Tuesday, 20 August 2013

As things stand I say to hell with Britain

By Stanley Collymore

Pardon my asking, but isn’t the legal responsibility for apprehending and or physically detaining those who are known to be personally implicated in criminal activities, of whatever nature, or are reasonably suspected of being so involved on UK soil the sole responsibility of our lawfully constituted, supervised and publicly accountable domestic police forces?

That said, it’s absolutely true that in the only country in the world, namely the United Kingdom, that rather condescendingly, patronizingly, disdainfully and feudalistically designates its lawful residents to be subjects, never deeming it fit, proper or just to elevate them to the dignified status of citizen since to do so would be at variance and even clash with the supercilious notion as well as the deeply entrenched classism mindset itself concomitant with the instinctive subservience sycophantically and even avidly displayed, nurtured and cherished by numerous Britons and others in our midst to their alleged and so-called hereditary betters.

A phenomenon, it must be said, that is ludicrously widespread and endemic still, even with our advent into the 21st Century, throughout Britain, but nevertheless still allows members of the general public in extraordinary circumstances to properly carry out the misnomer action of a citizen’s arrest of someone or persons engaged in the criminal act of breaking the law of the land.

But proscriptions do apply all the same. Since persons involved in this ostensibly public-spirited enterprise are at risk themselves of falling foul of the law if they act under a vigilante’s prescript. Furthermore they must adhere, even with the best of intentions in mind, to the established principle of exercising in the process of what they’re doing the very minimum of restrictive force to achieve their aim, and which under no circumstance can or should be lethal.

Crucially, too, they must contact the nearest police force immediately afterwards, apprise them fully of what they’ve done, and on the arrival of the local constabulary summarily hand over the alleged but apprehended suspect to them and thereafter unhindered allow the police to lawfully deal with the matter in hand.

Therefore, taking established precedent and all that has been earlier said into consideration how the hell then could MI5, not known to be a part of the BBC’s staff, evidently not naturally at the scene there to prevent a crime, and clearly as well not an element of any British police force presumptuously, premeditatedly and selectively turn up without being summoned, as far as we know, to the premises of the BBC wile a Newsnight programme was being aired with Abu Nusaybah as an interviewee and invited contributor to that specific programme, and on its completion and with him still in the studio summarily arrest him?

For what? I’d like to know! Giving an honest interview on our state broadcaster that contradicts the lying narrative of our political leaders and their warped equivalent of the vicious dogs in the novel Animal Farm – i.e. MI5 that evidently doesn’t want the criminal roles that it and they all callously and intentionally played in the deadly Woolwich scenario properly coming to light, and that consequently make them unambiguously culpable for the events that took place there in May 2013.

Abu Nusaybah didn’t bulldoze his way into the BBC or the Newsnight studio for that matter wielding a meat cleaver or machete to gain access; he was there expressly at the BBC’s invitation to give the interview he was asked to. So if he’s culpable of a crime for acceding to the BBC’s request then so is the BBC, and specifically those who invited him to the BBC, equally guilty under the criminal tag of joint enterprise. But no one in their right mind would suggest that’s a valid criminal road to go down and the BBC isn’t be charged with anything. Moreover, nothing in Abu Nusaybah’s interview can in the remotest sense be construed as criminal or lend any credence to the notion that it was an incitement to criminality far less murder.

Besides, I’ve constantly seen and heard far worst on British TV of all shades by white Caucasian interviewees and so-called pundits that manifestly fall foul not only of the legally designated Ofcom standards but also British law, but I don’t know of a single instance where either the police far less MI5 have gone charging into the respective broadcasting entity, whether it was the BBC, Sky or the other independent broadcasters, to arrest those concerned.

In the direct aftermath of the Woolwich killing Nazi moron Kelvin Mackenzie formerly of the Sun and Hillsborough infamy openly declared on Sky’s Press Preview that the police should have summarily gunned down and kill Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale instead of just incapacitating them. Thankfully he was sternly slapped down not by Sky’s presenter of that programme but by his fellow guest on Press Preview. This conscionable and intelligent white female – evidently in possession of human characteristics that morons like Kelvin MacKenzie markedly lack -  tersely pointed out to him that the role of the British police is to thwart crimes and prevent others that have already occurred  wherever possible from escalating, not act as sadistic assassins or executioners.

Such niceties however and the instinctive respect for law and order which is the undoubted bedrock of any society, however much it is provoked, that wants to realistically claim an be seriously recognized as a civilized one is evidently lost on mindless cretins like Kelvin MacKenzie as we saw in his venomous tirade about the Hillsborough tragedy and his exceedingly pernicious and asinine scapegoating of the very people who were the victims and not the perpetrators as he bullishly and stupidly claimed of that catastrophe and in tandem with that spurious assumption vented his venom and acerbic diatribe against them, making him a very wanted man in Liverpool, which to this day according to impeccable sources this craven coward eschews like the plague. But were anyone to actively call for or even suggest his physical demise this useless piece of human detritus would be doing his utmost to seek legal recourse.

Another one in similar mould is Anne Diamond who also on another Sky Press Preview – Sky sure as hell knows how to pick them – aired on Saturday 4 May 2013 with Stephen Dixon as the presenter avidly defended Jimmy Savile, suggesting and then outrightly saying that this serial paedophile monster shouldn’t be posthumously stripped of his knighthood. Her rationale, if one can so dignify it, for this perverted and even debauched analysis of hers is that during his lifetime Jimmy Savile raised large sums of money for several charities and good causes. The obvious awareness, even with hindsight, that this was a calculated front on his part to mask his vile paedophilia and other predatory sexual abuses of vulnerable children, youths and adults apparently either didn’t dawn on this vacuous blonde bimbo or possibly might even have fitted in excellently with her own sick mindset.

Which makes one wonder what lurid skeletons Anne Diamond has hidden away in her personal cupboard, bearing in mind that contrary to popular myth paedophilia as well as the predatory sexual abuse of minors or the highly vulnerable aren’t or were they ever the sole preserve of the male gender, since women, although it isn’t fashionable to say so, do offend in this regard as well!

Going back to Kelvin MacKenzie’s scenario that the police should have executed Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, for that is what it amounts to, this is my take on the matter. These two men both of whom are black had allegedly killed a white off-duty soldier who like them was born in Britain and shared a common British nationality. However, instead of running away from the scene of their alleged crime and with ample opportunity and time to do so both Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale deliberately stood their ground.

Naïveté or stupidity on their part? I don’t think that either is a valid assessment of the situation. For what they did was unprecedented by any standards where the law is consciously broken and certainly where public murder is concerned. Remaining in the direct vicinity of their alleged actions they consciously and keenly involved witnesses present in a rational discourse of why they acted as they did; asked to be photographed and even willingly posed for photos of themselves to be taken. They also made it clear that the several members of the public who were around when this broad daylight incident occurred and were still present after it happened had nothing to fear from them.

And, crucially, they were going nowhere; had no intention at all of changing their minds and escaping capture but would instead wait stoically where they were until the police came and they would surrender themselves. Which they surely and philosophically must have known was steeped with loads of risks for them, not least that at best their premeditatedly embarking on what they consciously intended could lead to their peaceful apprehension or at worst, and as happened in the case of Mark Duggan and other black British men before them, result in their summary execution that would publicly be masqueraded as is the customary practice by the Metropolitan Police in particular as a defensive measure, and the powers that be wouldn’t have given a shit. But whatever the outcome was that their intentional decision presaged Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale weren’t in the least fazed by it any more than they were by the prospect of being summarily executed by the police.

And perhaps the commander of the police’s rapid response team that took some 14 minutes or more to get there and seeing these guys still standing around waiting for them recognized this defiance and its attendant stoicism and decided not to grant them their wish, possibly to die as political or even Islamic martyrs. Besides, it’s bloody futile the state killing someone who wants to die and is committed to that specific goal. That’s why we changed the law in Britain where a suicide aspirant could be physically prevented from taking their own life, then charged with what was then a capital offence, prosecuted in court and sentenced to death if found guilty on behalf of the state for trying to killing themselves. You couldn’t make stuff like that up!

So all the gratuitous crap we see, hear and read in the British media about these courageous and fearless Caucasian witnesses of this gruesome killing in Woolwich, generally females by the way, altruistically confronting these two black murderers is just that. For how can one realistically confront somebody who isn’t in a confrontational mode but very much the opposite, and furthermore poses no imminent or direct physical harm to them? But by employing this clichéd red herring those who run the British media know perfectly well that it fits excellently into the white stereotypical narrative of brute Blacks and dauntless whites. What surely ought to be more troubling I feel is the consistent dumbing down of our educational system and most particularly the English Language, in which the media play a prominent part, by those who arrogate it exclusively as their own yet haven’t the foggiest comprehension of salient words within it far less have any grasp of their proper utilization. But whoever heard of any sensible person attributing logic or commonsense, for that matter, to bigots of any kind?

Interestingly enough while the Woolwich murder allegedly committed by Michael Adebolajo and his accomplice Michael Adebowale has instinctively been slammed and vigorously promulgated by the UK government, British media and every other conceivable redneck white supremacist acerbically fortified with his or her warped racist, selective xenophobic or Islamophobic agenda as an act of terrorism, other at best brutal and at their worst much more horrifying killings with a greater loss of life and that had also catapulted themselves into the media spotlight and the national consciousness have unsurprisingly not been so labelled by these very same people copiously foaming at the mouth like vicious rabid dogs at what happened in Woolwich. And I’ll refer in this article, and for the purpose of balance, to just a tiny fraction of them where the defendants were actually found guilty in a court of law for what they did.

There were, of course, the murders committed by David Copeland, otherwise known as the London nail bomber, an engineer by trade, 22 years old and whose meticulously planned terror subsequently carried out at the Admiral Duncan Pub but for the grace of God managed to kill only three people. Three people too many in my opinion, but that said thankfully far fewer than what he evidently intended to be the case and were he not stopped when he was could quite conceivably have been more catastrophic with a serial dimension attached to it.

Meanwhile in Manchester in the north of England Dale Cregan callously utilizing the tactic of a call to the emergency services lured police constables Nicola Hughes aged 23 and her colleague Fiona Bone 32 who jointly answered that emergency call to the police in response to their planned deaths by ambushing them both with a savage gun and grenade attack that brutally cost them their lives. But incredibly these weren’t Dale Cregan’s only killings on his rampaging murder spree across northern England and where the same modus operandi were callously employed by him. But even more notorious than either of these two examples was the frenetic killing spree of the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.

These subsequently convicted and wilful murderers it must be pointed out share the same ethnicity; they are all white Caucasian males with Anders Behring Breivik and David Copeland very well known by the authorities in their respective countries to hold rather extremist racist and xenophobic views against non-whites; so their murders weren’t by any means spontaneous, committed out of the blue or fashioned for that matter in some sterile vacuum of isolation.

However, other than an evanescent flirtation with the tag terrorist but only applied in the case of Anders Behring Breivik and that was carried in their initial broadcast bulletins immediately after the news broke of the tragic events in Norway and at a time too when the British and other western media, noteworthily institutionally racist themselves and which therefore collectively and automatically had thought that the carnage created in Norway was the work of non-whites, the correspondingly conclusive outcome of the twisted minds of the producers, editors, presenters, anchors and the pack of mindless stenographers that risibly masquerade as informed or objective journalists which they patently aren’t and who either run or else work for these corporate media organizations or as in the case of the BBC a statutorily established, licence fee funded and supposedly public corporation, and were therefore absolutely convinced in their minds, but without a shred of evidence to support their ludicrous assumptions, that the culprits involved were most likely the usual globally south descended suspects living in that Scandinavian country, were the terms terrorist or terrorism freely bandied about.

But thereafter when the real identity of the actual perpetrator of these gruesome acts was acknowledged and publicly disclosed by the Norwegian authorities and the shocking for many, including these media corporations themselves, but nevertheless inescapable truth finally emerged that it was the handiwork of a solitary mass murderer who was white, a Norwegian citizen and that no non-white persons: Norwegian or otherwise, were directly or indirectly implicated in these premeditatedly executed mass killings, there was an instantaneous and seismic shift in the attitude of the British and other western media not only in how they reported the events in Norway but also in their stance towards the white perpetrator that had savagely occasioned them.

In a 180 degree about face the BBC and the rest of them without even bothering to give an explanation for this change of heart injudiciously but summarily dropped in their news bulletins, documentaries and all other reporting on this human catastrophe which had been visited on the Norwegian public by Anders Behring Breivik all references, however remotely so, to the word terrorism or the concept that this white man was a terrorist. And watching these very people and broadcasters that only a short while previously had had no compunction whatsoever or any moral integrity at all in liberally banding about the terrorist epithet to the same crime when they all wishfully thought and noticeably mischievously and erroneously conveyed to the general public the distinct impression that its perpetrators were non-European was most revealing to say the least.

For here they were now quite studiously and calculatedly not only having unconscionably dropped all references to terrorism in the light of who they were forced to by facts to acknowledge was the genuine terrorist, if that term was to be correctly used at all, since to carry on as before would fuck up their racist narrative, but were additionally too earnestly seeking to mitigate the crime itself as well as exculpate the criminal from any wrongdoing on the entirely asinine basis that Anders Behring Breivik was justifiably provoked into doing what he did because of the threatening and encroaching march of multiculturalism across Europe; which is a most sickening conclusion by any rational perspective that I can think of.

Yet the same media organizations in tandem with the UK government, fascist groups like the EDL and the BNP, populist and self-serving MPs, unelected legislators in the misnomer-named House of Lords and the multiplicity of rent-a-mouth so-called expert pundits and social commentators that harangue the airwaves with their facile outpourings have from the very outset and still continue to waste no time at all in labelling the Woolwich killing a terrorist act; this despite emerging and compelling evidence to the contrary that it wasn’t!

Terrifying it most certainly was I must confess but by no stretch of the imagination, any logical strand or a comprehensive interpretation of that much misrepresented term was it a terrorist act; and its only right and proper to unequivocally state this fact and essay to put matters in their true perspective. For if every random lone wolf killing engineered by and subsequently executed on the basis of whatever personal or political grievance the killer may have justifiably harboured or otherwise nurtured and consequently felt compelled to act because of it were to be either cavalierly or else wilfully and mischievously categorized by those with their personal hidden agendas and a great deal to gain either financially or politically from being able to quite calculatedly establish a perennial climate of deep-seated but irrational fear among the general population to achieve their hope for objectives.

Might themselves have been unashamedly and directly responsible through their premeditated, brutally instituted, engagingly fostered, actively supported and rather cynically effected actions that undeniably provided the catalyst that triggered the lone wolf responses they secretly but earnestly hoped for, then when these actually come about publicly, most vehemently but all so dishonestly condemn them, thus maximizing the capital gains they derive from them with regard to themselves and their contrived goals ably assisted in that regard by the effusive efforts of those useful idiots in our communities whom they know they can easily con and therefore reliably count on to actively facilitate the means whereby they can activate their odious and destructive agendas and fulfil their goals.

Agendas and objectives that are the complete antithesis to the prospects of a truly vibrant and genuinely cohesive society by lending a much greater public acquiescence to their steadfast cause; their simplistic but effective mantra being one of we’re the good guys and the guardians of a democratic and civilized society, while the other guys that don’t look like us, share our views and who aren’t us must be roundly demonized as the enemy within and their retaliation to our deeds, the reasons for which are always never stated of course, branded as acts of terrorism.

For if these are truthfully the terrorists what etymological term I wonder do we then apply to successive British Prime Ministers, their cabinet ministers, MPs, House of Lords members, senior civil servants, the intelligence services, principal police officers, government advisers and others who devise and shape our foreign policies; or come to it our military chiefs that either conveniently forget or callously overlook the Nuremburg protocols which specifically state that the proposition of claiming to be following orders  doesn’t wash and is no valid defence in a court of law.

Protocols that were introduced by the way principally at the behest of the British government, were then freely and even indiscriminately employed as crude implements of revenge by its judges allocated to the Nuremburg Trials to summarily in kangaroo-style instituted tribunals readily dispose of Nazi politicians, German military officers, members of the SS, and anyone else that the British government along with its wartime collaborators, and wantonly utilizing the concept of victor’s justice, wanted to humiliate, punish and ultimately get rid of; and which as expected worked a treat for the Brits.

Meanwhile, the Nuremburg protocols, post World War II, have consensually been wholly incorporated into international law; have themselves turned into the revered mechanisms for other international laws, treaties and charters, like for example the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions, that are universally recognized and well respected, and parallel to that have been ratified into domestic law by virtually all the member countries of the United Nations.

Therefore with that firmly in mind and Britain moreover an avid co-instigator of all the aforementioned and to boot a founding and permanent member still of the United Nations, one could easily be forgiven for thinking that its various instruments of government, the judiciary and all the other resplendent and overt paraphernalia that jointly constitute its much vaunted democratic processes of governance would have been fully cognisant not only of what the country in contemporary terms and over many decades had been instrumental in actively though self-servingly and dishonestly prosecuting in many countries, particularly so in the Global South, but equally as well and most especially so had similarly done in the case of Magna Charta over the centuries.

And consequently having conscionably so, if indeed those who subsequent to the ending of World War II and at all levels of government since have been running the United Kingdom are or were ever capable of such probity that is must surely have recognized, even if reluctant to accept this reality, the overriding moral responsibility and crucially too the acknowledgement of and significantly so the long overdue and the indisputable requirement for a genuine commitment to common justice, the universal and a markedly divergent from the customary, sterile, feudalistically class-driven or financially determined human rights that themselves in conjunction with the overarching, indivisible and inalienable respect that Britain does indisputably owe both to its own people and in the light of its dark and far from exemplary colonial and imperialistic history most of the rest of the world as well. What a truly pathetic commentary on the state of our nation, which has obligingly become a lapdog for the rich and the powerful! And I couldn’t agree more with that sentiment.

Sinisterly in partnership with that seismic shift in governmental behaviour and the stark realization of it by those who observe these things is the accepted trend that it’s not illegal anymore in the United States for instance to falsify the news we receive about events in or directly concerning our countries with the corporate media bosses quite shameless stating that “the news is what we tell you it is” rather than what it actually is, and with the British media slavishly and unreservedly following suit. Sky News after all is owned by the nationality carpetbagging, American-cum-Australian Rupert Murdoch who also owns the misnomer-named Fox News in the United States; while in the UK the BBC, our compulsory licence-fee funded and state broadcaster, has been doing the same for yonks. And returning to the US lets not forget that just six giant corporations own every facet of the electronic and press media in that country.

But it’s not only a similar phenomenon which affects us here in the United Kingdom where our media is concerned and moreover has evidently lost its independence; our governments that increasingly over the years have voluntarily surrendered their independence to the US with the current Con-Dem coalition one and the official Labour Party opposition currently, pusillanimously and rather elatedly embedded up that country’s ass are similarly culpable. Sensible and prescient-minded individuals are fully knowledgeable regarding what stems from hubris; it’s nemesis, or colloquially blow-back, which ultimately comes back to bite as well as haunt its sponsors and perpetrators.

Personally I see the Woolwich killing as a murder with distinct and quite overt political overtones, not at all dissimilar from those multiple ones with their unmistakable inbuilt components of self-righteousness, calculation, savage violence and sheer revenge that Britain routinely in the past carried out in the Global South and nowadays in the 21st Century still unconscionably, rather dishonestly and criminally does, and would you credit it still expects, as automatically happened in the past, to get away with its criminality.

After all what do you, for example, call the rather gratuitous and premeditated murders on a pretty grand scale of quite innocent black civilians in their own country, these murders themselves following on from the precursor of the savage torture, male castration without aesthetic let alone any semblance of concern for the unfortunate victims let alone the chillingly unsophisticated, absolutely rudimentary as well as the excruciatingly painful and utterly distressing for them barbarous way in which their scrota were literally hacked open and their testes bloodily and heartlessly severed from their bodies?

I play cricket and know all too well what it feels like, as I’m equally sure many other avid cricketers at all levels of the game do, to have ones testicles painfully struck by a delivery from a fast bowler, and it’s why protection guards specifically for the groin area were introduced in the club and similarly the higher professional versions of this especially remarkable game that we all love so as to preclude exceptionally painful experiences like the aforesaid from being occasioned by batsmen at the crease during play.

Now try if you will to imagine the terror that understandably and horrifyingly would be caused in you or alternatively how you would feel if your son, dad, brother, other close relatives, your partner, spouse or even close friends were to have their balls criminally, barbarically and uncaringly removed in this most monstrous of ways by those who innately considered you or those quite close and dear to you as much less than pieces of shit.

But I’m getting way ahead of myself on this one, aren’t I? Because as whites this presumption on my part is a vivid imagination and a bridge too far in that respect for the likes of you to seriously consider far less ever realistically expect to happen to you, so why should you care? And furthermore would be flippantly regarded as a scenario which in your rather apathetic or even warped minds ought only to be contemplated in the case of Blacks or other purported inferior races.

So having physically emasculated these black men who were thus involuntarily turned into eunuchs but not created as such persons habitually were in Arab societies to be subsequently employed as guards in harems or as chamberlains in any palace, which in itself would have been bad enough, the government of the United Kingdom sitting in Westminster London racially gave carte blanche to its agents in Kenya, principally its colonial representative there, to do whatever they liked with these unfortunate black men, women and children, a number of the adults among them constituting the elderly, that were held under their control; and they did just that!

Routinely they were shackled, herded into fortified stockades to further restrict their movement, doused with petrol or paraffin, set alight and then allowed to burn alive while their taunting, inhumanly sadistic and tormenting persecutors eagerly stood by and gleefully watched their deliberate incineration. Others on the other hand were maimed, often having their limbs severed by machete cuts or else were executed in whatever manner that their sick torturers whimsically decided upon. While additionally over a million Kenyans of both sex were summarily detained, forcibly confined to squalid concentration camps – yes you read that correctly, and this just after World War II had ended – that were fenced off with barbed wire and where the inmates there were routinely subjected to sexual assaults, systematic beatings and horrific acts of torture that included several of them being roasted alive. While the “lucky” ones among their number but with the constant threat of death still hanging over them were brutally forced to build with their bare hands the Embakasi Airport that was paid for by purported US foreign aid.

All of this ironically occurring just seven years after the Second World War ended. A war in which the British and comprehensive contingents of nonwhites, British Empire and unmistakably colonial troops and allies that included hundreds of thousands of Kenyans who now found themselves the intentional victims of identical and in many cases even worse ghastly atrocities systematically carried out against them by of all people a smug British lot that after World War II had arrogated to themselves the moral high ground; had altruistically, courageously and very successfully on their part, these colonial troops, ably assisted a beleaguered Britain to importantly save itself and also to permanently put an end to the mass killings and other heinous acts of brazen criminality, as well as the completely inhuman activities that were being committed throughout Nazi Germany and similarly in the territories of its continental-wide European satrapies, Axis allies and fascist collaborators.

In the meantime, in a similar barbaric fashion to that which the British colonial authorities that had been autocratically in charge then and along with their white accomplices and several other willing Caucasian surrogates and collaborators who with the fullest knowledge, complicity and the barbarous authorization of consecutive British governments in London that quite evidently racially-motivated had habitually and unreservedly effected against multitudes of other unfortunate black women, juvenile females and clearly even non-pubescent black girls that unquestionably were manifestly sexual innocents at the times, on the slave plantations of the Caribbean and the Americas.

And otherwise comprehensively as well had with absolute and untroubled impunity carried on with their mass rapes and the indiscriminate sexual abuses of black females throughout these contiguous territories and regions; their 21st Century successors: the equally exclusively white expatriate but this time African located British colonial authorities, selectively put in charge by the UK regime with overall and ultimate responsibility for that unwilling Kenyan colony and solidly having the former’s complete and unstinting authority, along with their white accomplices there to freely impose whatever bestial acts of inhumanity that their warped minds conjured up and their intrinsically cultivated and pernicious racism gave vent to against innocent Kenyan civilians regardless of their age, gender or physical infirmity, didn’t need to be told twice by their bosses in London, or reminded afterwards for that matter what their perceived duties to the British crown, white supremacist notions or the Master Race ideology – one and the same thing as it happens – indubitably were.

Unsurprisingly in the circumstances scores of thousands of Kenyan women and young girls were serially raped by white British soldiers, run of the mill civilians, public service officials and all manner of other Caucasian scum including butch lesbians. And they all committed these crimes arrogantly knowing that they could, would get away with it and moreover in a month of Sundays would never be charged by the so-called legal authorities with any of these crimes much less be ever be prosecuted for them.

Not least because these paragons of the law were of a similar mindset themselves and sure as hell either personally and deeply implicated in what was going on or else casually or indifferently condoned these reprehensible acts. Furthermore they were uniformly fully cognisant of the fact that no white judge, the only ones around, would ever contemplate far less actually act on sending one of their kind to prison for raping a black female. A black female who rather than being sympathetically treated as the rape victim that she was would instead by these racist scumbags be instinctively regarded as either lying, which is perceived by most Caucasians to be an intrinsic characteristic of all black people, or else would have assumed that she got what she asked for and rightly deserved.

Which wasn’t coincidental by any means, since pseudo white science had centuries earlier conveniently, subjectively and quite advantageously for these self-confessed eugenicists and self-proclaimed Aryans, but oh so fraudulently  as well for these duplicitous jerks that thought it up in the first place, concluded that black females unlike their white counterparts could never be raped. And this deliberately contrived scientific its proponents sallied forth was due chiefly to the fact that the vaginas of black females, they passionately argued, were distinctly and structurally different from those of white females.

A concerted act of nature they rationalized which places all black females, regardless of their age, into a recurring state of oestrus that emphatically forces them either consciously or subliminally to enduringly solicit the sexual assistance of others to satisfy their sexual cravings. A situation that they also bizarrely concurred which rationally, ethically and legally negates any assertion of rape or sexual abuse that black females might therefore seek to cunningly profit from by unlawfully crying rape or have others do so on their behalf.

Conversely they argued, and their successors still do, that no such state of affairs applies or could ever do to white females who both in legal and social terms can actually be raped. Thus it accounted for the prevalent rape of black females throughout slavery and colonialism and the involuntary infusion of the white male Y chromosome in all Blacks of Caribbean origin and some 95% of their number across the United States, Canada and Latin America.

Guilt feelings run deep, generally subconsciously and most glaringly so, it must be pointed out, among white Caucasians of all social classes and backgrounds who apart from not only going into a contrived state of denial when confronted with them consistently also take to arrogating to themselves the moral high ground and from there arrogantly and asininely proceed to lecture others. The European holocaust is one such example of literally thousands if not millions of this kind of behaviour. Attributing blanket rectitude or pervasive probity to white women on the basis of what white men have done and still do to black women and the crude assumption therefore on their part that all black men are dangerous threats to white women, obsessively want to do the same to them and prudently these Caucasian women must be protected at all costs is another.

Don’t these nincompoops ever bother to take note of what their womenfolk do when they go abroad on holiday? Anyhow, moving on from my intentional swipe at these evidently and pathetic, intellectually challenged morons the accepted white narrative is that non-white men who sleep with precocious and minimally underage but “consenting” white girls, which legally and morally in my opinion is a crime that should be punished, must vociferously be condemned from the rafters by everyone.

And when I say everyone I quite literally mean everyone from the Prime Minister, Home Secretary, the media, pundits, the police and even the closet paedophiles themselves that these hypocritical buggers all know about but covertly protect because they’re from the perceived proper social set, related educational or financial backgrounds and in our present day world of Reality TV with entirely worthless numbskulls living out their pathetic existence through face, Facebook friends they don’t know and are unlikely ever to meet compounded by rationally insignificant so-called celebrity imitations passing themselves off as the genuine article, right down to ordinary members of the public.

But there’s a noticeable disconnect here in relation to all of this as there’s no similar outcry or any action taken when the observable and innocent victims of Caucasian paedophiles or sexual abusers are black or otherwise non-white. And especially so when these abhorrent crimes are avidly engaged in as part of the sex tourism industry profitably organized by known British and other EU tour operators and companies without a moment’s hesitation or concern it would seem from within Britain and the other EU countries to those where these innocent or vulnerable children are predatorily, routinely and pitilessly mercilessly abused, while at the same time unceremoniously stripped forever of the innocence of childhood which they never get to experience in the first place.

But what the heck, there’s no need to fuss as they’re not white; and so it doesn’t matter is the universal and quite uncaring Caucasian rationale. And it’s this overall and explicitly pernicious mindset not only towards vulnerable and systematically abused non-white children in their own countries for God’s sake – out of sight and therefore out of mind – but also those living their lives in the Global South generally by our contemporary white rulers and lawmakers in the west, their Caucasian kith and kin in solidarity with them, establishment figures, the media, our military chiefs, their counterparts in the police forces, and the tax-evading, utterly self-serving, shady and financially obsessed oligarchs whose corporations dominate the military industrial complex in whose pockets all of the aforementioned are committedly embedded, which is largely responsible for exacerbating the already serious problems that we’re faced with. Which specifically in the case of Blacks s have been ongoing now for in excess of 500 years; and that to anyone with even the most rudimentary knowledge of basis arithmetic is half of a millennium!

A half of a millennium in which the same race of people and now their equally arrogant, irascible and 21st Century successors have been systematically and gratuitously kicking in the assess of those in the Global South and most particularly those of black people, and furthermore conceitedly expecting them not only to uncomplainingly put up with this unwarrantable, agonizingly painful, mentally debilitating and the intentional and entirely humiliating kicks administered to them but also, and most crucially as well, spinelessly respond to how their sadistic and unquestionably savage abusers derisively dictate to them that they must; but should they refuse to do so, to summarily and violently have the wrath of hell unleashed against them.

In other words the instinctive peevish and brutal response of those who either see themselves as God’s chosen people or their Caucasian kith and kin, religiously different, but who nevertheless with the same ludicrous white supremacist mindset haughtily regard themselves as humanity’s Master Race. And from my personal perspective I must honestly say after a profound and calculated consideration of the matter that if this arrogant collective of markedly asinine morons either can’t see or more likely aren’t prepared to re-evaluate their intensely perverse thinking that’s often translated into pernicious action that in itself is highly detrimental to others, it must be sincerely hoped that as happened in the misnomer named 2nd World War their conceit and innate savagery will cause them again to be pitted against each other; this time in what expectantly, from my perspective at any rate, will be an Armageddon holocaust that will in effect permanently eradicate both sets of these moronic species of humanity from the face of the earth to the resultant and inclusive benefit of a rather hard done by and long-suffering rest of mankind.

For it’s an absolute given that those who choose to live by the sword are ultimately doomed to perish by it, and this observable inevitability is as markedly applicable to Britain and the rest of the west as it is to everyone else. So no measure of bewildering obfuscation, ludicrous hype of its indisputable, God-given superiority and even a purported national invincibility relative to those of other nations it patronizingly looks down upon or disparagingly dismisses as irrelevant; nor any amount of unwarrantable sanctimony superciliously directed at others by Britain concerning how they should conduct their personal or strictly domestic affairs, advice that consecutive British regimes and Britons collectively don’t heed themselves, will ever dissipate the unavoidable consequences as regards the actions of these white supremacist and Master Race proponents and practitioners.

Not unless a determinedly serious and discerning stock is vigorously taken of their pertinacious attitudes and pernicious conduct towards other people who persistently and intentionally as it happens always end up as their inexcusable victims. For as every intellectual mind knows those who the gods wish to destroy they first make mad; and conspicuously insanity, compounded by an inherent death wish that appears to have generated a life of its own, seems currently to have permeated every fibre and sinew of the British body politic, that of its western Caucasian counterparts and close allies and, of course, their obsequious and ever obliging global satrapies.

Saturday, 17 August 2013

Elena Isinbaeva and the west’s self-righteous penchant for creating bogus enemies

By Stanley Collymore

In an episode of the much loved, British comedy series Rising Damp the quite canny and highly amusing landlord character known as Rigsby famously said to one of his student tenants that there were those in the British political establishment who if they had their way would not only make homosexuality legal but would also insist on it being compulsorily as well.

How very true, bearing in mind that many of these same people are the deeply inculcated products of our single sex male as well as female public schools where homosexuality is often seen and practised as a rite of passage. For those of you who aren’t aware of this farcical British term public school let me enlighten you that these rather elitist institutions have nothing whatsoever to do with the general public and are essentially exorbitantly high paying boarding kennels where the rich, privileged, powerful and those that can afford it social climbing snobs send their progeny to while they keep their dogs, the canine species, lovingly at home.

Hardly surprising then that effectively cut off from what’s generally considered to be normal everyday existences as well as finding themselves firmly isolationist but comfortably ensconced in a well-heeled bubble of unreality where they’re energetically schooled in the conceited belief that their destiny is to rule Britain that aberrant behaviour to you and me not only becomes the norm where these youngsters are largely concerned, but is also with relative ease and an endemic nepotism compounded by a mindboggling obsequiousness on the part of the general British public is readily and routinely translated into the exposition of their adult life as well as the careers they eventually embark upon, which invariably centre on politics and the law.

In a supposed democracy that Britain self-importantly likes to see itself as and even arrogantly takes to boasting about that belief that I supposed is as it should be, as long as those decisions and attendant private consensual behaviour don’t negatively, detrimentally or unwarrantedly impact on the lives of others. However with homosexuality of the male kind, the female variety was never a criminal offence in the UK as Queen Victoria: imbued with an intensely healthy heterosexual sexual appetite herself, adamantly refused to accept that women behaved in this way, and as the powers that be didn’t dare contradict this formidable lady the criminal penalties introduced for male homosexuality were never ascribed to lesbianism, which was never outlawed in Britain.

All that aside I nevertheless fail to comprehend why something that’s strictly a private matter between consenting adults, and the operative words here are consenting and adult, and frankly should steadfastly remain so between those directly involved, just as for instance the number of times that one masturbates should also be, although in that particular respect there are very few people among the general populace who’d candidly admit to ever having done so even though everyone does it and its quite commonplace, should any longer be an issue for public debate far less become an obsession with some people who grandiosely and rather asininely set themselves up as the self-appointed spokespersons not only for homosexuals across the UK but the world as well.

We each of us knows, or should do, what our sexual predilections are and whether or not we feel comfortable with them; but none of us under any circumstance has the right or obligation to force our sexual preferences or perversions, for that matter, down the throats of others however much we might conceitedly, rather stupidly or utterly preposterously think that we have and inalienable right to do so.

Britain sees itself as and is internationally recognized as a sovereign state and its elected and not so elected, as is the case with the House of Lords, legislators if they get a parliamentary majority in their respective house pass what laws they like or think fit and the British public customarily accepts that. We might not like those laws but we can democratically take a number of necessary steps to have them repealed; the direst of these from the standpoint of our elected lawmakers and the incumbent government is to oust them from office at the next general election.

But however objectionable we might find our laws, and there are many nasty ones on our statute books, the average Brit would be most offended and take great exception to interfering outsiders telling us what laws we should passively obey and those that we should object to. That sentiment however because of Britain’s imperialist and colonialist past doesn’t seem to resonate with Brits when they essay to stick their unwanted and unwarranted noses into other peoples’ business and that includes the domestic affairs of other countries.

We none of us can choose our biological parents or are we ever given the chance to do so and consequently we cannot or could we ever have determined what our race, ethnicity or skin colour will ultimately be. Incitement to racial hatred for example is a crime in Britain but it doesn’t stop the British police who are supposed to be protectors of the law from being racist against Britain’s black minority through racial profiling and even the summary execution of such people; and the same routinely goes for the USA, all of continental Europe, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, as well as those other areas of the world where white Caucasian hegemony prevails.

So to see bumbling and utterly conceited imbeciles in Britain childishly throwing their dummies out of their prams and having an almighty and spiteful go at Russia’s female world record holder and champion pole-vaulter Elena Isinbaeva for basically defending the honour and dignity of her country and saying and doing nothing more than what most Britons would do if the boot was on the other foot is not only obtuse but also absolutely hypocritical.

For it’s unreservedly up to the Russian people what government they elect and for that country’s parliamentarians to pass what laws they see fit in the best interests of their fellow citizens, and this has nothing at all to do with anyone else but the Russians themselves, who can take the same steps as Brits or other westerners would to remove regimes which don’t take cognisance of their best interests.

But the matter becomes even more offensive in my view when homosexuality which is a western obsession among the well-heeled, chattering classes and the puerile that really like nothing better than to ape their so-called social betters is premeditatedly and orchestratedly in the most vile and coercive manner rammed down the throats of others even in Britain, much less Russia, where the vast majority of us aren’t homosexuals or lesbians. Open tolerance and a total non-discriminatory acceptance of homosexuality is one thing, however haughtily seeking to brainwash, blackmail or pressurize others who aren’t the least interested in or inclined to that kind of sexual orientation is in my view just as aberrant as the perceived and paranoid notion that imbecilic homophiles have that all heterosexuals somehow have it in for homosexuals, when frankly most people globally couldn’t care less what homosexuals get up to among themselves as long as their conduct doesn’t impact in anyway on their own individual lives.

What next I wonder; the embracing of paedophilia? For all this hyped controversial Russian law seeks to do is to protect minors from the undue influences of those with pronounced homosexual agendas; no different in my personal opinion from British laws protecting promiscuous and even overly willing but distinctly underage, white schoolgirls from predatory sexual grooming. Or are those prized idiots who either can’t or intentionally refuse to see the glaring similarities between the two scenarios going to say there are none because they will it so; while secretly knowing that most of our paedophiles are rich, celebrity and highly privileged white Caucasian males?

Qatar which is to host FIFA’s football world cup after Brazil beheads those who are convicted of homosexuality; and that sexual act is a crime there as it is in other Persian Gulf Arab Bantustans. But I don’t hear these same western hypocrites vilifying this barbarous treatment of homosexuals or even calling for a ban on Qatar’s hosting of the football world cup, and for the obvious reason that these Arab Bantustans are sycophantic satrapies of Britain and the rest of the west that allow the west, notably the USA to exert its pernicious hegemony in that troubled region, while Russia is enviously seen and maliciously portrayed through its obsequious media as an infuriating buffer against its further expansionist, imperialist and hegemonic thrust globally. Therefore Russia must be castigated and any vile, trumped up pretext that can be used to whip up resentment among an ill-informed, daft British and other western public against that country must be made use of to do so.

Finally, if homosexuality, which is quite lawful in Britain is such a redeeming facet of one’s life, why is it then that several among our political and other privileged elites who surreptitiously are homosexuals or lesbians frequently and voluntarily opt to go through life and even the pretence of sham heterosexual marriages, and you know of some of these high profile public and political figures that I’m talking about, rather than choose to be entirely open and quite proud advocates of what they actually are? Astoundingly queer behaviour if you ask me; that’s why I’m asking.

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

Venal Tanzanian government idiots in cahoots with Gulf Arab savages.

By Stanley Collymore

Most people in the west and probably elsewhere, I would hazard a guess, have never heard of Tanzania, don’t know or actually care what it is, and if given a blank map of the globe to inspect, that’s assuming, of course, that they eventually suss out it’s a country and moreover of two parts, would be terribly hard-pressed even so, I’m absolutely sure of that, to give a rough idea let alone be able to categorically sate where precisely it’s located.

Well, for the elucidation of all such people regardless of how their ignorance or disinterest came about in the first place, Tanzania is a purportedly independent East African republic that comprises the territory of Tanganyika on the African continental mainland and the Indian ocean situated off-shore African island of Zanzibar that jointly opted to politically merge with each other and become the unitary state of Tanzania.

However, previous to the voluntary, supposed mutually beneficial and political integration of these two separate entities both territories were individual colonies of the former British Empire, but in the aftermath of Britain’s rather bruising, bloodied and manifestly internecine 1939-45 conflict with its fellow colonialist-minded and established European rival Germany: itself a committed imperialistic, empire-building aspirant, as well as a pugnacious contender for the global crown which Britain wore as a world dominator.

Global aspirations on the part of Germany that sparked a bloody war between these two European countries, with the resultant clash instigated between them and eventually, and one would also say inevitably, fought out between their respective biological kith and kin; in the case of Germany those that regarded themselves as quite privileged to be resident on the one hand in their Nazi paradise and on the other the declared, Caucasian recognized and accepted homeland of the Master Race, and on the part of Britain, principally among its so-called upper classes, ruling elites and their deferentially grovelling and enthusiastically willing plebeian supporters, an arrogant belief that theirs was a land superior in the extreme and consequently second to none.

Leading to a situation in which Britain quite embarrassingly and very reluctantly post World War II finding itself compelled by dint of its dire destitution, financial bankruptcy in other words, markedly caused by the consequences of that same hubristically-oriented war, to reluctantly but none the less hard-headedly offload much of its sprawling, global empire that it couldn’t any longer viably afford to possess, militaristically suppress as was its wont to do, or physically maintain was unmistakably up the proverbial creek without a paddle. And consequently the only commonsensical and practical thing it could do in these given circumstances was to grudgingly accede to the inevitable and grant several of these countries their long-overdue independence, which is exactly what happened.

However having done so one would have realistically thought that those African countries that had a particularly torrid time of it under British colonial rule would have auspiciously grabbed the chance to create a better future for themselves and put their colonial past as far behind them as was possible. But not a bit of it; for contrary to all sensible expectations it soon became evident that many of their so-called leaders imbued with what one can only charitably call a bizarre, utterly perverse and self-destructive fascination with the psychological illness Stockholm Syndrome, freely chose instead to embrace it to the manifest detriment of their own people. A situation that in all the years post their so-called independence successive generations of these so-called African leaders have not managed to or shown any inclination whatsoever of shaking off.

It’s a grotesque situation that’s particularly pronounced and disturbingly worrying in East Africa and the countries bordering that region where self-imposed servitude, little different if at all so from that which disastrously blighted their countries, region and the whole of the African continent throughout the Transatlantic Slave Trade and subsequently manifested itself in a multiplicity of truly horrendous guises, racism and apartheid being just two of them.

So what possess Africans, and in particular their so-called leaders, to blithely and routinely embark on what to any rational person with a solitary functioning brain cell in his or her head clearly knows is at best decidedly nonsensical and at its worst is evidently destructive psychologically and in every other conceivable way one can imagine not only to Africans per se but the global Black Diaspora as well? For the excruciatingly humiliating, painful and quite traumatic history of what has monstrously and quite intentionally been done to the vast majority of Blacks generally, as well as virtually every African past and present within the last 500 years, that’s half of a millennium when considered in a hardnosed fashion, in particular is no kept secret, is therefore universally well known, and has been meticulously and contemporaneously chronicled all that time.

But old habits however injurious, abusive or patently demeaning they essentially and evidently are in the eyes of everyone else that observe them that have been inculcated over a sustained period of half of a millennium of servitude and oppression in the psyche of many Africans and other black people obviously die hard, or not at all, it would seem. For how else can one rationally explain after all this time of the most unrelenting and concerted abusive treatment at the hands of others, including their House Nigger leaders, that the overwhelming majority of Blacks globally and most categorically so in Africa that ironically is the cradle of humanity and civilization as well as bountifully blessed with a plethora of natural resources, still in the 21st Century lie and employing every reasonable means of deduction in terms of their social, political or financial development let alone advancement are quite basically trapped at the very bottom of these progressive determinants?

It’s why this seemingly instinctive inclination towards the ludicrous reinforcement of their servitude embarked on by some Blacks elsewhere and many indigenous Africans in particular on the continent of Africa not only worry but also incenses me. And here among a mass of such examples that exist is just one of them.

The government of Tanzania is concertedly preparing to kick Massai tribesmen of their land in order to allow rich overseas tourists the freedom to shoot animals like lions and leopards at will. And so as to further facilitate this travesty of justice not only for the indigenous Massai people of Tanzania but also the wildlife there as well the said government is making radical changes to the Lolionado Game Control Area which the Massai people have had land rights to since the beginning of time. And who have this African regime accorded these rights to instead? Well the Lolionado Game Control Area is now owned by the United Arab Emirates’ firm Otterio Business Corporation and has been operating there since the mid 1990s.

With this change of status and indeed ownership over 68,000 Massai residents will be evicted so that rich clients, that include the so-called UAE royal family, will be able to have unrestricted freedom to hunt in an area that is on the regular migration route of the wildebeest. In actuality, Otterio Business Corporation is owned by the UAE rulers, a senior member of whom is in the UAE defence ministry. Significantly as well during Tanganyika’s British colonial period Lolionado Game Control Area was set aside exclusively as a hunting area for European royalty though the Massai people were allowed to carry on living where they always were.
Not so unfortunately under the Tanzania’s government plan: one being instituted at the behest of the UAE regime, and which effectively means the Massai people will be summarily ethnically cleansed from their ancient and ancestral lands. Altogether an area in excess of 1,500 square miles is expected to be ethnically cleansed in this way of its indigenous Massai population. But if this wasn’t dreadful enough the Arab people have murderous form where Africans are concerned; and all Africans know this well. For without the keen, extremely greedy and racially motivated involvement of Arabs in the Transatlantic slave trade there probably wouldn’t have been one.

For it was the Arabs who a millennium earlier had colonized and drastically altered the demography of North Africa in the same way that Caucasians emanating from Europe would centuries later do in Australia, North America and New Zealand for example and very pretty much aware of Africa from a firsthand perspective, had used their knowledge of that continent that whites were totally ignorant of to employ every subterfuge they could devise to obtain and quite lucratively sell in their millions the unfortunate Blacks that brutally and miserably ended up in the grotesque servitude in which they were routinely subjected to across the Atlantic in the misnomer named regions that white Europeans arrogantly called the New World and accordingly had savagely and uncompromisingly exerted their racist, imperialist and colonialist hegemony over.

So observing so-called black leaders anywhere in the world and particularly so in Africa gratuitously and sycophantically giving in to the very people that have the blood of millions of their ancestors on their hands; a barbaric tribe of people still living in Neanderthal times and who as graphically shown in their recent, widespread and totally unrepentant lynching of Blacks in Libya during that country’s western backed massacre there, and a country which when I last looked was still geographically part of Africa, makes me physically sick, as it should any self-respecting black man or woman and even more so those who are or aspire to being leaders of African countries or feel they’ve an entitlement to speak for the Black Diaspora.

The world is sickeningly used to seeing whites cynically and heartlessly exploit Africa and wilfully cause turmoil there among its people in order to plunder its multiple resources for their own selfish benefit. That of itself is a maddening revelation; but for Africans, having purportedly at the official level at any rate through the relentless struggle of those among the black community that wanted to get rid of this imperialistic colonialism and rightfully claw back some of the dignity, self-respect as well as the independence that their ancestors and themselves violently lost through these collective and completely insufferable acts that indisputably amount to a profoundly pernicious and perverse travesty of justice, to complicitly engage in the 21st Century in what are undeniably acts of treason against their own people with Arabs of all people just beggars belief!

Just recently, August 2013, in the United Stasi of America which benefited hugely from the African slave trade surgeons there denied a black youth a life-saving heart transplant. Their reasoning being that he had achieved poor grades in school and therefore to give him this life-saving treatment would be an absolute waste of time as he either couldn’t or more likely wouldn’t follow the post-operative regime to ensure that the new heart did what it was supposed to. Cut out the crap lame excuses and it amounts to one thing only; the life of a Nigger, who these white supremacist morons only perceived this youth as, wasn’t worth anything.

But isn’t that what the USA’s Supreme Court ruled on March 6 1857? When Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered that court’s decision: “That the Negro has no rights which the white man is bound to respect.” And to observe the Tanzanian government as well as other obsequious African so-called leaders freely, comfortably and venally buying into this said narrative and with their old enemies the Arabs makes one seriously wonder if it isn’t time for these detrital Blacks to be humanely disposed of; which is more than can be said for what they selfishly do to their own people who, Africa’s brutal history aside, deserve much better.

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

There’s no specific time to fall in love!

By Stanley Collymore

I don’t want to alarm you but my personal feelings for you
have intensified dramatically over those past months that
I first met and have come to know you; and to be quite
honest with you it’s a fascinating development that
I’ve wholeheartedly welcomed. Too early you
could possibly and quite logically say in
response to this amorous declaration
I’m making for me to properly
assess my true emotions
towards you, bearing
in mind the short
time that we’ve
known each

But while caution and circumspection are themselves
essential tools in helping to effectively gauge the
worthiness or even the sheer advisability of
embarking on a romantic liaison whatever its origins or the
circumspection of its time frame might be, the emergence and
reinforcement of true love thankfully does not come, nor
should that ever be the case, with a predetermined
analysis or prescripted guidelines on how one
should initially react or later behave
when lanced by the dart of love;
but rather instead welcome
with open arms this
pleasurable and
intrusion into
one’s private life.

And that’s precisely what I’m hoping for in our case if you’ll
allow it. For I know with absolute certainty that I’ve
fallen deeply, excitingly and commitedly in love
with you and there’s nothing now or in the
foreseeable future that’s ever likely to
change how I feel about you, and
understandably want very much to encourage
you to do the same in respect of me, as
there’s no specific or optimum time
to ever fall in love; just the
 recognition that one
is in love!

© Stanley V.Collymore
9 August 2013.

Fortitude or Failure?

By Stanley Collymore

Lost hopes; lost dreams? But are they really only what you see
them as if you so easily give up at the first real challenge
they present and don’t fight tenaciously for what you
say and even claim you believe in? Life is beset
with problems and difficulties of all kinds
but rather than see these as
insurmountable obstacles that one must walk
away from without determining how or why they
arose in the first place, why not instead perceive them
as personal challenges to be robustly tackled and
vigorously employed in the most constructive
way that one can imagine or implement not
only for the overall benefit of one’s self
but also to positively serve as an
effective means of encouragement
for others who find themselves
in like circumstances?

© Stanley V. Collymore
8 August 2013.

Monday, 5 August 2013

Get lost racist Britain and USA! Independent Zimbabwe is none of your business.

By Stanley Collymore

The United Stasi of America conceitedly lecturing the legitimate governments of Zimbabwe or others on their supposedly stolen elections simply because the local electorate in those countries saw through the treachery and sycophancy of and resolutely refused to vote for the west’s favoured stooges buttressed by scrupulously maintained mechanisms in the countries concerned to prevent these toadies from corruptly cheating their way to power on behalf of the west’s colonialist and imperialist hegemonic global agenda is nothing less than sour grapes at seeing these potential satrapies of the west roundly rejected by the local voters and is also akin to the pot calling the kettle black.

The entire world saw and knows what blatantly went on in the USA’s presidential elections of 2000 and again in 2004 giving an entirely new meaning and dimension to the term highway robbery. But there was also monumental theft and election fraud covertly carried out in several previous US presidential and other national elections as well. So the US is in no moral position to get on its sanctimonious high horse concerning the results of other peoples’ elections, either fairly or fraudulently carried out, that it doesn’t like; and brings to mind the Biblical injunction, first remove the beam from your own eyes if you want to criticize the mote in the eyes of those you’re hostile to.

It’s the same with Britain that automatically, embarrassingly and like a feckless, fatuous and all too eager to please her lover mistress does everything that the US demands of it; except that in Britain’s case that transcends both perversely and pervertedly into an Oedipus Complex relationship since Britain was the Mother Country of the once backwater, and still is, North American colonies that morphed into the United Stasi of America. For even in our purported green and pleasant land our supposedly democratically elected governments are woefully unrepresentative of and light years distant from the electorate’s true will; but it doesn’t stop these regimes from claiming, assuming and corruptly abusing the political power they’ve arrogated to themselves.

No national regime in the UK whether independently as a single political party or in mutual coalition with another party, as is currently the case between the Tories and the Lib-Dems, has in historical memory even going back to for them the halcyon days of the rotten boroughs, and most certainly not in contemporary times, secured in excess of 50+1% of the registered electoral vote and consequently couldn’t say and certainly in today’s terms can’t either to be in possession of a popular mandate to rule the country. Nevertheless it doesn’t prevent such UK regimes, either arrogantly or in a totally disconnect manner from the vast majority of ordinary members of the public, from acting as if they do. Even Tony Blair with his supposed 1997 New Labour landslide managed only to garner less than 33% of the votes cast in that general election in which just 45% of all registered British voters bothered to participate.

So work the maths out for yourselves if you can in educationally dumbed down and intellectually challenged Britain more preoccupied with reality TV, facile so-called TV entertainment; the sordid lives and antics of fatuous, harebrained alleged celebrities egotistically and emotionally in love with themselves, and a general public possessed of short term memories and even shorter attention spans that’s evidently too dumb by far to think for themselves, relying instead on what their perceived social betters, those in charge of the country, and a Pavlovian controlling media that routinely, self-interestedly, and quite successfully too as it happens, condition them how and what to think, whether you still think or can objectively believe that the emergence of British governments, or more aptly regimes, in such ludicrous and markedly unrepresentative circumstances can honestly be said to have been democratically arrived at, much less are truly representative of the will of the people?

And if you concur with me that our national elections are an orchestrated farce and the resultant regimes that they produce in their wake are sorely lacking in every aspect of democratic credibility and accountability, a situation that’s even more disastrously intensified at local government level where routinely only between 10-15% of registered voters, which in itself is a tiny fraction of those eligible to vote but who don’t even bother to register to do so because they know from firsthand experience just how corrupt, nepotistic and out of touch these local councils for the most part together with their jobsworth senior appointed officials across the board and deeply mired in their mindboggling ineptitude are, and consequently voluntarily choose not to take part in these elections.

How on earth then can the likes of David Cameron, others in his regime, or for that matter those that are intimately associated or nepotistically connected with them and who persistently and enormously benefit either politically, financially or both from what’s essentially a profoundly corrupt British electoral system that is also fundamentally unfair, or their counterparts in the United Stasi of America, the European Union, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – since these are the main culprits for overly castigating others for allegedly indulging in exactly what they’re deeply involved in doing themselves – morally or in any other way, come to that, dare point the finger of accusation at Zimbabwe or any other country that they’re racially or ideologically hostile to? And as invariably turns out to be the case those are generally their only determinant reasons for doing so.

Additionally these western countries, in particular the United Stasi of America, Britain and France, are also highly instrumental in instigating brutal coups, regime changes and the savage assassination of democratically elected leaders of several sovereign states that they don’t like, and doing so principally because these countries don’t share or subscribe to in any way to the unilaterally perceived interests of these western states; conduct that is so colonial 19th Century and in of all places the 21st Century.

Friday, 2 August 2013

Verpiss euch rassistische Briten! Unabhaengiges Simbabwe hat nichts mit euch zu tun.

By Stanley Collymore

So there are those in Britain who want the UK to leave the EU and among these are current British Members of the European Parliament or MEPs particularly those on the far right of the political spectrum as well as the intellectually challenged and unsurprisingly the brain dead among the growing and nauseating throng of xenophobic, imperialist and colonialist mindset Colonel Blimp morons ensconced in their cosy bubble of unreality and who’ve yet to come to terms with the fact that we’re living in the 21st Century and not the 18 or19th ones when Britain had an empire on which their predecessor sort boasted that the sun would never set.

Well sorry folks but the sun has set and permanently so on this imperialistic travesty whether you like it or not! And as someone steeped in and very much an aficionado of democratic principles especially when it comes to people determining how they live their own lives with the unassailable entitlement to determine what government they have and who they democratically ally themselves with or not, I wholeheartedly agree that the British people as indeed those in residing in Scotland who want independence for that nation have an inalienable right to make these choices which in turn should be fully respected and steadfastly adhered to by everyone that values the concept of Democracy as well as its practical implementation.

Pretty straightforward stuff one would have thought; but not so when it comes to these British political and other intellectually challenged Luddites. For while claiming that Britain, which campaigned vigorously to enter the EU to the constant rejection of a “Non” snub from France’s President Charles de Gaulle who evidently had Britain pegged to a T and knew that letting it into the EU would be a monstrous mistake and with Britain only allowed in after he died, has subverted its sovereignty to Brussels, these said morons have quite conveniently overlooked the fact that the UK is by far most subservient in multiple respects that manifestly tarnish its so-called sovereignty well beyond anything that it would ever dare to contemplate far less permit in relation to itself as regards the EU when objectively contrasted with the multitudinous demands, requirements and even the facile whims of the United Stasi of America, which realistically is essentially the world’s premier rogue state as well as one of the least democratic, despite the myriad of sanctimonious claims it arrogantly and lyingly promulgates to the contrary, that there is on Planet Earth.

And if one wanted categorical proof of this among the USA’s many infamies they need look no further than the way it treats its whistleblowers forced to reveal to the public, because there are no legitimate channels opened to them to do so, the perverse and endemic criminality of their elected rulers and others. But rather than being actively encouraged, ably supported and openly lauded by the public generally and especially those who have no problems at all in fraudulently sequestering the moral high ground for themselves whenever it suits their pertinacious and self-interested ends, for their outstanding courage, altruistic public service and public spiritedness are instead viciously hounded and deceitfully branded as traitors, witch-hunted and brazenly without the due process of law subjectively and publicly characterized by those in power as criminals, something which they most evidently aren’t.

Meanwhile the real lawbreakers and loathsome traitors not only against their country, its lawfully enshrined constitutional requirements and their fellow citizens and who themselves are fanatically aided and abetted by authentic war criminals in and out of political office or power but who all the same are possessed of official immunity for their wrongdoings, those that premeditatedly commit crimes against humanity, intentionally abrogate every manner of international law there is in their avid pursuit of greed, public, official and personal malfeasance walk free unmolested and carry on benefiting financially from doing so. And the most asinine excuse for the UK not bothering about its manifest loss of sovereignty to the United Stasi of America while obsessing about Brussels was offered by a British MEP whose name I shan’t mention as I have no intention of giving the oxygen of publicity to this prized asshole, who idiotically declared in an interview aired on RT’s “World’s Apart” hosted by Oxana Boyko on 1 August 2013 that Britain, the US, Canada and the other white Caucasian colonial outposts like Australia and New Zealand are English speaking countries, share common values and must therefore act in concert with each other at all times.

That’s like asininely saying one’s father is known to be a serial paedophile but even so his family, other blood relatives and friends must support him through thick and thin and anyone who points out the lunacy of this ludicrous assumption must be castigated and dealt with in the most savage of ways, which is precisely what this savage Caucasian collective of western led nations do in respect of any country, notably those in the Global South that insist on the same rights to their sovereignty and independence that this British MEP claims he wants for Britain but that he and his ilk are none the less very much ill-disposed to granting to other countries which resolutely refuse to kow-tow to their imperialistic, neo-colonialist, fascist, Nazi-driven mindset, and the markedly fraudulent, venal and avaricious plundering of their natural resources demands.

It speaks volumes too with regard to the much vaunted but sham claims of these pathological and pathetically sick Master Race, white supremacists, God’s chosen people Zionists that never miss a chance to deceitfully portray themselves as the spirited defenders of democracy and human rights even when they’re gleefully and at their perverse leisure massacring millions of innocent civilians including very young children, babes in arms, the elderly and infirm throughout the Global South. Whose democracy and human rights do they have in mind then, I wonder?

And continuing with the subject of democracy Zimbabweans went to the polls on Wednesday 31 July 2013 to elect a new President and parliament. But even before polling day arrived far less the first ballot was cast the west and its house nigger proxies in the so-called MDC were shouting that President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF Party would steal the elections, and post their balloting by the Zimbabwean people but with no official results declared as yet, Thursday 1 August 2013, the same MDC, perhaps anticipating its legitimate defeat, is ludicrously claiming that monumental fraud by the government has taken place. In the immortal words of Mandy Rice-Davies in the Profumo case all those years ago “they would say that wouldn’t they?”

Then we have the quite bizarre situation of the western media making a meal of the fact that there were no western observers monitoring these elections. Oh really? What outside agencies, including either British or EU ones, were allowed to monitor the US Presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 that the entire world well knows that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney blatantly stole? The same charge also applies to the elections in Canada that Stephen Harper the arch-Zionist there also stole. And when were elections held in Britain and the west’s favourite Persian Gulf state Bantustans of Bantu Saudi, Bahrain or Qatar for example that these western hypocrites flagrantly back to the hilt politically, diplomatically and militarily in exchange for the massive amounts of Dangegeld which they receive from these despotic, patently non-democratic and barbaric entities, in tandem with the right demanded by and pusillanimously given to western corporations by these western satrapies to plunder at the expense of the local population that have no say whatever in any of this their natural resources?

And wasn’t it the identical situation in what was then Rhodesia under Ian Smith when the majority indigenous Black population had no say at all in the running of their own country as they likewise had no political vote as was the case in apartheid South Africa? And what did Britain and the vast majority of its white British population have to say about that? As I recall these white racists were overwhelmingly of the view as was their governing regime in London that Rhodesia’s whites were their kith and kin and consequently nothing should be considered or affected which might impede them from embarking as before on what they were doing to these vastly inferior to white folk and even savage Blacks. And true to Britain’s racist past and form successive British regimes of every political persuasion knowing what was eagerly expected of them and evincing the views that they too racially and zealously shared acted accordingly and very much to the detriment of Zimbabwe’s black population.

Therefore to have these same people and their equally racist politicians in tandem with the west’s quite markedly sycophantic media which at the time were the zealous flag bearers of this insensate prejudice against Black Zimbabweans to now ludicrously demand that President Robert Mugabe’s government permits western election observers with their entrenched racist bias not only towards him but also his elected government to monitor elections in a Zimbabwe that literally had to fight Britain and its white colonialist surrogates in what was then Rhodesia for its independence would be rather analogous I think to the parents of Stephen Lawrence being forced to acquire the services of independent criminal investigators and experts to get evidence to put the remaining racist killers of their son in prison, then for the police and Crown Prosecution Service that both individually and collectively did everything in their power to prevent Stephen Lawrence having justice and with the police additionally going out of its way to reprehensibly and quite inexcusably smear the Lawrence family, their friends and supporters as well, conceitedly assuming the right and even insisting that this evidence the Lawrence family came by through its own volition must be handed over to them: the very people who treated this family so abysmally and that they obviously don’t trust, would be a gross insult not only to the Lawrence family but also anyone with a functioning brain that chose to use it honestly and objectively.

So why under any circumstance then should President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe trust so-called western election observers; and furthermore what external election observer agencies and crucially from the Global South do you know of that monitor British elections or those held elsewhere in the EU for that matter? And don’t tell me that the British regime is genuinely concerned about the well being of Blacks living thousands of miles away in Southern Africa in a country that is no longer a part of the Commonwealth when that same British regime has enormous billboards festooning our metropolitan landscape, vans offensively driving around London effectively saying Niggers aren’t welcome in Britain and the British police and our border agency are authorized by a racist Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to carry out racist stop and searches exclusively against black and other non-white Britons solely on the basis of their ethnicity and skin colour, not to apprehend so-called illegal immigrants as she and her racist ilk maintain, since illegality in all its many manifestations has nothing whatsoever to do with one’s ethnicity or skin colour, but to appease racism in Britain, foment discord and suspicion among our diverse communities on racist lines but more importantly lay down her marker as challenger for the Tory leadership and vaingloriously PM of Britain.

For if these racist stop and searches were anything other than being manifestly racially motivated and were in effect intelligence led the police or the Border Agency wouldn’t be asininely utilizing their time combing the streets of London or parking themselves outside tube and train stations in a bid to apprehend so-called illegal immigrants who are in actual fact bona fide Black and other non-white British citizens lawfully making their way to work. Instead those providing this intelligence if it were genuine to start with would have no difficulty one would assume in telling the police or the Border Agency where these supposed illegal immigrants actually live, work or even hang out, thus precluding any requirement on the part of these law enforcement officers to make complete asses of themselves by aggressively behaving from all independent witness accounts exactly like their predecessors in Nazi Germany. That said I don’t suppose for a moment that being equated to Nazi or even East German Stasi scum would remotely trouble London’s intellectually challenged police forces or the Border Agency imbued with a similar mindset one bit out, for that’s precisely what they both are; and in the case of the police, despite the rather gentlemanly manner in which Lord McPherson phrased it that they’re institutionally racist, have effectively been scum for some considerable time now; and leopards, to mix metaphors, don’t change their spots!

Besides the Tory Party has past form in this particular subject area and one readily recalls the vile shenanigans of David Cameron in his racist political attack on British non-whites. And those of us who’re neither genetically possessed of short memories nor embarrassingly limited attention spans as is so commonplace among many Britons these days, characteristics which they liberally have in common with their American kith and kin, remember all too well his abhorrent racist mantra “Are you thinking what we’re thinking” that he unashamedly used to spearhead Michael Howard’s bid to become PM of Britain. So what Theresa May is up to though shocking to some isn’t unexpected to many since what we’re seeing from her is very much par for the course as far as the Tory Party is concerned. So why bang one’s head against a brick wall where these Colonel Blimp, Fascist and Nazi Conservative nutters are concerned? Herr Adolf Hitler and his Nazis as did Benito Mussolini and his Fascists deluded themselves that their odious regimes would last for a thousand years; they didn’t, and history has recorded what happened to them. Likewise, I have no doubt that in time the Tories and their similarly racist ilk will get their comeuppance.

What is of importance to me though amidst all the odious shenanigans, hypocrisies, blatant double standards and the sanctimonious outpourings that routinely emanate from Britain and particularly its politicians is that sane among us observe a sense of proportion and recognize that what Britain is indulging constitute the embodiment of a very sick society and its interests and indeed those of its western allies and likeminded collaborators in universal criminality in evidently resource rich countries like Zimbabwe are the same as they’ve always been, the rapacious white exploitation of these countries and the African continent as a whole. And what Britain specifically wants in black ruled Zimbabwe is the same as pertains in neighbouring official post apartheid South Africa where Blacks having grudgingly and at great cost having secured the right to vote are strictly restricted to just that while genuine power and indisputable financial control of the country stays exclusively in expatriate Caucasian hands with local whites overseeing this travesty of justice.

And because President Robert Mugabe from intense traumatic and personal experience knows the white racist mindset extremely well and simply won’t allow it to exist any longer in his country he must therefore be venomously vilified and vituperatively demonized by any means possible while the ingratiating House Niggers without any apparent significant support in Zimbabwe but even so preposterously fall over themselves to do their western puppet masters bidding at every turn of the wind up key implanted in their backs must be championed as the saviours of that country. We’ve seen it all before throughout Africa and in the case of Zimbabwe is akin to crying wolf and we all know the outcome of that particular story