Friday, 27 July 2012

Greeks bleed too and can also be killed

By Stanley Collymore

Nikos Michaloliakos is a man whose upcoming murder has with scrupulous meticulousness been decided on, is planned quite carefully and most certainly will unrelentingly be executed at the most convenient time and place that those who want him dead and are wholly committed to this task will opt for. The murder location is extraneous as all bases I’m reliably informed, and that includes Greece, are covered; so were I in Nikos Michaloliakos’ shoes I wouldn’t on any account be in any particular hurry in the foreseeable future, an option which is very limited in his case, to leave Greece. This article therefore isn’t only his obituary but also an unequivocal warning to his family members, close associates and members of the Greek police force that they too are targets for assassination.

Under the strictest confidentiality I gave a solemn pledge, and one I intend to assiduously adhere to, to the persons involved who of their own volition have trustingly shown me a comprehensive list of those that have been chosen and targeted for killing complete with a resume of their daily movements, personal activities and the like, and what they generally get up to. So these planned murders are for real I can assure you. I wasn’t given copies of these however and astutely didn’t ask for any for quite understandable reasons. Neither did I enquire of my informants where they got their information from, who their sources were or the names of their whistle blowing contacts linked to these doomed individuals, or those holding sensitive jobs within government and other departments that were of the greatest assistance to them by providing them with such invaluable information. Suffice to say that together with my investigative and other journalistic background and experience I’m totally convinced that the information I saw is authentic as are the proposed murders of those earlier alluded to and primarily that of Nikos Michaloliakos.

Have I notified the police of what I was made privy to? No. Will I do so? Most definitely not! Why not? There is of course the confidentiality pledge I made but just as importantly it’s not my remit or shall I ever make it so to safeguard the lives of people that are either killers themselves, wilfully engage in the murders of those who’ve done them no harm whatsoever and moreover set about consciously doing so simply on the basis of hate crimes, racial bigotry, ethnic xenophobia or a combination of all these things as is the case with Nikos Michaloliakos and the others whose deaths to be perfectly honest and blunt with you I shall heartily welcome. For as I see it one can’t expect to live by the sword yet balk at the idea of dying by it, or rule themselves to be above the law but when it suits their purposes crave its protection.

And besides the information I came by was volunteered to me by those who provided it because they felt quite strongly about what they’re doing, passionately believe it to be right for me to air the demise of the loathsome monsters they’re after, and trusted me to accurately report their story in a manner befitting their cause and which I’ll unfalteringly do, not least so because of the trust they’ve placed in me. So in no way was the information I came by solicited by me but having got hold of it and also having the utmost credibility in the integrity of those that provided it I’m not about to walk away from it. Furthermore, as a bona fide journalist and not some media hack that is regrettably so commonplace in all aspects of the media these days I’ll protect my sources with my life if necessary, but other than that will determinedly exercise the legal right that is mine to claim the privilege of that same protection and shan’t hesitate to do so.

In normal situations conspiracy to murder someone or a group of people or otherwise knowing of such a conspiracy, being a willing party to it or concealing such knowledge from the appropriate legal authorities in addition to its moral dimensions is also legally a crime. I know that and will in duly constituted normal circumstances rigorously adhere to and always comply with my moral and lawful obligations under the law, but as anyone with a mildly functioning brain cell in his or her head knows there are justified exceptions to every rule there is.

And I’m strictly referring to justified exceptions not those sham ones that we routinely witness being employed by the rich, powerful or well connected who know they can say and do whatever they like, including the blatant flouting and disregard for the law, and with absolute impunity get away with it. Like me you doubtlessly saw the BBC, Sky, CNN, Fox, Channel 4 and the rest of the western corporate broadcasting media that transmit domestically across or into the UK from overseas carrying those savage and vitriolic comments by US 2012 presidential wannabees, TV pundits and other similarly demented rent-a-mouth bigots advocating the assassination of Iranian scientists, some of whom were actually killed, and even the murder of Julian Assange.

Apart from the fact that these targeted victims of theirs weren’t guilty of any wrongdoing other than in Assange’s case and from their rather warped standpoint of exposing the secret crimes and rampant criminality of western governments and their ilk that they desperately wanted to be kept secret from their public whom they systematically and on a routine basis lie to and not something that any sane person would want to vilify a conscientious whistleblower for laudably revealing, I didn’t see or hear of Ofcom the British media regulator, the British police or the CPS stepping in and invoking in Ofcom’s case as that body both morally and legally should have done but clearly and conspiratorially refused to administrative sanctions, or in that of the police and CPS criminal proceedings for conspiracy to murder against those involved and including the media outlets that gleefully and extremely irresponsibly aired those murderous threats that for the Iranian scientists became an all too realistic and horrifying reality.

As I see it it’s either a case of Ofcom, the police, CPS, the media etc playing footloose and fancy free with the law as it stands; being entirely subjective with it; or else are jointly of the same sick view that people from counties they don’t like, or worse still are officially directed they mustn’t care about are fair game to be murdered at will with their untimely deaths celebrated and boasted about, while individuals that from the jaundiced perspective of these minders or that of their own and from whose asses they all think the sun shines and consequently these chosen people must be inviolate of all such harm or ignominy creating in the process a perplexing quandary as well as a debased quagmire of conduct that’s completely devoid of all probity isn’t only untenable but also wholly unacceptable I feel.

All the same these are predicaments that I shan’t waste any time on or lose any sleep over as such brazen dishonesty were I to countenance it would stick indigestibly in my craw forcing me to vehemently puke my guts out and believe me I’m not in the least partial to making myself masochistically ill either literally or metaphorically. So I’ll keep my own counsel on this matter I’m reporting on  and as usual base what decisions I make on the exercise of commonsense and my own gut reactions to the situation with which I’m confronted and must therefore deal with.

Nikos Michaloliakos’s fate is already sealed and that’s a good thing, and as far as I’m concerned this inevitable result can’t come soon enough for me; but sadly it’s entirely out of my hands what exactly happens to this man or when, even though I shall welcome his death when it occurs with total equanimity and have no problem or any qualms whatsoever in readily and openly admitting to this. But as I said I’ve had no input in what will ultimately take place, have requested none and have studiously but never the less interestedly so assumed the punctilious role of messenger because I genuinely want for this ogre of a man to know that he and his family members will be killed; and by calculatedly and publicly revealing this fact to concertedly implant in him and they the incalculable and debilitating sense of insecurity, unnerving fear and the paralysing awareness of the certainty of their unavoidable deaths that I want for them to endure. Thus administering to them in general and Nikos Michaloliakos specifically a taste of his own medicine, unwillingly so no doubt but all the same subjecting him to the same traumatic ordeal that he quite jubilantly and sadistically forced his unfortunate victims to undergo.

By any natural definition of the term or logical comprehension of it Nikos Michaloliakos is an abhorrent and sadistic fiend; a physically ugly and emotionally unattractive brute and murderous monster possessed of a deeply engrained penchant for murder and sadism and with the blood of numerous innocent men, women and children of all ages, as has been the case for the better part of 39 years now, dripping copiously from his blood-stained paws.

My personal and detailed research on this loathsome ogre who sorry to say continues to breathe God’s wholesome air and is shockingly revealing of his criminal machinations over a number of years, is itself supported by a plethora of reliable sources ranging from individuals who from a longstanding perspective know Nikos Michaloliakos well; deserters from his Nazi-indoctrinated movement in all of its various guises that are themselves concomitant with those that consciously abandoned the pretty sick and utterly paranoid doctrine of vile hatred, pernicious xenophobia and mindless violence he enthusiastically adheres to and vaingloriously and self-righteously preaches ad infinitum as well as ad nauseum underpins the revealing but far from comprehensive profile on him produced by Wikipedia.

Against this firm backdrop and with all of this data to hand it’s no exaggeration to say that Nikos Michaloliakos is someone that the many decent elements still prevalent in this world can well do without and furthermore fittingly rejoice at the discovery that plans to permanently excise him from the rest of humanity, which he’s forfeited every right to belong to, though long overdue are finally about to reach fruition. And that in a world scarred by enervating and untold misery that’s sickeningly and premeditatedly caused by the likes of him can only be a cause for celebration.

We’ve none of us brought anything into this world when we first entered it as infants and it’s a sure bet that we won’t be able to take anything from it with us when or however we ultimately leave this earthly existence that we’re given the opportunity to experience, no matter how much we’ve managed to come by during our time here or the way, lawfully, ethically or otherwise, that we did so. So it’s a particularly bewildering and idiotic approach I think for anyone to needlessly expend so much time, energy, effort or at times great dollops of mental endeavour or heartache on this financial and acquisitive one-upmanship compounded with all the grief that it undeniably causes to others, especially and ironically when in doing so one can’t escape the inevitability that our hold on what we’ve acquired is at best a transient one.

Chiefly so as none of us unless we’re physically condemned to die with a pre-determined date set for our execution or happen to be someone hell-bent on suicide knows with any certainty exactly when we’re going to die. For pending executions can either be commuted to a prison sentence or overturned altogether and suicides reconsidered, made a complete hash of or be abandoned. And while it might be argued that the accumulated wealth garnered by those that have it will go to one’s biological heirs or prescribed beneficiaries, even if that were to take place in the orderly and stated manner that the benefactor wished for what is there to categorically guarantee that the expressed recipients of one’s ill-gotten gains let’s says won’t have their inheritance taken away from them in the same duplicitous and even brutal fashion in which they were originally attained by others adopting the same methods applied then to similarly enrich themselves?

It’s a quite relevant question I believe and which I’d like to take this opportunity to put to the one percenters globally particularly those who’re located in the so-called developed world and whose twisted fixation, spurious reasoning for defending that indefensible obsession and their detestable objectives to financially screw everyone else by any means possible in their unrelenting march to further enrich themselves and strengthen their economic hegemony over the rest of us and which is all too sickeningly apparent, has additionally become a rather conspicuous and commonplace methodology that their fawning but very much lower tier attack dogs like Nikos Michaloliakos that aren’t by any means in the same super-bracketed financial league as these one percenters are have in spite of everything unquestioningly adopted while stridently and viciously defending this reactionary rightwing stance they’ve pledged themselves to with a ruthless commitment which exhibits the essential characteristics that can only be defined as being determinably psychotic.

So taking into account our respective individual and unalterable mortality in this world what on earth is the point really of unnecessarily concocting and then either conceitedly, duplicitously or even fearfully irrationally embarking on any campaign let alone a concerted and malicious one of disliking, bearing ill-will against, abusing, intentionally and disadvantageously exploiting for our own selfish advantage, or even self-righteously killing our fellow human beings on the spitefully arrogant and ludicrous assumptions of our alleged racial superiority vis-à-vis the racial inferiority of those whom we’ve purposely demonized then wilfully created in our imagination a spectre of them as intrinsically evil and as such quite entitled to brand and destroy them as our enemies?

Persons that in our mind’s eye the unsuitability of their skin colour, ethnic origin, place of birth or nationality, their parentage, ancestry and the social class we deem that they should belong to; how they look, speak or dress; their religion, education or the lack of either or both of these; their cultural and social norms which though different from our own aren’t in any way threatening or injurious to them; our own preconceived and entrenched prejudices linked closely to a pervasive paranoia on our part about such people, and all of this compounded irrevocably by the extremist view that these people aren’t proper human beings anyway and consequently those holding such opinions have the absolute right to do whatever they like with them whenever they choose to, as it’s no crime or any moral blot on their consciences when they do. How cold-bloodedly insensate and utterly stupid with it too when like them, the vilified damned and socially despised, we’ll all of us inevitably shuffle off this mortal coil of ours and become once more the basic and recycled constituents of which this earth is made.

My maternal grandmother perceptively instilled into my consciousness from early childhood the sensible and obvious fact that there’s a world of difference between someone with commonsense that’s also educated and the individual with an education but who has no commonsense. Nikos Michaloliakos is in my opinion and that of others whose judgement I trust and respect very much ensconced in the latter category of persons; an emblematic flash flood which although it can and does cause serious damage nevertheless despite its best endeavours fails miserably to attain the status of a tsunami. In other words Nikos Michaloliakos clearly is, has always been and if left to his own devices will definitely persist in being a murderous thug and this is one incontrovertible reason among several other pertinent ones why he must be stopped and will be. In the meantime here’s a sanitized profile of a living ogre and walking dead.

Nikos Michaloliakos was born in Athens in 1957 and later completed his studies at the Faculty of Mathematics of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. At the age of 16 he joined the nationalist 4th of August Party of Konstantinos Plevris. He also participated in the Athens local organization of EOKA-B. He was arrested for the first time in July 1974 during a protest outside the British embassy in Athens against the stance of Britain toward the Turkish invasion of Cyprus. He was arrested again for assaulting journalists covering the December 1976 funeral of Evangelos Mallios, a policeman who tortured prisoners during the Regime of the Colonels and was assassinated by the Revolutionary Organization 17 November. Nikos Michaloliakos though was released due to technical issues related to his arrest. While in prison Nikos Michaloliakos met the leaders of the Greek military junta of 1967-1974 and after that joined the Army where he became a commando of the special forces; but following his arrest again in July 1978 he become a member of a far right extremist group finding himself sentenced to one year’s imprisonment in January 1979 for illegally carrying guns and explosives. He was also dismissed from his position in the army.

Released from prison following his sentence Nikos Michaloliakos set up the Chrysi Avgi (Greek for Golden Dawn) magazine. The politics of the magazine were, at least initially, closely aligned with National Socialist beliefs but it ceased publication in April 1984 when Michaloliakos joined the National Political Union and assumed after a personal order from Georgios Papadopoulos the leadership of its youth section, but in January 1985 Nikos Michaloliakos decided to renounce his connection with the National Political Union and set up instead the Popular National Movement - Chrysi Avgi.

Nikos Michaloliakos remained the leader of Chrysi Avgi until he announced its disbandment in November 2005 taking this step after clashes with anti-fascists and from then onward until 2007 continued his political activity through the Patriotic Alliance that under his control was reformed in 2007. Chrysi Avgi as a political party drew public attention in the 1990s and early 2000 and in May 2012 under Michaloliakos' leadership garnered 21 seats in parliament and was embroiled in various controversies. Nikos Michaloliakos steadfastly adopts the position that there were no gas chambers in Europe during World War II insisting that such stories are deliberate propaganda based on a myth.

However there is a great deal more to the ignoble and criminal activities of Nikos Michaloliakos than have been delineated in the abbreviated profile given of him above that because of issues of confidentiality and to safeguard sources whose identities could be greatly compromised and their lives seriously put at risk were this information to be publicly disclosed I’ve decided not to detail them in this article because there’s a monster out there that needs to be destroyed, and while in ideal circumstances providing the fullest information and placing this freely in the public domain is always the best course of action, disclosure must nevertheless at times be tempered with good and sound judgment that doesn’t allow a quarry like Nikos Michaloliakos to revamp his defences or in his desperation cause more harm than what he’s already done, and in a worst case scenario even elude the snare which has been set to entrap him; this I’m not about to let happen.

What I can say however is that this monstrous beast has given instructions to his followers of hooded fellow thugs and vicious gangsters to gratuitously assail immigrants and especially those from ethnic minorities with dark skins. Many of these hapless victims including pregnant women have been savagely and seriously beaten up by these thugs and hospitalized as a consequence of this while those who’ve been less fortunate have been murdered. Eva Cosse, a Greek herself and a researcher with Human Rights Watch, says that daily attacks by organized groups roaming the streets of Greece and particularly those of Athens at nights mainly, looking specifically for and pouncing on anyone who they don’t regard as Greek has become an habitual affair that the Greek police show no interest at all in stopping since they don’t even bother to investigate these evident and escalating brutal crimes with their race hatred dimensions. That’s because she acknowledges and all the empirical data to date show that the police themselves are a fundamental part of the problem. And not least so because many of their rank and file as well as their senior officers and commanders are either active members of or have deep sympathies with far right, fascist or Nazi groups within and outside of Greece and therefore do everything that they can to shield those who’re carrying out these abominable atrocities.

Furthermore have made a manifesto commitment during the recent Greek parliamentary election campaign to physically turf out of their hospital beds and onto the streets all immigrants that are hospitalized whatever the circumstances for this in Greece, the Golden Dawn party led by Nikos Michaloliakos has already set about putting into practice its programme to do so, even going one step further and pressurizing emergency ambulance crews and medics not to respond to or treat injured immigrants; and have been successful as well in forcing some hospitals not to accept any immigrant patients with the discernible attendant health risks that these unfortunate patients then find themselves subjected to as a consequence of this intentional and callous treatment meted out to them.

But it isn’t just the non-admission or refusal to treat immigrant patients that Nikos Michaloliakos and his Golden Dawn party are fixatedly obsessed with and pushing for all that these are worth, they’re also demanding that Greek volunteer blood donors insist that the blood they donate won’t be given to immigrant patients that in surgical operations and the like might have a need of it and for whom the administering or denial of blood to them could very well decide the continuation of that patient’s life or their untimely death, with Golden Dawn also stipulating that prosecution and imprisonment for those, blood donors and medical practitioners alike, deemed to have flouted its directives be automatic, and with severe penalties comprised of a mixture of a lengthy period of incarceration and harsh financial forfeiture be a standard practice.

Whichever way one looks at it though it’s patently obvious that Nikos Michaloliakos is a pretty odious individual, someone that those who have known him most of their live and detest him as much as I do along with the relative and friends of those who became his victims must evidently wish that he’d never been biologically conceived or failing that had been calculatedly strangled at birth by the attending doctor or midwife, which in the subsequent years of his emergence into and existence in the ranks of homo sapiens had this missed opportunity been seized upon would most undoubtedly have prevented a load of torment and grief among those whose live he’s either marred, grossly affected or eliminated.

Often depicted as an educated individual which he clearly is in terms of having rote learnt and accumulated certain requisite knowledge pertaining to his preference subject of economics, one mustn’t be duped though into thinking that the inculcation of, for lack of a better term, education by the likes of Nikos Michaloliakos vis-à-vis the acquisition either inherently in the biological sense or though personal experiences of commonsense are one and the same thing and the two are therefore inherently compatible with each other; they’re not! And while Nikos Michaloliakos may be educated he’s manifestly far from being a commonsensical person.

For how can he be when on the one hand he avowedly states that he wants to see, is committed to having, and consequently is doing his utmost best to make Greece a nationalistic state which is entirely devoid of foreigners and immigrants, who he asserts should go back to where they came from in what’s essentially a global community, yet on the other hand he not only wants but quite asininely in my view expects others from this same global community who in his warped mind aren’t a part of this narcissistic, nationalistic and immensely flawed xenophobic Grecian world he ludicrously ludicrously but impracticably wants to create solely for Greeks, whoever they are, and of which no others are entitled to belong and should certainly in his opinion not even have a look-in in this regard, to financially bailout his sick notion of Greece in relation to its undeniably self-inflicted and burdensome economic woes.

No one bankrupted the Greeks but themselves and if foreign banks saw the opportunity that was there and ruthlessly seized upon it to cash in and massively enrich themselves which was quite obviously the case they evidently did so with the complete knowledge and active involvement of successive Greek regimes which traditionally have had no moral fibre whatsoever in matters that relate to their people and whose endemic crookedness would metaphorically make a rather bent corkscrew blush with embarrassment at being so straight. So it’s utter humbug at best and rather dishonest at its worst for Nikos Michaloliakos, his supporters and followers to play the innocent victims in all of this and particularly as regards the dire economic plight of Greeks generally and that of Greece explicitly, and what’s more ascribe their national predicament to everyone but the Greeks themselves, deceptively depicting Greeks as unwilling innocents naively caught up in the financial intrigues and banditry of predatory outsiders that most conveniently and scapegoatingly are lumped together as immigrants who’re alien to everything Greek and conspiratorially bearing malice aforethought to the Greek nation as a whole and everything that it proudly stands for are concertedly and escalatingly impelling Greece and the Greek people with it along the unpalatable and dangerous road of absolute ruin.

It’s a fraudulent assertion of course that apart from being utter tosh begs the rather obvious and relevant question that Nikos Michaloliakos and his discreditable ilk consistently, dishonestly and very conveniently overlook; and which is, what precisely do Greek governments and Greeks per se actually stand for or for that matter have in common with each other? For evidently there are no homogenous objectives or even a common or mutually beneficial concept that I can detect let alone realistically or honestly say exist between these two entities.

Greek politicians who for most of Greece’s recent history have essentially consisted of a junta of elite military officers that subjectively and without even a superficial attempt at lip service to the notion of democracy have completely but unaccountably to the entire Greek population held total sway over Greece and Greek lives; have never had or sought to acquire any discernible common interests with the average Greek; wouldn’t have wanted any; and rather significantly would have been totally shocked and very upset had it been suggested to them that they should.

A power-hungry, completely fascistic and brutal oligarchy then with a fixated lust for imperious domination and cold-bloodedly complimented by that grouping’s unwavering commitment to its own self-preservation so as to ensure this, the fraudulent entre to the primary purposes of these generals roles as they saw them were the political control of Greece, the economic empowerment of themselves while doing so and the unhindered achievement of these goals by every means at their disposal; so no unity of purpose then between an elite of self-imposed rulers and those who were being autocratically ruled, or any meeting of minds among them. Also no related situations either wished for or mooted by those in charge and certainly not as far as running the affairs of Greece or controlling its people were concerned; a state of affairs not only well known to but also resignedly accepted by the Greek people.

Elites everywhere and undeniably of every sort, especially those intimately involved at whatever level with the political governance of others, routinely, obsessively and quite infamously create their own specific distribution of groupies consisting of cronies, nepotists and sycophants among those that are wittingly prepared and happily ready to submit themselves uncomplainingly to the mindless subservience of self-abasement which those who welcome and actively encourage these abhorrent and aberrant forms of conduct rapaciously gorge themselves on, and in this particular regard Greece’s own elite that for the greater part of its existence has principally and consistently encompassed either a military or reactionary component hasn’t been any different, it’s fair to say, from its counterparts elsewhere.

However in return for this symbiotic state of affairs characterized by this unconscionable level of fawning those unscrupulously prepared to indulge in it have clearly and conscientiously balanced their self-imposed humiliation against the personal rewards they evidently expect to receive and benefit from for doing so; and Greece’s case the assiduous application of the Nelsonian eye by those in charge of and to whom this sycophancy is directed to the concerted and very widespread non-payment of their taxes by these toadying beneficiaries not only ended up becoming a rather commonplace feature and episode for many generations of Greeks who saw it as their inalienable right to defraud the state but also carried on apace both systemically and systematically, robbing the Greek exchequer significantly in the process of funds it could ill-afford and that were vitally requisite for the overall and constructive development of the Greek people as a whole.

This has of course glaringly resulted in the grotesque disparity of wealth, levels of income, living conditions, personal improvement and political empowerment as well a palpable manifestation of the conspicuous lack of educational and social mobility amongst the have and have-nots in Greek society that have nothing at all to do with the presence of immigrants living in Greece, and even less so does it give an credence to the idiotic notion peddled by Nikos Michaloliakos and his ilk that the mere residence there of these people is somehow inimical to the common welfare of Greeks and the universal interests of Greece without unsurprisingly so any specifics relating to this given by them to substantiate these calculated and malicious racist assertions.

For rather than supposedly being a detrimental impediment to the livelihoods of Greeks and the creation of a major calamity, all things considered, for Greece itself by encumbering its rightful transformation from the virtual feudal state that it has long been, and carries on being to this day, into becoming a contemporary progressive one fit to belong to and capable of holding its own in the modern world of the 21st Century, immigrants have instead made invaluable contributions to Greek society and very much so in the economic sector.

Not afraid of hard work or the prospect of having to work hard immigrants in Greece from the global south, just as they do elsewhere in Europe where they’ve managed to settle, happily do the menial, dirty and very low paid work that the local citizens of their host countries disdainfully turn up their noses at and resolutely refuse to do; pragmatic but certainly so selfless actions that make extremely indispensible contributions to the local and national economies of the countries concerned. So far from being the incompetent, indolent and worthless scroungers who wantonly abuse the hospitality extended to them by a generous nation that needn’t have bothered to do so by selfishly preying off the altruistic benevolence of the Greeks while contributing absolutely nothing in return for this, the fear mongering tactics and evil caricatures whipped up and brutally employed by Nikos Michaloliakos and his demonic cohorts to depict these immigrants as clearly what they’re not in order to garner populous support for their racist and fascistic rabblerousing at a time of severe economic austerity and in a frantic bid to scapegoat others for the Greeks’ own self-induced problems no resemblance whatever to this group of vilified people who are in effect productive workers that realistically and in its calamitous economic and social plight Greece can ill-afford to lose, would be bloody daft to think it can, and even more stupidly tries to get rid of.

But racism has no logic whatever, doesn’t function on any and those that peddle it know full well that they’ve already lost the argument, and like sewer rats when exposed to daylight that scamper back off to the safe refuge of the sewer they know well and feel comfortable in racism likewise serves the same purpose for all racists. People who despite their threatening and divisive bluster are actually pretty scared little boys and girls inside who simply haven’t mastered the techniques of psychologically growing up and making that transition from being frightened dependent kids to matured adults because in reality they’ve neither the intellectual acumen associated with the capacity for objective reasoning nor the requisite commonsense that’s required to back this up.

Therefore this unsettling awareness of their endemic inadequacies, tremendously debilitating and chokingly stultifying, induces them into an instinctive, self-protective mode and fanciful sense of denial, not dissimilar from that of an ostrich burying its head in the sand and pretending that the reality around it doesn’t exist, that in so far as these puerile nerds are concerned and who further find themselves faced with their own chimerical demons that they haven’t the foggiest idea how to effectively and permanently exorcize conveniently and falsely impugn others for their feelings of inadequacy and myriad shortcomings. And like the monkey that unwittingly exposes more of its tail to the viewer the higher and more determinedly it climbs up the tree that it’s attempting to scale and take control of, equally those at the commanding heights of this detritus of humankind, fervently imbued with their deadly racism and vicious hatred of those they’ve no credible reason or even a realistic defence for disliking, the more airs and graces that they assume while deluding themselves of their innate racial, social and intellectual capabilities and the superiority that goes with them in marked contrast to those that the see nothing wrong at all in callously demonizing, totally fail to realize that paradoxically at the same time they too are unwittingly betraying their own inner secrets of multiple imperfections.

For it’s crystal clear that the one thing that angry men and women don’t like is to look into the mirror at themselves and objectively observe what’s there, as it’s much easier to turn their anger, frustration and hatred not on themselves for their blunders and shortcomings but on others whom they discourteously perceive as different; and unlike the enlightened man or woman that seeks to understand what they don’t originally grasp, these racist ignoramuses of whatever class or social milieu they come from automatically dismiss everything they’re not familiar with or that doesn’t fit in with their prejudices, since they’re wholly incapable of anything else.

There are few people on Earth that can realistically and honestly say that they’re truly indigenous to the country or even the region where accidentally but always involuntarily through their birth or even in the wake of it have from a conscious decision on their part to be there they now find themselves established; a state of affairs that for example is as relevant to Greeks as it is to white Australians and New Zealanders, Argentineans, Caucasian North Americans, and that consists of Canadians too, or Arab North Africans, specifically Egyptians, and lots more such communities globally that are the witting or unwitting products of a combination of factors that led to a series of events that range from centuries of unchecked migration resulting in the extensive and lasting demographic reshaping of the lands occupied as in the case of Arab settlement in North Africa to the imperialistic colonization of huge swathes of already populated landmasses and the intended genocide and brutal displacement of the people resident there, concomitant with the widespread theft of these homelands and the arrogant renaming and reconfiguration of them in the images of their interlopers as cold-bloodedly happened in the cases of Argentina, the US and Canada, New Zealand and Australia, and the paradisiacal territories which because of the global ignorance and navigational error of a white, Caucasian European and ostensibly sea-explorer came to be known as the West Indies.

So how totally asinine then for Nikos Michaloliakos reeking from the pungency of his own as well as the fetor filth of his followers to talk of let alone demand a Greece that ought in his words to be both nationalistic and devoid of everyone except those that in his warped mind qualify for the dubious honour of being Greek, an imprimatur that would of course lay entirely in his hands. Fine! But what about those Greek immigrants and residents Nikos Michaloliakos who don’t just live in other European countries although for sure still on the same continent that Greece is a part of but can also be found in sizeable numbers much further afield in places not remotely European by any stretch of the imagination, and from a global outlook are as far apart as Australia and the United States of America? What do you advise should be done with these Greeks living abroad Nikos Michaloliakos? Should they be compelled to return to the Greco-Nationalistic-Utopia you would have established for them, or don’t the same rules apply because like all other Europeans Greeks aren’t ever considered as immigrants regardless of where outside Europe they physically end up and therefore see themselves as having the inalienable right to stay there and do whatever they like?

Now surely anyone apart from perhaps the most addled-brain moron can see not only the flawed reasoning of such a proposition but also the diabolical injustice of it; and I would say that it’s a safe bet that no intelligent Greek living in Australia, the United States, Canada or any other place outside of Europe would take up your offer Nikos Michaloliakos to voluntarily quit their home, ditch their livelihood and perhaps even the country they were born in and rightly see themselves as a proud and patriotic citizen of to ridiculously gallivant off to Greece, especially in its current and ongoing dismal economic straits, simply to placate the perverted and perverse prattling of an utter prickhead like you, and if approached would most certainly tell you to piss off while fondly suggesting to you as well a number of other bodily functions that you Nikos Michaloliakos could additionally do to yourself.

Notwithstanding the above however there’s another much more serious and inescapable problem for Nikos Michaloliakos and his arrogantly touted idea of a nationalistic Greek state and it comes in the form of the ubiquitous Greek pimps: those wealthy enough to pay their taxes but who’ve always stanchly refused to do so absolutely confident they’d be consistently allowed to get away with this criminal act of tax avoidance, which they always managed to do, with the active help of successive corrupt and rapaciously greedy themselves venal Greek regimes and MPs and who’ve upped the stakes as well as their own personal sticks, left Greece and taken their ill-gotten gains, stupendous sums of money to you and me, with them convinced that it’s only a matter of time before Greece is either kicked out of the Eurozone at the insistence of Angela Merkel keen to get re-elected and whose restive electorate is totally against the taxes of hardworking Germans being used to constantly bailout what they see as inveterate and irremediably indolent Greeks forever on the take and always wanting something for nothing.

Or the worst case scenario for these wealthy Greek pimps where the Euro collapses and becomes defunct; that’s why with the pressing urgency, self-centeredness and the survival instinct of rats deserting a sinking ship they’re cold-bloodedly, unpatriotically and in their droves disinvesting and diverting their money from Greece and reinvesting it in banks or other financial institutions elsewhere or else massively involving themselves in the purchase of hugely expensive properties in countries they pragmatically conclude are significantly safer bets for the continuing growth of their inordinate wealth and incomes.

When Francois Hollande the Gaelic wimp now ridiculously postulating himself as the archetypal hardman of French politics was running for the French presidency in 2012 David Cameron self-righteously interfering in the internal affairs of France on behalf of his fellow mass murderer and committer of heinous crimes against humanity Nicolas Sarkozy whom he obviously wanted and expected to win that election, and with the insufferable conceit characteristic of those that accord to themselves what they absolutely think is their justified and immutable right to the designation of the Master Race and quite comically in David Cameron’s case causes him to believe that he’s a direct and pedigree descendant of the Duke of Normandy otherwise more commonly known as William the Conqueror, the 1066 victorious invader and very last occupier of England other than the Americans who it would appear that all of our governments have lacked the balls to tell them to go home and they’re too dumb to get the message that they’ve overstayed their welcome here.

Poor David, he’s probably as a consequence of his posh and sheltered upbringing hasn’t grasped what chastity belts were enforcedly invented for among the women of the so-called aristocracy and with several British women in 2012, even in what’s undoubtedly a promiscuous society like ours, routinely cuckolding their husbands and partners who father their children but unknowingly never sired them and moreover doing so at the current rate of 36%, it’s a pretty safe bet that these aristocratic wives with their husbands constantly gallivanting off to wars all over the confounded place including Crusades in the Middle East and never really at home for any lengthy periods of time that the rate of infidelity among the female ancestors of the David Camerons of this world was a darn sight higher even with the utilization of chastity belts by their husbands, which wasn’t a particular problem for these women as it happened since this little predicament they were faced with could always be circumvented by a friendly and obliging locksmith; as were the number of illegitimate children they conceived and bore, successfully foisted on unsuspecting husbands and cleverly got away with it. It never stopped of course and still happens to this day even among the choicest of our aristocratic brood mares, accounting for the fact that so many of our present and past leaders with their ingrained notions of hereditary superiority vis-à-vis the rest of us ordinary peasants are both figuratively and literally right bastards; it’s in their genes!

So all the suggestions of a pure and unadulterated line of descendants stretching down through the centuries from God knows when to the present, and first and foremost David Cameron’s birth and beyond, that is just fanciful tosh; but anyway there was our David publicly backing Sarkozy another mongrel like himself with risible aristocratic assertions and farcical pretentions until the opinion polls showed that Nicolas Sarkozy was going to lose as even the habitual fascistic, Nazi-indoctrinated and Vichy aficionado French electorate had had enough of this murderous, far right moron they’d put in the Elysée Palace. By all accounts this was a most unpleasant revelation for David Cameron who though stunned by it decided as befitting the posh to imperiously put out an open invitation to wealthy Frenchmen and women to abandon France, which he said would in the wake of Francois Hollande’s victory spell economic doom for that county as it’d be plagued by socialist dogma and financial disaster due to exorbitant public service spending and punitive tax increases against the rich, and instead they should relocate and beneficially invest in Britain with its rational austerity programmes favouring those who intelligently manage their financial affairs, the filthy rich and tax evaders in other words, notwithstanding the fact that the average Brit today is in realistic terms worse off than their grandparents since this is the worst economic crisis that Britain has had in the past 50 years.

And while it’s perfectly true to say that David Cameron and his rightwing cohorts in government that comprise the Con-Dem regime that’s superficially in charge of the country and wretchedly it must be said is rapidly driving us to hell in a handcart don’t entertain the notion of letting cash-strapped and hard-up Greeks descend on our green and pleasant land, in their eyes only to defile it, and furthermore will ruthlessly do everything in their power to stop them from doing so, this in spite of their fundamental right as EU citizens to travel and reside unhindered in any EU country including our own, there is no reluctance or shame though on the part of David Cameron, George Osborne or Nick Clegg in actively encouraging and permitting wealthy Greeks who’re primarily responsible for and are therefore the main culprits of their country’s endemic economic problems further plunging Greece into an even greater fiscal catastrophe by selfishly taking their massive transferable financial assets out of the country and decamping as economic refugees with them in Britain.

Thus the tidal wave of abetted, harboured and wealthy economic refugees from France has been joined by a Greek tsunami of compatible souls but with a discernible difference; for unlike their Gaelic counterparts these Greeks have taken to disposing of their Euros in expensive bricks and mortar enterprises, frenetically buying up houses all over our nation’s capital particularly in areas like Knightsbridge, Chelsea and Mayfair and doing so in a manner and with a constancy not seen before. Actions whose accumulative outcome is pushing house prices through the roof as it were while at the same time being a complete disaster for local Londoners who would love to get their feet on the housing ladder and start owning their own homes, as well as those who live outside of the city, commute there to their workplaces and evidently would also like to live in London and own homes there but likewise can’t do so because of the astronomical prices being demanded by realtors for houses in London and that these Greek and other economic refugees have exclusively contributed to and carry on doing so, making it practically impossible with the added problem of banks resolutely refusing to grant loans or mortgages to anyone without a 100% credit rating, the well-heeled in other words, for many local Londoners as well as other Britons to own cheap or sheik homes.

So it’s the height of irony I would say having Greeks from a putative nationalistic state of the one envisaged by Nikos Michaloliakos if he has his way, who’re not only responsible for but are also significantly exacerbating the dire economic situation there to be effectively debarring local Londoners whose demographic formation is chiefly non-Caucasian from realizing their cherished dream of home ownership which is also one shared by millions of other Britons. And while quite obviously it’s highly undesirable and entirely infra dig as Nikos Michaloliakos and his backers see it for niggers, wogs and coons, among the plethora of other hackneyed and derogatory terms they routinely and disdainfully apply to non-whites generally and Blacks in particular in order to rationalize their gratuitous hatred of these people, to be in Greece and must therefore be forcibly and murderously removed from it, they somewhat perversely see no problem in wealthy Greeks coming into London as immigrants, a term they unhesitatingly perceive as nauseatingly offensive when applied to residency in Greece itself, and making local Londoners feel that they’re not only being deliberately and contemptuously treated as if they’re worthless, of no account and wholly irrelevant immigrants in their own capital city and country by individuals whose country would be less than welcoming or hospitable to them but insultingly as well they must grin and bear it.

That in 2012 it’s still possible for some people to belligerently hold on to the conceited idea that what they regard as exclusively their own ought forever to stay that way while at the same time systematically depriving others of what’s clearly theirs is the kind of mindboggling stupidity that must vigorously be confronted and effectively destroyed by any means possible irrespective of who is behind these thoughts or actions. For it makes a shameful mockery of natural justice and enlightened standards of conduct and glaringly flies in the face of all logic and commonsense to knowingly accord to such people civilized behavioural processes which they’ll advantageously and selfishly use for their own benefit as well as to promote their intolerant view of the world at the expense of those that in a month of Sundays and themselves endowed with the power, control and prospect to influence events they would never reciprocate the slightest measure of kindness or goodwill towards.

Nikos Michaloliakos and his crew of Nazi-sympathizers that reside inside and outside of Greece: a country that during World War II eagerly and unsympathetically dispatched thousands of Jews, Romany people and several others, those cruelly dubbed die Untermenschen by their persecutors, to the terrible concentration, labour and death camps throughout Western and Eastern Europe fall squarely into this category of persons who ought permanently to be kept at arms length, never trusted under any circumstance, and when required to in reply to their calculated acts of brutality and murder fight their fire with fire of one’s own; as it’s the only language of acknowledgement that these savages really understand and duly show respect for. A clear-cut message then to them that violence will simply beget violence in return from which no one is immune and that Greeks, whether they live in Knightsbridge, Chelsea, Mayfair, Athens itself or globally elsewhere, bleed too and can also be killed.

It’s a recurring and somewhat depressing nightmare unfortunately and accounts for many of the problems beleaguering the world that the authors of these captious disputes and who themselves are quite often the most obstreperously nationalistic about the countries they consider to be theirs exclusively generally turn out to be the most uninformed about the true historical facts relating to them, and I’m quite positive that Nikos Michaloliakos is one such individual. He certainly talks a great deal about Greece and nationalism but how much does he actually know I wonder about the real history of that country?  It’s why I’m taking this opportunity to acquaint him and his kindred spirits with some aspects of it that emphatically debunk the nonsense that he and they prattle on about vis-à-vis their fictional Greece.

Africans were worshipped in Greece and in Rome. The religion of the Greeks was established by Africans and Greek gods were black. The oracles of Delphos and Dodona were established by Africans and according to Herodotus the first of these was founded by two black doves that flew across the waters from Egypt; black doves being symbols of black priestesses. Delphos Island in turn becoming one of the greatest tourist centres in the ancient world. Finally the worship of Isis and Horus, both black, was very popular in Greece and the Roman Empire. I’ve also given below a number of academic and historical references which you can check out for yourselves.

Athens, its history and coinage; p97, Cambridge 1924. Grace Bardsley; The negro in Greek and Roman Civilization. Zundel; Revenue Archaeol, March 1861. Hist, de la Caricature Antique, pp 101-2. Rojers J.A, Sex and Race, Vol 1, pp80-84. Higgins; The Celtic Druids; London 1829. G.K. Osei, A journey into the African Past, pp 4-4, London 1964.

Facts don’t lie Nikos Michaloliakos but human beings sadly reliably do, and the more insecure or dishonest they are the greater and more insidious these lies tend to be. Dishonesty and insecurity are transparently inseparable and ingrained characteristics of your sinister and pathetic life Nikos Michaloliakos, a life in which you’ve constantly sought and unhappily too often for your victims one must say have managed to needlessly bring grievous psychological and physical hurt, untold misery, pain, disconsolation, grief and murder into the lives of those who’ve never occasioned or ever attempted to cause you any harm. All they’ve ever done is to simply exist as human beings: people with hopes, ambitions and the natural desire like the rest of us to do well for themselves and their families, utilizing in the process the immutable God-given talents they were endowed wit. But to the sick minds of you and your followers Nikos Michaloliakos that’s insufferable and oughtn’t to be tolerated let alone allowed, therefore these people must at best be forcibly driven out from the milieu of what you determine is your Master Race society or at its worst be utterly destroyed and permanently forgotten. But the best laid plans of mice and men etc…

Now the wheel of your dastardliness has effectively turned full circle Nikos Michaloliakos and to mix metaphors you’ll be hoisted with your own petard; poetic justice or what? Never having had any aberrant interest in the obituaries of those who’ve at length shuffled off their mortal coils nor ever likely to acquire one as death is an inevitability of life, notwithstanding that I shall never the less with much more than a little satisfaction be looking forward to the imminent publication of your obituary Nikos Michaloliakos. Goodbye!

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

Bollocks to you David Cameron, Obama and Co., the sane among us aren’t fooled!

By Stanley Collymore

So David Cameron’s Con-Dem government wants to protect us from the evils of the internet and is trying its very best to disingenuously convince us that this is the case, an exercise that’s altruistically embarked on of course. And the dishonest and propagandistic political message that these irredeemable conmen and women are concertedly peddling through their compliant corporate media outlets and with the full cooperation of their obsequious rent-a-mouth TV and radio analysts is that there’s a substantial and extremely unscrupulous number of malicious and wicked individuals out here in our communities either solitary or in concert with likeminded persons working assiduously to improperly blacken or even destroy the wholesome characters through instances of slander, libel malevolent inferences or acts of pernicious trolling, whether of a personal or professional nature, of people who’re innocently and ineffectively at a serious disadvantage from all this and attributively from persons whom they have no other recourse to act against in the existing set of circumstances except through the very expensive and unwieldy process of court action that in turn can and does serve as an enormous deterrent to them readily doing so.

It’s an absolute and deliberate lie of course; and anyway who is it that’s entirely responsible for framing and enacting the legislation of laws pertaining to libel and slander that are geared very much in favour of the rich, powerful and influential and decidedly against the ordinary man and woman on the street who is quite accustomed to being bludgeoned in this manner by these same types of hoodlums in conjunction with their mafia corporate media that is ever so willing to serve their interests, leaving the Joe and Jane Public of this world with no alternative open to them other than to take this abuse and character assai nation gratuitously dished out to them on the chin, knowing perfectly well that there’s absolutely nothing else that he or she can logically do about it.

And even if later these wilful lies are eventually exposed for what they really are and apologies or corrections are made in relation to them, the truth is that they’re never given the prominence or banner headlines initially accorded to the lie and anyway the consequences that stem from these calculated fabrications always as it happens turn out to be irreparable and worthless in the circumstances, not least because the collective memory of the general public is typically fickle and short-lived at best so that what it’s told initially in such emphatic terms usually sticks and becomes permanently embedded in the minds of those who’ve been indoctrinated with it as the authentic narrative to be followed and invariably the one that they must believe as well.

But where does the truth as apart from the well-rehearsed and slick public relations propaganda fed through the media, parliament and the other establishment institutions to a pre-conditioned and in many instances also a totally ignorant, utterly credulous or poorly informed public lay? Not you can be sure of it in the monumental crap that those with an invidious, self-serving and undisclosed agenda of their own and conjoined with an apt user friendly narrative purely for public consumption and expressly designed to selfishly advance these warped objectives would have the rest of us believe is actually the case.

There’s a bit of malice and perhaps even a touch of evil in all of us human beings considering by and large the imperfect species that we are; but in 2012 ordinary folk even in a significantly computer-literate age have far better things in austerity driven and socially inequitable Britain to do with their lives, including simply surviving for example, than to spend their valuable time and constructive energy premeditatedly fabricating damaging stories or nefariously fashioning injurious libels or slander at will, or simply out of sheer perversity engaging themselves in the rather questionable pastime of dispensing ostensibly hateful diatribes or malicious innuendoes or gossip against people that even if they’ve heard about them in some circuitous way or other have certainly never met and manifestly don’t know them at all.

Yes there are nerds about and aplenty so; the X-Factor groupies I call them, who consistently live their lives, if you can logically call these fatuous non-existences of theirs such, through the puerile antics of others that in their blinkered eyes pass for celebrities, and when these fawning dumbos periodically get upset by the actions or otherwise of these pampered, publicity-seeking morons they adulate and consequently can and invariably do respond like the everlasting brain-dead and highly juvenile cretins they themselves effectively are, persons given to impulsively letting of steam without thinking of the consequences as in reality they haven’t the wherewithal with which to think rationally if think at all, they can and do often become vituperatively and mordantly abusive.

Then there are their football equivalents that rather brainlessly are entirely incapable of making the crucial distinction between what’s undoubtedly a sport which they’ve every right to follow, support, enjoy or even feel passionately about and the incongruity of insanely using it and the sporting celebrities that it sporadically throws up to fill a gaping void in lives that are otherwise essentially unproductive, bereft of meaning and even thoroughly useless. And because of this no one with a functioning brain cell in his or her head is the least astonished when such people go off the deep end and violently or abusively verbally let rip online to assuage their intensive or even immense frustrations. But these are actions that can quite properly and effectively be dealt with within the framework of our domestic laws as they stand and certainly don’t need the sledgehammer of internet vandalism by a conservative led government of all things with its documented historical and criminal propensities masked as humanitarian gestures and civilized necessities to crack this wearisome nut.

So David Cameron’s Con-Dem regime of privileged, hopelessly out of touch with the common man or woman on the street; a posh pricks or twats, feel free to take your pick, Cabal of largely hand me down, inherited millionaires phenomenally adept at forcing austerity measures down the throats of hardworking, taxpaying Brits while they shamelessly salt their ill-gotten gains in tax havens overseas and employ unscrupulous lawyers and accountants to ensure that they and their similarly well-heeled friends pay the minimum amount of tax possible if any at all, don’t need to postulate that additional or even more draconian legislation is urgently required to deal with what’s basically a minor problem if that was their real motivation which it clearly isn’t.

Consequently, what we’re being presented with by these Tory thugs, their Lib-Dem sycophants intoxicated with unanticipated power after aeons of oblivion in the political wilderness and the class indoctrinated, parliamentary Labour Party assholes who’re even worse one must forlornly confess than their Tory counterparts and will cheerfully and pusillanimously jump aboard this particular Tory bandwagon and wholeheartedly support this proposed legislation, is at its very best dishonest and at its worst characteristic rightwing, crypto-fascist, Nazi crap that the Tories and their ilk are exceedingly good at engaging in.

That said one must give credit where credit is due as the Tories don’t disappoint by pretending they’re other than the loathsome bunch of bastards they’ll always be; with Labour though and particularly the parliamentary Labour party of MPs the only relative consistency with that lot is the name Labour, and after the regrettable stewardship of the party by war its criminals Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Peter Mandleson and David Miliband among others of that ilk it’ll be a brave man or woman indeed who could courageously put his or her head above the parapet and honestly say there’s such a thing as the British Labour Party let alone one that truly empathizes with the ideals of those who founded it and the aspirations of the men and women that still call themselves Labour.

And the rather sickening thing about all this is that those endeavouring to frame these new and invasive laws expressly designed to curtail our freedom of expression and particularly so in a country where successive regimes of every political persuasion have persistently over the years resolutely refused to consider let alone implement a written British Constitution that expressly delineates what our inalienable rights as well as our specific obligations to each other and the country we belong to are, as equal citizens of the United Kingdom and not as serfs or subjects of some hereditary monarch that we have no choice but to accept  because our opinions simply don’t count and the powers that be don’t deem it fit to ask us what they are, are the very ones who’re the most culpable offenders when it comes to breaking domestic and international laws, damaging dishonestly the reputations of those they not only capriciously opt to take a dislike to but also criminally choosing to murder in countries we’re not officially at war with and whose governments and citizens pose no threat whatsoever to us individually or as a nation.

Like what you’re now doing in Syria and earlier and most effectively so in Libya as well David Cameron. Libya a country that after your aggressively assisted self-styled freeing of it from the stated clutches of Colonel Gaddafi is now completely in tatters, where massacres are so routine that embarrassedly the western media that was your and the rest of NATO’s cheerleaders don’t report on any situation in Libya any more, and where the one growth industry in that country is terrorism and the export of it currently with the consent of yourself and the rest of your western allies to Syria where British Special Forces and UK trained, funded and supported death squads are illicitly and murderously operating in a sovereign independent state against all international norms, laws and conventions so as to satisfy your subservience to the Israeli and global Zionist desire for unlawful regime change in that country.

And additional to the deadly role you’re playing in Afghanistan both for the Afghans as well as our own troops there you’re also actively aiding the barbaric despots in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Bantu-Saudi among others in this premier Arab league against their own people striving to accomplish the democratic goals you lyingly claim you’re in favour of universally and want to see in Syria; if so why not the aforementioned Bantustans I’ve mentioned as well? But clearly such rhetoric by you David is only applicable when the skin colour of those that are petitioning for such fundamental human rights exclusively matches that of your own as your statements on multiculturalism in Europe generally and the UK especially, coded euphemisms like that which you engineered for Michael Howard in his vain attempt to become Prime Minister of Britain; remember the one publicly incorporated in Tory TV and other media ads  and well as blazoned across Conservative campaign posters: Are you thinking what we’re thinking? Views that now as then reiterate your public aversion to and private racist hatred as regards having Blacks or as your lot sees them Niggers in you midst. Succour to the bullying thugs like those in the BNP and EDL that you’ve never condemned, and why should you since like Adolf Hitler’s brown shirts they are your recruiting sergeants, mirror your views and in your tacit support for them you simultaneously make racism in Britain and wider Europe respectable.

Then there’s the Iraq debacle and the little matter of the soon to be mass murderer Tony Blair economical with the truth as usual resulting in the deaths of 1.5 million Iraqi civilians and the wholesale destruction of another non-white country; an imperialist and colonialist adventure in the classic white European sense that you David Cameron along with the rest of your Tory lot and the entire House of Commons wannabe Memsahibs and Bwanas enthusiastically signed up to so you could ravage Iraq of its oil and gas reserves and at the same time get your perverted kicks at seeing the superior white man literally knock the shits out of a bunch of desert bozos, never mind that Iraq enjoyed a civilization millennia before England or Britain still physically joined at the hips to ice ravaged Europe even existed as a separate entity. But why allow facts to get in the way of old fashioned racism, eh David?

So someone among Joe or Jane Public, going back to the thrust of your proposed legislative curbs on the internet David, decides for reasons known only to themselves to take a verbal pot shot at some run of the mill, publicity junkie and so-called celebrity, politician or their intimate associates. So what? These people aren’t indisposed to dishing out this kind of vitriolic abuse themselves against those that they look down on or even detest when it suits their purposes and when that happens it’s usually treated as something to have a good laugh about. Remember the distasteful and criminal remarks of Jeremy Clarkson of Top Gear that everyone from you to the BBC, which refused to fire him and made pathetic excuses for him, and loads of other post gits in between together with their mindless supporters thought funny but would have taken a very different attitude if those words were spoken by a Black, Asian, other non-white person or even a member of the white working class and were specifically targeted at the upper crust?

And answer me truthfully David, if you’ve any semblance of what the truth is, which is worse, laying into the likes of Louise Mensch a fellow conservative and colleague of yours, justifiably so in my view, or having individuals like her using their position as an MP to foment illegal regime change wars in other people’s countries, activities that result in the senseless massacres, mass murders and heinous crimes against humanity of scores of thousands of innocent civilians in developing countries never white Caucasian ones we can be sure, as we witnessed in Iraq with in excess of 1.5 million Iraqi civilians killed and collectively another 10 million internally and externally even to this present day, 13 June 2012, displaced as refugees and all on a bloody evil, calculated and pernicious lie by a white, Caucasian British, universally condemned among the world’s majority populations and even a substantial number of people within Britain itself war criminal British Prime Minister and a grotesquely sick cheerleading UK parliament. Never mind that a large section of the British public was against this UK and United States contrived and Zionist sponsored war whose principal beneficiaries of it are the multinational oil and gas corporations, a grasping, innately crooked and criminal Wall Street and the many financial and banking services that feed off it and sure enough the military industrial complex, with the usual kickbacks for services rendered to corrupt politicians involved on both sides of the Atlantic.

And I know from sources that Louise Mensch is every bit as enthusiastic about regime change in Syria as she was for it in Iraq mouthing the usual dishonest platitudes of which we’re all too familiar with and that come instinctively without any rational arguments to back these up from the likes of her while doggedly remaining both mute and deaf to the real concerns of the people of Bahrain, Yemen, Jordan, Morocco, Egypt and Bantu-Saudi among a list of others valiantly striving for despite UK, US and other western backed brutality, torture, beatings, incarceration and murder of genuinely peaceful protestors by their regime leaders against them for daring to request what the posh like David Cameron and privileged parliamentarians like Louise Mensch automatically take for granted.

But when all is said and done it must be remembered that these people aren’t white Caucasian and there in the mindset of individuals like David Cameron and Louise Mensch don’t belong to the perceived white Master Race that Louise Mensch (German isn’t it?) and her sort consider themselves to be an essential part of; so to them such people are trash and totally unfit to be called human beings and therefore the white Nazi, Master Race perception firmly held by these flowers of the human race trumps everything else enabling these prized specimens of humanity to do whatever they like with this unquestionably perceived in their warped minds detritus of human kind, in the full knowledge that they can rely on their race and skin colour to accord them as per normal the immunity they routinely count on and expectedly get from ever being persecuted or even made to be held responsible for their actions by the judicial arm of similarly likeminded scumbags that not only protect them but also proactively act on their behalf as and whenever necessary to do so.

I personally wouldn’t sully my conscience, which means a great deal to me and that I treat with the utmost respect, nor tarnish my hands with the blood of Louise Mensch or any other creature remotely like her for that would be analogous in my case to nonsensically climbing down into a putrid sewer of the most unpleasant kind to dispose of a verminous cockroach or two among the myriads of them that live and thrive there as to be blunt with you I don’t do sewers; even so I can well understand why there are those who’d want to fumigate and effectively eradicate the cockroaches of both houses of Britain’s parliament and frankly I admire their balls and reasons for wishing to do so.

Now I’m fully cognisant that such outspoken remarks by me will undoubtedly draw the fury of the ludicrously self-styled honourable members of the House of Commons where probity is in very short supply, almost to the point of being non-existent one can honest say, except in the case of three MPs that beyond doubt are worthy of that description all of them backbenchers for understandable reasons and quite evidently not on the take nor with their greedy snouts in the trough of public largesse unintentionally funded by the hard-pressed and austerity inflicted British taxpayers, criticisms that can equally and justifiably so be levelled at their lordships and ladyships in the upper house; but I don’t give a toss about their response or what they actually think about me as I’ve always spoken my mind on matters of importance to me and the society I live in, and shan’t in any way whatever the consequences are allow myself ever to be deterred from doing so.

For what’s being said needs to be said, and if it should turn out that I’m the only one in Britain with the guts not only to stand up and publicly say what needs to be said but also unyieldingly expose the lies, half truths, utter fabrications, sanctimonious cant and the perniciously inspired and hidden agenda of David Cameron and his legion of arrogant, egotistical cohorts in relation to the restrictions that they propose to impose on my freedom of expression on the internet or society generally for that matter, never mind yours as you’ll have to fight your own battles and frankly it’s high time that you got off your sedentary asses and did so, and resolutely challenge these infractions by every means at my disposal then so be it.

Scare tactics in the same way as attempts to emotionally blackmail or pressurize me into doing something that someone selfishly and unilaterally wants done regardless of what my concerns are on the matter as these weren’t canvassed nor would they have been taken into consideration routinely fall foul with me and always fail. Furthermore nothing or any living thing apart from myself scares me, and as for God he quit trying to condition how I think a long time ago with the two of us affably settling on a mutually compatible arrangement between us where he does his thing and I do mine and it works brilliantly. So neither you David Cameron, your corporate hoodlums, pusillanimous judiciary, fellow venal MPs nor anyone else for that matter who cares to jump on this iniquitous bandwagon that you’re fronting but clearly aren’t the brains behind, the latter evidently belongs to those lurking in the murky shadows that are pulling your chain, can ever hope to succeed with me in the way you’re going about it, and in these circumstances I shall basically ignore your puerile shenanigans and those of a rubber stamping parliament and carry on as I’ve always done. Don’t say you haven’t been warned!

I’ve been very fortunate indeed to have had throughout the formative years of my upbringing and well beyond some extraordinarily sagacious, tremendously informative, highly imaginative and essentially influential persons in my life that ranged from my parents, other close relatives and personal friends to my teachers, both at my primary and afterwards my secondary grammar school, the closely knit members of my church congregation, most notably my Anglican priest who knew me from babyhood and spiritually encouraged and was always there for me in my role as an altar server, church choir member and later in my adolescence as a Sunday School teacher, and who even now in his nineties is still going strong, remains naturally physically fit, unencumberingly mobile, entirely compos mentis, still travels widely as he’s always done, gets more dynamic as the years go by, and evidently takes a huge delight in chauffeuring me around the nostalgic places of my youth whenever in my rather busy work schedule I still manage to find the time to visit him and the cradle of my youthful and rather rewarding upbringing.

Is the consummate host that energetically inspires me spiritually as well as secularly, especially in political matters of which taking into consideration his longevity, wide-ranging experiences, social and political activism both as a Church of England priest and social reformer advocate and his undoubted genius he’s extremely well qualified to do, and with whom not unnaturally and quite fortunately I’m absolutely delighted to say I have an unqualified respect and constant admiration for as well as an abiding loyalty along with an unbroken and empathetic bond that not only stretches over several delightful decades of our friendship with each other but has also unshakably and immeasurably strengthened during that time.

Regrettably for me some of these people, all mentors of mine in one way or another, aren’t any longer in this world even though I know that if they were still physically around to do so they would gently chide me for entertaining the thought of what I see as the sad and terrible loss of them not being here, as all of these people were hugely but pragmatically religious individuals who believed in the sanctity of our earthy life and genuinely felt that we should honestly do our very best at all times to respect this as well as make the most of life itself while we’re here, but at the same time saw our earthly existence as a transient one, a transit station as it were on the way to what they earnestly believed was a much better and more rewarding life after death.

Convinced too that whether one succeeded in or missed out at accomplishing this assignment in life as they saw it depended solely on how they conducted their own life on earth and was a principal reason why God endowed each and everyone of us with our won individual brain to enable us to think for ourselves, doing so in concert with a conscience which we also have to assist us in determining for ourselves what’s right or wrong and furthermore how we deal with either when confronted with it, and most crucially what our response will be in the aftermath of that decision to the consequences that stem from it. Choices and consequences that are wholly our own regardless of whatever slant we might truthfully, conveniently or even dishonestly try to put on them and for which, whether we’re disposed to doing so or not, we’ll have to take full responsibility for eventually, if not in this life then undoubtedly in the next.

It’s why I’ve always scrupulously embarked on the moral precepts I was brought up with as a child and that throughout my life have persistently and prominently but objectively featured in everything I do; and this applies particularly to situations or people whom I feel I must either adversely or critically comment upon. For not once in my life have I irresponsibly lashed out or will I ever do so at someone or something simply out of revenge or because in behaving thus I hope to derive what in my honest view would be a puerile feeling of satisfaction from having acted in that way, far less demean my personal integrity or abuse my conscience by spitefully fabricating stories about persons or situations in order to push or advance some hidden agenda or other of my own, crave the limelight, or God forbid seek to make a name for myself.

To start with I’m an open book when it comes to the things that I passionately believe in or else utterly detest and the red lines that I wilfully draw in my personal sand are unmistakably clear, unambiguously delineated, perspicuous in the extreme and avowedly transparent for those with eyes and the mental capacity and perspicacity to distinguish this trend to unequivocally become fully knowledgeable of this fact; so I don’t gratify myself or will I ever do so by engineering in anyway hidden agendas that I don’t need to have since I don’t give a damn about what anyone outside of those who’re emotionally close to me or persons whose judgement or opinions I rate immensely think of or say about me, and that’s a situation that isn’t about to change voluntarily on my part or coercively through the actions or responses of others David Cameron and Co. So if what I write makes anyone ill at ease and the proverbial cap fits then they know what to do; and if that too creates a problem for them that’s just tough and their funeral not mine.

Tell it like it is has always been my resolute approach not only to journalism but also to every characteristic of my professional and private lives and the greater the transgression by someone or the injustice committed by them and either exposed by me or revealed in the public domain and categorically proven to be true the more caustic my condemnation of it will be. As a highly motivated, assured and academically committed student fortunate as were my peers throughout our time at the 18th Century established, prestigious and co-educational grammar school we all attended to have been allocated to classes that weren’t any greater than 14 in number; taught by specialist teachers who knew their subjects really well and were wholeheartedly devoted to our collective and individual academic excellence, I was likewise blessed by having as my English and Latin Master a man of enormous ability, immeasurable intellectual vigour, absolute probity and a remarkable skill at communicating with others.

Was a calm and attentive listener as well as a practised problem solver whose authoritative and dignified manner inspired and sustained a substantial belief in one’s self and capabilities; was a stickler for punctuality, reliability and civilized norms of behaviour; had an infinite love for his job; was enormously respected and deeply admired not only at our school but also in the wider community which we came from, and being the iconic but unassuming figure he was inevitably turned into the inspirational cultural guru and academic mentor to many of his charges, myself included, and someone to whom I shall forever be indebted. For profoundly conscious from the very outset of my huge interest in and immense love for English as he knew me from babyhood and was a contemporary of my parents as well as a particularly close friend of several principal members of my extended family, this colossus of a man and a unique human being to whom a vital part of my cultural, social and academic education was happily and auspiciously entrusted actively encouraged, sharpened and consolidated this passion of mine through his compellingly persuasive arguments, an altruistic devotion to me, and of course his inimitable expertise which was refreshingly uncomplicated, impeccably honest, always to the point, enliveningly amusing in its discourse and delivery, and in the consensual opinion then of all those who studied under him and still judged so several years later into our respective adulthood was second to none.

His name is Kenneth G. Doughlin and he personified in the most complete sense of its meaning the founding Latin motto of our school which is “Aliis Non Sibi”, whose English translation is “For others not ourselves”; a motto which in every respect not only proudly characterized the philosophy of our school but was also one that every pupil who was privileged to attend it was ardently encouraged to live by.

Armed with such moral fortitude it was a foregone conclusion therefore that those of us who were so assiduously exposed to these finer aspects of human nature would always in one way or another physically translate them into our daily lives, and consequently accounts for why it is that I shall always be on the side of the oppressed and voiceless with a personal and resolute assurance to fearlessly exposing and confronting injustice of any kind whenever and wherever I find it or whatever source, no matter how powerful or influential that might be, from which it stems. An unconditional commitment that buoyed by Mr Doughlin’s appreciative guidance has enabled me to fashion my own personal Latin motto that I determinedly stand by and which is: “Oderint dum metuant!” and whose literal meaning is, “Let them hate provided they fear!”

Likewise Mr Doughlin taught me that while an enlightened man will always seek to understand and possibly inculcate the truth of what at the very outset he didn’t grasp the ignoramus on the other hand promptly dismisses everything he’s unfamiliar with or that doesn’t tie in with his or her prejudices or utter stupidity; an acknowledgement that fits suitably and logically with the Zimbabwean proverb: “nhaka yemapenzi inodyiwa nevakangwara” (fools and their birthrite are soon parted) that I would later become familiar with and made the conscious decision to incorporate into my arsenal of persuasive arguments to deploy as and when apposite in my dealings with my fellow man.

However the maxim to be constantly true to one’s self has always from my childhood been a cardinal principal in my life and one I shan’t ever stray from, and like those who earnestly hold the belief and say that if God is for you what does it matter who’s against you my challenge to the world is this, as long as my conscience is clear it’s an irrelevance of the highest order what my critics may adversely think, say about or endeavour to do in relation to myself, as frankly I don’t give a damn. And were they to sensibly acknowledge this and start behaving like rational human beings if indeed they’re ever capable of acting as such would, in my opinion, save a lot of wasted energy on their part, since gratuitous criticism of me is basically like water falling of a duck’s back; that said; that said and the democrat that I am such persons are perfectly entitled to be fools if they want to be.

It was inevitable that like Mr Doughlin’s my life notwithstanding an intense willingness by me to explore other professions and garner experiences from them and other ways of life, which I cheerfully did, would substantially be an academic one with English in its multifaceted forms a prominent part of that decision; one that in combination with those practical and psychological teaching applications I’d devised on my own incorporated also much of what I’d acquired from Mr Doughlin and that throughout my academic career has stood me in good stead. And among the several important things that Mr Doughlin taught me and which still greatly influence my life four of them continue to be firm favourites of mine.

Maximize your vocabulary Mr Doughlin always told me and never use the same adjective or adverb more than once in any piece of work unless it’s a totally unavoidable; be descriptive, clear, informative and interesting in what you write or say so that if someone a thousand years later were to come across your writing he or she wouldn’t have any difficulty at all reliving the situations that you described as if they were themselves contemporaneously present when these occurred; and knowing of my keen interest in journalism even at that tender age I was advised to always do my own research, factually check out all information either given to me or which came to hand from other sources, and once convinced of the veracity of this and the rightness of what I was doing to publish and be damned. Finally he counselled me that there was no such things as good or bad English, just English that was either appropriate or inappropriate.

A warm, evocative and instinctive smile always explodes and radiates liberally across my face just as the evident humour but undoubted seriousness of the exposition of what they’re told has never been lost on my students whenever a recollection of Mr Doughlin’s celebrated remark is either personally remembered or else employed by me as a teaching incentive. No good or bad English just an apt or inapt form of the language? How come? Mr Doughlin’s exposition of his remark was typically humorous as it was elucidatory.

You wouldn’t he said stand up at a party given in honour of your parents’ wedding anniversary or at the reception celebrating your sister’s nuptials and in ether or both of these cases entertain the assembled guests with a ribald commentary on those whom you’re supposedly revering and punctuated by choice four letter words would you, he asked rhetorically. Neither would you if you were engaged in a spot of Do It Yourself (DIY) he propositioned, and unfortunately in the process missed the nail you were meant to be hammering into the plank of wood which you’re securing and instead brought the hammer forcibly and painfully down on your fingers react by civilly saying, “Oh dear me what a silly thing I’ve done!” In both these instances Mr Doughlin emphasized the words used were inappropriate to as well as futile as regards the circumstances in which they were utilized.

As I’d expected of him Mr Doughlin had consummately made his point which I instantly and completely accepted with no supplementary explanation required then or subsequently, except to fully acknowledge that this truism of his inevitably became the benchmark of all my writing and will remain so, employing the English language imaginatively, descriptively and succinctly as and when required to its full effect while conscientiously eschewing the pitfalls and bogus blandishments of rank mediocrity, of which there’s plenty of it about, openly masquerading itself as creative genius.

But in the UK it isn’t only in the literary field that those who’re committed to excellence must unhappily witness the disquieting, illogical and persistent trend of the recurrent dumbing down of ability only to have it absurdly replaced by a mindless and enfeebling mediocrity which then becomes the yardstick that everyone, whether they want to or not, must unquestioningly settle for. The British educational system has suffered massively because of this and in tandem with the pernicious and commonplace culture of enforced homogeneity cultivated in its Petri-dish of political correctness and that viral-like has been let loose on the rest of us, dictates that no pupil should fail; that selection instituted on competition and natural ability is not only immoral and physically disruptive to developing minds but emotionally divisive and damaging too, as is the entire notion of success based principally on meritocracy and the traditional work ethic that are themselves also antagonistically seen and attacked as passé.

Politicians, bankers and the corporate media are likewise in the forefront of this reprehensible mindset with its in-built criminal dimensions of dishonesty, corruption, wanting something for doing absolutely nothing; venal nature, not accepting responsibility for one’s transgressions but instead always willing to falsely accuse others for the undeniable blameworthiness of those that are casting the stones of accusation at while laying the groundwork for the castigation of those they maliciously and intentionally decided to vilify, just as they industriously create the culture of persecution where the innocent are the ones burdensomely placed under suspicion, unjustly have even the most private details of their personal lives routinely and rigorously subjected to the most invidious scrutiny by the guilty ones who unsurprisingly exempt themselves from this and all speciously done under the pretext of national security and the protection of the ordinary citizen when it’s nothing of the sort but has everything to do with an irrational fixation to wield power in all of its forms and exert unchallenged control over other peoples’ lives.

Without doubt these are the concerted actions of psychologically unbalanced, extremely selfish and therefore highly dangerous persons with just a nodding and involuntary acquaintanceship with adulthood solely because of the progression from infancy to physical maturity if one lives long enough that Mother Nature predestines for those of us who’re lucky enough to get that far, but who in essence are nothing more than puerile and self-centred individuals with the mindset and savage propensity of feral kids permanently trapped in the bodies of immature adults and with no discernible recognition whatever of what’s actually right or wrong or any conceivable possibility of ever of rectifying this gross inadequacy.

How else could western governments, including our own British one, while publicly and self-righteously espousing the cardinal principles of democracy and human rights for all never the less unlawfully invade, occupy and with total impunity horrendously massacre the citizens of sovereign independent countries that posed no threat to them simply to impose their hegemonic domination over them and plunger their natural resources; then buoyed up the easy success of these murderous ventures of theirs equally illegally and just as cruelly embark on brutal regime change in others for identical reasons? But for all that and notwithstanding their unquestionable criminal actions miserably fail to grasp the implausibility and moral dishonesty of them never the less sequestering the moral high ground, liberally passing themselves off as the epitome of rectitude and cloaking themselves piously in the vestments of 21st century paragons of virtue.

How dare the BBC with a well documented history, long established and unenviable record of fabricating and falsifying news stories, making the news rather than reporting it in other words, use our licence fee that we Brits on pain of prosecution, conviction and imprisonment should any of us take the moral position and refuse because of the BBC’s unprofessional and criminal conduct to pay it, to promote the Zionist agenda of settler, apartheid Israel, that of the US and European neo-cons and additionally act as the exuberant cheerleader of the United States, UK and NATO’s imperialist and white supremacist wars conducted incessantly in the global south, and in these roles behaving with the kind of reckless arrogance and premeditated dishonesty as was recently, unmistakably and notoriously exposed in just one of it many exemplification?

This was when it knowingly, wilfully and fraudulently took Marco Di Lauro’s photos of serial rows of pre-internment bodies from the Iraq War, publicized them with the explicit suggesting narrative in its news bulletins and on the internet that these were the corpses of innocent Syrian civilians massacred in their droves in Houla, Syria by an alleged out of control and murderous Syrian regime. This despite the fact that the BB knew full well where these photos originated from, that they had absolutely nothing to do with Syria let alone Houla and being the toadying mouthpiece of the British government, our elite establishments and like the rest of the British and western corporate media plays a similar role for the evil axis of Euro-Israeli-Transatlantic neo-con Zionism was party to and consequently well aware that the Houla massacre was a co-ordinated US, UK and France enterprise that was implemented by foreign death squads trained by these three aforesaid countries and placed on the payroll of Bantu-Saudi, Qatar and Kuwait.

The principal objectives being to destabilize Syria, terrorize its citizens into turning against the Assad government thus further facilitating that goal, and using the propaganda of contemptible  media like the BBC, Sky, CNN, Fox, France 24, al-Jazeera and the rest of them to publicly and dishonestly vilify the Syrian government for acts of atrocities it had nothing to do with in order as we witnessed in the run up to the second Iraq war soften up and dupe western public opinion into believing that the Bashar al-Assad government was an odious monster that had lost all its credibility to run Syria and rule the Syrian people and must therefore be removed at all cost and by any means possible, conveniently omitting to say that the true agenda all along of those wanting to get rid of Bashar al-Assad who unwaveringly refuses to become a compliant puppet of the west as virtually every other western imposed ruler in the Arab world is, is to pave the way for illegal regime change in Syria that the west and Israel for hegemonic and geo-political reasons have wanted all along. So the BBC being the consummate liar which it is was up to its usual dirty tricks once more.

Reality or commonsense for that matter clearly don’t feature in any analysis by the BBC which in what passes for such is always propagandistic, subjective and warmongering, and were this sick, decrepit and past its sell by date thoroughly has-been with the morals of a fetid septic tank and the imagination of a lavatory brush to take even the most hurried look at itself in the mirror it would quickly see with striking clarity what a loathsome corporate creature it really is that in fairness to us licence fee payers and in charitable humanity to itself and those that work for it is only fit for one thing, the knackers’ yard; but survives this ignominy because it acts as a useful tool for whichever British government is happens to be in power at the time.

Meanwhile the banks having hit on the opportune and highly profitable wheeze that they’re too big and important to fail and that they’ve since ruthlessly and relentlessly pushed to convince a financially distressed public while collaboratively co-opting our corrupt, venal government and MPs to ably assist their criminal enterprise, jointly with their legislative bedfellows heartlessly continue to take us to the cleaners knowing as they do so that there’s absolutely nothing we can do about it since the financial, political and even the judicial cards, as nobody that can it seems would ever consider let alone try to prosecute them for their criminality, are all stacked in their favour. And while austerity measures engineered by the reckless irresponsibility and criminal conduct of these bankers bite harshly forcing the hapless victims that had absolutely nothing to do with the dire circumstances they’re now ominously faced with and acutely affect their lives, the bankers using our government as a willing soft touch and handy cash machine increasingly demand more and more expensive bailouts that they quickly get without having to furnish any obligation or give specific assurances they’ll change their ways and start behaving responsibly. Taxpayers’ money by the way that quite absurdly through the massive bonus schemes that the banking fraternity carries on with to reward itself in spite of the economic health of the country is nothing short of a scandalous recipe for rewarding failure, rampant greed and criminality.

But like dutiful children inescapably saddled with the controlling disposition of compulsively domineering parents that exploit the bogeyman of fear to terrorize their progeny and keep them firmly in control the British public and its western equivalent are equally the intentional quarry of the unscrupulous machinations of government agencies and think tanks covertly working in partnership with the governments that we elect to similarly manipulate how we think and react, especially to those situations they devise or otherwise have an immense interest in themselves. And they do this while at the same time creating an enormously advantageous but all the same a fictional world that is used to subvert the actual occurrences of the real one and in its place is then paraded as though it was, depriving in the process, through this concerted and duplicitous exercise of influence and control, the vast majority of the public from ever knowing the truth of what our governments and their official agencies are really up to; how they perfidiously betray the trust that the general public confidently but somewhat naively puts in them; and callously refuses that same body of men and women the possibility to become truly sentient, independent thinking and discerning individuals able to make objective and sensible assessments relative to their own lives based on reliable information, rational deductions, sound judgement and most importantly facts.

Facts that the political and even the judicial authorities on both sides of the Atlantic would prefer to stay out of the public domain by keeping them secret, and as such do everything in their power, including breaking the law when it either proves awkward or too problematic to legitimately evade or change, to guarantee that is the case. And all the talk by these people and their feigned concern about protecting and preserving our national security interests is just a load of disingenuous hogwash and amounts to nothing more on their part than an utterly selfish shameless and self-indulgent determination characterized in a culture of inveterate wrongdoing by a chronic mania for secrecy to permanently hide from the public the accumulated criminal transgressions, lies, privately expressed disdain for the public itself and its wellbeing, excessive greed, financial irregularities, culpable dishonesty, personal malfeasance, political chicaneries and even the sordid infidelities of those who rule us and their privileged allies among the rich and powerful.

Having become an adult I still vividly remember from my Sunday school days as a child our classes being exhorted by our popular parish priest not to metaphorically conduct our lives ever as though they were whitened sepulchres on the outside but inside full of dead men’s bones; a reference that was all too clear bearing in mind the deeply but pragmatically closely integrated religious community that we all belonged to, where secrets would be most difficult to maintain for long anyway and hypocrisy was not only universally frowned upon but also mercilessly but all the same good-humouredly lampooned. I’ve mentioned this because it’s exactly how I feel about those who comprise the so-called establishment elites that control our country, de facto our lives, and egotistically believe they have an omnipotent right to do so; sentiments shared by their counterparts in Europe, North America and the white Caucasian satellites globally, for they are indeed in every respect of their lives and actions whitened sepulchres with dead men’s bones deeply entombed inside of them.

A very chilling and classic example of this is the United States’ intimate relationship with the largely Bantu-Saudi, Wahabi and salafist constituent al-Qaida army in its dealings with the US that is physically similar in structure but obviously not in its moral dimensions or applications to the role played by the Switzers at the Vatican or the Ghurkhas in the British Army, outsiders in other words with a pledged loyalty to their respective creator and manager. And the United States not only created al-Qaida, it has managed it all along and still does so. Used by the US against the Soviets in Afghanistan the United States has since deployed al-Qaida as far afield as Chechnya, Kosovo, Afghanistan once again, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia and East Africa generally, the Caucasus, Libya, Nigeria, inside the United States itself, notoriously so in the 9/11 attack in New York, and of course currently in Syria.

Effectively al-Qaida is a covert official arm of the United States’ Administration that’s directly answerable only to it and controlled solely by means of executive power, and in its operations is as indivisible a US agency as the CIA is with the principal differences that the CIA is duly constituted through the US’s political, Congress for example, and judicial systems, is publicly known about and universally acknowledged at home and abroad as a crucial and integral part of the United States’ intelligence services which is part of its remit, and officially at any rate is supposedly subject to political and constitutional oversight. This most definitely is not the case with al-Qaida however, which although similarly steeped in the same black arts as the CIA and with carte blanche to carry out its murderous global atrocities at the behest of the United States is never the less free from all democratic scrutiny, as it exits in that nice and rather comfortable environment that US politicians and TV talking heads, otherwise known as so-called pundits, pompously and conceitedly refer to as official deniability.

And that’s precisely what it is, for while the United States disingenuously continues to publicly fulminate about al-Qaida being a terrorist organization, which by the way it evidently is but it’s the same United States that specifically created it as such, ranks it as Public Enemy No.1 and vows to destroy it whatever it takes to accomplish this, this tsunami of hot air emanating from Washington is nothing more than insidious propaganda of the worst kind, since al-Qaida serves two key roles for the United States which that country has no intention of ever dismantling. For on the one hand al-Qaida is a major plank in the United States’ Zionist-directed foreign policy, if indeed one can dare dignify it with such a label, of global hegemonic control particularly in the Middle East and Asia and the geo-political consequences associated with this. While on the other hand the United States and al-Qaida connivingly but oh so ingeniously play the good cop, bad cop routine where al-Qaida assumes the role of bad cop and cheerfully allows itself to be viciously maligned by the US as a bloodthirsty, terroristic beast and the Devil incarnate.

It’s a ploy and a highly successful one too that terrorizes the vast majority of the US public into a state of perpetual fear bordering on mass hysteria and whereby the US Administration can do whatever it likes with its citizens, and unhesitatingly does so, to limit their constitutional rights and freedoms all the better to implement its own hidden and illiberal agenda effectively turning the country into an intolerant, fascist, police state far removed from what the Founding Fathers envisaged that it would be.

This is not a mindset however that’s peculiar to the United States’ authorities even though they and their country are in the driving seat where this kind of attitude is concerned but can also be found all over Europe most notably in the UK, which is the most paranoid, security-fixated and CCTV intrusive county in the world with our lawmakers who unreservedly support these kinds of oppressive and undemocratic measures as a means of governing us being themselves among the worst corrupt offenders and criminally disposed individuals breathing God’s wholesome air that one could find anywhere. Therefore, the Communications Data Bill and the Enterprise and Regulatory one going through parliament don’t surprise me in the least, far less so would the prospect of them becoming law. Clearly these people have a great deal to hide and as such will do their damndest to protect their heinous crimes.

Consequently, while reprehensible war criminals like Tony Blair, Donald Rumsfeld, Madeleine Albright, Dick Cheney and the perniciously odious and obsequious, political and judicial goons in Sweden for example walk free and are amply rewarded for their calculated and multifaceted crimes against humanity, those brave individuals like Julian Assange and other whistleblowers who’re prepared at great risk to life and limb to put their heads above the parapet and expose these wrongdoings must be vilified and viciously made examples of. For let’s not kid ourselves these raft of actual and proposed legislations deceitfully marketed as indispensable measures to protect ordinary members of the public aren’t anything of the sort and are basically a criminal’s charter to protect the criminality of the rich and shameless and on a personal level I shan’t ever accept this no matter how many laws you and your parliamentary racketeers pass on the subject David Cameron. And you don’t have to monitor my communications to find that out, since I’m not afraid to openly tell the lot of you so.

In addition with Syria your very latest target and presently under the cosh of the United States, Britain and France’s hegemonic designs in the Middle East and this trio of countries professed Christian ones in the bargain, I’d like to draw the attention of their leadership to Saul’s biblical journey to Damascus equally with murder and mayhem also in mind. He commendably though underwent a spiritual conversion we’re told on the road to Damascus and the rest as we say is history. Realistically, I don’t expect a spiritual or any other conversion from those of you who call yourselves Christian and as far as your savage Arab puppets are concerned it’s my definite opinion they’re well beyond redemption of any kind, but miracles do happen as the subsequent life of Saint Paul, erstwhile Saul, testifies.

Happy birthday USA on this 4th July 2012; an important date that we both share as it’s also my birthday, but regrettably that’s all that we have in common with each other.