By Stanley Collymore
Henry II the Plantagenet King of England who didn’t at all mind changing the goalposts to suit his political whims, other self-absorbed interests and even figuratively cut his nose off to spite his face, quite analogous really in his grandstanding antics to most if not all of today’s current batch of western politicians and is proof positive, if any was ever required, that centuries later those in the west who run the show evidently don’t have the capacity to learn from the past or even game-changing experiences, famously in one of his outbursts when the powerful Roman Catholic, Britain wasn’t protestant then, had the audacity to oppose him, obviously incapable of waging war on the Holy See as he was, decided instead to find expression for his palpable anger on his less formidable but none the less still very much a prickly thorn in his royal side English Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket with these words: who will rid me of this turbulent priest?
With no shortage of accomplices prepared to demonstrate their loyalty and curry favour with their absolute monarch Henry II knew that he could and would eventually get his wish without having personally orchestrate his doomed Archbishop’s death, soil his hands with the prelate’s blood, and could arguably deny and plausibly insist that culpability for both of these incidents wasn’t actually his, making him historically and undoubtedly one of the earliest recorded, best known and highly successful spin doctors of all time; so with that very much in mind I’d like to thought-provokingly borrow the clothes, if only temporarily so, of this master tactician; to paraphrase his immortal words and hypothetically apply them to our current political situation of comparable alliances which correspondingly has its own toxic mix of religious components to deal with.
On Thursday 12 May 2011 a German court in the spotlight of domestic and the international media coverage convicted and sentenced to five years in jail suspended pending an appeal the conveniently stripped of his US citizenship, 91 years old, Ukrainian born John Demjanjuk of being an accessory to the calculated murder of 28,000 Jews who it was said during the court trial were killed in one of Poland’s notorious Second World War death camps where claimed the state prosecutor Demjanjuk was a camp guard who worked at the time for the German SS; a claim that the defendant has always robustly denied. John Demjanjuk it was also revealed in court was captured by the Germans and given by them an either or option, very reminiscent of George W. Bush’s post 9/11 threat “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists”, to join the SS or else lose his life. Disingenuously the prosecution went on to say that Mr Demjanjuk chose to join the SS when he could have refused to do so.
Really? How many people confronted with the same ultimatum by the ruthless killer machine that was Nazi Germany’s government, its various state organs and those correspondingly of its Europe-wide allies whether these were open in their support like France, Italy, Spain, the Baltic countries, Greece, Belgium, Denmark, Croatia and Norway, from where Vidkum Quisling: the prominent Norwegian politician infamously though involuntarily I would suspect has eternally conferred his name to the English language as the archetypal Nazi collaborator, among others, or covert partners like Sweden, Holland, the Vatican and Eire would have chosen death to life?
When Pakistan: a nuclear armed country with a population of 180 million people was given a similar ultimatum post 9/11 by the United States that threatened to obliterate it if it didn’t opt to throw in its lot with that country in its farcical war on terror, what do you imagine Pakistan did and is still continuing to do against the majority wish of its own people, who have more guts than its sycophantic, avaricious, endemically corrupt and cowardly governments it seems, and the compromising integrity of its sovereignty and independence? Importantly and without the benefit of hindsight what would you have done if you were placed in the invidious position that John Demjanjuk found himself? And please let’s not expediently forget in the intentionally contrived fog of post-war revisionism that there were several Jewish and Mischlinge: those of mixed Jewish and Gentile origins, collaborators as well; so it’s quite easy to be highly critical and somewhat sanctimonious after the event especially if you didn’t have to make that difficult choice yourself or one similar to it.
But most tellingly in this court case juxtaposed with the irony of where it actually took place, since Germany was the protagonist as well as the progenitor and principal perpetrator of the European holocaust which wasn’t its first in the 20th Century, as it had carried out a previous one in its South West Africa colony now independent Namibia less than two decades prior to the much commemorated European one during which the Witbooi and other Namibian people were completely eradicated (please Google Shark Island and Germany’s First Holocaust) but no compensation paid and no one brought to book and everything evil which emanated from these holocausts was Germany’s sole liability, was notably the novel indictment with which John Demjanjuk was arraigned; namely that his mere presence at a concentration camp that was run by the Nazis in whose employ he allegedly was, and arguably involuntarily so since the prosecution provided no credible evidence to prove otherwise, rendered him an accessory to mass murder.
Now if that is lawfully right, acceptable and 66 years after the war’s end a prosecutable offence with which to clobber John Demjanjuk what does this German prosecutors and his officials, I’d like to know, have to say about the entirely voluntary conduct of their government and those of several other EU countries including the United Kingdom’s which were deeply complicit in the highly illegal, morally indefensible and racially motivated, US instigated and instituted practice of what together they unconscionably and euphemistically described as extraordinary rendition attendant with its extensive torture, other well documented, serious human rights violations and premeditated, cold-blooded murders? Will we now, following this landmark court precedent by the Germans, see comparable prosecutions in the EU, United States and elsewhere where these crimes took place to that of John Demjanjuk of those who are culpable as accessories after the fact; and if not why not? I would really like to give you the benefit of the doubt Mr Eric Holder and say that like me you’re an intelligent man, but the key difference between us and one that I hold most dear is that I have a strong and unalterable moral compass, something that is patently alien to you, which as a chief law officer is a major job handicap I’d say.
I’m also pretty aware that the White House, 10 Downing Street, and the BBC among others are following my articles on Twitter, and although it might be rather challenging if not completely impossible for them to escape the destructible mindset into which they’ve evidently and rather immaturely ensconced themselves and take regard of some if not all of the things I’ve written I would expect as the very minimum, since I haven’t the slightest intention of compromising my principles by trying to act or write in a way which is completely alien to my nature or have fear of anyone who is human like me and breathes like I do, that they take the opportunity afforded them by following me to at least improve their level of English.
As a child it was cordially impressed upon me by those who raised and mentored me that my life would be fundamentally meaningless unless there is something for which I’m prepared to die or kill for and in my puberty at grammar school I was first introduced to and progressively became intimately familiar with the life and work of the German reformer Martin Luther and the spirited and fearless response he made to his inquisitors at the Diet of Worms, which had an immediate and profound effect on my own young life that has stayed with me throughout the subsequent years of leaving that academic institution; so nothing fazes me, since I live each day to the full and as if it were my last alive, and whatever you or anyone else for that matter who I don’t know or care for might think of me is quite frankly an irrelevance to me, so don’t ever expect me to shut up because someone either irrationally or subjectively and without any logical reasoning imagines or even worst still believes that I should turn a blind eye to what’s actually going on or submissively and sycophantically deliver either or both of my cheeks for chastisement in order to curry favour with those who exercise great power and routinely abuse it; that’s never likely to happen with me under any circumstance, since I firmly believe in the intrinsic philosophy that if you can’t stand the retaliation then you oughtn’t to have been in the fight which you started in the first place.
But of course there are those who are remarkably good at operating their double standards and dishing out with customary impunity their innumerable injustices to other people from honey-trapping them using their puppet media to hound and vilify their character on trumped up sex charges as is the case with Julian Assange and their compliant courts, employing the façade of judicial probity and impartiality, to finish the job off of forever blackening their victim’s name while incarcerating them at the same time in the blaze of media publicity, to regime change and naturally extrajudicial murder, arrogantly playing God with other peoples’ lives.
However, when some courageous soul has got the balls to stand up to and fearlessly challenge these oafish brutish thugs, for that’s what they are, suggesting for instance that the same tactics of summary, extrajudicial killings should be similarly used against them, their families, fellow conspirators and their relatives then all hell breaks loose from these said morons against those advocating for them a taste of their own medicine, and who furthermore are instantly branded and demonized as terrorists, an appellation that they, the real terrorists, would never append to themselves, of course, for doing precisely the same things; and when actually cornered most cowardly behave like the big girls’ blouses that they are. So brand me a terrorist if you want to, frankly I don’t give a shit as I’m not; but as someone who despises with a consummate passion all practices of double standards and hypocrisy, especially when applied for unwarranted and personal gain as we’re currently witnessing in Libya, then I firmly and honestly believe where these thugs are concerned in the dog eat dog precept of what’s good for Peter is also good and possibly infinitely better for Paul. Now where do you stand on this issue if you’ve got the guts to take a stance that is?
Libya is presently under a full-scale, racist and barbaric NATO assault with all the imperialistic savagery that these born again, western colonialists that are waging war against it can assemble and is haughtily doing so with the sycophantic backing of a neutered UN Security Council that is nominally headed by a witless and spineless rickshaw Charlie who despite not being Chinese epitomizes all the stereotypical characteristics of the fawning, ever pleasing coolie figure in the fittingly appropriate American television series Bonanza. Quite willing to denounce all the ills, real or imaginary, of Colonel Gaddafi this slant-eyed and evidently visually impaired oriental imbecile is nevertheless unable to detect let alone recognize or do anything constructive about the much worst atrocities which ritualistically are being perpetrated by the regimes of Bahrain, Yemen, Qatar and the throng of other abominable, despotic Persian Gulf sheikdoms instigated by, savagely orchestrated at the command of, and handsomely paid for by the Satan of them all Saudi Arabia: that bastion of modern enlightenment, women’s emancipation, universal human rights and progressive liberal democracy. Augment that with the absolute impunity with which Israel: the only country in the world and pampered enfant terrible at the UN, is unquestioningly accepted as such yet has no domestic or internationally acknowledged borders that in itself is a flagrant contravention of United Nations membership rules; which sees no requirement to have any as it overbearingly carries on against the nauseating and unsympathetic backdrop of western applause and undisguised encouragement for its incessant land grab as it increasingly gobbles up yet more Palestinian land for its own Nazi equivalent of Lebensraum, is not a worthy spectacle to observe, or a redeeming one either for arrogant, complicit western states that endlessly from their political soapboxes spout their fake ethical values to the rest of us.
I don’t know the circumstances under which Mr John Demjanjuk was allowed into the United States and granted US citizenship but it’s a safe bet that he would have found it much easier to have achieved these ambitions than any Haitian, other black Caribbean person or most Latinos would have done then and now; for even though the US like its near neighbour Canada and the Antipodean outposts Australia and New Zealand has intentionally decimated through genocide its indigenous population and has ruthlessly ensured that the dominant one to replace it is white Caucasian, it nevertheless like every other state in the white Diaspora countries worldwide can not resist the infernally obsessive and endemic racism with which they’re individually and collectively imbued to base their immigration policies almost entirely on skin colour rather than human worth, talent, the real possibility of that person making a genuine and valuable contribution to their prospective adoptive country or simply ethical considerations.
So it’s a no-brainer that while whites will always be given unwarranted preference to emigrate to these countries and especially those like the United States that have brutally stolen the lands of others in order to compulsorily maintain their white demographic advantage, non-whites on the other hand will always find themselves having to jump through a number of inequitable and calculatingly engineered hoops, as if they were dogs on show at a Cruffs event, to weed out the mass of them and facilitate a process where only the most acquiescent ones or those who aren’t perceived as a threat to the established white status and culture: this despite the fact that there’s no such thing as a homogenous white culture that embraces all Caucasians and far less so in the United States of all places, are let in; but the clear-cut message that is being sent out when such decisions are taken is that skin colour and white, clan loyalty takes precedence over everything else. How else would John Demjanjuk, a white man, have been allowed into the US in the first place, or Kurt Waldheim another Nazi killer have become UN Secretary General: a post which no one can assume without US say so, acquire that job?
This however is a state of affairs that has a long and established pedigree in the case of the US; for despite the much hyped and often referred to as a landmark in the commendable progress of international law show trials which took place in Nuremburg post World War Two those Nazis who were showcased and summarily dealt with were essentially in the scheme of things merely small fry, as the really big fish were intentionally allowed to get away scot-free and not only by the United States and UK but also the Soviet Union and France. Germany’s scientists moreover were the very first to develop nuclear bomb technology and were literally light years to the fore of this type of expertise long before scientists working in the world’s other developed countries even knew of or would have readily understood what it was all about, but the major reason that Nazi Germany didn’t develop, test explode or utilize the first atomic bomb which it quite easily could have done was that Adolf Hitler, maligned as he was by the allies, was a firm believer in conventional warfare, was very lukewarm towards and ultimately much opposed to the concept of nuclear warfare, particularly against opponents who didn’t have similar capabilities; a moral compass which the United States undoubtedly didn’t have when it dropped its atomic payloads on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and, from all perceptible accounts in 2011, still doesn’t have; sonst wurde Deutsch bestimmt und nicht Englisch das Lingua Franca der Welt gewesen haben wenn der Fuehrer Adolf Hitler nicht so im Gegensatz zu dieser Art waere.
However, at the climax to the end of the war with knowledge of this German breakthrough and its vital importance having come to light among the allies, and furthermore with many German scientists fully cognisant in which direction the wind was decidedly blowing and their lives and careers ought to and would eventually follow were they to play their cards right, having chosen to abandon their sinking Nazi ship and search for refuge wherever they could find it could only observe with uninhibited delight as the principal war allies scrambled among themselves to get their hands on as many of them and their expertise as they possibly could. And this they readily did in the fully aware that they had a captive audience as it were, and one that given the choice of being sentenced to lengthy jail sentences, possibly even being executed, or working for their potential new bosses naturally and quite enthusiastically opted for the latter; so the genesis and development of the American, British, Russian and French nuclear weapons programmes, their atomic and nuclear bombs evolution as well as the rocket and space exploration progression of these countries , and most conspicuously that of NASA since it was the Germans that also had a monopoly in these important fields of modern transformational, scientific advancement, owe everything to German Nazi knowhow.
But Nazi scientists to one side the United States both physically and financially facilitated the extensive relocation of scores of thousands of notorious, high status as well as many ordinary but none the less extremely dangerous and murderous Nazis from right across Europe to safe havens in South and Central America and several Caribbean territories like Puerto Rica, Cuba and the Dominican Republic that apart from Puerto Rica which is an American colony were at the time fundamentally weak, willing and obsequious countries totally under the control of the United States of America. Moreover, the US also arm-twisted the then UK Labour government of Clement Attlee presiding over a war fatigued and financially bankrupt Britain to physically take in and integrate within its territory some 100,000 known Ukrainian and other Waffen SS killers and their families from Eastern Europe on the incredible pretext that these people who were purported to be rabidly anti-communist would be most helpful to the US, which despite the harsh privations that had been personally experienced in a recently waged global war and were still quite fresh in the memories of every Briton and millions of other people around the world this lunatic country, the United States of America, nevertheless still recklessly wanted to plunge them into another unnecessary catastrophe by contemplating going to war with the Soviet Union: a country that posed no threat to the US, was a valuable and trustworthy ally in the war against Nazism, which had lost over 26 million of its citizens doing so and in helping to defeat Nazism and fascism, and without whose immeasurable contribution the outcome of World War II would have been immensely different.
Even the white-controlled, criminal lineage and backwater state of Australia wasted no time at all in getting in on the same act of liberating these vile European Nazi killers, their immediate relatives and even members of their extended families readily offering resettlement to them in that massive, stolen, antipodean land that was itself a locale and antecedent of its own cultural holocaust and widespread racial genocide through a well-orchestrated and exclusively Europe wide conducted recruitment campaign, even before the last bullet of World War II was fired, that most obscenely and quite insensitively to everyone who’d made a stance against Nazism and fascism and had even rendered the ultimate sacrifice with their lives in doing so, insisted most categorically that all prospective immigrants to Australia must be Caucasian and Aryan, that could quite easily have been a publicity blurb for Europe based Nazis themselves. Which prompts the logical question, with an entrenched and utterly repulsive mindset by whites such as these why on earth was World War Two with its multi-ethnic contributors ever mooted let alone conducted in the first place?
Another group of criminal offenders in this interminable saga are those who pre-war lived side by side in harmony with Jews, were either related to them by blood or marriage and invariably had very close relationships varying from personal friendships to work ties with them but who had no compunction whatsoever when the herd instinct, to which like Pavlov’s dogs they were all conditioned to, kicked in of roundly betraying these people, effortlessly informing on them, and colluding with the Nazi authorities in which ever country they were located in, in turning these selected victims into suitable grist for the Nazi extermination machine; then the moment the tide of fortune changed , the writing was on the wall and the war they supported was about to be lost easily stole the identities of those whom they’d callously sacrificed and knew quite well but with personal survival and non-detection of their infamy very much the priority now of these treacherous scumbags whose earnest wish was to be as far away as possible from the scenes of their crimes, saw many of them turning up in Canada and the US which went out of their way to embrace these fictitious Jews, all too eager to tell their harrowing but nauseatingly fabricated experiences and personal stories of their horrible treatment at the hands of the Nazis.
Those from among them who haven’t succumbed to the ravages of old age and died still live in these two countries with their children, grandchildren and other offspring, and though it’s fairly safe to surmise that they can never tell the truth and publicly reveal who or what they really are or would they want to, such is the monstrous nature of their betrayals and unpardonable crimes, their fraudulent lives of make belief and the odium that open exposure would justifiably inflict on them, they’re still diehard Nazis at heart although they’re most careful to masquerade these sentiments under the entirely acceptable appellation of fervent Zionism. Just ask yourselves, if Senator John Kerry’s parent,: European immigrants to the United States, can ostensibly change their entire persona from being allegedly Jewish to Christian without him or anyone else ever knowing about this until it leaked out decades later, what else did they get up to in their actual as apart from their supposed homeland; and who exactly are they? Which rather confirms the old English adage of never be too willing to judge a book by its cover or for that matter take a morphed Jew, Christian or Zionist at face value.
The sickening immorality and deeply appalling injustice of these people acquiring, able to and in many instances knowingly being allowed to keep their UK, Canadian, US and other foreign citizenship standing with its respective civil and human rights privileges coupled with the stark realization that those pariah entities, specifically Nazi Germany, its World War Two allies and covert supporters, whose witless barbarity created and nurtured the ideal environment for these wicked shenanigans to have started in the first place and were thus able to flourish unchecked thereafter alongside that of those who are culpably responsible for giving these people succour, shelter and refuge aside, the shameless moving of the goalposts in the middle of the proverbial game to suit the expedient ends of criminal minds hiding conveniently behind the smokescreen of legal precepts isn’t only outrageous but utterly repugnant as well.
Now that Germany through its court system and with the unquestionable backing of its western friends has ruled that John Demjanjuk is an accessory after the fact of mass murder because of where he’s alleged to have been, at a German Nazi run Polish death camp, when these murders took place are we now going to see this same principle of law which has successfully convicted John Demjanjuk for crimes committed more than sixty six years ago also applied with the same persistence, resolve and utter ruthlessness, in the pursuit of justice and not revenge naturally, to the perpetrators of much more recent and even worst human rights violations and atrocities that have been committed than those that took place in Poland and where the prospective defendants weren’t only major accessories after the facts of these specific crimes but were actually also the masterminds and controllers of them?
In truth it would take up enormous man hours and reams of paper to tabulate these in full and properly do justice to them, so instead I shall do a précis of some of the most heinous of these offences and invite you to draw your own conclusions accordingly.
MASS MURDERS INC:
1. Henry Kissinger’s Operation Condor campaign is which scores of thousands of hapless South Americans were tortured and killed in the most horrendous circumstances possible, those women that were either pregnant or had young babies having these callously taken from them and given to childless members and supporters of these vile juntas at the express command of this refugee German turned US citizen, with many of these victims shackled and dumped alive from aircraft at thousands of feet over the Atlantic to their certain deaths.
2. The secret for years US government sponsored Tuskegee syphilis project that for some four decades used thousands of unsuspecting African-American males that sought routine medical treatment in hospitals as live and no-consenting guinea pigs for biological experiments leading to the excruciating deaths of many of them that successive governments then denied any knowledge of or any culpability for until the truth eventually emerged.
3. Post 9/11 extra rendition depravities: Abu Grahib, Bagram, Guantanamo Bay and several CIA torture gulags in East European and Scandinavian countries where kidnapped so-called terrorist suspects were quite literally thrown naked into the freezing snow and forced to remain there for extended periods of time with some of them dying as a result while many others lost vital limbs because of frostbite.
4. Internment and the infamous Bloody Sunday massacre when Catholics peaceful protesting for civil rights denied to them for centuries in Northern Ireland were cold-bloodily gunned down by British paramilitary forces with successive UK governments denying all responsibility for what took place and even took to vilifying the victims as terrorists; a view substantiated by the white wash verdict of a handpicked and extremely biased commission set up to give the semblance of investigating the events of that day. Undeterred by this narrow-mindedness the relatives, friends and communities of those slain kept up their campaign for justice for them which came some 30 odd years later when a properly constituted and truly impartial enquiry unanimously concluded and wholehearted concurred with what the relatives, friends and those present then and that had witnessed these deadly events firsthand always knew and openly said that those heartlessly and indifferently murdered were all innocent.
5. The conspiratorial kidnap, systematic torture, killing and sadistic dismemberment of the body of Patrice Lumumba Congo’s first and only democratically elected president by USA, Belgium, French and British special forces, the subsequent overthrow of Congo’s legitimate government and the installation of Sese Seko Mobutu as the west’s ruthless oppressor and foreign agent that over the decades of his authoritarian rule ensured that his western puppet masters got everything that they wanted, as he obediently plundered the rich resources of the Congo on their behalf and lesser so his own and with the west’s backing sowed the seeds of turmoil exemplified in the well tried and tested divide and rule tactic that still plagues the Congo to this day.
6. The so-called Gulf of Tonkin incident when the United States dishonestly and intentionally instigated a fabricated attack on itself, blazoned its premeditated response to the world as self defence and used the manufactured situation which it milked for all it was worth as a justified pretext to assault Cambodia and start a war against Vietnam where a multiplicity of atrocities were then routinely committed against the local populations of both these countries and their environment; who for example can forget Agent Orange and its devastating effects?
7. Then there’s Afghanistan and Iraq – over a million Iraqi children needlessly allowed to die as a direct result of US inspired and vengefully executed sanctions against Iraq; over a million more entirely defenceless Iraqi men, women, the elderly, disabled, young children and babies killed in the 2003 US-led, British and NATO attack, invasion and occupation of Iraq and in excess of five million more Iraqis indiscriminately displaced. The country’s previously imposing infrastructure deliberately damaged and in many instances completely destroyed; priceless Iraqi treasures and artefacts dating back through millennia looted and sent off to the west; religious sectarian strife intentionally fomented; Iraq’s enormous oil reserves and financial wealth with its independence and sovereignty seriously compromised; with each of these several outcomes and repercussions stemming directly from a very brutal war based solely on a panoply of wilful lies propagated by George W. Bush, Tony Blair, the Zionist lobbies in the United States and Britain and in tandem with America’s rightwing neo-con nutters. While in respect of Afghanistan where does one start let alone finish, as there’s no end to that war in sight?
The above are merely snapshots of the murderous crimes that the west, and particularly the US, has wilfully carried out subsequent to1945 but despite knowing this will the mafiosi prosecutor at the ICC Luis Moreno Ocampo, who is willingly being made use of by NATO and the west in the identical fashion that Percy Yutar allowed himself to by apartheid South Africa examine any of these crimes and prosecute with the full force of the law those who are responsible? Like hell he will!
This Argentinean-Italian mobster with the DNA of a Sicilian brigand that reacts automatically to the dictates of his godfather can only do what he’s ordered to, so while it’s perfectly satisfactory with indecent haste and in the calculated spotlight of media publicity to issue arrest warrants for Colonel Gaddafi and members of his family on trumped up charges of crimes against humanity when neither Luis Moreno Ocampo nor any of his team has ever set foot in Libya to investigate or corroborate these suspected crimes no similar indictments will be forthcoming however from this rather absurd but would-be Al Capone against the murderous officials of Zionist, apartheid Israel or any of its like-minded autocratic, Arab Gulf state counterparts. Similarly, don’t expect him to instigate any enquiry either to ascertain why NATO created, Libyan refugees fleeing the western manufactured strife in that country are intentionally allowed to perish by NATO assets assembled in the Mediterranean Sea and off the coast of Libya which are supposedly there on a humanitarian mission precisely to protect Libyan lives from what they assert are the genocidal tendencies of Colonel Gaddafi; so why not rescue them then when in desperation they send out SOS messages from their crippled and stranded boats with dead and dying passengers which in many instances can be physically seen from these NATO ships and helicopters? But ever more importantly why doesn’t Luis Moreno Ocampo ICC prosecutor extraordinaire investigate these events which are a contravention of both maritime and international laws that specifically state that vessels that are in distress and indicate this must be given assistance even by military ships.
It’s a vile situation that renders the ICC, as if we didn’t already know that, to be an opprobrious political cat’s paw not worthy of the name court, and it beats me why with its obvious racist and imperialist agenda where only Blacks and other non-white suspects are characteristically hauled up before it that Third World countries don’t instantly dump it, leave it exclusively to the whites whereupon it would straight away collapse as an institution, and in bidding the ICC a permanent goodbye tell it corrupt and venal officials what they can do with themselves. But rather than this happening the rulers of these Third World states who I would imagine are in dire need of urgent brain transplants and ought compulsorily to be detained in a mental institution, locked in a room away from everyone else and repeatedly made to listen to Bob Marley’s epic, classical rendition of “Liberate your mind from mental slavery” and I would attach the words colonialism and neo-imperialism as well; for despite the ritualized contempt which these Third World numphties are condescendingly shown by this white man’s construct and pseudo-judicial lynching club they nevertheless still remain signed up to it. Talk about turkeys voting for Christmas!
It’s a similar mindset that stupidly causes these Third World idiots still completely captivated by a capitalist system that’s in terminal decline and very much on life support as well as wholly and intractably enamoured by the Hollywood image of the west, particularly that of the United States of America, are themselves fortified by greed, a marked lack of confidence in or respect for their own countries’ monetary institutions, clearly fuelled by the rife and encourage d institutionalized corruption that they foment, and are a major constituent part of; a craven need for white approval preposterously linked to the subservient and jaundiced view that anything which is valuable must come from the west, be fully controlled by it and comprehensively have the full blessing of white Caucasians, to put their countries’ and their own personal wealth, invariably seen by them as the same, into banks and other financial institutions located in and owned entirely by the west where the governments of these western states whenever they’re economically hard up and need cash to bail themselves out, want to mischievously create problems in those countries whose leaders they disfavour but are the owners or custodians of these massive bank accounts, or for their own venal and twisted purposes long to bring about regime change there can, under the facade of a diversity of bogus pretexts arbitrarily seize their financial and other assets and, as in Iran’s case, hold on to them indefinitely.
We saw quite recently with Libya this crass and thieving behaviour by these western countries in operation and who have now turned their avaricious attention to Syria, which beseeches the very rational questions of why do the leaders of these Third World countries, even the democratically run ones, knowing full well the past form, modus operandi, capriciousness and untrustworthiness of the west juxtaposed with the unbridled hostility and unrestrained aggression which it knows it can and frequently and instantaneously does unleash against its perceived foes: real or fabricated, asininely place their economic or any other kind of wealth for that matter in the custody of these serial, criminal, western countries? Let me put this to you bluntly, would you either on a personal or business level having seen relatives, close friends, business associates or even persons who are total strangers to you that have been treated in this same invidious and highly contemptuous way with their assets that they entrusted to those who behaved in this inappropriate manner ripped off at will willingly choose either in a private or business capacity yourself to have anything at all to do with the perpetrators these acts or anyone remotely like them, let alone if you were a previous victim yourself of such fraudulent conduct carry on dealing with those who maltreated you? No you wouldn’t, and neither would any reasonable person either; which speaks volumes don’t you agree of the lack of character and integrity of most of the leaders of these Third World countries; and the west knows this, that’s why it treats them as it does!
Speaking of which Barack Obama will soon be off to some God forsaken place in Ireland which even the average patriotic Irishman or woman hasn’t even heard of; apparently he’s going there to celebrate his Irish roots. Now don’t laugh, not yet at least as there much more to come. It has come to light, it’s been stated, that Obama’s great, great, great grandfather on his mother’s side of the family emigrated from this place in Ireland to the United States: not that those largely destitute Irish who made the trip across the Atlantic in their droves had much of a choice in that decision making process forced into poverty, dispossession and degradation as they and their fellow Irish at home in Ireland were by the potato famine and British colonial induced starvation among the Iris people as a whole who religiously were overwhelmingly Catholic; anyway this realization was a fact that not even Barack’s late mother and maternal grandmother knew anything about and neither would he, indicating that previously there wasn’t any desire or necessity on the part of this white constituent of Barack’s other half biologically speaking to reconnect with Ireland, since how can one connect with someone or something they never knew anything about in the first place?
Moreover, during Barack’s presidential campaign there was a marked lack of visibility by his white relatives, even those living in the United States of America and born there and of which I imagine there must be some, but none of them came to his aid or campaigned ardently for him which might lead one to logically presume that this element of his blood line didn’t much care for having him let alone acknowledging him as its kith and kin, which is remarkable and quite telling for a man who is now claiming and warmly embracing white Irish relatives he doesn’t know, didn’t know existed and obviously has no bond with while his white American relatives living in the country where he’s President continue to stay a mystery to the world at large, and euphemistically to say the least seem more than a little bashful in coming forward and claiming kin to someone that is not only a historic figure as the first genuinely African-American person to be elected President of the United States of America but also presumably the most powerful man on earth because of the exalted position which he holds as head of the world’s only super power state. Rather odd then, don’t you think, when there’s no roll call of any of them when in marked contrast all of Joe Biden’s tribe, Sarah Palin’s brood and John McCain’s lot were ever there in one’s face and more than eager to chip in and help their beloved kith and kin.
While US presidents are well known for swaning off to Europe, usually Ireland, to supposedly reconnect with their European roots, and I dare say that future US presidents of Caucasian and specifically Irish descent will continue for a multiplicity of reasons: the significant Irish vote in the United States electorate, to do so, right now and in the general scheme of American politics Barack Obama is unique. This is a mixed race black man who when his white American mother married his black Kenyan father in Hawaii, then a colony of the United States, and subsequently gave birth to him this consensual married couple could not have done either of these two things in mainland USA where they would have fallen foul of the institutionalized Jim Crow laws that prevailed there and where Mrs Obama would have been publicly ostracised and imprisoned, her marriage forcibly annulled by judicial edict as it wouldn’t have been legally recognized, a huge contradiction in terms as you can’t annul something that supposedly doesn’t exist but that is the US for you, and Mr Obama, Barack’s father, would have been summarily convicted of statutory rape for marry and having sex with his white wife and for that nonchalantly dispatched to Death Row.
Times have changed I hear you say, and yes they have to some extent but not on the scale which you’re disingenuously suggesting that they have. There’s nothing amiss with searching out one’s relatives and roots as it’s an instinctive human desire to know who exactly we are but doing so in the manner in which Barack is embarking on is frankly repugnant. His father who he physically knew, if only for a comparatively short span in his life, was a black man who hailed from Kenya where all of Barack Obama’s paternal relatives come from, and similarly significantly Michelle his wife and all her relations on both sides of her family are African-Americans whose ancestors were forcibly brought to what is now the United States of America from Africa as slaves.
The narrative of the European holocaust is writ large across the remembrances, real or perceived, of white, Caucasian, European Jews and Zionists alike and Barack Obama crucially from actions that he’s purposely taken since assuming office wholeheartedly and even fanatically some would say shows that he clearly empathizes with these people; so why doesn’t he, it is quite fair to ask, do the same with black and African people? On balance were Barack Obama minus his statutory CIA security detail and completely on his own to pop up one night for argument sake in Rostock, East Germany; St. Petersburg, Russia; the East End of London, UK; or some redneck, backwater district in the Deep South of his own country no one in any of these locations or several others I could mention would have any difficulty identifying him as a black man and possibly wanting or even trying to put his lights out specifically because in their eyes he was unquestionably a black man. Even the US Supreme Court is unequivocal in its definition of what constitutes a black man or woman for that matter, someone it ruled who is known to have a single drop of Negroid blood coursing through their veins. In Barack Obama’s case I think we can confidently say he not only has more than that solitary drop of black blood coursing through his particular veins but he also looks black. So what exactly is Barack’s problem racially speaking when it comes to other black people?
Britain’s royal family is highly dysfunctional; everybody in the United Kingdom, even the royal sycophants, knows that and the relationship between Prince Charles and his father Prince Philip has never been a good one at best and it’s similarly touch and go with his mother the Queen who unlike Princess Diana has never been close and chummy with her own children, and it’s fair bet to say that such family structures with their strains and the rest of it are duplicated all across the world. We have a saying in Britain one can choose their friends but not their blood relatives. To add to this mix although it’s not widely known as it’s not something that either she or her public relations people publicize. Queen Elizabeth II of England has black ancestors one of them being Princess Sophie Charlotte who became Queen of England when she married George III and was the grandmother of the legendary Queen Victoria.
Queen Sophie Charlotte was a direct descent of Margarita de Castro y Sousa of the African branch of the Portuguese Royal House - Portugal incidentally is England’s oldest political ally - but I don’t see Prince Charles nor would I expect him to (and why on earth should he?) who is the Queen’s biological son and unmistakably white either dissing or intentionally and contemptuously sidelining most or all of his white relatives to perversely align himself with his very distant African roots just because he doesn’t or hasn’t got on with his dad or mum, and I don’t know of or can I imagine any other white person, prominent or plain ordinary, who would; effectively enacting in reverse what Barack Obama who evidently hasn’t come to terms with his personal demons is doing.