west, Blacks were incapable of ever looking after themselves let alone capable of running a state; that it was the whites who made South Africa the prosperous country it was and furthermore whites, as in what was then Southern Rhodesia, were our kith and kin.
Margaret Thatcher set the tone when she publicly declared and I quote her words: “Those who believe that the African National Congress (ANC) will become the government of South Africa are living in cloud cuckoo land.” What she conveniently failed to tell the world was that she and her husband Dennis were making enormous profits from business ventures they had in South Africa, getting the kind of financial returns on these that they would never have been able to receive in any so-called western state including the United Kingdom, as with having a small white minority forcibly and illegally in charge of South Africa, no democracy or adult suffrage in the country, the black population forcibly fragmented, told where it could and could not live, forced to carry passes to travel about its own land, literally treated as itinerant migrants within its own country, routinely split up as families by the state that fostered family breakups to intentionally break down cohesion among black people, and additionally paid starvation wages, the resultant massive financial profits that were made off their labour, exploitation, repression and misery were, in such circumstances, ideally suited from a white perspective to guarantee a much greater distribution of South Africa’s wealth to its white minority population, regardless of their lack of skills what little contribution that they actually made to the country’s economy and prosperity as they were all guaranteed jobs and supervisory roles for life vis-à-vis the Blacks who were the ones that did the work, and, of course, foreign carpetbaggers and exploiters of whom there were many such western participants like Maggie Thatcher and her husband.
Well aware that we would be on the receiving end of rightwing racist attacks both verbally and physically we had resolved from the start of our campaign to adopt the Gandhian approach of passive resistance combined with non-violence knowing full well that even though this approach wouldn’t be an effective deterrent to these thugs among the public or in any way stop the police attacks against us as well as those orchestrated in the media , we were none the less determined that our campaign would be based on civilized and mature standards of behaviour and high moral principles; and that none of our detractors and abusers would ever get us to descend from these benchmarks, which we’d voluntarily set ourselves, into the foul sewers of racism, intolerance and injustice where they were most comfortably at home and in their element.
Yes, we were hurt at times; but the physical pain from the unprovoked beating we received at the hands of the police viciously breaking up our peaceful demonstrations apart there was also the psychological pain derived from the share callousness of these inhuman purveyors and supporters of apartheid. Steve Biko’s murder, widely and dishonestly reported in the British media, both print and electronic, as a self-inflicted accident when purportedly in a customary black tirade (why is it that Blacks always get into tirades but whites somehow never do?) he slipped on a bar of soap and conveniently fell through the window of a room where he was being housed several stories up in that building. Remarkably the British media never for a moment questioned the veracity of these so-called facts from the apartheid regime in South Africa any more than they deem it necessary to question the lies of the Zionist authorities in Israel nowadays. No one asked what this building was or why Steve Biko was there in the first place.
The reality was that it served as the torture centre of BOSS: the Bureau of State Security – how appropriately crass a name that fitted well into the white, racist, master race mindset vis-à-vis these savage Blacks as the majority population of South Africa were widely regarded not only in South Africa itself but among many whites in the west. Similarly there was no condemnation in the British media when the interior minister in the apartheid regime publicly stated and I quote: “Steve Biko’s death leaves me cold.” In fact the British media celebrated effusively the murder of another black man who they effortlessly labelled as a terrorist. Thanks to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission the entire world now knows the truth and the full facts surround this case but the British and western media have never apologized for their craven subservience to the apartheid regime in South Africa, the lies which they willingly published or their deliberate defamation of Steve Biko.
Fast forward to April 2011 and we see boy Hague, the current British Foreign Secretary, talking about the denial by Colonel Gaddafi of human rights in Libya and his fellow British and so-called EU foreign counterpart, Catherine Ashton, demanding that Iraq recognizes the human rights of the MKO a well-documented terrorist organisation even in the west but is now being conveniently employed to carry out terrorist attacks in Iran at the west’s behest – while both these persons quite expediently overlook worse atrocities in Bahrain and Yemen. And who among the anti-apartheid movement in the United Kingdom can forget William Hague then a member of the British Young Conservatives along with many more of his ilk at the time happily parading themselves in counter pro-apartheid and police unmolested demonstrations, on university campuses and at Conservative Party conferences proudly wearing T-shirts banner headlined with the slogans: “Hang Nelson Mandela” and bomb the ANC, and like their leader Maggie Thatcher and the US President Ronald Reagan readily and regularly vilifying Nelson Mandela as a terrorist and the ANC as a terrorists organization; a classic case of openly rewording the vile apartheid abusers while selectively and unwarrantedly punishing their hapless victims.
South Africa has quite remarkably out of its trauma made great strides since Nelson Mandela was released and adult suffrage permitted to all South Africans; nevertheless there’s still much to do and a long way still to go, as the long nightmare years of apartheid and the ANC’s opposition to it that predates the Russian Revolution has left its dark and debilitating legacy and it will take time to undo all the harm that the critics of a democratically black led South Africa and those hankering after the good old days point to as black incompetence and inability to run a modern, progressive, democratic state; although their interpretation of the word progressive – namely white controlled and white dominated – differs vastly from my own and all those who opposed apartheid. Anyway, I have no time for such people who when it suited their purposes ridiculed the ANC for being older than the Russian revolution yet made no significant progress as a resistance movement because of the non-violent stance it had taken but when it was forced to take up arms as it ultimately did in the wake of the increased barbarism of the apartheid state and its western collaborators perversely condemned it as a terrorist organization.
The treatment of Winnie Mandela too showed how sick these people were and still are. Vilified relentlessly in the British and western media as everything from a serial adulteress to someone advocating neckklacing black traitors it’s amazing how these people could have managed to keep straight faces while indulging in their nefarious pursuits of theirs against Winnie. Treating this remarkable and dignified lady with the contempt they have in the wake of her well-documented mistreatment at the hands of the apartheid regime is mindboggling. To call her a serial adulteress when genuine serial adulterers and adulteresses like Prince Charles, Camilla, Princess Anne, Mark Phillips her ex husband, other prominent members of the British Royal Family, Paddy Ashdown of Bosnia infamy, Nancy Reagan, Bill Clinton, 99.9% of senior and well-known BBC staff members and those in the British media generally, as well as countless others who didn’t or would they ever have had to put up with the travails that Winnie Mandela was subjected to: arbitrary house arrest; not allowed to have more than one visitors at a time; her husband locked away for 27 years and her visits to see him very much at the personal whims of the authorities and could be terminated at any time without rhyme or reason; the list goes on, is utterly risible as it is wholly repugnant.
What are Prince Charles’ excuses for treating Diana the way he did; or those of Paddy Ashton re his wife; or any of Winnie’s detractors who’ve been regularly having it off with their respective lovers unknowingly behind the backs of their wives, husbands or partners? I wasn’t aware that their spouses or partners were locked up for 27 years in the circumstances that Nelson Mandela was and all the rest of it, and that these poor, devils compelled to live in utter privation as Winnie Mandela was had to find some ways to relieve their sexual boredom or psychological pain. In fact the contrary is very much the case; as all of those mentioned above live and continue to do so in complete opulence; are highly privileged members of society and hold down very high-powered hereditary, political or otherwise influential media positions. So I ask once again; what are their rational excuses for putting it about as they’ve done and some of them still carry on doing while hypocritically asserting that it was wrong for Winnie Mandela to similarly and more realistically relieve her sexual tensions placed in the intolerable situation that she was in; single-handedly at first keeping her husband’s name in the spotlight when others didn’t want to know, and not even sure if she would ever see him again when those criticizing her wanted her husband dead? What rank hypocrisy and utter stupidity. Aren’t these buffoons aware of the old maxim that people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones?
On the issue of necklacing, what’s wrong with the sentiment Winnie Mandela expressed? Why is it perfectly okay for westerners to seek revenge for real or imagined wrongs they perceive have been done against them but wholly wrong for others to contemplate let alone do the same? Lord Haw Haw, real name William Joyce, the Irish/American, pro-German radio propagandist broadcasting out of Berlin during World War II was captured, arrested, subjected to a brief sham trial and summarily hanged by the British at the conclusion of the war on transparently trumped up charges of treason, which was illegal as one can only lawfully be charged with treason if he or she is or was a citizen of the country trying that person on treason charges, and Lord Haw Haw was never a British citizen. What the British did was to indulge themselves in pure spiteful revenge since this man was not a military combatant but was simply one of Goebel’s propagandists who was very effective at his job of undermining British armed forces morale, and now the British authorities were getting their own back at him for this, which after all this time gives me hope that one day soon we’ll see some country or countries do the same with the plethora of British and particularly BBC reporters, those of the US, notably Fox News; CNN; NBC: and ABC and for good measure other western propagandists as well; and I hope the west daren’t complain having set a precedent with Lord Haw Haw.
So I wholeheartedly then and still do now endorse what the bold Winnie Mandela said at the time. These were black traitors who knew and could see the physical and mental effects of apartheid on the majority black, suppressed people of South Africa yet they were prepared to sell out their own people; and I don’t know of any country or people in the entire world who if they were ever put in similar circumstances to those that Winnie Mandela was barbarously subjected to and continuously so for more than three decades wouldn’t have wanted these traitors equally and brutally eliminated from the face of the earth.
A measure of the civilized nature of black South Africans was that when they eventually won their epic struggle for freedom in the face of everything that was thrown at them and the murderous and inhuman treatment they were subjected to on a daily basis: forced removals of longstanding black communities to make way for white settlements; bantustanization, the pass laws; job reservations with Blacks told what jobs they could and could not have and such work as they got always being of a menial nature; the immorality laws which banned mixed race marriages or transracial sexual relationships to protect the alleged virtue of white women that they more often than not were less concerned about protecting themselves, although these laws were never designed to prevent white male rape of black domestics and other black females; the Sharpeville and Soweto Massacres and the iconic image of that brave black student carrying in his arms the dead body of his classmate in the systematic gunning down of unarmed, peaceful black students demonstrating to have a decent education for themselves and other blacks and not forced to be taught in their own country with its own languages in the hybrid dialect of their oppressors, they didn’t resort to the kind of violent and cold-blooded vindictiveness characteristic of whites but instead set up the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to bring about reconciliation in their country. Can you seriously imagine the United States, Britain, France, Canada, Australia or any other white ruled country even in 2011 doing the same in similar circumstances? Don’t hold your breath on that one else you might choke for lack of air. It simply won’t happen!
Which brings me to the nub of why I’m writing to you Mr President. Richard Goldstone was one of those comfortable, white judges who presided over the pernicious practices of apartheid; no matter what the revisionists of South African history might say, all of whom are like their fellow Nazis in post war Germany that suddenly and conveniently became afflicted with mass amnesia, pretending that they didn’t know what was going on right under their noses, and let’s face facts South Africa’s Jews are no different from the rest of them. Yes, some Jews inside South Africa did courageously fight against apartheid and paid the ultimate price for doing so; Ruth First was one such person murdered by BOSS in neighbouring Mozambique where she’d gone to help black refugees there. Her husband Jo Slovo was also relentlessly targeted and was nearly killed by the apartheid regime but thankfully survived to see a democratic South Africa emerge in his life time and was made a minister in the post apartheid government of South Africa. Sadly he has passed away of cancer but the entire nation of South Africa led by its black majority which considers all South Africans as equals gave him a hero’s farewell which he richly deserved and along with people like myself mourn his passing. Where was Zionist Richard Goldstein? To use a military term he was AWOL; and very much defending the apartheid status quo. Nothing has changed with this man.
But we remember all too well those like Percy Yutar who the Boers cynically used as a Jew to prosecute Nelson Mandela and the enthusiasm with which he carried out his task. The Boers and their British counterparts had no love for the Jews all of whom were essentially refugees or the descendants of refugees fleeing over 200 years of pogroms against them right across Europe and including Russia where it all started and up to World War II, but recognizing that as whites they were very much in the minority in South Africa and hadn’t been able to do what their kith and kin had managed to do in Australia against the hapless Aborigines, or in the United States and Canada against the Native Americans and consequently there would always be a black majority in South Africa – hence the gerrymandering process of Bantustans pretending that the Blacks in South Africa were one people but several nations, no such Bantustans for the different cultural and linguistic Europeans though that had found their way to South Africa - the Boers and their complicit British colonialists were quite keen to have as many white men, women and children emigrate there to boost their numbers and although deep in their hearts they would have preferred they weren’t Jews, at least these Jews were white, so they held their noses, swallowed hard and allowed them in.
Nevertheless the Jews in South Africa despite their ordeal in Europe at the hands of their fellow whites who were Christians still by and large empathized with them in a manner that they weren’t prepared to or would they ever have allowed themselves to with their host country’s majority and indigenous black population and even more ironical they self-servingly and avariciously supported apartheid, a move that quickly benefited them enormously financially, making South African Jews even in 2011 the richest Jews anywhere on earth; as many of them got involved in South Africa’s diamond industry and with their expertise in this field came to dominate that industry whose HQ after the fall of apartheid in South Africa they moved to Israel which tells its own racist story, as Israel has no diamond mines.
Like many of his white, Jewish South African compatriots several of whom moved to Israel after the collapse of apartheid Richard Goldstone is an ardent Zionist and no different from all the others that infest Palestine now largely renamed Israel. Goldstone’s own daughter and other close family members have moved from South Africa to Israel where they currently live and are Israeli citizens, and for the UN to have so crassly given him the task of investigating Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity by this racist, colonialist, imperialist, apartheid and Zionist entity which has been implanted against the wishes of the indigenous Palestinians in their midst would have been similar to asking well known Nazis to preside over the Nuremburg Trials. Richard Goldstone was a United States and UK backed plant with complicit support for this move rendered by the EU; so what he’s done and the inconceivable shenanigans which are going on in the US Congress to have the report that carries his name rescinded comes as no surprise to me. It was planned that way.
But that’s not my worry. What concerns me is that this racist, Zionist Jew is being widely reported as a South African judge even though his sympathies obviously lie elsewhere and accordingly that deeply offends me and other anti-apartheid activists as well tarnishes with its attendant great harm to the positive image of post apartheid South Africa, and for a diversity of obvious reasons, among it true friends. South Africa which has been charitable, humane, magnanimous and civilized in victory in a way that no white country is capable of must consequently act and act decisively by severing all links with its reprehensible past; and that means among other things stripping Richard Goldstone of his South African citizenship even though he values his Israeli one much more, and additionally rescinding his residential rights to live and work in South Africa, making it abundantly and unequivocally clear to the whole world why this is being done.
You and the South African parliament must also be courageous enough to insist and immediately legislate to this effect that the operations connected with South Africa’s diamond industry and the companies involved in these stay in South Africa and it won’t be business as usual; and if such companies don’t care to conform with the new regime then let them know in no uncertain terms that they’ll be summarily thrown out of the country. I don’t know and neither do you of a single major industry in the so-called developed world whose headquarters isn’t there. Would Mercedes Benz move its HQ to India; British Aerospace to Barbados, or Boeing or Airbus to South Africa? I don’t think so; besides there’s national legislation in all of these countries to prevent key industries relocating elsewhere or foreigners, particularly non-whites, from gaining control of key, strategic companies and services in these countries.
South Africa as indeed all other African countries must do the same and stop being the copious supplier of raw materials from cocoa to diamonds which are shipped abroad, turned into valuable commodities there that these African countries can produce but the west would then prohibit them entering their markets, yet have no scruples whatever of converting these commodities which they buy for a pittance from these African countries, including yours, and then adding insult to injury sell them back to you at exorbitant prices. This must stop immediately, and you must do what the west does with its own products; have your own productions done at home in Africa, create your own markets and determine your own price for your goods, not leave that too to places like Tel Aviv as is the case with your diamond industry or the stock markets of Europe and the USA as is the case with all African products. You are a sovereign independent country; please act that way!
Finally Sir, I’d like to see a full public recognition and state rehabilitation of Winnie Mandela and a statue erected to honour and show our collective gratitude to this extraordinary Lady, everything she’s stood for, represents, and has done to help free South Africa from the bondage of apartheid and servitude; and you Mr President are more than most ideally equipped to do this. Stop letting the west and whites determine who Blacks should venerate and who they shouldn’t. Amandla; and God bless South Africa!
Dear Mr President,
This is a personal plea to you both in your capacity as President of the Republic of South Africa and as an unrelenting fighter against apartheid.
Let me first give you some detailed background information of myself before venturing into why I am writing this letter to you. I’m British and was from the outset a member and active supporter of the Anti-apartheid Movement in the UK. A student at the time it was a very uphill battle for those of us who pinned our colours firmly to the mast of highlighting, attacking and doing everything legal in our power that we could think of to bring about democratic change and the dismantling of Apartheid in your country.
A formidable task we had no illusions about what we were undertaking knowing full well the vast range of political, civic, diplomatic, economic and military forces that were reined against us and which were quite extensive, redoubtable and at time extremely brutal in the process; but we’d psychologically prepared ourselves for this and were even prepared to risk and sacrifice our lives for the cause we’d undertaken, knew was a right and just one, and were in it for the long haul.
In Britain many of our members were constantly harassed by the civic forces organized against us including those of the police who regularly beat us up with impunity causing some of us to be hospitalized, arrested our members on spurious whims of their but never charged us of anything, preferring instead to keep us locked up in police cells overnight, humiliate us while there and release us after 24 hours detention. Meanwhile, the media routinely ridiculed us, made us out at best to be losers but more frequently branded us as fifth columnists and enemies of the state; some of them even accused us as agents who were working for foreign powers, notably Russia. None of them ever bothered to interview us, listen to anything we had to say, find out what we really stood for or objectively deal with the subject of apartheid, preferring instead to deal with abstracts and stick to their well rehearsed and intractable script that South Africa was an ally of Britain and the west, Blacks were incapable of ever looking after themselves let alone capable of running a state; that it was the whites who made South Africa the prosperous country it was and furthermore whites, as in what was then Southern Rhodesia, were our kith and kin.
Margaret Thatcher set the tone when she publicly declared and I quote her words: “Those who believe that the African National Congress (ANC) will become the government of South Africa are living in cloud cuckoo land.” What she conveniently failed to tell the world was that she and her husband Dennis were making enormous profits from business ventures they had in South Africa, getting the kind of financial returns on these that they would never have been able to receive in any so-called western state including the United Kingdom, as with having a small white minority forcibly and illegally in charge of South Africa, no democracy or adult suffrage in the country, the black population forcibly fragmented, told where it could and could not live, forced to carry passes to travel about its own land, literally treated as itinerant migrants within its own country, routinely split up as families by the state that fostered family breakups to intentionally break down cohesion among black people, and additionally paid starvation wages, the resultant massive financial profits that were made off their labour, exploitation, repression and misery were, in such circumstances, ideally suited from a white perspective to guarantee a much greater distribution of South Africa’s wealth to its white minority population, regardless of their lack of skills what little contribution that they actually made to the country’s economy and prosperity as they were all guaranteed jobs and supervisory roles for life vis-à-vis the Blacks who were the ones that did the work, and, of course, foreign carpetbaggers and exploiters of whom there were many such western participants like Maggie Thatcher and her husband.
Well aware that we would be on the receiving end of rightwing racist attacks both verbally and physically we had resolved from the start of our campaign to adopt the Gandhian approach of passive resistance combined with non-violence knowing full well that even though this approach wouldn’t be an effective deterrent to these thugs among the public or in any way stop the police attacks against us as well as those orchestrated in the media , we were none the less determined that our campaign would be based on civilized and mature standards of behaviour and high moral principles; and that none of our detractors and abusers would ever get us to descend from these benchmarks, which we’d voluntarily set ourselves, into the foul sewers of racism, intolerance and injustice where they were most comfortably at home and in their element.
Yes, we were hurt at times; but the physical pain from the unprovoked beating we received at the hands of the police viciously breaking up our peaceful demonstrations apart there was also the psychological pain derived from the share callousness of these inhuman purveyors and supporters of apartheid. Steve Biko’s murder, widely and dishonestly reported in the British media, both print and electronic, as a self-inflicted accident when purportedly in a customary black tirade (why is it that Blacks always get into tirades but whites somehow never do?) he slipped on a bar of soap and conveniently fell through the window of a room where he was being housed several stories up in that building. Remarkably the British media never for a moment questioned the veracity of these so-called facts from the apartheid regime in South Africa any more than they deem it necessary to question the lies of the Zionist authorities in Israel nowadays. No one asked what this building was or why Steve Biko was there in the first place.
The reality was that it served as the torture centre of BOSS: the Bureau of State Security – how appropriately crass a name that fitted well into the white, racist, master race mindset vis-à-vis these savage Blacks as the majority population of South Africa were widely regarded not only in South Africa itself but among many whites in the west. Similarly there was no condemnation in the British media when the interior minister in the apartheid regime publicly stated and I quote: “Steve Biko’s death leaves me cold.” In fact the British media celebrated effusively the murder of another black man who they effortlessly labelled as a terrorist. Thanks to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission the entire world now knows the truth and the full facts surround this case but the British and western media have never apologized for their craven subservience to the apartheid regime in South Africa, the lies which they willingly published or their deliberate defamation of Steve Biko.
Fast forward to April 2011 and we see boy Hague, the current British Foreign Secretary, talking about the denial by Colonel Gaddafi of human rights in Libya and his fellow British and so-called EU foreign counterpart, Catherine Ashton, demanding that Iraq recognizes the human rights of the MKO a well-documented terrorist organisation even in the west but is now being conveniently employed to carry out terrorist attacks in Iran at the west’s behest – while both these persons quite expediently overlook worse atrocities in Bahrain and Yemen. And who among the anti-apartheid movement in the United Kingdom can forget William Hague then a member of the British Young Conservatives along with many more of his ilk at the time happily parading themselves in counter pro-apartheid and police unmolested demonstrations, on university campuses and at Conservative Party conferences proudly wearing T-shirts banner headlined with the slogans: “Hang Nelson Mandela” and bomb the ANC, and like their leader Maggie Thatcher and the US President Ronald Reagan readily and regularly vilifying Nelson Mandela as a terrorist and the ANC as a terrorists organization; a classic case of openly rewording the vile apartheid abusers while selectively and unwarrantedly punishing their hapless victims.
South Africa has quite remarkably out of its trauma made great strides since Nelson Mandela was released and adult suffrage permitted to all South Africans; nevertheless there’s still much to do and a long way still to go, as the long nightmare years of apartheid and the ANC’s opposition to it that predates the Russian Revolution has left its dark and debilitating legacy and it will take time to undo all the harm that the critics of a democratically black led South Africa and those hankering after the good old days point to as black incompetence and inability to run a modern, progressive, democratic state; although their interpretation of the word progressive – namely white controlled and white dominated – differs vastly from my own and all those who opposed apartheid. Anyway, I have no time for such people who when it suited their purposes ridiculed the ANC for being older than the Russian revolution yet made no significant progress as a resistance movement because of the non-violent stance it had taken but when it was forced to take up arms as it ultimately did in the wake of the increased barbarism of the apartheid state and its western collaborators perversely condemned it as a terrorist organization.
The treatment of Winnie Mandela too showed how sick these people were and still are. Vilified relentlessly in the British and western media as everything from a serial adulteress to someone advocating neckklacing black traitors it’s amazing how these people could have managed to keep straight faces while indulging in their nefarious pursuits of theirs against Winnie. Treating this remarkable and dignified lady with the contempt they have in the wake of her well-documented mistreatment at the hands of the apartheid regime is mindboggling. To call her a serial adulteress when genuine serial adulterers and adulteresses like Prince Charles, Camilla, Princess Anne, Mark Phillips her ex husband, other prominent members of the British Royal Family, Paddy Ashdown of Bosnia infamy, Nancy Reagan, Bill Clinton, 99.9% of senior and well-known BBC staff members and those in the British media generally, as well as countless others who didn’t or would they ever have had to put up with the travails that Winnie Mandela was subjected to: arbitrary house arrest; not allowed to have more than one visitors at a time; her husband locked away for 27 years and her visits to see him very much at the personal whims of the authorities and could be terminated at any time without rhyme or reason; the list goes on, is utterly risible as it is wholly repugnant.
What are Prince Charles’ excuses for treating Diana the way he did; or those of Paddy Ashton re his wife; or any of Winnie’s detractors who’ve been regularly having it off with their respective lovers unknowingly behind the backs of their wives, husbands or partners? I wasn’t aware that their spouses or partners were locked up for 27 years in the circumstances that Nelson Mandela was and all the rest of it, and that these poor, devils compelled to live in utter privation as Winnie Mandela was had to find some ways to relieve their sexual boredom or psychological pain. In fact the contrary is very much the case; as all of those mentioned above live and continue to do so in complete opulence; are highly privileged members of society and hold down very high-powered hereditary, political or otherwise influential media positions. So I ask once again; what are their rational excuses for putting it about as they’ve done and some of them still carry on doing while hypocritically asserting that it was wrong for Winnie Mandela to similarly and more realistically relieve her sexual tensions placed in the intolerable situation that she was in; single-handedly at first keeping her husband’s name in the spotlight when others didn’t want to know, and not even sure if she would ever see him again when those criticizing her wanted her husband dead? What rank hypocrisy and utter stupidity. Aren’t these buffoons aware of the old maxim that people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones?
On the issue of necklacing, what’s wrong with the sentiment Winnie Mandela expressed? Why is it perfectly okay for westerners to seek revenge for real or imagined wrongs they perceive have been done against them but wholly wrong for others to contemplate let alone do the same? Lord Haw Haw, real name William Joyce, the Irish/American, pro-German radio propagandist broadcasting out of Berlin during World War II was captured, arrested, subjected to a brief sham trial and summarily hanged by the British at the conclusion of the war on transparently trumped up charges of treason, which was illegal as one can only lawfully be charged with treason if he or she is or was a citizen of the country trying that person on treason charges, and Lord Haw Haw was never a British citizen. What the British did was to indulge themselves in pure spiteful revenge since this man was not a military combatant but was simply one of Goebel’s propagandists who was very effective at his job of undermining British armed forces morale, and now the British authorities were getting their own back at him for this, which after all this time gives me hope that one day soon we’ll see some country or countries do the same with the plethora of British and particularly BBC reporters, those of the US, notably Fox News; CNN; NBC: and ABC and for good measure other western propagandists as well; and I hope the west daren’t complain having set a precedent with Lord Haw Haw.
So I wholeheartedly then and still do now endorse what the bold Winnie Mandela said at the time. These were black traitors who knew and could see the physical and mental effects of apartheid on the majority black, suppressed people of South Africa yet they were prepared to sell out their own people; and I don’t know of any country or people in the entire world who if they were ever put in similar circumstances to those that Winnie Mandela was barbarously subjected to and continuously so for more than three decades wouldn’t have wanted these traitors equally and brutally eliminated from the face of the earth.
A measure of the civilized nature of black South Africans was that when they eventually won their epic struggle for freedom in the face of everything that was thrown at them and the murderous and inhuman treatment they were subjected to on a daily basis: forced removals of longstanding black communities to make way for white settlements; bantustanization, the pass laws; job reservations with Blacks told what jobs they could and could not have and such work as they got always being of a menial nature; the immorality laws which banned mixed race marriages or transracial sexual relationships to protect the alleged virtue of white women that they more often than not were less concerned about protecting themselves, although these laws were never designed to prevent white male rape of black domestics and other black females; the Sharpeville and Soweto Massacres and the iconic image of that brave black student carrying in his arms the dead body of his classmate in the systematic gunning down of unarmed, peaceful black students demonstrating to have a decent education for themselves and other blacks and not forced to be taught in their own country with its own languages in the hybrid dialect of their oppressors, they didn’t resort to the kind of violent and cold-blooded vindictiveness characteristic of whites but instead set up the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to bring about reconciliation in their country. Can you seriously imagine the United States, Britain, France, Canada, Australia or any other white ruled country even in 2011 doing the same in similar circumstances? Don’t hold your breath on that one else you might choke for lack of air. It simply won’t happen!
Which brings me to the nub of why I’m writing to you Mr President. Richard Goldstone was one of those comfortable, white judges who presided over the pernicious practices of apartheid; no matter what the revisionists of South African history might say, all of whom are like their fellow Nazis in post war Germany that suddenly and conveniently became afflicted with mass amnesia, pretending that they didn’t know what was going on right under their noses, and let’s face facts South Africa’s Jews are no different from the rest of them. Yes, some Jews inside South Africa did courageously fight against apartheid and paid the ultimate price for doing so; Ruth First was one such person murdered by BOSS in neighbouring Mozambique where she’d gone to help black refugees there. Her husband Jo Slovo was also relentlessly targeted and was nearly killed by the apartheid regime but thankfully survived to see a democratic South Africa emerge in his life time and was made a minister in the post apartheid government of South Africa. Sadly he has passed away of cancer but the entire nation of South Africa led by its black majority which considers all South Africans as equals gave him a hero’s farewell which he richly deserved and along with people like myself mourn his passing. Where was Zionist Richard Goldstein? To use a military term he was AWOL; and very much defending the apartheid status quo. Nothing has changed with this man.
But we remember all too well those like Percy Yutar who the Boers cynically used as a Jew to prosecute Nelson Mandela and the enthusiasm with which he carried out his task. The Boers and their British counterparts had no love for the Jews all of whom were essentially refugees or the descendants of refugees fleeing over 200 years of pogroms against them right across Europe and including Russia where it all started and up to World War II, but recognizing that as whites they were very much in the minority in South Africa and hadn’t been able to do what their kith and kin had managed to do in Australia against the hapless Aborigines, or in the United States and Canada against the Native Americans and consequently there would always be a black majority in South Africa – hence the gerrymandering process of Bantustans pretending that the Blacks in South Africa were one people but several nations, no such Bantustans for the different cultural and linguistic Europeans though that had found their way to South Africa - the Boers and their complicit British colonialists were quite keen to have as many white men, women and children emigrate there to boost their numbers and although deep in their hearts they would have preferred they weren’t Jews, at least these Jews were white, so they held their noses, swallowed hard and allowed them in.
Nevertheless the Jews in South Africa despite their ordeal in Europe at the hands of their fellow whites who were Christians still by and large empathized with them in a manner that they weren’t prepared to or would they ever have allowed themselves to with their host country’s majority and indigenous black population and even more ironical they self-servingly and avariciously supported apartheid, a move that quickly benefited them enormously financially, making South African Jews even in 2011 the richest Jews anywhere on earth; as many of them got involved in South Africa’s diamond industry and with their expertise in this field came to dominate that industry whose HQ after the fall of apartheid in South Africa they moved to Israel which tells its own racist story, as Israel has no diamond mines.
Like many of his white, Jewish South African compatriots several of whom moved to Israel after the collapse of apartheid Richard Goldstone is an ardent Zionist and no different from all the others that infest Palestine now largely renamed Israel. Goldstone’s own daughter and other close family members have moved from South Africa to Israel where they currently live and are Israeli citizens, and for the UN to have so crassly given him the task of investigating Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity by this racist, colonialist, imperialist, apartheid and Zionist entity which has been implanted against the wishes of the indigenous Palestinians in their midst would have been similar to asking well known Nazis to preside over the Nuremburg Trials. Richard Goldstone was a United States and UK backed plant with complicit support for this move rendered by the EU; so what he’s done and the inconceivable shenanigans which are going on in the US Congress to have the report that carries his name rescinded comes as no surprise to me. It was planned that way.
But that’s not my worry. What concerns me is that this racist, Zionist Jew is being widely reported as a South African judge even though his sympathies obviously lie elsewhere and accordingly that deeply offends me and other anti-apartheid activists as well tarnishes with its attendant great harm to the positive image of post apartheid South Africa, and for a diversity of obvious reasons, among it true friends. South Africa which has been charitable, humane, magnanimous and civilized in victory in a way that no white country is capable of must consequently act and act decisively by severing all links with its reprehensible past; and that means among other things stripping Richard Goldstone of his South African citizenship even though he values his Israeli one much more, and additionally rescinding his residential rights to live and work in South Africa, making it abundantly and unequivocally clear to the whole world why this is being done.
You and the South African parliament must also be courageous enough to insist and immediately legislate to this effect that the operations connected with South Africa’s diamond industry and the companies involved in these stay in South Africa and it won’t be business as usual; and if such companies don’t care to conform with the new regime then let them know in no uncertain terms that they’ll be summarily thrown out of the country. I don’t know and neither do you of a single major industry in the so-called developed world whose headquarters isn’t there. Would Mercedes Benz move its HQ to India; British Aerospace to Barbados, or Boeing or Airbus to South Africa? I don’t think so; besides there’s national legislation in all of these countries to prevent key industries relocating elsewhere or foreigners, particularly non-whites, from gaining control of key, strategic companies and services in these countries.
South Africa as indeed all other African countries must do the same and stop being the copious supplier of raw materials from cocoa to diamonds which are shipped abroad, turned into valuable commodities there that these African countries can produce but the west would then prohibit them entering their markets, yet have no scruples whatever of converting these commodities which they buy for a pittance from these African countries, including yours, and then adding insult to injury sell them back to you at exorbitant prices. This must stop immediately, and you must do what the west does with its own products; have your own productions done at home in Africa, create your own markets and determine your own price for your goods, not leave that too to places like Tel Aviv as is the case with your diamond industry or the stock markets of Europe and the USA as is the case with all African products. You are a sovereign independent country; please act that way!
Finally Sir, I’d like to see a full public recognition and state rehabilitation of Winnie Mandela and a statue erected to honour and show our collective gratitude to this extraordinary Lady, everything she’s stood for, represents, and has done to help free South Africa from the bondage of apartheid and servitude; and you Mr President are more than most ideally equipped to do this. Stop letting the west and whites determine who Blacks should venerate and who they shouldn’t. Amandla; and God bless South Africa!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)